Softness regarding weak chains in Targheeb wat Tarheeb
Compiled by Ali Hassan Khan
Yüklə 0,98 Mb.
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- This carries a clear proof that praying tarawih in the masjids of Muslims is an established sunnah. Ali ibn Abu Talib continued to urge Umar to revive it, until he finally did it”.
- Beliefs concerning the Sah abah (Companions)
- Tahtawi, commentary of Durr adds: And denying his Khilafah is also Kufr [Tahtawi, 1:244].
Compiled by Ali Hassan Khan. Qiyamul-layl in Ramadan July 30, 2010 at 5:19 am | Posted in Aqeedah and fiqh of ahle-sunnah explained, Defence of sunnah | 2 Comments
i
Rate This 
Salam alaikum. Imam Hakim in his “Mustadrak” (1/144) wrote: عبد الله بن محمد البلخى ببغداد ثنا أبو اسمعيل السلمى ثنا عبد الله بن صالح حدثنى معاوية بن صالح حدثنى أبو طلحة بن زياد الانصاري قال سمعت النعمان بن بشير على منبر حمص يقول قمنا مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم في شهر رمضان ليلة ثلاث وعشرين إلى ثلث الليل ثم قمنا معه ليلة خمس وعشرين إلى نصف الليل ثم قمنا معه ليلة سبع وعشرين إلى نصف الليل ثم قمنا معه ليلة سبع وعشرين حتى ظننا ان لا ندرك الفلاح وكنا نسميها الفلاح وانتم تسمون السحور * هذا حديث صحيح على شرط البخاري ولم يخرجاه * وفيه الدليل الواضح ان صلوة التراويح في مساجد المسلمين سنة مسنونة وقد كان على بن ابى طالب يحث عمر رضى الله عنهما على اقامة هذه السنة إلى ان اقامها (Chain) from Abu Talha ibn Ziyad al-Ansare: I heard Numan ibn Bashir in the minbar of Hums saying: “We stood (in prayer) with Allah’s messenger (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) on the 23-d night of Ramadan up to the first third of the night; then we stood with him on the 25-th night up to the middle of the night; then he led us on the 27-tn night (for so long) that we fear missing the falah (success)….. We used to call sahur – falah”. Commenting on this Hakim said:”This carries a clear proof that praying tarawih in the masjids of Muslims is an established sunnah. Ali ibn Abu Talib continued to urge Umar to revive it, until he finally did it”. And it was narrated by Beyhaki in his book (2/495) from Thalaba ibn Abu Malik al-Qurazi: “Allah’s messenger (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) went out (to the masjid) one night during Ramadan, he saw some people in the corner of the Masjid praying. He asked: “What are they doing?”. Someone replied: “O Allah’s messenger, these people don’t know much Quran, Ubay ibn Kab is reciting, and they are behind him following his prayer”. Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) said: “They have done well”, or he said: “They have done right”. And he didn’t object to their action”. It’s mursal, because Thalaba tabein. But it’s recorded via other chain from Abu Hurayra by Ibn Nasr al-Marwazi in “Qiyamul layl”, Abu Dawud and Beyhaki. The latter is acceptable as a supportive report. (quoted from book of Muhammad al-Jibali) One of the shia points, is question whether pray with such name was known during the time of prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) or not. Actually it wasn’t, it was named tarawih because Moslems use to rest after first 4 rakahs for a while. So it’s much better to call it simply qiyam (standing), as it was said by Muhammad Shaqrah. Shias claiming that praying qiyam in the Ramadan in congregation is innovation. But, we should notice that sayidina Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) use to pray in the congregation during Ramadan. Ibn Abu Shayba narrated in his “Musannaf” (7700, also see “Kitabu Fadhail Ramadan” ibn Abu Dunya, #43): حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ السَّائِبِ ، عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَانِ ، عَنْ عَلِيٍّ ، أَنَّهُ قَامَ بِهِمْ فِي رَمَضَانَ. Narrated to us ibn Fudayl, from Ata ibn as-Saib, from Abu Abdurrahman (as-Sulami) from Ali, that he use to stand (imam) for them in the Ramadan. Chain of this athar is hasan inshAllah. 1) Abu Abdurrahman Sulami. That’s Abdullah ibn Hubayb ibn Rabea. Nasai, Ijle said he was thiqat. Shabe confirmed that he heard from Ali ibn Abe Taleeb. And it was narrated from Ata ibn Sayeeb (next narrator in chain), that they entered Abu Abdurrahman when he was ill. So chain is connected. (Tahzeeb al-kamal Mizzi #3222) 2) Ata ibn Saeeb. Saduq that get confused in the end of his life (taqreeb). Imam Ahmad said about him: thiqat, thiqat. Pious man (Tahzeeb al kamal Mizzi #3934). 3) Ibn Fudayl, that’s Muhammad ibn Fudayl, he was saduq. (Taqrib #6227). Ibn Abu Shayba also narrated (#7693): حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ عَيَّاشٍ ، قَالَ : سَأَلْتُُ عَطَاءً هَلْ كَانَ عَلِيٌّ يُصَلِّي بِهِمْ فِي رَمَضَانَ ، قَالَ : كَانَ خِيَارُ أَصْحَابِ عَلِيٍّ زَاذَانُ ، وَأَبُو الْبَخْتَرِيِّ وَغَيْرُهُمْ يَدْعُونَ أَهْلِيهِمْ وَيَؤُمُّونَ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ فِي رَمَضَانَ. It was reported to us by Abu Bakr ibn Ayash, which said: I asked Ata did Ali prayed to them (as Imaam) in the Ramadan? He answered: “Good companions of Ali, like Zazan, Abul Bukhturi and others, called their families, and ruled them (in the pray) in mosque in Ramadan”. Ibn Abu Dunya narrated it with slight difference: Abu Bakr ibn Ayash asked Ata: Did Ali stand (as Imaam) for them in the month of Ramadan? Ata answered by saying of children: “By Allah, he stand for them”. (“Kitabu Fadhail Ramadan”#45). Ibn Abu Dunya also narrated from Ata ibn as-Saib from his father, that Ali stand (as Imaam) for them in the month of Ramadan. (“Kitabu Fadhail Ramadan”#46). The punishment for homosexuality July 22, 2010 at 2:20 am | Posted in Aqeedah and fiqh of ahle-sunnah explained | Leave a comment
i
Rate This
Praise be to Allaah. Praise be to Allaah. Firstly: The crime of homosexuality is one of the greatest of crimes, the worst of sins and the most abhorrent of deeds, and Allaah punished those who did it in a way that He did not punish other nations. It is indicative of violation of the fitrah, total misguidance, weak intellect and lack of religious commitment, and it is a sign of doom and deprivation of the mercy of Allaah. We ask Allaah to keep us safe and sound. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And (remember) Loot (Lot), when he said to his people: ‘Do you commit the worst sin such as none preceding you has committed in the ‘Aalameen (mankind and jinn)? 81. ‘Verily, you practise your lusts on men instead of women. Nay, but you are a people transgressing beyond bounds (by committing great sins).’ 82. And the answer of his people was only that they said: ‘Drive them out of your town, these are indeed men who want to be pure (from sins)!’ 83. Then We saved him and his family, except his wife; she was of those who remained behind (in the torment). 84. And We rained down on them a rain (of stones). Then see what was the end of the Mujrimoon (criminals, polytheists and sinners)” [al-A’raaf 7:80-84] “Verily, by your life (O Muhammad), in their wild intoxication, they were wandering blindly. 73. So As Saihah (torment — awful cry) overtook them at the time of sunrise. 74. And We turned (the towns of Sodom in Palestine) upside down and rained down on them stones of baked clay. 75. Surely, in this are signs for those who see (or understand or learn the lessons from the Signs of Allaah). 76. And verily, they (the cities) were right on the highroad (from Makkah to Syria, i.e. the place where the Dead Sea is now)” [al-Hijr 15:72-76] al-Tirmidhi (1456), Abu Dawood (4462)and Ibn Maajah (2561) narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Loot, execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.”. Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi. Ahmad (2915) narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “May Allaah curse the one who does the action of the people of Loot, may Allaah curse the one who does the action of the people of Loot,” three times. This was classed as hasan by Shu’ayb al-Arna’oot in Tahqeeq al-Musnad. The Sahaabah were unanimously agreed on the execution of homosexuals, but they differed as to how they were to be executed. Some of them were of the view that they should be burned with fire, which was the view of ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased with him) and also of Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with him), as we shall see below. And some of them thought that they should be thrown down from a high place then have stones thrown at them. This was the view of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him). Some of them thought that they should be stoned to death, which was narrated from both ‘Ali and Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with them). After the Sahaabah, the fuqaha’ differed concerning the matter. Some of them said that the homosexual should be executed no matter what his situation, whether he is married or not. Some of them said that he should be punished in the same way as an adulterer, so he should be stoned if he is married and flogged if he is not married. Some of them said that a severe punishment should be carried out on him, as the judge sees fit. Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah be pleased with him) discussed this issue at length, and he mentioned the evidence and arguments of the fuqaha’, but he supported the first view. This is explained in his book al-Jawaab al-Kaafi’ li man sa’ala ‘an al-Dawa’ al-Shaafi, which he wrote to deal with this immoral action. We will quote some of what he said: Because the evil consequences of homosexuality are among the worst of evil consequences, so its punishment is one of the most severe of punishments in this world and in the Hereafter. The scholars differed as to whether it is to be punished more severely than zina, or whether the punishment for zina should be more severe, or whether the punishments should be the same. There are three points of view: Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq, ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib, Khaalid ibn al-Waleed, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn al-Zubayr, ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Abbaas, Maalik, Ishaaq ibn Raahawayh, Imam Ahmad according to the more sound of the two reports from him and al-Shaafa’i according to one of his opinions, were of the view that the punishment for homosexuality should be more severe than the punishment for zina, and the punishment is execution in all cases, whether the person is married or not. Al-Shaafa’i, according to the well-known view of his madhhab, and Imam Ahmad according to the other report narrated from him, were of the view that the punishment for the homosexual should be the same as the punishment for the adulterer. Imam Abu Haneefah was of the view that the punishment for the homosexual should be less severe than the punishment for the adulterer, and it is a punishment to be determined by the judge (ta’zeer). Those who favoured the first view, who are the majority of the ummah – and more than one scholar narrated that there was consensus among the Sahaabah on this point – said that there is no sin that brings worse consequences than homosexuality, and they are second only to the evil consequences of kufr, and they may be worse than the consequences of murder, as we shall see below in sha Allaah. They said: Allaah did not test anyone with this major sin before the people of Loot, and He punished them with a punishment that He did not send upon any other nation; He combined all kinds of punishment for them, such as destruction, turning their houses upside down, causing them to be swallowed up by the earth, sending stones down upon them from the sky, taking away their sight, punishing them and making their punishment ongoing, and wreaking vengeance upon them such as was not wrought upon any other nation. That was because of the greatness of the evil consequences of this crime which the earth can hardly bear if it is committed upon it, and the angels flee to the farthest reaches of heaven and earth if they witness it, lest the punishment be sent upon those who do it and they be stricken along with them. The earth cries out to its Lord, may He be blessed and exalted, and the mountains almost shift from their places. Killing the one to whom it is done is better for him than committing this act with him, because if a man commits sodomy with another man, in effect he kills him in such a way that there is no hope of life after that, unlike murder where the victim is wronged and is a martyr. They said: the evidence for that (i.e., that the evil consequences of homosexuality are worse than those of murder) is the fact that in the case of murder, Allaah gives the next of kin the choice: if he wishes he may have him executed and if he wishes he may let him off, but He enjoined executing the homosexual as a hadd punishment, as the companions of the Messenger of Allaah were unanimously agreed, and as is clearly indicated by the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and there is no evidence to the contrary; rather this is what his companions and the Rightly-Guided Caliphs (may Allaah be pleased with them all) did. It is narrated from Khaalid ibn al-Waleed that he found a man among one of the Arab tribes with whom men would have intercourse as with a woman. He wrote to Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (may Allaah be pleased with him) and Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq consulted the Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them). ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib had the strongest opinion of all of them, and he said: “No one did that but one of the nations, and you know what Allaah did to them. I think that he should be burned with fire.” So Abu Bakr wrote to Khaalid and he had him burned. ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Abbaas said: The highest point in the town should be found and the homosexual should be thrown head first from it, then stones should be thrown at him. Ibn ‘Abbaas derived this hadd punishment from the punishment that Allaah sent upon the homosexuals of the people of Loot. Ibn ‘Abbaas is the one who narrated from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) the words: “Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Loot, execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.” This was narrated by the authors of al-Sunan and was classed as saheeh by Ibn Hibbaan and others. Imam Ahmad quoted this hadeeth as evidence, and its isnaad meets the conditions of al-Bukhaari. They said: and it is narrated that he said: “May Allaah curse the one who does the action of the people of Loot, may Allaah curse the one who does the action of the people of Loot, may Allaah curse the one who does the action of the people of Loot,” and it is not narrated that he cursed the adulterer three times in one hadeeth. He cursed those who do a variety of major sins, but he did not curse any of them more than once, but he repeated the curse for the homosexual three times. The companions of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) agreed unanimously that the homosexual is to be executed, and none of them differed concerning that. Rather they differed as to the method of execution. Some people thought that this difference means that they disagreed about executing him, so they narrated it as a matter concerning which the Sahaabah differed, but it is a matter concerning which there was consensus among them, not a matter of difference. And they said: Whoever ponders the words of Allaah (interpretation of the meaning): “And come not near to unlawful sex. Verily, it is a Faahishah (i.e. anything that transgresses its limits: a great sin), and an evil way (that leads one to hell unless Allaah Forgives him)” [al-Isra’ 17:32] and what He says about homosexuality (interpretation of the meaning): “And (remember) Loot (Lot), when he said to his people: Do you commit the worst sin such as none preceding you has committed in the ‘Aalameen (mankind and jinn)?” [al-A’raaf 7:80] will see the difference between them. When Allaah mentioned zina, He described it as a “great sin” (faahishah – indefinite) among other great sins, but when He mentioned homosexuality, He called it “the worst sin” (al-faahishah – definite). This suggests that it contains all the essence of evil and sin. End quote from al-Jawaab al-Kaafi (p. 260-263). Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: With regard to homosexuality, some of the scholars said that the hadd punishment for it is the same as the hadd punishment for zina, and it was said that it is less than that. But the correct view on which the Sahaabah were unanimously agreed is that both are to be killed, the active and the passive partners, whether they are married or not. The authors of al-Sunan narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Loot, execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.” And Abu Dawood narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas concerning the unmarried person who commits a homosexual act that he said: He is to be stoned. And something similar was narrated from ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib (may Allaah be pleased with him). The Sahaabah did not differ concerning the ruling that the homosexual is to be executed, but they differed concerning the methods. It was narrated from Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (may Allaah be pleased with him) that he is to be burned, and from others that he is to be executed. It was narrated from some of them that a wall is to be knocked down on top of him until he dies beneath it. And it is said that both should be detained in the foulest of places until they die. It was narrated from some of them that he should be taken up to the highest place in the town and thrown down from it, to be followed with stones, as Allaah did to the people of Loot. This was narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas. According to the other report, he is to be stoned. This was the view of the majority of the salaf. They said: because Allaah stoned the people of Loot, and stoning is prescribed for the zaani by analogy with the stoning of the homosexual. Both are to be stoned, whether they are free or slaves, or one of them is the slave of the other, if they have reached the age of puberty. If one of them has not reached the age of puberty, he is to be punished but not stoned, and none is to be stoned except one who has reached puberty. End quote from al-Siyaasah al-Shar’iyyah, p. 138. Secondly: The one to whom it is done is like the one who does it, because they both took part in the sin. So both are to be punished by execution, as it says in the hadeeth. But two exceptions may be made to that: 1 – One who is forced into sodomy by means of beating, death threats and the like. He is not subject to any hadd punishment. It says in Sharh Muntaha al-Iraadaat (3/348): There is no hadd punishment if the one who has been sodomized is forced into it, such as if the one who did it overpowered him or threatened him with death or beating and the like. End quote. 2 – If the one to whom it was done is a minor and has not reached the age of puberty. There is no hadd punishment in this case, but he should be disciplined and punished in a way that will deter him from committing this crime, as stated above in the quotation from Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah. Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) narrated in al-Mughni (9/62) that there is no difference of opinion among the scholars concerning the fact that the hadd punishment should not be carried out on one who is insane or a boy who has not yet reached the age of puberty. And Allaah knows best. http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/38622/ Tabarruk July 18, 2010 at 8:53 pm | Posted in Aqeedah and fiqh of ahle-sunnah explained | Leave a comment
i
Rate This
It was narrated that when ibn Zubayr seen people making maskh over the maqam of Ibrahim (alaihi salam), he said: “You weren’t ordered to rub it, you were ordered to pray near it”. ( Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Abdullah al-Hamade “Masail akadiya allathi qararaha aimatul malikiya” p 94). And it was narrated from Saeed ibn Musaib, that he disliked putting hand over the minbar. (Masail akadiya allathi qararaha aimatul malikiya p 94-95). At-Tartushi said: “Umar ibn al-Khattab ordered to cut tree, under which (companions) pledged allegiance to prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam), because people started gathering under it, and Umar fear that some fitna may happen to them”. (Masail akadiya allathi qararaha aimatul malikiya p 96). Scanned book HERE, corrections to translation only welcomed. Ashraf Ali Thanwi: Our belief about sahabah June 15, 2010 at 4:29 pm | Posted in Aqeedah and fiqh of ahle-sunnah explained, Defence of companions | Leave a comment
i
1 Votes
In his book “Bahishti zewar” chapter about faith, Ashraf Ali Thanwi (rahimuhullah) wrote: Beliefs concerning the Sahabah (Companions)
The greatest among them are four Companions: Hadrat Abu Bakr Siddiq radiallahu anhu. He took the place of Rasulullah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam and supervised the matters of the Deen. He is therefore called the first Khalifah. He is the best person in the entire ummat. After him comes Hadrat Umar radiallahu anhu. He is the second Khalifah. After him is the third Khalifah, Hadrat Uthman radiallahu anhu. After him is the fourth Khalifah, Hadrat Ali radiallahu anhu.
|