| Discussion and conclusion:
This was reviewed and approved.
TD S2 160446 (P-CR) Evaluation and conclusion on Key Issue #1. (Source: Intel, Nokia, NTT DOCOMO).
Abstract: Proposes evaluation and conclusion on Key Issue #1.
Drafting session comment: Parts of the evaluation will be incorporated in the solution #5 description update in TD S2 160679.
Discussion and conclusion:
There were a number of issues raised and the solution proposal should be re-drafted. This was left for off-line discussion to try to provide an agreed solution proposal in TD S2 160735 which was reviewed. Ericsson commented that the document is incomplete and suggested postponing the conclusion to check alignment with changes agreed. It was decided to remove the part covered by the other contribution. DOCOMO commented that 7.x.2 should be moved to clause 8. This was left for off-line work and revised in TD S2 160813 which was reviewed. Orange asked to add information on how to achieve IMS emergency call when the PLMN has no CS domain and to change the editor's note to a normal note. There was some discussion on this as there was no requirement for a PLMN to support CS domain. An LS to SA WG3 to check the security aspects for solution #5 was drafted in TD S2 160870. This was left for further off-line discussion and revised in TD S2 160869. This was left for e-mail approval. e-mail revision 11 was agreed. Revised in TD S2 160928. Approved.
TD S2 160870 [DRAFT] LS on Security aspect for a solution #5.
Abstract: To: SA WG3. Attachment: TR 23.749 1.1.0.
Dostları ilə paylaş: | 
