Seventh framework programme



Yüklə 1.94 Mb.
səhifə1/24
tarix30.12.2018
ölçüsü1.94 Mb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   24



EGEE-III

Proposal number 222667



SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME

Research Infrastructures

INFRA-2007-1.2.3: e-Science Grid infrastructures

Grant agreement for: Combination of Collaborative Project & Coordination and Support Action


Annex I - “Description of Work”
Project acronym: EGEE-III

Project full title: Enabling Grids for EsciencE-III

Grant agreement no.: 222667
Date of preparation of Annex I (latest version): XXX September 2009

Date of approval of Annex I by Commission:


List of Beneficiaries


Beneficiary no.

Beneficiary name

Beneficiary
short name


Country

Date enter project

Date exit project

1

European Organization for Nuclear Research

CERN

CH

M1

M24

2

Universitaet Linz

JKU

AT

M1

M24

3

MTA KFKI RESZECSKE- ES MAGFIZIKAI KUTATOINTEZET

KFKI-RMKI

HU

M1

M24

4

CESNET Zajmove Sdruzeni Pravnickych Osob

CESNET

CZ

M1

M24

5

Ustav Informatiky, Slovenska Akademia Vied

II SAS

SK

M1

M24

6

Institut Jožef Stefan

JSI

SI

M1

M24

7

Akademickie Centrum Komputerowe CYFRONET Akademii Gorniczo-Hutniczej im. Stanislawa Staszica w Krakowie

CYFRONET

PL

M1

M24

8

Sveuciliste u Zagrebu Sveucilisni Racunski Centar

SRCE

HR

M1

M24

9

Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie - FOM

FOM

NL

M1

M24

10

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

VUB

BE

M1

M24

11

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GMBH

FZK

DE

M1

M24

12

SWITCH – Teleinformatikdienste fuer Lehre und Forschung

SWITCH

CH

M1

M24

13

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

CNRS

FR

M1

M24

14

CGG Services

CGGV

FR

M1

M24

15

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare

INFN

IT

M1

M24

16

Elsag Datamat S.P.A.

ED

IT

M1

M24

17

Trust-IT Services Ltd

TRUST-IT

IT

M1

M24

18

Helsingin Yliopisto

UH.HIP

FI

M1

M24

19

CSC - Tieteellinen Laskenta Oy

CSC

FI

M1

M24

20

UNINETT Sigma AS

SIGMA

NO

M1

M24

21

Vetenskapsradet – Swedish Research Council

VR-SNIC

SE

M1

M24

22

Russian Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”

RRC KI

RU

M1

M24

23

Greek Research and Technology Network SA

GRNET

GR

M1

M24

24

Institute for Parallel Processing - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

IPP BAS

BG

M1

M24

25

University of Cyprus

UCY

CY

M1

M24

26

Tel Aviv University

TAU

IL

M1

M24

27

Institutul National de Cercetare-Dezvoltare in Informatica – ICI Bucuresti

ICI

RO

M1

M24

28

Institut za Fiziku

IPB

RS

M1

M24

29

Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu

TUBITAK

TR

M1

M24

30

Laboratorio de Instrumentaçao e Fisica Experimental de Particulas

LIP

PT

M1

M24

31

Instituto de Fisica de Altas Energias

IFAE

ES

M1

M24

32

The Provost, Fellows and Scholars of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Queen Elizabeth near Dublin

TCD

IE

M1

M24

33

The Science and Technology Facilities Council

STFC

UK

M1

M24

34

Delivery of Advanced Networking Technology to Europe Limited

DANTE

UK

M1

M24

35

Inter-University Research Institute Corporation, High Energy Accelerator Research Organisation

KEK

JP

M1

M24

36

Academia Sinica

ASGC

TW

M1

M24

37

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information

KISTI

KR

M1

M24

38

Chonnam National University

CNU

KR

M1

M24

39

University of Melbourne

UNIMELB

AU

M1

M24

40

Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

WISCONSIN SYSTEM

USA

M1

M24

41

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

RENCI

USA

M1

M24

42

BT Infrastructures Critiques SAS

BT-IC

FR

M1

M24


Table of Contents


Abstract 22

Concept and objectives, progress beyond state of the art, S/T methodology and work plan 23

Concept and project objective(s) 23

Overall PERT and Gantt-charts, and relations between the different Activities (NAs, SAs, JRAs) 25

Overall Deliverable List 31

Planning of Reviews 45

Progress beyond state of the art 46

Networking Activities and associated work plan 48

Overall strategy and general description 48

Timing of activities and their components 50

Activities list/overview 51

Activities’ descriptions 52

Effort for the full duration of the project 96

List and schedule of milestones 97

Service Activities and associated work plan 101

Overall strategy and general description 101

Timing of activities and their components 104

Activities list/overview 105

Activities’ descriptions 106

Efforts for the full duration of the project 133

List and schedule of milestones 134

Joint Research Activities and associated work plan 137

Overall strategy and general description 137

Timing of activities and their components 138

Activities list/overview 139

Activities’ descriptions 140

Efforts for the full duration of the project 147

List and schedule of milestones 148

Implementation 150

Management structure and procedures 150

Beneficiaries 154

Consortium as a whole 193

Resources to be committed 203

Potential impact 210

Strategic impact 210

Plan for the use and dissemination of foreground 220

Contributions to standards 221

Contributions to policy developments 221

Risk assessment and related communication strategy 221

Consideration of Gender Aspects 226




Table of Changes


Version Number

Section

Change

Proposal to v1

All

Proposal adapted to the I3 Instrument description of work template.




All

The Consortium has been rationalised to be composed of only JRU lead beneficiaries and commercial partners.




All

The following members of the Consortium have left the project: UvA and KNMI (Netherlands JRU members), TUM (Germany JRU member) and TID (Spain).




1.1

Information added on how the EGEE-III activities work together to achieve the goals of the project as well as the mapping of resources to activities.




1.2

Provides the scientific baseline from where the project is starting and details how the progress of the project will be measured.




1.3.4.1, NA1

Further detail regarding interactions with EGI_DS added. Milestone MNA1.3 converted to a deliverable DNA1.4 at PM7, whose scope has been detailed further. PM19 Deliverable converted to a milestone, MNA1.5.

Text on concertation activities has been added to the NA1 section.






1.3.4.2, NA2

NA6 activity merged with NA2 activity, and tasks, deliverables and milestones rationalised as follows:

  1. Original TNA6.1 task becomes TNA2.6

  2. Original TNA6.2 task becomes TNA2.7

  3. Original TNA6.3 combined with new TNA2.6, implementation realised through collaborating projects such as BEinGRID.

  4. TNA6.4 removed as the activity coordination is now overseen by NA2

  5. DNA6.1-2 combined in DNA2.5 and DNA2.6.1-2

  6. DNA6.3.1-2 combined in DNA2.7.1-2

  7. MNA6.2.1-2, MNA6.3.1-2 and MNA6.4.1-2 are combined in MNA2.6.1-2.

  8. Partners TID and TUM (Germany JRU) have withdrawn their participation.

The effort for the business tasks has been adjusted as suggested in the ESR.

The text on dissemination material for the EU has been added.

Relations to the GridTalk project specified.





1.3.4.3, NA3

Further details on the quality assurance added.




1.3.4.4, NA4

Further clarifications and detail added.

Manpower adjusted according to recommended cuts in the ESR. Appropriate relations with collaborating projects have been identified.

Milestones MNA4.1, MNA4.3, MNA.4.4 and MNA4.5 rationalised and combined to form MNA4.1.1-2.

Partner KNMI (Netherlands JRU) has withdrawn its participation.






1.4.1, SA

Detail on optimisation plans has been added.




1.4.4.1, SA1

The descriptions of DSA1.2.1 and DSA1.5 have been updated to reflect the above plans.




1.5, JRA

The manpower has been adjusted according to ESR recommendations. Further details on the programme of work and partner responsibilities are pending and will be provided in the next iteration. The original text of the proposal is kept as a placeholder.

Partner UvA has withdrawn its participation.






2.1

The security coordination discussion in the mgmt Section includes the mechanisms for open consultation




3

The collaborating projects have been classified according to specific interactions with the EGEE project and provided in two tables.

Version 2

3

Further detail on relations to OGF-EUROPE has been added and more details will be worked in the pending MoU.




2.3, table 4

Given the fact that there will only be one beneficiary for Serbia, the Joint Research Unit for Serbia has been removed. Further, three JRU members have been added to the Sweden JRU, and one to the Cyprus JRU.




2.4

Table has been revised to note that the resource commitments are estimates at the end of the first year of the project. Figures for the time of writing (December 2007) and estimates for M24 have been added to the text following the table.




NA2

MNA2.6.1-2 milestones are checkpoints to verify the content of the deliverables DNA2.6.1-2 and DNA2.7.1-2. The content of these milestones will be reported in said-deliverables. Therefore, milestones MNA2.6.1-2 have been converted to business days events with assessment of their effectiveness.




NA4

Clarification on production of dissemination material has been added to MNA4.1.1-2 in the NA table of milestones.




NA1

The misalignment of DNA1.4 has been corrected (at PM7).




All

All tables have been updated to match the exact template provided.




All

All beneficiary names match the data in the Grant Preparation Forms.

Version 3

NA1, GANTT chart and deliverable tables

DNA1.4 has been moved from PM7 to PM6 for better alignment with EGI_DS plans.




Figure 5

The figure has been updated to reflect correctly the latest timelines and interactions with EGI_DS.




All

OGF-EUROPE spelling unified.




2.3.i

A sentence on subcontracting has been added.




1.1.2, overall deliverable list

A footnote has been added against the “delivery date” column, stating: “Deliverables will be submitted within a maximum of 45 days after the quoted "Delivery date”.” Note: footnote removed in Version 4 upon request from the EC Services.




2.4

Further to the request for the declaration of costs for unfunded participants, a statement has been added to take into account the total value of manpower contributed by unfunded participants.




2.2

The Joint Research Unit members of CNRS have been updated/corrected according to the list provided by beneficiary CNRS.

Version 4

2.4

Addition of Table “Overview of the EGEE-III budget”.




2.3

Table has been updated to reflect only the list of Joint Research Units participating in the project. It also includes a JRU for the Centrale Recherche SA/Ecole Centrale Paris which was not included before as not specifically “national”.

The text has been updated to reflect the fact that the consortium is composed in part of JRUs, not NGIs.



Version 5

All

Removal of CRSA as a beneficiary and addition of all allocated tasks and responsibilities (NA2) to CNRS JRU. Addition of CRSA and ECP to CNRS IDG JRU.





All

Total number of beneficiaries now 42. All tables updated to reflect the change in numbering, budget tables updated to reflect changes made to the GPFs (tables 6 and 7).

Version 6

0

Addition of chapter “0”: Abstract.





JRU table 4 and section 2.2

Update of all Joint Research Unit member names.


Version 7

1.3.6

Change of milestone MNA2.1-8 to a quarterly rather than bi-monthly rhythm to ensure input from the quarterly reports can be taken into account.




SA1 and JRA1 sections, as well as overall manpower tables

Budget-neutral addition of 70 person months to SA1 and 52 person months to JRA1 for INFN. All manpower tables updated to reflect the changes. The deliverables DJRA1.1 and DJRA1.3 see the additional manpower allocation.




NA2 section, Section 2.4 and tables 6 and 7

The 12,000€ fund destined to finance travel for business speakers at EGEE events has been moved to CERN’s budget from ED to facilitate its management.




All

The term “federation reviews” has been replaced by “country reviews”: in light of the work done towards sustainability, reviewing partners in a country is more suited than on a federation basis.




Budget tables section 2.4, SA1

The seed resources foreseen as non-manpower funds in SA1 (51,000€, section 2.4) have been allocated to 4 partners in equal shares following the implementation of a procedure drawn up by the Resource Allocation group and approved by the PMB. This has been adjusted in the SA1 section text, as well as in the budgets of the concerned institutes: CYFRONET, CNRS (LAL), GRNET (AUTH) and STFC (RAL)




Section 2.2, table 4

Update of the JRU member list for France (CNRS).




Section 2.2, table 4

Update of the JRU member list for Greece (GRNET).




Section 2.2, table 4

Update of the JRU member list for Turkey (TUBITAK).

Version 8, revision for the second year of the project

Overall GANTT chart, sections 1.3.2, 1.4.2, 1.5.2, 1.3.6, 1.4.6 and 1.5.6

Further to the revised plans for the second year of the project, some milestones have been added and the description of existing milestones has been changed. This is reflected in the relevant tables and GANTT charts for the activities.




1.3.4.1, NA1

TNA1.1, TNA1.3 and TNA1.4 have been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow. MNA1.5’s description has been complemented with further detail.




1.3.4.2, NA2

TNA2.1, TNA2.4 have been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow. A new milestone has been added to the activity.




1.3.4.3, NA3

TNA3.1, TNA3.2b have been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow. A new milestone has been added to the activity.




1.3.4.4, NA4

TNA4.1.3, TNA4.2, TNA4.3.1 and TNA4.3.2 have been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow.




1.3.4.5, NA5

TNA5.1 and TNA5.3 have been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow.




1.4.4.1, SA1

TSA1.1, TSA1.2 and TSA1.3 have been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow. A new milestone has been added to the activity and MSA1.11’s description has been complemented with further detail.




1.4.4.2, SA2

TSA2.1 has been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow. MSA2.3.2’s description has been complemented with further detail.




1.4.4.3, SA3

The introduction to the section sees additional information concerning the evolution of the activity in the second year. TSA3.5 has been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow. MSA3.4.2’s description has been complemented with further detail.




1.5.4.1, JRA1

The introduction to the section sees additional information concerning the evolution of the activity in the second year. TJRA1.1 has been updated to better describe the changes made for the second year. The text is highlighted in yellow. New milestones have been added to the activity.

A full glossary of terms used in this document is available online at:

http://egee-technical.web.cern.ch/egee-technical/documents/glossary.htm



Dostları ilə paylaş:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   24


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2017
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə