Trust and Transition in Eastern Europe and the fsu



Yüklə 0,6 Mb.
səhifə10/10
tarix03.01.2019
ölçüsü0,6 Mb.
#89718
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10



Table A.2. Civic participation. 1990


































Share of active participants in institutions, %






















Church

Sports

Arts

Unions

Parties

Environ-

ment


Profes-

sional


Charity

Other

Type I groups*

Type II groups**

Transition economies

2.45

4.73

3.65

7.89

3.49

2.14

1.92

1.77

1.91

8.95

13.31




Belarus





































Bulgaria

2.42

3.58

2.71

4.55

4.64

3.38

2.32

1.84

1.93

7.83

11.51




Czech





































Estonia

1.09

8.43

7.34

11.01

4.37

1.98

2.28

1.09

2.38

10.62

17.66




Hungary

2.60

1.70

1.90

4.60

1.20

1.30

1.60

1.70

0.80

6.01

7.41




Latvia

3.21

8.86

4.54

9.19

5.98

4.87

3.32

4.10

1.88

16.17

18.49




Lithuania

2.90

6.50

5.50

9.30

3.80

1.80

1.40

1.00

1.50

10.40

14.50




Poland





































Romania

4.35

2.72

1.45

14.14

2.18

0.91

1.45

1.81

1.81

8.88

17.77




Russia

0.97

3.06

2.60

8.62

4.54

1.43

0.87

1.27

2.35

5.30

14.02




Slovakia





































Slovenia

2.03

3.00

3.19

1.74

1.26

1.45

2.13

1.35

2.61

6.38

5.12

OECD

7.06

8.71

5.41

2.69

4.13

1.77

3.39

5.07

3.87

20.36

10.21

China

2.00

5.80

8.40

0.80

25.80

2.00

17.10

15.80

1.60

23.60

43.70

Turkey


































T-test: TEs vs. OECD***

0.00

0.01

0.04

0.00

0.33

0.25

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.15

Correlation with cumulative growth 1989-98

-0.02

-0.58

-0.41

-0.52

-0.83

-0.62

-0.45

-0.53

-0.51

-0.42

-0.73

Notes:


































* Type I is the sum of paricipants in Church, sport clubs and charity organisations.










** Type II is the sum of participants in political parties, trade unions and professonal organisations.







***T-test reports P-values for difference in means; 0.00 mean statistically significant at more than 1% level.






Table A.3. Civic participation - public and private interest













Discuss politics

Correlation with

Friends important

Correlation with










Putnam gr

Olson gr




Putnam gr.

Olson gr.

Transition economies

16.16

0.01

0.05

35.35

0.03

-0.03




Albania

19.63







19.14










Armenia

22.08







44.65










Azerbaijan

9.18







35.27










Belarus

23.14







31.73










Bulgaria

12.92







41.46










Croatia

17.91







48.41










Czech

16.73







38.65










Estonia

15.17







26.89










Georgia

17.90







67.84










Hungary

17.03







38.33










Latvia 90

17.60







24.29










Lithuania

14.71







21.89










Macedonia

15.31







49.64










Moldova

18.01







21.39










Poland

17.68







26.11










Romania

16.78







20.76










Russia

19.94







29.35










Serbia+Montenegro

12.73







48.28










Slovakia

13.33







32.26










Slovenia

9.15







41.14










Ukraine

12.51







34.99







OECD

15.12

0.48

0.39

56.79

0.56

0.75

China

15.29







29.91







Turkey

17.54







70.47































Source: World Values Survey, 1995.


















1 A functioning market economy empowers the consumer; a functioning democracy the voter. Both thus establish control over the economically and politically mighty, and force the economic and political powers into a process of continuous adaptation and learning; see also M. Olson (1993)

2 It is intriguing to think of social capital as an asset that is accumulated the more it is used. Hence, where norms of reciprocity exist, the more I offer help to my neighbour, the more he or she will feel obliged to help me. Elster (1989) reports examples of how such a system can end up creating too much social capital, as people get burdened with offers for help from others. In one African case, a man’s roof broke down from the weight of helpers wishing to demonstrate their support in repairing it.


3 The question of complementarity between formal and informal social capital has a parallel in the discussion of whether relational contract enforcement and formal, written contracts are complements of substitutes. Some recent evidence for market economies suggest that important complementarities exist between the two (Poppo and Zenger, 2000) although on aggregate the use of relational contracting is arguably more pervasive in less developed countries.

4 The data were provided to the authors ahead of general publication of the WVS results. However, we only obtained country level means, rather than the individual observations themselves. This limits our study to a cross-section of 21 countries, which is obviously a poor basis for statistical inference. We also received only limited access to data for non-transition economies.

5 This is arguably a rather weak measure of the density of social networks, as conceptualised by Coleman. As noted above, the economic significance of informal social capital is probably highest at the local level – not the national level.


6 Note that Fukuyama classifies China as a “low trust” economy and puts much stronger emphasis on informal social capital (the extended family) in explaining its recent success.

7 Participation in these groups can be seen as a step in the process of modernisation; as such membership enhances autonomy in two directions. It provides greater autonomy vs primary groups like families, clans, or closely knit local communities; but it also provides added autonomy vs the superior power of the state (Schmitter, 1993)

8 Knack and Keefer (1997) use the term "Putnam Group" for the first type of organisations; and the term " Olson Group" for what we describe as "Type Two" organisations. If we do not follow Knack and Keefer in using these terms, it is because we would feel uneasy about the suggestion that political parties, trade unions and professional organisations have to be identified primarily with rent seeking and mutual blockage as described by Mancur Olson. On the contrary, we see them as essential parts of a democratic and pluralistic polity. That they are not fully efficient in this function in some of the new democracies that emerged from under Communism is another issue (Przeworski, 1991).

9 Indeed across the 8 countries with available data civic participation rates in 1990 and 1995 are negatively correlated.

10 It would be interesting to check this at the level of individuals and see whether the characteristics of those actively engaged in civil society have changed. We intend to pursue this in future research.

11 The results for confidence in “companies” and “trade unions” should be interpreted with caution, as the WVS asks a general question, whereas the NDB allows respondents to differentiate between private and state enterprises and old and new trade unions respectively. The highly negative correlation of WVS and NDB data applies to trust in private companies. For trust in state companies the correlation is positive, albeit low.

12 The same results can be obtained by looking only at growth in 1998 (to account for potential endogeneity problems), as well as by using an aggregate score of the quality of governance from the BEEPS rather than the single measure of confidence in the legal system.

13 Income inequality rose rapidly in many transition countries, reaching an "Latin American" level in some of the CIS countries (Nowotny 1996, Milanovic 1998).

14 Countries closer to the EU from the start had better accession prospects, benefited from cross border shuttle trade and employment opportunities and had already under socialism been more exposed to western societies and their political thinking.

15 Abundant natural resources provide a cushion during at the onset of the transition, but they might also slow or distort the transition process by providing rent seeking opportunities and diverting the government’s attention away from reforms. Table 7 shows that, indeed, economic reliance on a few natural resources tends to lower the stock of social capital.

16 In other words, the initial conditions variables really belong into the growth equation. They would thus be correlated with the residuals of a simple regression of growth against social capital and thus not be valid instruments.

17 Following Greene (2000, p. 385) we chose a simple F-test implementation of the Hausman test, which involves first regressing the potentially endogenous variable against the set of instruments and using the obatined fitted value as an additional regressor in the original equation. The F-test rejects the OLS specification if the fitted value is significantly different than zero. Support for the OLS model also comes from a comparison of coefficients in the two specifications: the coefficients on civic participation do not change much between the OLS and IV models.


Yüklə 0,6 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin