JPEG XR (Extended Range) :
JXR1. F. Dufaux, G. J. Sullivan, and T. Ebrahimi, “The JPEG XR image coding standard [Standards in Nutshell],” IEEE Signal Process. Magazine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 195–199 and 204, Nov. 2009.
JXR2. Kodak Lossless True Color Image Suite. [Online] . Available:
http://r0k.us/graphics/kodak/
JXR3. JPEG Core Experiment for the Evaluation of JPEG XR Image Coding.
[Online]. Available: http://jahia-prod.epfl.ch/site/mmspl/op/edit/page-58334.html
JXR4. Microsoft HD photo specification: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/wmphotoeula.mspx
JPEG-LS:
JLS1. M. J. Weinberger, G. Seroussi and G. Sapiro, “The LOCO-I Lossless Image Compression Algorithm: Principles and Standardization into JPEG-LS,” IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, vol.9 , pp. 1309 – 1324 , Aug. 2000.
Website : http://www.hpl.hp.com/loco/HPL-98-193RI.pdf
JLS2. J. Weinberger, G. Seroussi, and G. Sapiro, “LOCO-I: A low complexity, context-based, lossless image compression algorithm”, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA.
JLS3. Ibid, “LOCO-I A low Complexity Context-based, lossless image compression algorithm”, Proc. 1996 DCC, pp.140-149, Snowbird, Utah, Mar. 1996.
JLS4. See Z. Zhang, R Veerla and K.R. Rao, “A modified advanced image coding” CANS University Press, pp. 110-116, 2010.
PROJECT:
JLS-P1. This paper involves comparison of various image coding standards such as JPEG, JPEG-LS, JPEG2000, JPEG XR, advanced image coding (AIC) and modified AIC (MAIC) (Also H.264/MPEG4 AVC intra mode only). Extend this comparison to HEVC intra mode only. Consider test images at various spatial resolutions and at different bit rates. Include BD-bit rate and BD-PSNR as metrics besides PSNR and SSIM. Consider also implementation complexity.
JPEG:
JPEG1. G. K. Wallace, “The JPEG still picture compression standard,” Commun. ACM, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 30–44, Apr. 1991.
JPEG2. Independent JPEG Group. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijg.org/ WWW.jpeg.org
JPEG3. J. Aas. Mozilla Advances JPEG Encoding With Mozjpeg 2.0.
[Online]. Available: https://blog.mozilla.org/research/2014/07/15/mozilla-advances- jpeg-encoding-with-mozjpeg-2-0/, accessed Jul. 2014.
JPEG4. W. B. Pennebaker and J. L. Mitchell, “JPEG Still Image Data Compression Standard,” Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1992.
JPEG5. JPEG reference software Website: ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/msdos/graphics/jpegsr6.zip
JPEG XT:
JXT1. T. Richter et al, “The JPEG XT suite of standards: status and future plans,” [9599 – 30], SPIE. Optics + Photonics, San Diego, California, USA, 9 – 13, Aug. 2015.
JXT2. M. Fairchild : “The HDR Photographic survey,” available online at http://rit-mcsl.org/fairchild/HDR.html (retrieved July 2015).
JXT3. R. Mantiuk: “pfstools : High Dynamic Range Images and Video,” available online at http://pfstools.sourceforge.net/ (retrieved July 2015).
JXT4. T. Ritcther : “JPEG XT Reference Codec 1.31 (ISO License),” available online at http:// www.jpeg.org/jpegxt/software.html (retrieved July 2015)
JXT5. T. Richter, ”Lossless Coding Extensions for JPEG,” IEEE Data Compression Conference, pp. 143 -152, Mar. 2015.
(See JXT1) JPEG XT is a standardization effort targeting the extension of the JPEG features by enabling support for high dynamic range imaging, lossless and near lossless coding, and alpha channel coding, while also guaranteeing backward and forward compatibility with the JPEG legacy format. JPEG XT has nine parts described in detail in Fig. 2. Further extensions relate to JPEG Privacy and Security and others such as JP Search and JPEG systems are listed in the conclusion. JPEG XT is forward and backward compatible with legacy JPEG unlike JPEG-LS and JPEG2000.
JPEG XT Projects:
JXT-P1. The JPEG XT suite of standards described in this paper can lead to several projects. Review this paper in detail and implement these standards. Please access the reference software.
PNG
PNG1. T. Boutell, “PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Specification version 1.0”, Network Working group RFC 2083, available online at http.ietf.org/html/rfc2083 (retrieved November 2014).
WebP:
Web.P1. WebP—Google Developers. [Online]. Available: http://code.google.com/speed/webp/
Web.P2. The WebP container format is specified at https://developers.google.com/ speed/webp/docs/riff_container, while the VP8L format is specified at https:// developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_lossless_bitstream_specification.
WebM:
WebM1. The WebM Project. [Online]. Available: http://www.webmproject.org/
WebM2. WebM™: an open web media project, VP8 Encode Parameter Guide, 2-Pass Best Quality VBR Encoding, Online: http://www.webmproject.org/docs/encoder-parameters/#2-pass-best-qualityvbr-encoding
WebM3. Paul Wilkins, Google® Groups "WebM Discussion", Online: https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/webmdiscuss/UzoX7owhwB0
WebM4. Ronald Bultje, Google® Groups "WebM Discussion", Online: https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/webmdiscuss/xopTll6KqGI
WebM5. John Koleszar, Google® Groups "Codec Developers", Online: https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/forum/#!msg/codecdevel/yMLXzaohONU/m69TbYnEamQJ
DIRAC (BBC):
[DR1] T. Borer and T. Davies, “Dirac - video compression using open technology,” EBU Technical Review, pp. 1-9, July 2005.
[DR2] Dirac website: www.diracvideo.org
[DR3] Dirac software: http://sourceforge.net/projects/dirac/
[DR4] Ashwini Urs, “Multiplexing/demultiplexing Dirac video and AAC audio while maintaining lip sync”, M.S. Thesis, EE Dept., University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, May 2011.
[DR5] A. Ravi and K.R. Rao, “Performance analysis and comparison of the Dirac video codec with H.264/ MPEG- 4, Part 10”,Intrnl. J. of wavelets, multi resolution and information processing (IJWMIP), vol.4, No.4, pp. 635-654, 2011.
[DR6] See DR5. Implement performance analysis and comparison of the Dirac video codec with HEVC.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |