|
|
C1-080392
|
TAU in Connected Mode
|
Robert
|
SA2, RAN2, RAN3
|
Agreed
Reply LS to C1-080023
|
|
|
C1-080393
|
LS on Access Class barring
|
Robert
|
SA2, RFAN2
|
Agreed
Reply LS to C1-080033
|
|
|
C1-080394
|
Reply on LS on Area and Access Restrictions
|
Christian
|
RAN2, RAN3, SA2
|
Agreed
Reply LS to C1-080035
|
|
|
C1-080396
|
LS regarding service invocation for Application Initiated Sessions
|
Alf
|
MSF Protocol and Control WG
|
Revised to C1-080645
Reply LS to C1-080039
|
|
|
C1-080397
|
LS from TISPAN to 3GPP – reply on empty SIP INVITE
|
Georg
|
TISPAN WG3
|
Revised to C1-080617
Reply LS to C1-080041
Related T-docs in C1-080301 and 302
|
|
|
C1-080398
|
LS on removal of transparent NAS container on BCCH
|
Chen
|
RAN2
|
Agreed
Reply LS to C1-080339
|
|
|
C1-080399
|
LS on handling of an uplink NAS message at intra-LTE handover
|
Chen
|
TSG RAN WG2
|
Agreed
Reply LS to C1-080345 and C 1-080031
|
|
|
C1-080400
|
Reply to LS on Network Initiated PDP Context
|
Georg
|
TSG SA WG2
|
Revised to C1-080633
Reply LS to C1-080348
Related with C1-080042, 054 -056 + 199
|
|
|
C1-080401
|
LS on inter-MME load balancing, Attach/TAU/Service Request procedures and corresponding RRC/S1 connection establishment procedures
|
Yang
|
SA2
|
Revised to C1-080572
Reply LS to C1-080349
|
|
|
C1-080402
|
LS on outstanding NAS messages
|
Robert
|
SA2
|
Revised to C1-080574
Reply LS to C1-080351
Actions shall be to SA3 and not SA2
|
|
|
C1-080404
|
Support of Turkish alphabet characters for the Short Message Service
|
Peter / Ian
|
GSMA
|
Agreed
Reply LS in C1-080368
The CR is split off to C1-080403 CR#0016
New coding will extend the 160 characters.
The topic has been discussed before and the service requirements have been discussed before.
Concerns that more characters will be put in due to other countries being in a similar situation.
Alcatel-Lucent was concerned about the extension of the agenda for CT1#51-bis, as this could take meeting time away from discussions on SAE.
|
|
|
C1-080417
|
Dual IP-stack UE
|
Georg
|
SA1, SA2
|
Revised to C1-080646
Related with C1-080373
Revision of C1-080004
CIMS-080005
The rationale for this CR was not clear, and it was commented in the WS that SA1 and SA2 should be asked for advice on this.
Commented that simultaneous use of IPv4 and IPv6 address seems to be prohibited by SA2.
Related CR in Tdoc C1-080200
|
|
|
C1-080430
|
TISPAN R1 and R2 documentation
|
Keith
|
TISPAN WG3, TISPAN, CT
|
Revised to C1-080575
|
|
|
C1-080451
|
CR 24.801: reject causes for EMM procedures
|
Yannick
|
SA1, SA2
|
Revised to C1-080576
Related with C1-080450
Related outgoing LS in C1-080451 to clarify relation between “EPS service” and “GPRS service” if any
|
|
|
C1-080529
|
Asking about AVPF in TS 26.114 and TS 26.235
|
Christer
|
SA4
|
Revised to C1-080647
Related to tdoc C1-080319
|
|
|
C1-080459
|
PNM Scope
|
Andrew
|
SA, CT, SA1
|
Revised to C1-080553
Related with C1-080458
No company has contributed to the PNE part, thus the TS 23.259 lacks a major part of the PNM functionality.
|
|
|
C1-080537
|
Solution selection for Paging Permission (PPACR) with Access control
|
Hiroshi
|
RAN2
GERAN
|
Revised to C1-080577
Related with C1-080318
Discussion
Moved to correct agenda item
The current service requirements are for GERAN & UTRAN.
Decoupling of the solutions for GERAN & UTRAN accesses is a possibility.
RAN2 is working on a concept for this in EUTRAN.
CT1 would like to follow the proposed recommendations.
|
|
|
C1-080553
|
PNM Scope
|
Andrew
|
SA, CT, SA1
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080459
Related with C1-080458
No company has contributed to the PNE part, thus the TS 23.259 lacks a major part of the PNM functionality.
MCC was asked to immediately inform SA1 about this LS, as it was requested to have a reply by CT#39
|
|
|
C1-080617
|
LS from TISPAN to 3GPP – reply on empty SIP INVITE
|
Georg
|
TISPAN WG3
|
Revised to C1-080648
Revision of C1-080397
Reply LS to C1-080041
Related T-docs in C1-080301 and 302
|
|
|
C1-080633
|
Reply to LS on Network Initiated PDP Context
|
Georg
|
TSG SA WG2
|
Revised to C1-080579
Revision of C1-080400
Reply LS to C1-080348
Related with C1-080042, 054 -056 + 199
|
|
|
C1-080645
|
LS regarding service invocation for Application Initiated Sessions
|
Alf
|
MSF Protocol and Control WG
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080396
Reply LS to C1-080039
|
|
|
C1-080646
|
Dual IP-stack UE
|
Georg
|
SA1, SA2
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080417
Related with C1-080373
Revision of C1-080004
CIMS-080005
The rationale for this CR was not clear, and it was commented in the WS that SA1 and SA2 should be asked for advice on this.
Commented that simultaneous use of IPv4 and IPv6 address seems to be prohibited by SA2.
Related CR in Tdoc C1-080200
|
|
|
C1-080647
|
Asking about AVPF in TS 26.114 and TS 26.235
|
Christer
|
SA4
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080529
Related to tdoc C1-080319
|
|
|
C1-080648
|
LS from TISPAN to 3GPP – reply on empty SIP INVITE
|
Georg
|
TISPAN WG3
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080617
Revision of C1-080397
Reply LS to C1-080041
Related T-docs in C1-080301 and 302
|
|
|
C1-080572
|
LS on inter-MME load balancing, Attach/TAU/Service Request procedures and corresponding RRC/S1 connection establishment procedures
|
Yang
|
SA2
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080401
Reply LS to C1-080349
|
|
|
C1-080574
|
LS on outstanding NAS messages
|
Robert
|
SA3
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080402
Reply LS to C1-080351
Actions shall be to SA3 and not SA2
|
|
|
C1-080575
|
TISPAN R1 and R2 documentation
|
Keith
|
TISPAN WG3, TISPAN, CT
|
Revised ot C1-080578
Revision of C1-080430
The only change is to CC CT
|
|
|
C1-080576
|
CR 24.801: reject causes for EMM procedures
|
Yannick
|
SA1, SA2
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080451
Related with C1-080450
Related outgoing LS in C1-080451 to clarify relation between “EPS service” and “GPRS service” if any
|
|
|
C1-080577
|
Solution selection for Paging Permission (PPACR) with Access control
|
Hiroshi
|
RAN2
GERAN
|
Revised to C1-080667
Revision of C1-080537
Related with C1-080318
Discussion
Moved to correct agenda item
The current service requirements are for GERAN & UTRAN.
Decoupling of the solutions for GERAN & UTRAN accesses is a possibility.
RAN2 is working on a concept for this in EUTRAN.
CT1 would like to follow the proposed recommendations.
|
|
|
C1-080578
|
TISPAN R1 and R2 documentation
|
Keith
|
TISPAN WG3, TISPAN, CT
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080575
Revision of C1-080430
The only change is to CC CT
|
|
|
C1-080579
|
Reply to LS on Network Initiated PDP Context
|
Georg
|
TSG SA WG2
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080633
Revision of C1-080400
Reply LS to C1-080348
Related with C1-080042, 054 -056 + 199
|
|
|
C1-080667
|
Solution selection for Paging Permission (PPACR) with Access control
|
Hiroshi
|
RAN2
GERAN
|
Agreed
Revision of C1-080577
Revision of C1-080537
Related with C1-080318
Discussion
Moved to correct agenda item
The current service requirements are for GERAN & UTRAN.
Decoupling of the solutions for GERAN & UTRAN accesses is a possibility.
RAN2 is working on a concept for this in EUTRAN.
CT1 would like to follow the proposed recommendations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
