Yoksullaştirma ve sağlik


milyarder = 2.5 milyar insan! Niçin? Sürdürülebilir mi, katlanılabilir mi, sağlıklı olunabilir mi, nasıl?



Yüklə 206,76 Kb.
səhifə3/3
tarix18.12.2017
ölçüsü206,76 Kb.
#35229
1   2   3

358 milyarder = 2.5 milyar insan! Niçin? Sürdürülebilir mi, katlanılabilir mi, sağlıklı olunabilir mi, nasıl?


Bu bölümü, Gazi Musafa Kemal ATATÜRK’ün görkemli bir uyarısı ile bağlayalım :


  • Dünya yurttaşları; kıskançlık, açgözlülük ve kinden uzaklaşacak biçimde eğitilmelidir.”



Summary
So many recent econometric studies have tried to prove a systematic relationship between globalisation and growth and between growth and poverty reduction. The message of these studies was clear: Open your economy, liberalise and you will grow, and as you grow, poverty will be decreased. This research is supposed to lay to rest the attacks on globalisation and, though it shuns the words, breathe new life into long-discredited trickle-down economics, which held that ‘a rising tide lifts all boats’. Trickle-down economics became discredited for an obvious reason : It was not true. Sometimes growth helps poor people, but sometimes it does not. By some measures poverty increased in Latin America in the 1990s, even in many countries including Türkiye where there was growth. It was not just that well-off people gained disproportionately from growth. Some of their gains may even have been

at the expense of the poor.

There are some policies that in the long term may enhance growth and reduce poverty, such as enhancing education opportunities for disadvantaged classes, which lets countries to tap into rich underused reservoirs.
But the returns to investments in pre-school education today will not manifest themselves for 2 decades or more not the kind of results that show up in typical econometric studies. Hidden beneath the surface in these econometric studies of globalisation is another subtext : Because globalisation has proven so good for growth and poverty reduction, critics of globalisation must be wrong. But these cross-sectional studies cannot address the most fundamental criticisms of globalisation as it has been practiced : That it is unfair and that its benefits have disproportionately gone to rich people.

After the last round of trade negotiations, the Uruguay Round, a World Bank study showed that Sub-Saharan Africa was actually worse off. Asymmetric liberalization had global terms of trade effects. The globalization studies suggest that Africa has suffered because it has not globalised. That may be partly true. But it is also true that Africa has suffered from the way that globalization has been managed. Thus, these econometric studies on globalisation, growth and poverty have been a misleading distraction, shifting the debate away from where it should be on the appropriateness of particular policies for particular countries, on how globalisation can be shaped including the rules of the game and on international economic institutions, to better promote growth and reduce poverty in the developing world.

The anti-globalization movement has often been charged with being unthinking in simply asking whether globalisation is good or bad. But the econometric studies, for all the seeming sophistication of their statistics,
are equally guilty.

It’s clear enough that Globalisation = Poverty! This equation has been proved by numerous proofs.


On the other hand, it’s also clear enough that Poverty = Unhealthy.. So, health workers who feel responsibility to the era they live in, should no doubt determine their struggle platform and direction towards Globalisation tales and attacks in order to create a healthier Türkiye and The World. She desperately needs urgent social policies
in crucial sectors in terms of health, education, nutrition, employment, housing etc. with driven of an independent national economy policy.

Therefore, at the final analysis, as a deeply affected country in negative manner through Globalisation attacks


by the international capital, Türkiye should no doubt radically review her policies in toto and we strongly advise her to act as a leader for organising resistance against Globalization tales just like Prof. Chossudovsky suggests too.
358 $ billionaires= 2.5 billion people! Why? Is it sustainable, bearable, is the poor could be healthy, how?

Key words : Poverty, Globalisation / Globalization, Health, Unhealthy, New World Order, Imperialism


K a y n a k l a r ... (Metinde belirtilenlere ek..)


  1. Globalization, growth, and poverty: Building an inclusive world economy. 2002 A co-publication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-521608-3, WB ISBN 0-8213-5048-X.

  2. Örtlek, M. Küresel çağda yoksullaşan kadın. www.radikal.com.tr, 09.03.05

  3. Kerem K, İkinci S. Turkey: poverty increases with economic expansion. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jun 2005/turk-j11.shtml, / 11 June 2005.

  4. Stiglitz, JE (Nobel Laureate in Economics, 2002). Poverty, globalization and growth : Perspectives on some of the statistical links. Oxford University Press: Human Development Report 2003. www.oup.com/us/catalog/ general/subject/ Economics/Developmental/?view=usa&sf=toc&ci=0195219880.

  5. www.dpt.gov.tr, DPT, 2001 Yoksulluk Raporu.

  6. Varol G, Saltık A. Küreselleştirilen Dünyada Sağlık ve Halk Sağlığı Disiplinin Yeri. 9. Ulusal Sosyal Psikiyatri Kong., 11-14 Haziran 2002, Malatya.

  7. Saltık A. Özelleştirmenin Meslek Hastalıkları ve İş Kazalarına Olumlu / Olumsuz Etkileri. MESKA
    (Meslek Hastalıkları ve İş Kazaları) 1. Simp., 28 Nisan-1 Mayıs 2004, Panel konuşması, İstanbul,
    Simp. Kitabı, syf. 107-115

  8. Dumanlı, R. Yoksulluk ve Türkiye'deki Boyutları; DPT, Planlama Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara 1995

  9. Gümrükçü, H. (Doç.Dr.) Küreselleşme ve Türkiye. Avrupa Türkiye Araştırmaları Enst., Hamburg, ISBN 3-932569- 19-5, Beta Basım, Cağaloğlu İst. 1. bs., 2003

  10. Çalışkan, K. 'Yeni yoksulluk' nasıl aşılacak? http://www.tempodergisi.com.tr/kose/kerem_caliskan/07942/
    (20-26 Nisan 2005)

  11. Monbiot, G. G8’lerin yoksul ülkelerın borçlarının silinmesi için dayattığı koşullar zenginler kulübüne çıkar sağlayacak. http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment, 14th June 2005.

  12. ILO report sees wide gaps in wages, productivity gains. Globalization failing to create new, quality jobs or reduce poverty. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/inf/pr/2005/48.htm

  13. Cornia GA. Globalization and health : results and options. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 2001;79:834-841.

  14. Saltık A. Yeni Dünya Düzeni ve Cumhuriyet’in Sağlık Hizmetleri. Ulusal Halkçı Sağlık Kurultayı,
    Konferans-bildiri, Ankara, 25.05.02, Teori Dergisi, Ağustos 2002.

  15. Işıklı A. Dünya Bankası’nın Laik İmparatorluğu’nda Kumarhane Kapitalizmi. Otopsi yay., 1. bs., Ankara, 2002

  16. Bilbilik, E. Küresel Dünya Politikaları ve Ulusal Seçenekler. Kaynak yay., 1. bs., Ocak 2002

  17. Saltık A. Küreselleş-tir-me’nin Acımasız, Bilinçli Silahı : ”Yoksullaş-tır-ma” ve Halk Sağlığı.Yoksulluk Simpozyumu bildirisi, 31 Mayıs-1 Haziran 2003, YOKSULLUK, Cilt 3, syf. 330-351, İstanbul.



1 Bize göre açıkça ABD’yi işaret ediyor..




Yüklə 206,76 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin