| Discussion and conclusion:
Cisco raised some issues and asked for simplification of the LS rather than providing solutions to each individual issue. Ericsson suggested asking only whether these 2 variants can be applied, or whether any other variants need considering. Alcatel-Lucent commented that the privacy issue may be reduced by adding user information around the PCRF. It was clarified that the goal is to prevent the identity of the interception target from being discovered. Cisco questioned whether there will be time for SA WG3 LI to provide a response in their meeting this week. This was further discussed off-line to clarify the LS and revised in TD S2 160561 which was reviewed. Further corrections were needed and this was left for off-line discussion and revised in TD S2 160855. This was left for e-mail approval. e-mail revision 2 was agreed. Revised in TD S2 160920. Approved.
TD S2 160113 (DISCUSSION) Discussion on Lawful Interception in split architectures. (Source: OTD).
Abstract: This discussion paper highlights a potential deficiency related to the proposed solution for Lawful Interception of split architectures.
Dostları ilə paylaş: | 
