95 actively causing his confinement or preventing him from exercising his privilege of leaving the place in which he is. It is now regarded as a sufficient deprivation of freedom of the driver of a car proceeds at such a speed as to prevent a passenger from alighting. For example X is a passenger of a saloon car driven by Y. Y, despite protestations of X proceeds at high speed past a place where X is supposed to alight. Restraint, for the purposes of False Imprisonment must occur against the plaintiff's will, so that voluntary compliance with a police request to accompany the Defendant to clear himself does not necessarily amount to imprisonment. Read: Alderson V. Booth (196) 2 QB 216 . Likewise, a summons by telephone to call at the police does not necessarily amount to imprisonment: Read: Ferguson V. Jensen (1920) 53 DLR 616. Although The Tort of False Imprisonment is a species of Trespass, it need not involve the use of actual force or direct physical contact. It is adequate for the purposes of False Imprisonment if there is a constraint upon a person's will, so great as to induce him to submit. The Tort of False Imprisonment is established if Plaintiff is not discharged as a prisoner at the end of his sentence:
