| Discussion and conclusion:
Telecom Italia commented that this proposal does not solve the problem reported by CT WG4. Alcatel-Lucent commented that it may be better to move Step 7 after Step 9. The associated LS from Telecom Italia in TD S2 160075 was then reviewed. This CR was then noted.
TD S2 160075 LS on the Revocation of Discovery Filters. (TELECOM ITALIA S.p.A)
Abstract: Reply LS to Incoming liaison 'LS on the clarifications on the Revocation of Discovery Filters' TD S2 160010 (C4-151864).
Discussion and conclusion:
Response to TD S2 160010. This was reviewed and further explanation should be considered. This was left for off-line discussion and revised in TD S2 160550 which was reviewed and revised to clean up and remove 'draft' in TD S2 160883 which was approved.
TD S2 160044 LS from RAN WG2: Reply LS on ProSe UE Relaying Support. (RAN WG2)
Abstract: RAN WG2 would like to thank RAN WG3 for the LS on ProSe UE Relaying Support. RAN WG2 agrees that it is beneficial if the eNB knows that a UE is authorized for ProSe UE-to-Network relaying. Furthermore, it is indeed beneficial for the eNB if this information comes from a trusted node instead of relying on the UE through the ProSe Function. RAN WG2 thinks a feasible solution would be to supply the eNB with this information as part of the subscription information from the HSS, similar to other ProSe services. RAN WG2 notes that the CRs technically endorsed by RAN WG3 seem consistent with the above.
Convenors comment: Proposed to be noted as CC for SA WG2.
Dostları ilə paylaş: | 
