A railway extension from Sandergrove to Milang was built in 1884. The district experienced a very rapid move away from sheep to wheat in 1850s, and from wheat to livestock, vineyards and mixed farming in 1870s. Dairy production increased after the installation of railway, allowing local farmers to tap into the Adelaide market.
Around the turn of the century, the introduction of cheap superphosphate and other means to raise the fertility of the soil encouraged a new wave of settlers. Many of the farmers began experimenting with new crops, new techniques and mechanisation. For example, the shipping merchant, W.P. Dunk, raised the first ostriches in the district and sold many to Bowman, at Campbell Park. His farm abandoned mid-1890s, due partly to price fall, partly to the birds’ reaction to the cold.
Again, the vulnerability of local production to local, national and international competition meant costly investment for little returns. For example, in the early 1870s, more than half of South Australia’s exports to Victoria were being transported through Milang, but by the late 1880s, when the railway had been built through Tailem Bend, most trade through Milang withered away.
In 1885, Ophel’s luck ran out: in March, the AFA approached Walter Hutley to take over as teacher. Hutley was not a teacher, but, with his wife, had just arrived in the colony from North Africa where he had been a missionary with the London Missionary Society. In May, Ophel and Fred Taplin both resigned from their positions at Point McLeay, but Fred was induced to withdraw his resignation. In June, Hutley was appointed on £ 100 per year plus three rations, and Mrs. Hutley was appointed as matron at £ 25 per year and one ration. (A practice had developed to give officers, like everybody else on the mission, one ration per head, as well as two rations for the use of visitors.) Hutley took over his duties as schoolmaster and store-keeper in August. (AFA Minutes).
CCL not granting sections, unless Needles situation clarified.
Ophel’s final report: Enrolments, Point McLeay, 1875 - 1885
Year Enrolled Attendance
Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total
1875 19 21 40 18 17 35
1876 20 17 37 17 13 30
1877 19 18 37 16 15 31
1878 16 14 30 15 13 28
1879 26 19 45 22 15 37
1880 23 13 36 17 12 29
1881 17 15 32 13 11 24
1882 18 13 31 15 11 26
1883 25 16 41 17 14 31
1884* 16 11 27 12 6 18
1885* 12 8 20 11 6 17
* measles.
|
Hutley quickly made a favourable impact on the AFA who sent J. McEwin and M.H. Madge to report on his running of the school: Mr Hutley, they reported:
… has introduced into the school the course of instruction, and the methods of teaching, followed in the public schools. We were present when the various classes were exercised in reading, arithmetic, Australian geography, and a blackboard object lesson, and found the children fairly proficient in all subjects.
The lesson on Australian geography was given from an outline map, from which the names of the places were omitted, and some of the native boys were able to indicate correctly the names of the chief towns and ports, with their products and extracts.
The writing of the boys and girls was good, the books clean and neat, and the composition and dictation fairly free from error. (AFA Annual Report, 1885)
The 1880s and 1890s were probably the most prosperous decades in the early history of Point McLeay, if AFA reports can be believed:
There is a sewing machine in nearly every cottage, and as a rule the native women make most of the clothing worn by their families. The children’s dormitories were clean and comfortable and the children healthy and contented. Mrs Hutley is matron and instructs the girls in needlework. (Ibid.: 11)
In 1886, The Needles lease was sub-let on condition that the lessee removed all rabbits, which were again in plague proportions: complaints were being lodged from neighbouring farmers and there was a danger that the terms of the lease might not be fully met.
Fred Taplin involved himself more closely in the work of the school while Hutley was in charge, and in the work of evangelizing in the district. He recommended the appointment of Mark Wilson and Joseph Koolmatrie to paid positions as assistant teacher and itinerating evangelist respectively:
At Pt McLeay, a new departure has been made in the appointment of Joseph Koolmatrie as a native evangelist. He is located on the shore of Lake Albert, near Campbell House. His duties are to teach the children whom he can gather, and the adults when the opportunity offers.
A young native, named Mark Wilson, has been appointed assistant teacher in the school with the two-fold object of helping Mr Hutley, and training himself for useful work elsewhere, if opportunity offers.
The Reading Room has been of considerable benefit and entertainment to our young people. We have to thank the proprietors of the Observer, Chronicle, and Christian Colonist for kindly furnishing us with free copies of these papers - also the Stow Church Sunday School and Mr. H. Hussey for a supply of books for the library. F. Taplin. AFA Report, 1886: 7-9.
In his School Report for his first year, Hutley wrote of his suggestions for changes in the curriculum, and one can gauge from his comments that a certain lack of direction must have been occurring under Ophel:
I felt the necessity for some definite course of instruction, and for this purpose, I adopted that in use in the public schools in this colony.
This I have modified in some points since them, but have adhered to it in the main. My highest class is now doing the work of the third standard, but towards the end of the year I hope to commence the work of the fourth or compulsory standard.
As a consequence of this measure, some new subjects were introduced, drill amongst others, which have become a favourite with the children.
Av. Daily attendance: 23-25. AFA Report, 1886: 11.
Hutley seems to have had some strong ideas about the conduct of his school and the welfare of his students:
-
he argued with Fred Taplin about the housing of young workmen in the dormitory with the children;
-
he insisted that the curriculum, and the standard of work, ought to be equivalent to the general level in government schools;
-
after ten weeks’ service, he had Mark Wilson’s appointment terminated.
The AFA supported Taplin against Hutley over the accommodation of the young men, which must have put Hutley – and his wife who was matron of the dormitory – well off-side.
In the late 1880s, the development ofPoint McLeay as a self-supporting community continued: in 1886, their own sailing boat, the Teenmine, was launched, and the AFA was granted control of four more sections of land, which they put at the disposal of Aboriginal lessees: these blocks were taken up at different times by George Karpany, Henry Lampard, Alfred Cameron and other residents at Point McLeay. The population at the Mission still kept increasing however, with many young children, often orphans or children abandoned in Adelaide, being brought there particularly in the period 1885-1900. The need for more cottages and an expanded dormitory did not diminish.
In his report on a visit to Point Mcleay for the AFA, John McEwin spoke of his meeting the Education Department Inspector on the steamer to Milang:
Fellow passenger Inspector Stanton of the Education Department… opportunity was taken to press the claims of the school to a semi-official inspection.
The schoolwork is being carried out carefully and methodically by Mr Walter Hutley, with Mrs Hutley as matron.
Both the subjects taught and the manner of teaching, strongly resemble the public school system.
The children are bright and intelligent, ready to answer, and not very often wrong. The subjects are, of course, such as only find place in the lower classes of town schools. There is no ‘higher education’ for boys, nor advanced school for girls, at the Point, but sound and substantial work, quite equal to the general necessities is being done.
The writing is in many cases good, and the books, as a rule, clean. In arithmetic, the first three rules only are at present in hand: in those, both boys and girls are fairly proficient.
In dictation, the percentage of error was perhaps large, but in reading the children did better. In recitation, many of the younger ones did nicely, “Mary and her little lamb” being apparently a favourite.
It has been suggested to bring the school more immediately under government control. We do not favour the idea. A divided authority would be calamitous, nor do we see prospect of great gain in any direction by the change. The school is doing a good work, and we advise the letting well alone.’ AFA Annual Report, 1886: 12, 14.
Stanton himself was in the habit of writing regularly for the Education Gazette on his travels around the state, and in 1887, reported on his visit to Point McLeay, among other things:
At Milang specimens ‘of … our noble savage, somewhat deteriorated by civilisation and whisky, are to be met with, the younger members, it may be, in puris naturalibus… ‘
… A school at Point McLeay Mission Station … ‘conducted much on the lines of our public and provisional schools, but any inspection they get are purely unofficial so far as the Government is concerned. I was there a short time ago, and .. I found several thoroughbred black boys able to work a proportion sum, and to write fairly well from dictation difficult passages in the fourth Royal Reader.’
Meningie … is dreariness itself, but boasts a post and telegraph office, and a police station; there is neither clergyman within thirty-six miles [i.e. at Point McLeay] nor lawyer nor doctor within fifty miles, though some drugs and medical advice can be procured from the superintendent of the Point McLeay Mission Station. (Stanton, 1887: 53-54)
A rather casual first inspection report: however, the link had been made which required the government to pay some attention to the standard of education at Point McLeay (and therefore other Aboriginal mission schools) and not bury Aboriginal children under the carpet of ‘difference’. Hutley was certainly not inclined to allow this to happen and was anxious to ensure the Education Department’s regular inspection of the school:
The school has been visited and examined by the government inspector, Mr Stanton. I look forward to a visit from him twice a year in future, once to examine for results, and another time to report on the teaching and conduct of the school, although we may not expect a high percentage of passes, yet the result of these visits will be beneficial to all concerned.
My own examinations have been held quarterly and although no prizes are given, beyond the honour of being at the top of the class for the quarter, yet the children look forward with eagerness to them. (AFA Annual Report, 1887: 8)
Nothing is as clear, or as purely motivated, as it first seems: at this time, the number of ‘half-castes’ and ‘quadroons’ was growing rapidly, and ‘full-blood’ numbers were declining. These terms are offensive nowadays, but were freely used in the nineteenth century: in fact, policy was often based on these differences, with an assumption that the ‘more white’, the more civilised, therefore the more assimilable and the more educable (and the converse as well). As a visitor to Point McLeay reported at the time:
What strikes a visitor more, however is the very small portion of pure natives and the variable degrees between white and black complexions, which make up the school.
A few could hardly be distinguished from the swarthier children in our state schools, and only about as many as these show unmistakeable features and skin of the Aboriginal. The majority of the children seem to be half-caste. It would be unfair, however to infer from this that the school is composed mainly of illegitimate children; as I am informed by Mr Taplin that these are quite the exception, and that the reason for the prevalence of the half-caste is that these intermarry and that the offspring of such unions have more vitality than those of the pure natives.
It is evident, therefore, that a new race is being generated, and one which will be much more likely to be engrafted into the community than the Aboriginal could ever be expected to be.
Canon Andrews. (AFA Annual Report, 1887, in Jenkin, 1979: 187).
It turned out that Joseph Koolmatrie made an outstanding evangelist and Sunday School teacher: he was employed by the AFA for some years. In 1887, Matthew Kropinyeri was also taken on as a Sunday School teacher and may have worked as a teacher for some time on the Coorong. However, by 1891, he was being employed at Point McLeay as a mason, along with Robert Wilson.
In the late 1880s, Tailem Bend was proclaimed as a town, a railway depot and works centre on the new route between Adelaide and Melbourne. Small farmers’ and town blocks were offered for sale in the face of opposition from local pastoralists who feared more resumptions of their land. Tailem Bend rapidly became a union town, and the spirit of unionism spread through rural communities in the district. This was not necessarily good news for Aboriginal workers, since the unions of the day were in the forefront of racism, refusing to work with Aboriginal people. Many sheds thus became barred to Aboriginal shearers and employment became even more difficult to find:
So, despite the decades-long custom of inter-racial labour, the white and Aboriginal shearers now worked in separate sections of their sheds. The new muscle of labour brought apartheid in its train and delivered another blow to the proud Ngarrindjeri. (Linn, 1988: 136-137)
There were still many large pastoral properties in the district: Wellington Lodge pastured thirty thousand sheep and the flocks of others, such as Pontt, Allan Bell Lawson, and Anderson, numbered in the many thousands. The Meningie (and Tailem Bend) Council first met in 1888, under the solid domination of pastoralist interests: the first chairman was Hyde, manager of Warrengie Station, and its concerns were almost exclusively those of ‘the man on the land’, especially of the one in the station homestead. The Meningie Council area encompassed Point McLeay, but it agreed at one of its first meetings to exempt the mission from rates and road charges, since, one suspects, one should not be paid for doing nothing.
Thus employment opportunities for Aboriginal people beyond the mission gates were rapidly withering away: pastoralists required only shearers, and then only for a few weeks each year, and small farmers did not need much hired labour at all, nor could most of them afford it. Aboriginal girls were not eager to work as domestics at this time. The one option, of allowing, or even encouraging, Aboriginal people to move to the city to find work in the rapidly growing industrial sector, was not even contemplated: the rightful place for primitive people was in the countryside, the city would be alien to them, and so on. But much of this was so taken for granted that it did not ever come up for discussion or argument.
But if employment opportunities were diminishing, what was the role of education in preparing people for post-school work ? The links between education and employment were becoming more tenuous, as a consequence of racism and isolation, just at the time when Aboriginal education was being brought more into line with education policy generally, when at last Aboriginal children were being promised an education of roughly equal quality, the promise of eventual entry into the mainstream economy and social mobility system. But this was not to be for many generations: the betrayal of any Ngarrindjeri aspirations towards equal rights was yet to come.
Hutley’s labours were rewarded by better attendance and enrolments: by 1887, forty three children were enrolled, with a ninety percent attendance. However, his wife was growing increasingly resentful at having to act as matron of the dormitory and resigned in July. The AFA was forced to appoint a single woman, Miss Evelyn Hunter, on £ 25 per year, as matron. She was to remain for nearly thirty years, but this extra expenditure put some strain on the finances of the AFA: the annual budget of the Mission had grown to £ 2,550, or a million dollars in today’s terms.
Joseph Koolmatrie continued as teacher, travelling around the lakes and as far as Murray Bridge. The AFA was very satisfied with his work: ‘The native teacher Joseph Koolmatere is doing good work amongst the camps and is well worthy of his hire.’ On the other hand, Fred Taplin was accused once again of improper conduct, this time charged by the Destitute Board with being the father of Susan Broad’s child. After an investigation, Fred was cleared, the perennial innocent victim.
In 1888, Fred Taplin toured mission and government stations in Victoria and reported back to the AFA on the disparities in funding:
In 1886-1887 alone about £ 12,084 was spent on 553 aborigines in Victoria, being at the rate of £ 21 per head. In SA during the same year, the annual vote for about 6,000 aborigines, only amounted to £ 5,104 or about seventeen shillings per head. (AFA Annual Report, 1888: 9)
List of Wages and related expenses paid out in last quarter, 1888 [Source: PMLB]
[Name] [Employment] [Days Worked] [Rate] [Total Wages]
?Matthew Kropinyeri? Baker & Butcher 79 2/- £ 7.10.0
Henry Lambert Boatman 55 2/- 5. 0.0?
George Harris Wool Washer 361/2 2/- 3.13.0
William McHughes Mason 205 yds @ 1/9 17.18.9
“ Laborer 22 2/6 2.15.0
James Rankine Laborer 30 1/6 2. 5.0
Louisa Robinson Wool Picker 24 1/6 1.16.0
Mark Wilson Horse Driver 72 1/6 5. 8.0
Crofton Giles Stockman 26 2/- 2.12.0
John Wilson (Senr.) Laborer 49 2/- 4.18.0
“ Engine Driver 26 3/- 3.18.0
Philip Rigney Laborer 23 2/- 2. 6.0
William Young Wool Washer 6 2/- 12.0
E. Kropinyeri Labourer 19 2/- 1.18.0
Robert Wilson Mason 53 2/- 5. 6.0
Benjamin Rigney Labourer 76 1/6 5.14.0
John Finke Labourer 79 1/- 3.19.0
Ellen Rankine Wool Picker 24 1/6 1.16.0
Peter Gollan Rabbiter 63 2/ 6.6.0
Bertie Tripp Labourer 2 2/- 4.0
Shearing 1150 sheep @ 17/- per 100 9.15.6
Chapel cleaning [1 quarter?] 1.12.0
School servants 79 2/- 7.18.0
School washing 79 1/6 5.18.6
F.W. Taplin Superintendent - 1 quarter 37.10.0
D. Blackwell Overseer 25.0.0
W. Hutley Teacher 22.10.0
Miss Hunter Matron 1 quarter 6.10.0
Langan Carter Labourer 56 1/6 4. 4.0
William Rankine Labourer 69 2/- 6.18.0
Jacob Harris Labourer 61 1/6 4.11.6
Archie Blackmore Labourer 67 1/6 5. 0.6
Matthew Kropinyeri Bullock Driver 77 2/- 7.14.0
John Laelinyeri Labourer 36 2/- 3.12.0
Henry Angie Labourer 70 1/6 5. 4.6
Frank Blackmore Rabbiter 51 2/- 5. 2.0
Albert Kartinyeri Rabbiter 68 2/- 6.16.0
Henry Rankine Labourer 56 1/6 4. 4.0
Phillip Sumner Wool Scourer 24 2/6
“ Labourer 39 2/- 6.18.0
John Sumner Labourer 71 2/- 7. 2.0
Albert Stokes Labourer 30 1/6 2.18.6
Alfred Cameron Labourer 16 2/- 1.12.0
Louis Ngulgare Woolwasher 341/2 2/- 3. 9.0
John Wilson Junr. Labourer 44 1/6 3. 6.0
Joseph Koolmatrie Wool Packer etc. 70 2/- 7. 0.0
? John Davison ? Labourer 18 2/- 1.16.0
Total amount £ 297.14.9
Superintendent £ 37.10. 0
Works and Buildings 60. 0. 0
Wool Washing 75. 0. 0
Shearing & Farm 40. 0. 0
School and Institution 85. 4. 9
£ 297.14. 9
|
In 1888, a pound was worth roughly what $ 400 is worth today. From the table, one can identify who Lived and worked regularly at Point Mcleay, and who either worked very irregularly, or spent a lot of time working away from the Mission, John Davidson and Alfred Cameron, for example. Alfred Cameron worked for at least fourteen years as a farm hand for G.G. Hacket on Poltalloch, saving enough to set up himself and his large family on his own lease on the Coorong. There was no award for farm labourers in those days, in fact not until early this century, and wages, as one can see, were low, but supplemented by rations, which included a loaf of bread per person per day, and as much meat as anyone required.
School numbers continued to rise, as set out in Hutley’s report:
Statistics to June 30, 1888:
Boys Girls Total
Total number instructed during year 34 22 56
Average daily attendance 22 11.5 33.5
Number of days Day School open 215
“ “ Boarding “ “ 337
Report of L.W. Stanton, Inspector of schools, 1888.
I visited the school on 12 and 13 June and examined the children in attendance. The program of instruction has, since last year, been brought still further into agreement with the public school curriculum, and now coincides with it in all main particulars.
The points of difference are that the arithmetic and grammar are not yet carried so far as in the State schools, but still they have been taught in an improved manner, and to a further stage than I found in 1887.
Spent six hours in the school. Examined 34 children.
Reading much better.
Comprehension very much better.
Spelling tolerably good.
Composition good.
Grammar and arithmetic considerably improved but they are not yet abreast of the full standard.
The children, however, have been taught to think, and, so far they professed to go, they did fairly well.
In order to trace the career of each child, and to test more accurately individual progress, I propose to have a full register kept of every examination; and if I should in future years be asked to repay my visit, I can then gauge the state of the school with as much minuteness as could be desired.
I came away with the conviction that the school will go on improving.’
(reprinted in AFA Annual Report ,1888: 10-11)
|
In 1888, the rupulle of the Ngarrindjeri, Pullum, passed away. The AFA marked his passing with a tribute: ‘the co-operation of the chief was of considerable value to the missionary endeavours to work reforms.’ The mantle of rupulle should have fallen onto the shoulders of his son, John Laelinyeri, or of his nephew, Joseph Koolmatrie, but both men were devout Christians by this time, and the office of rupulle lapsed. With it died any chance of reviving the tendi, or yanarumi:
The formal Narrinyeri yanarumi, a unique Aboriginal court in which both men and women participated, was winding down by 1860, when its punitive functions gave way to the European mounted police. It struggled on, however, attempting to resolve matters of an internal nature, until the death of King Peter Pulami in 1888. (Berndt, 1989: 64)
Differences between Fred Taplin and Walter Hutley came to a head in early March, 1889, when Hutley tendered his resignation. Fred wrote enthusiastically in its support, in a letter loaded with possibly scurrilous accusations against both Mr and Mrs Hutley:
8 March 1889
Rev. F.W. Cox [Gen. Secretary, AFA]
Mr. [Hutley’s?] resignation having been accepted, I take liberty of writing to you regarding the duties of the school master and an explanation for doing so, should explain that after Mr. Hutley entered on his duties, he complained to me more than once that he had not been fairly treated as the work was more than he had been informed of before accepting the appointment.
The work done by Mr. Hutley has not been so great as that of his predecessor, Mr. Ophel, and no more than could be expected of an industrious man with his heart in the work. I enclose with this a list of the duties falling to the lot of the Schoolmaster, set out as explicitly as possible apart from verbal explanations. We shall be exceedingly pleased to have a change in this particular department, and hope that the coming man may be of such a disposition as may inspire the trust and confidence of all concerned.
With reference to the matronship, I do not think that a wife and mother ought to undertake the duties; they would be too great a tax on her .... attention. The appointment of Mrs. H. was an utter failure from the first. Those most acquainted with the work here can understand that all the officers should be willing to undertake their duties apart from mere necessary considerations. A man in charge of Aborigines cannot succeed until they are convinced that he has their welfare at heart. Mr. Ophel with all his shortness, was respected by all the people and his strong point always was genuine Christ-like character and missionary zeal. Another point which I would venture to make is, we must take into account the fact that the domestic and social life of the Aboriginal children is founded in that Boarding School and is of more importance than with technical education. Given a Christian Leader and Matron above suspicion of anything bordering on lack of integrity or selfishness, ... our work will go forward.
At present we are extremely unsettled. We are expecting the [Rev.?] Lyall next Tuesday and shall be very pleased to have his company.
One desirable thing in any official here is that they be total abstainers, both man and wife.
At the time, Fred was also being assailed for yet another case of improper behaviour, and this time a deputation of Aboriginal leaders, including W. McHughes, J. Wilson, J. Sumner, M. Kropinyeri, B. Tripp. A. Karloan, and H. Lambert, demanded a special meeting with the AFA to have Fred removed, perhaps for this alleged indiscretion as well, but explicitly for his incitement of the people against Hutley. Fred travelled into Adelaide to answer these charges and to give a lecturette at the meeting of the Australian Natives’ Association on March 18. He was due to return on the Tuesday, 19 March, to meet Rev. Lyall at Point McLeay, but stayed in town and was mysteriously killed in a fire at West’s Coffee Palace on March 22.
His place as superintendent was taken by his brother-in-law, Richard Blackwell, the mission farm supervisor. This appointment was immediately criticised by the local Aboriginal people, who pointed out that, although a fine farm manager, and devout Christian, Blackwell did not have any medical skills. Mark Wilson also complained that Blackwell was not much chop as a preacher either. Notwithstanding, his appointment was confirmed by the AFA. Hutley stayed on another month or two, but was replaced by a much older teacher, Mr Gregory, who in his turn would engage in bitter dispute with Blackwell.
Many years later, David Unaipon would write about his educational experiences, under Ophel and Hutley:
‘My earliest impressions as a native boy were centred mainly in learning the art of tracking animals, in knowing where the eggs of birds could be obtained, to find out the nests of honey bees, and on moonlight nights to observe the movements of opossums in the gum trees, and, if possible, capture them for food purposes. Swimming and boating were the recreations of aboriginal boys in those days, and they were taught how to use the net and the line in obtaining fish.
Mr Taplin did not expect to change the lives of the older people, but centred his activities upon the younger generation. He established a school which I attended and there entered a new mental world. He associated with this a dormitory so that the boys and girls might be trained in civilized ways … The Association endeavoured to train the natives in some of the trades, and a boot department was established and I was set to mend shoes. ..
.. the Association founded a Mutual Improvement Society and endeavoured to ascertain the ability of the natives to acquire a knowledge of the fine arts. Teachers were provided to give lessons in music, shorthand, drawing and other subjects. Some of the aborigines became efficient in these studies. One of my old chums became a teacher, another an expert shorthand writer, and I became so advanced in music that I was appointed the church organist…
… In course of time, music became my recreation only, for my mind became obsessed in other directions as I read the books and journals sent to the Station, especially the scientific works which showed the new inventions which were coming into the world…
As I am a product of missionary work, to which I owe any advance I have made, I feel it my duty to testify to its value in advancing the welfare of the aborigines, for I feel that the only hope for the improvement of my race lies along the line of properly-conducted missionary enterprise, which goes down to the fundamental needs of the aborigines and gives them the inner power to reconstruct their lives which have become shattered by contact with white civilization. (Unaipon, 1949)
Why is it that the Australian aborigines differ in cultural attainments as much as they do from Europeans ? … The answer is that the differences in the cultural achievements of Australian aborigines and, say, Englishmen are entirely due to the difference in the history of the cultural experiences to which each has been exposed. … Australian aborigines … had practically no contacts whatsoever with the outside world. ... the history of the English, or … any other European nation … has been a history of continuous cultural contacts with numerous other peoples over several thousand years in an area of the world where the cross-fertilization of ideas, customs, and ways of life has been of the most stimulating kind.
Even today, the Australian aborigines have been largely prevented from realizing their magnificent potentialities by discriminatory practices … But when Australian aborigines are given the opportunity they show themselves capable of achievement at least as great as that of the average man anywhere else. Some fifty years ago there was a school in … Victoria, which was attended entirely by aboriginal children. I quote from Reverend John Mathew:
“In schools it has often been observed that aboriginal children learn quite as easily and rapidly as children of European parents. In fact, the aboriginal school at Ramahyuck, in Victoria, stood for three consecutive years the highest of all the state schools of the colony in examination results, obtaining one hundred percent of marks.”
The story is everywhere the same … : wherever and whenever individuals are given the opportunities to realize their potentialities, we find that human beings everywhere can do what other human beings everywhere have done… the range of … differences is far greater within each ethnic group than between different ethnic groups.’
Montagu, 1960: 195-197
|
1889 – 1901: Prelude to One Nation
Throughout the 1880s and more so in the 1890s, native-born white Australians campaigned across the country for some form of federation of all of the Australasian states, including New Zealand and Papua New-Guinea, as white-controlled territories under one government. White natives felt very strongly that they, and not foreign-born Englishmen, should rule Australia, and should be able to expel Asians on the one hand and to confine Aborigines to reserves on the other. All classes of white society supported these ‘solutions’: employers in the North were almost as hostile against Asians as most workers, and rural workers generally were more opposed to Aboriginal employment of any sort than rural employers.
As workers formed strong unions, opposition to the employment of Aboriginal people forced them either out of the work-force altogether and back onto the missions, or forced the segregation of work-places: through the 1890s, even shearing sheds became all-white or all-Aboriginal, or segregated. The betrayal of any solidarity with Aboriginal people by the white working class was to continue for at least another fifty years.
In the 1890s, the South Australian economy was coming out of the 1880s depression, with the usual replacement of labour by machines. The rapid development of industrial enterprises in the towns and city, and of mechanisation in the rural economy, coupled with the breaking up of large pastoral estates into smaller blocks and cooperative settlements for the unemployed, allowed a few more people to settle on the land but, on balance, eventually forced many more out of the countryside into the city, to and through which more and more economic activity was being channelled (Williams, 1975: 83-86). But of course, Aboriginal people were barred from joining this movement to the city and were to be condemned to remain in the job-scarce countryside for another seventy years and more.
In the countryside, improved farming techniques, better use of water, and more irrigation schemes long the Murray, as well as attention to improvements in soil productivity, made farming on smaller blocks more viable, but paradoxically more people on the land meant less employment for farm labourers. By the 1880s, and certainly the 1890s, shearing (and associated tasks: crutching, felsing, dipping, and so on) was becoming one of the only occupations for farm labourers, and that only seasonal. Ngarrindjeri men – employment for women hardly extended even to domestic work – were forced back more and more onto the mission for employment. This pattern did not really change much until the railways felt the need for fettlers and workers for their more outlying operations in the 1950s. So one must ask, what sort of education did authorities envisage for Aboriginal people to suit their declining employment opportunities ? The answer came around 1910.
Ngarrindjeri people had lost their land to the invaders. Spiritual people they may be, but they could not exist on fresh air: so how were they to get by if employment in the mainstream was made more difficult to secure, or even being denied to them altogether ? Three options were pursued, each with its own educational implications:
-
begging in the streets of Adelaide, and when this was prohibited, in the towns: educationally, this required little but the ability to act dumb and quaint, to play up to the stereotype of the dying-out blackfellow;
-
to work on the mission, at any task that was required: this required being reconciled to a circumscribed life of poverty, submission to orders and short-term and variable low-skill employment;
-
striking out on one’s own block or section: this required an ethos of self-reliance and hard work, away from the mission and one’s relations.
Up to the 1920s, some people kept trying the first option, but it carried many dangers with it: very few people today are descended from these poor people and this option did not really have any positive outcomes. Many people stayed at the mission and worked there all their lives, leaving only to work seasonally as shearers or fruit-pickers. And from 1890 to 1910, many families set out on their own: those of Alfred Cameron, George Karpany, George Muckray, William McHughes, Joseph Koolmatrie, Peter Gollan and Henry Lampard, as well as others, spread out on blocks from Wellington down past The Needles.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |