Visions: a Disruptive Technology


Visions: a Disruptive Technology



Yüklə 445 b.
səhifə5/5
tarix05.01.2022
ölçüsü445 b.
#65708
1   2   3   4   5

Visions: a Disruptive Technology

  • Technologies and Issues

  • Components and Architecture



  • Integration of multiple ICT technologies

    • Integration of multiple ICT technologies

      • identification and tracking technologies
      • sensor networks
      • network protocols (cf. Future Internet
      • autonomic, pervasive and ubiquitous computing
      • AI, knowledge management, semantics
    • Key issues:

      • interoperability
      • security/trust and privacy
      • low resources (=> revisit protocols and algorithms
      • implemented in Internet and Web)
      • scalability


    Network/Internet Point of View

    • Network/Internet Point of View

    • Things point of View





    A Digital Ecosystem Point of View?

    • A Digital Ecosystem Point of View?



    Key issue: object identification and tracing

    • Key issue: object identification and tracing

    • A prominent killer app: Electronic Product Code

      • basic goal: product/object traceability
      • RFID tags attached to products
    • RFID advantages

      • low cost
      • maturity
      • no need of power (passive tags)
      • lifetime
      • strong support from supply chain and consumer goods industries
    • Other basic things

      • Mobile equipments (Near Field Communications (NFC), GSM…)
      • Sensors and (Wireless) Sensor Networks ((W)SN)


    Development of supply chain platforms

    • Development of supply chain platforms

      • Ex: WISP (Wireless Identification and Sensing Platforms) project
    • “Philosophical” vision: spime (B. Sterling)

      • object tracking through space and time
      • autonomy and collaboration
    • (Web) Semantic vision: The Web of Things



    Key issue: object2object communication

    • Key issue: object2object communication

    • First approach: develop specific communication protocols

      • adapted to each type of things and type of applications
      • need for standardization
      • which compatibility with Internet?
    • Second approach: (re-)use IP

      • integrate IP and IEEE 802.15.4 (6LoWPAN) (IP for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance)
      • make IP lighter (Internet Ø)
    • Third approach: (re-use) 802.15.4

      • enrich 802.15.4 (Zigbee)






    Visions: a Disruptive Technology

    • Visions: a Disruptive Technology

    • Technologies and Issues

    • Components and Architecture



    Identification (“sensing”)

    • Identification (“sensing”)

      • (passive, active) RFID tags
      • sensor networks
    • Communication

      • see discussion above
      • interface object/network
      • embed the TCP/IP stack into the devices (TinyTCP, mIP, IwIP…)?
    • Integration

      • object and service discovery
      • object and service cataloging
      • service composition/orchestration
    • Intelligence and Collaboration

    • Security and Privacy



    Ultimate goal: unique/universal Id for naming and addressing individual objects i.e., to attach an ego to each object, condition to develop ego-centric applications (cf. Jacob and the Angel (Genesis))

    • Ultimate goal: unique/universal Id for naming and addressing individual objects i.e., to attach an ego to each object, condition to develop ego-centric applications (cf. Jacob and the Angel (Genesis))

    • Naming is difficult!

      • ONS: Object Name Service
        • basically, RFID tag/EPC code → URI of a description file (Object Code Mapping Service-Direct Search (OCMS-DS)
        • more complex Object Code Mapping Service-Reverse Search (OCMS-DS): description → EPC code(s)
    • Addressing is difficult!

      • stupid but tricky issue: RFID addresses are different from IPv6 addresses (64-96 bits vs 128 bits)
      • addressing moving objects is even more difficult


    From host2host to object2object

    • From host2host to object2object

    • TCP is not adapted

      • designed for long-lasting connections while objects (like tags or sensors) exchange small pieces of data => handshake + congestion control/retransmit/recovery + flow control + buffering procedures too complex
    • Very heterogeneous networks and traffic

    • Scalability?

    • Quality of service?



    A definitive threat for privacy!

    • A definitive threat for privacy!

    • A security nightmare!

    • Security

      • IoT = a kind of unsupervised mobile/pervasive grids whose end-components are resource limited tiny objects = a security nightmare
      • memory segments of tags are protected by (short) password
      • physical attacks
      • Man in the Middle attacks
      • cryptographic techniques too CPU-intensive for low energy objects
      • multiple administrative domains (cf. grids)


    Privacy

    • Privacy

      • all your life can will be traced => possible monitoring, mining, analysis
      • connection possible with Linked Open Data => worsen the threats
      • open air connections => possibility of eavesdropping
      • not only your digital life but also your “analogical” life
      • you cannot even know what is sensed about you, when it is sensed, etc. Sensors do not ask for permission (cf. video surveillance)
      • no “forget option”


    Privacy (cont’d)

    • Privacy (cont’d)

      • Basic approach (e.g. EEXCESS EU project, W3C P3P (Platform for Privacy Preference)
        • user defined policy
        • privacy proxy
        • negotiation protocol
        • anonymization/pseudomization
        • integration of reputation and trust mechanisms (cf. course on security and privacy)
      • Issues
        • cryptographic techniques are too complex
        • scalability


    RFID

    • RFID

      • EPCGlobal
      • ISO, IEC (Int. Electrotechnical Commission), CEN, NAFTA…
      • industrial consortia
    • M2M

      • ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute )
      • 7 standard bodies joined in 2012
    • Communication

      • 6LoWPAN
      • ZigBee
      • NFC
      • … all communications standard bodies (ISO, IEEE…)


    Yet another buzzword or a revolution?

    • Yet another buzzword or a revolution?

    • Strong support from the industry

    • IoT platforms yet exist: xively (ex cosm, ex pachube), sen.se, etc.

    • Close to reality in “closed” ecosystems

    • Far from reality in “open” ecosystem”

    • Need for an holistic vision → multi-scale digital ecosystem?



    Yüklə 445 b.

    Dostları ilə paylaş:
    1   2   3   4   5




    Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
    rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
        Ana səhifə


    yükləyin