Emergency Medicine Residency Handbook 2009 Edition table of contents chapter page


Possible Conclusions from Journal Club



Yüklə 1,16 Mb.
səhifə13/17
tarix17.08.2018
ölçüsü1,16 Mb.
#71499
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17

3. Possible Conclusions from Journal Club


  • Question is answered, validating current practice or suggesting change

  • Leads to further questions and journal club subjects

  • No answer found in literature, possible future research topic


The schedule for Journal Club and resident presenters will be posted and distributed by the education chief resident. Please contact the resident coordinators at least 1 month in advance for topic and article assignments

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE CONFERENCE

Coordinators: Michael Lanigan, MD/Lorenzo Paladino, MD

Purpose:

*To address a focused clinical question that pertains to the everyday practice of emergency medicine

*To present the background, evidence and conclusions in a concise and conclusive talk
Format:

*2 separate EBM topics will be presented during the one hour lecture block. The conference coordinator may also include some didactic material on EBM during the session

*Residents may design their own clinical question or select one from the list provided. Topics must be approved by the conference supervising attending prior to beginning work

*The speaker should first address why the clinical question was chosen and how it affects our clinical practice

*The discussion should include a brief (no more than 5 minutes) review of the issue including background of the topic

*The talk should be no more than 20 minutes duration, and contain no more than 15-20 slides

*Review the presentation with the conference supervising attending at least 1 week prior to presentation

SENIOR RESIDENT LECTURES

All 3rd and 4th year residents will give lectures. The topics and material will be geared to junior residents or all academic years. The topics should be selected at the beginning of the Academic Year with the assistance of the Education Chief Resident.


It is expected that preparation will be far in advance. In order to present a high quality lecture, the residents will be expected to utilize current literature as well as textbooks and position papers. The residents must contact a faculty member, their advisor or any of the residency directors at least 1 week prior to the scheduled presentation time in order to go over the lecture slides. If the resident fails to contact a faculty member additional lecture or clinical duties will be assigned.
Practice is important, and it is therefore expected that the resident has had several practice sessions in order that the material is presented in a smooth and well-rehearsed fashion. Handouts will also be appreciated. In addition, the residents should arrive early to set up the AV equipment, so that the lecture may start on time.


The schedule for Senior Resident Lectures and resident presenters will be posted and distributed by the education chief resident

MISCELLANEOUS

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
RESIDENT RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES

In accordance with the recommendations of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and the SUNY-Downstate Graduate Medical Education Committee, the resident will be provided with an opportunity to:


1) Develop a personal program of self study and professional growth with guidance from the teaching staff.
2) Participate in safe, effective, and compassionate patient care, under supervision, commensurate with their level of advancement and responsibility.
3) Participate fully in the educational scholarly activities of their program and, as required, assume responsibility for teaching and supervision of other residents and students.
4) Participate in institutional programs and activities involving the medical staff and adhere to established practices, procedures, and policies of the institution.
5) Participate in institutional committees and councils, especially those that relate to patient care review activities.
6) Participate in evaluation of the quality of education provided by the program.
7) Develop an understanding of ethical, socioeconomic, and medical/legal issues that affect graduate medical education and of how to apply cost containment measures in the provision of patient care.
8) Residents shall perform their duties and at all times conduct themselves in compliance with all applicable departmental rules and regulations, as well as applicable Hospital policies and procedures, both personnel and operational, and such specific rules and regulations.
It is therefore expected that the resident always acts in a professional manner. Dishonesty, disinterest, and unkindness are serious offenses and may be grounds for dismissal from the program.
Policy on Eligibility and Selection of Residents

Candidates for residency will have graduated an LCME-accredited medical school or a medical school approved by the program director. Candidates will have passed the USMLE step 2 or the Complex Step 2 prior to entry into the training program. Residents will hold a medical degree from an allopathic or osteopathic medical school or an equivalent degree if from a foreign medical school.


All applications for PGY1 positions are accepted through the ERAS program. The Residency Director and the Assistant Directors screen completed applications for specific criteria. Interviews are offered to approximately 185 applicants based on their personal statement, letters of recommendation, board scores, transcripts and dean’s letter. Interviews are held twice a week, with 10 applicants per session. Applicants are given an introductory slide presentation, which describes the key aspects of the program including the length of the program. Usually, the residency director, and the assistant residency directors, and a resident interview candidates. The interviews are one on one or two on one and run approximately 20 minutes each. During the interview day, applicants are offered an opportunity to meet with residents for a question/answer session and tour of the facilities. Recruitment for the combined program was done similarly in concert with the Internal Medicine Program Director.
The Interviewers rank the applicants based on their prior academic performance and future growth potential, their interview presence and interpersonal skills, their commitment to Emergency Medicine, ethnic and cultural diversity, and the desire to work and learn in an inner city hospital environment.

PROMOTION/GRADUATION CRITERIA
Education in emergency medicine is a lifelong journey, not a destination. We, as a program, will teach you the fundamental skills, knowledge and humanistic qualities that constitute the foundations of emergency medicine practice. Under the guidance and supervision of qualified faculty, residents need to develop a satisfactory level of clinical maturity, judgment and technical skill. On completion of this program, residents should be capable of practicing emergency medicine, able to incorporate new skills and knowledge during their careers, and able to monitor their own physical and mental well being and that of others.

This program has established specific educational and administrative criteria for promotion to the next program level and graduation from this program. Educational requirements are outlined for each program year in the “Educational Objectives” section in this handbook. Furthermore, ACGME core competencies criteria by which residents’ performance will be judged, is outlined in the “Evaluations” section in this handbook. Please read these over carefully.



Other promotion/graduation criteria include, but are not limited to:

  • Procedure and Resuscitation log: Residents must document all procedures via the procedure tracking program online. All procedures and resuscitations must be put into the web-based procedure-tracking program. Remember to log every resuscitation in your online procedure log—the RRC thinks we don’t do enough resuscitations. Procedure and resuscitation log review will be performed by the Residency Directors or faculty advisor at regular intervals and your 6-month evaluation. One resuscitation per year must be logged in the competency-bot program. Please pay special attention to logging pediatric medical and trauma resuscitations and if you were the team leader for ANY resuscitation.

  • Competency-bot: Every resident must complete 5 chief complaints per year in the online competency-bot program. You must also log 3 procedures and 1 resuscitation as competency procedures. This is an extensive evaluation that the attending must fill out for all 9 of these competencies so please do not leave this to the last second. See the competency-bot section of the handbook for more info.

  • Patient Care Follow-up: Residents will be required to keep online documentation of patient care and clinical questions encountered for EM patients. You must do 4 follow-ups per year and each one will require a lit review and an answer to some clinical question. You must complete 4 per year. No exceptions.




  • Six-month evaluation: Twice yearly the Residency Directors will review each resident’s performance and discuss progress, achievements, advancements, problems, and projects with the resident. Residents must fill out an extensive self–evaluation package prior to their six-month evaluation. This is obtained from the residency coordinator.




  • Morning Report: All residents scheduled to work at KCHC at 7 AM or coming off the overnight shift are required to attend. Residents scheduled at UHB are encouraged to attend at the discretion of the UHB Attending. Residents must first report to UHB for rounds and are to report back promptly at the conclusion of the case. The resident presenting the morning report is required to submit a one-page write-up to the residency coordinator for his/her Portfolio on each topic that he/she presents.  The write-up should consist of a brief summary of the case with the pertinent teaching points highlighted.




  • Wednesday conference attendance: The RRC mandates at least 70% conference attendance by all residents. Therefore, all residents are required to attend Wednesday conference, unless they are excused because of ACGME work hour requirements (see “Monthly Schedules” section in this handbook). Remember, you will already miss a significant portion of conference during vacation and off-service rotations. If you need to miss a conference, speak to Dr. Silverberg.




  • Webtests: Residents must complete webtests; this is part of your residency. In order to receive a score for that month, you must complete the webtest by the deadline of each month (the 25th unless otherwise noted). Residents who persistently have low scores or do not take the exam MIGHT receive other remediation. In order to graduate you can miss no more than 2 tests and one of these cannot be the mock in-service exam. All residents must complete the mock in-service test.




  • USMLE Step 3: Passing Step III will be required by the end of your 2nd year in your residency training.




  • Summary of Resident portfolio: Residents are required to write a summary of their resident portfolio in order to be promoted to the next PGY level or to graduate. Please see the portfolio section of the handbook for more information




  • Faculty advisor: Your faculty advisor should meet with you at least every 3 months. Although this will occur more or less frequently depending on the advisor, it is your responsibility to approach your advisor. Every meeting must be documented in the resident’s folder. There are Resident Evaluation Forms (see “Faculty Advisor” section of this handbook) that may be used as a guideline for resident-advisor meetings to address certain issues and to document regular meetings. This form must be given to the residency coordinator to be placed in the resident’s file. Please inform the Residency Directors if there are any problems with meeting with your advisor or if you wish to be assigned to a different advisor for any reason.


PLEASE BE AWARE: Compliance with the fulfillment of these regulations has been a problem in the past, especially during the last months of the final year. Please follow these rules carefully - it is ultimately the Program Director’s decision on whether to promote or graduate you.

Supervision of Residents
Residents working in the ED will be supervised by ABEM board-eligible or board certified attending physicians who are licensed in the state of their practice. When residents rotate on non-EM services, they will be supervised in accordance with the ACGME/RRC faculty supervision guidelines for that specialty. Residents rotating in the Pediatric Emergency Department may be supervised by faculty boarded in Pediatric Emergency Medicine.
Residents rotating in the Pediatric Emergency Department may also be immediately supervised by fellows enrolled in an ACGME-accredited Pediatric Emergency Medicine fellowship. However, these residents will also have immediate access to a faculty member who is board-certified/board-eligible in EM or Peds EM.
All EM residents are ultimately under the supervision of the Program Director of Emergency Medicine regardless of what specialty they are working on.
Each patient encounter MUST be presented to an faculty member prior to disposition. All charts MUST countersigned by an attending in a timely manner.
Junior residents can be supervised by senior residents in the specialty under which they are rotating, but must ultimately be under a supervising faculty meeting the above criteria. Residents must be under direct supervision during all procedures until they are credentialed in that procedure. After that time, they will perform all procedures under general supervision. In the ED, there is always an attending in the clinical area to supervise all procedures. Faculty will not provide coverage from outside of the clinical area. As the residents progress in their level of training, they are given more autonomy in regards to patient management plans, procedures, and disposition.
Senior residents will be responsible for supervising the junior residents working in their assigned clinical area. Residents are also responsible for supervising and monitoring medical students. As residents progress, they may precept medical students. However, all patient encounters must ultimately be presented to the faculty in the clinical area. Residents will also work in conjunction with the nurse and clerical staff to assure that optimum patient care is given.
Further delineation of supervisory policies can be found in the resident handbook under that rotation summary.

Policy on Resident Duty Hours and Work Environment
The EM Residency adheres religiously to the duty hours restrictions. Residents will adhere strictly the ACGME and New York State Health Code duty hour rules. Any potential violation of these rules shall be reported to the Program Director immediately. If the Program Director does not correct the issue, then the resident should address the issue with the DIO of SUNY Downstate.

Residents will work in an environment that is safe from physical harm and free discrimination based on the residents’ sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, identified gender, or socioeconomic background.


Residents will be required to dress and act professionally while on duty.

Work Hours Rules:
Duty hours are defined as all clinical and academic activities related to the program; i.e., patient care (both inpatient and outpatient), administrative duties relative to patient care, the provision for transfer of patient care, time spent in-house during call activities, and scheduled activities, such as conferences. Duty hours do not include reading and preparation time spent away from the duty site.
As a minimum, residents shall be allowed an average of one full day in seven days away from the institution and free of any clinical or academic responsibilities, including planned educational experiences;


  • While on duty in the emergency department, residents may not work longer than 12 continuous scheduled hours. There must be at least an equivalent period of continuous time off between scheduled work periods;




  • A resident should not work more than an average of 60 scheduled hours per week seeing patients in the emergency department and never more than 72 duty hours per week.




  • Duty hours comprise all clinical duty time and conferences, whether spent within or outside the educational program, including all on-call hours.

On-call Activities

1. In-house call must occur no more frequently than every third night, averaged over a four-week period.
2. Continuous on-site duty, including in-house call, must not exceed 24 consecutive hours. Residents may remain on duty for up to six additional hours to participate in didactic activities, transfer care of patients, conduct outpatient clinics, and maintain continuity of medical and surgical care.
3. No new patients may be accepted after 24 hours of continuous duty.
a) A new patient is defined as any patient for whom the

resident has not previously provided care.




CLINICAL PROCEDURES

The purposes of procedure documentation are multiple. First, our program is required by the Resident Review Committee (RRC) section of the ACGME to ensure residents complete a certain number of procedures prior to completing their Emergency Medicine residency training. The RRC language is vague on the number of procedures required in most cases but is very strict about programs providing documentation of residents’ performing certain procedures. You will be supplied with a list of procedures that MUST be documented throughout your residency. The other major reason for requiring documentation of residents’ procedures is that after completion of residency training, hiring institutions will require documentation of competence in certain procedures before Attending Physician privileges are granted. Over the last several years, many hospitals have become more rigorous with respect to verification of procedural competence during the credentialing process. Thus, it is important for the resident to receive credit for all procedures performed or supervised during training.


The SUNY-Downstate system has gone exclusively to web-based tracking of procedures and resuscitations. During your orientation you will be given information about how to log onto the New Innovations system to record your procedures.
Please realize that there are two different “requirements” for the number of procedures you will need to document. You will be given a purple procedure book that lists all of the major procedures we do in the ED and how many you must log before you are considered “credentialed” to do that procedure by yourself in the hospital. Once you are “officially credentialed by our hospital” to do that procedure, you will be able to perform that procedure without supervision at and of the hospitals you rotate through. However, at that time, you still need to log more of that procedure in order to meet the RRC’s expectations of how many procedures you must do in order to graduate from any EM residency program. Both of these sets of numbers will be provided to you.
Keeping an accurate record is not only important for your future employment credentialing process, but is also imperative to maintain our program’s RRC accreditation. Furthermore, keeping an updated procedure log is also part of your promotion/graduation requirements. If you have any problems or questions about the tracking program, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Silverberg.

POLICY ON SUPERVISION OF FELLOWS AND FELLOW SUPERVISION

Fellows working in the Pediatric Emergency Department will be supervised by faculty that are board-eligible or board certified in Pediatric Emergency Medicine or Emergency Medicine.

Fellows working in the Adult ED will be supervised by ABEM board-eligible or board certified attending physicians.  When fellows rotate on non-EM services, they will be supervised by appropriately qualified and certified teaching faculty in that specialty. All PEM fellows are ultimately under the supervision of the Program Director of Pediatric Emergency Medicine regardless of what specialty they are working on.  

Fellows may be supervised by senior residents in the specialty under which they are rotating, but will ultimately be under a supervising faculty meeting the above criteria. Fellows will be under direct supervision during all procedures until they are privileged in that procedure.  After that time, they will perform all procedures under general supervision.  In the PED, there is always an attending in the clinical area to supervise all procedures.  Faculty do not provide coverage from outside of the clinical area.  As the fellows progress in their level of training, they are given more autonomy in regards to patient management plans, procedures, and disposition.  

Fellows may supervise pediatric and emergency medicine residents working in the Pediatric ED, but all patients are ultimately to be presented to the faculty member assigned to the Pediatric ED.

The chain of supervisory responsibility from medical student to Chief Medical Officer is as follows:  student- resident- fellow- supervising attending- section director- program director- chairman of the department- Chief Medical Officer.



EVALUATIONS and FEEDBACK
Residents will be evaluated on each clinical and non-clinical rotation using the following evaluation & feedback mechanisms. The six (6) core competencies will be addressed in these evaluations as they apply to the individual rotation.
Evaluation process:
A. Resident Evaluation

Multiple tools are used in the evaluation of the residents. They include oral feedback, written monthly evaluations, the EVALBOT computerized system, 6-month reviews with the Residency Directors, faculty advisor meetings, self-evaluation forms and a computerized SDOT (Standardized Direct Observational Tool), which is located on-line called COMPOTENCYBOT.



  • Oral feedback should be provided by the supervising faculty during or after each clinical shift.

  • Written evaluation will be completed at the end of each rotation by supervising faculty and the Resident Education Committee. When in the ED, Senior Residents will fill out evaluation forms for Junior Residents and vice versa, which will be reviewed by the Resident Education Committee. These evaluations are all open to review by the resident and faculty at all times. Residents review and sign all of these evaluations regularly but no less often than at their 6 month evaluations.(Next bullet)

  • Twice yearly, one of the Residency Directors will review each resident’s performance and discuss progress, achievements, advancement, problems and projects with the individual resident.

  • Residents fill out an extensive self-evaluation package prior to each six-month evaluation.

  • Residents are responsible to meet with their faculty advisor at least once quarterly for evaluation and feedback on performance. Advisors have full access and may look at their resident’s personal files including their portfolio, procedure certification and their “problems and concerns” file if any issues have been placed in this location.

  • EVALBOT is a web-based computer program that allows all attendings to anonymously evaluate each resident as often as the individual attending likes. It can be daily after each shift working with a resident or whenever the EVALBOT program sends out a weekly reminder that certain residents are in the department. Each evaluation has 2 parts; first, the attending can submit any written comment that they want concerning the resident’s performance, skills or areas of concern. The second section is a 5 point scale used to rank the resident in each of the elements of the 6 core competencies.

  • The COMPOTENCYBOT computer program requires direct observation by a faculty member in the clinical setting for approximately 10-20 minutes per encounter. The resident is required to get an attending to observe 5 patient interviews of different chief complaints, 3 procedures (including 1 sonogram) and 1 resuscitation each academic year. These numbers can be manually altered for certain residents that the Resident Education Committee feels needs to be evaluated more or less often than the general resident population. The goal is to evaluate the residents with specific attention paid to the elements of the 6 core competencies. Both faculty and resident are able to provide immediate feedback about that specific clinical encounter.


B. Feedback mechanisms:

  • Procedure notebook and resuscitation log review will be performed by a Residency Directors or faculty advisor at the completion of each rotation

  • Residents will be required to keep electronic documentation of patient care follow-ups. This can include but is not limited to: ward/ICU visits with chart review, discussion with consultants who managed the patient after ED care, follow-up phone calls, procedure/operative/biopsy and autopsy reports and samples of discharge and transfer summaries. Each follow-up should conclude with a detailed search of the literature reviewing the pathology and pathophysiology surrounding each patient followed up and should also discuss the most up-to-date treatment guidelines found in the literature. The resident will be required to fill out one internet based in-depth follow up form 4 times per year. A web-based computer program will keep track of how many each resident still needs to complete each academic year. This program is currently located on-line at: www.sunyem.com/admin

  • Resident charts will be reviewed on a random basis as part of the Emergency Department’s ongoing Quality Assurance Program

C. Faculty Evaluation:

  • All residents may anonymously evaluate the faculty at KCH/Downstate and the affiliates on a scan-tron form. Eventually, this form will become electronic and be found in the New Innovations software package. While this options is not available as of yet, you will be given plenty of notice when this change-over occurs. They may also put written comments on the back of these forms. These comments are distributed to the attendings by one of the senior faculty members such as the Chairman or Vice-Chair for Education or the Residency Director. This set of forms is handed out to every resident for completion prior to the inservice examination day and is due to be returned by the completion of the inservice examination. If it has not been returned to the residency coordinator prior to the inservice examination, the residents are required to complete it before leaving the inservice examination room.

  • Residents have the opportunity to evaluate faculty during their six month evaluation with the program directors

  • The EVALBOT program can also be used to evaluate the attendings in an anonymous fashion similar to how the attendings evaluate the residents with comments


D. Rotation Evaluation

  • Residents must evaluate each of their rotations at the end of the block. Evaluation forms can be picked up from the residency coordinator. These forms will be placed in the resident’s file and reviewed by the program directors regularly. Eventually, this form will become electronic and be found in the New Innovations software package. While this options is not available as of yet, you will be given plenty of notice when this change-over occurs.


E. Program Evaluation

  • The program’s ability to achieve its stated goals and objectives is evaluated on a yearly basis by both faculty and residents through specially designed forms available from the residency coordinator.


PLEASE BE AWARE: Compliance with the fulfillment of these requirements has been a problem in the past. We will therefore treat non-compliance very strictly. Residents in non-compliance will have to meet with one of the residency directors in person. They may be given extra assignments, have their clinical areas moved to undesirable locations or may even be prevented from advancing to the next year of their residency training (even graduating) if these goals have not been fulfilled.

Patient Encounter Follow up

(part of the competency-bot program)
Objectives:

The resident will be able to:



  1. Identify dilemmas in the diagnosis, work up, treatment or disposition of a patient in the ED (PC,PBL)

  2. Find/use resources to follow up on a patient and report on their ultimate outcome (SBP,PBL)

  3. Identify gaps in their own fund of knowledge concerning patient care issues (MK,PBL)

  4. Be able to perform a literature search to answer their own clinical questions (MK, PBL)

  5. Synthesize a plan to change their own patient care practices based on new knowledge acquired (MK,PBL)

A career in medicine means being a student of our patients. Our clinical work constantly generates questions as we manage our patients’ medical problems. An important component of being a physician is asking ourselves how to handle those questions and finding the answers in the most current literature as a way to continuously improve our own practice. This is the Practice-based-learning competency is its pure form.


We find ourselves challenged when a particular patient’s diagnosis is unclear or when management options were in questions. What clues were in the patient’s initial presentation that could have ultimately led us to the diagnosis in more direct fashion? Why did we choose one particular test or treatment regimen over another? Were there other options we should have considered? What is the standard of care and what evidence supports it? How did our decisions affect the patient’s outcome?
Specific examples of questions (and sources for answers):

  1. Why did we get a D-dimer for the evaluation of P.E.? (British Thoracic Society guidelines)

  2. Why did we use a beta blocker in suspected MI? (ISIS 1 study)

  3. Why did we get a C-spine x-ray? (NEXUS study, Canadian C-spine rules)

  4. How did they ultimately diagnose that patient with adrenal crisis? Was there a way we could have made the diagnosis in the ED? (review article on Endocrine Emergencies)

  5. Why did we discharge the patient with community acquired pneumonia? (PORT study)


Select four patients per year to do a follow-up on. This is only 1 follow-up every 3 months on average. This should be a patient that raises a question you feel you could learn something from. Examples would be where the diagnosis was unclear or the work up or management options were in question or new to you. Follow up on the patient’s course after the ED. This can be obtained through hospital records (admission chart, discharge summary, outpatient clinic notes), discussion with consultants who managed the patient after you and/or follow up phone calls to the patient. Use this information to launch your investigation, and fill in the follow-up form on the competency-bot website.
This is a requirement of your residency and failure to do this will result in failure to progress to the next PGY level or failure to graduate.

RESIDENT PORTFOLIO
The resident portfolio is a useful tool to document all of your educational activities, assist you in the development of expertise and promotion and will give you a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment. In addition, the portfolio will help you evaluate your own performance in a self-reflective manner.

This is the first step on your lifelong journey as a teacher and educator, and setting up your personal portfolio will help you gather and document all the educational activities throughout your career. At some point in your career you will have to present the same or similar information to your chairman when negotiating promotion and tenure as a faculty member.


The Portfolio should contain enough detail to allow evaluation of teaching and scholarly activity and yet be concise and selective as outlined. It should consist of two parts:
Part I: Summary - This is a summary of the teaching/scholarly activity documentation and should contain the following:


  1. A narrative statement (a teaching/scholarly activity philosophy):

This statement could be as short as one paragraph but shouldn’t exceed two single-spaced pages. It should include your clear goals, how you prepared to be an educator, what methods you used, what significant results you achieved, effective presentation of teaching materials, and reflective self-critique that allows you to improve. It is not supposed to be an existential statement on your progress or your life; It intended to be based on the contents of your portfolio. It should indicate what you believe is important about teaching/scholarly activity and how you put these believes into practice with specific regard to the five dimensions:


  • Expertise in Content

  • Instructional Design (what materials do you design to reach various types of learners, such as physician assistants, medical students, residents, fellows, attendings)

  • Instructional Delivery (how do you communicate information to learners, i.e. lecture, workshop, facilitated discussion)

  • Course Management Skills (how do you tell the learner how to be successful)

  • Evidence of Student Learning (student/resident evaluations, passing exams, success of students/residents in their career, increased proficiency in examining and treating patients)




  1. A quantitative summary of teaching/scholarly activities:

This information may be presented in a summary format (sample provided as attachment).

Teaching/scholarly activities may include :



    • formal didactic presentations (all lectures to faculty, seniors, juniors, medical students, journal club, CPC, Grand Rounds etc.)

    • workshops (EKG/Radiology/Splinting workshop, ACLS, etc.)

    • seminars

    • panels

    • informal discussions (focus group, topic review, literature battles, morning report, journal club, ultrasound teaching to juniors/students)

    • advising/mentoring of medical students and residents

    • teaching during clinical hours

    • bedside teaching.

Other scholarly activities may include:

  • research (grants, published research papers, abstracts, poster presentation)

  • published articles

  • textbook chapters

  • editing journals/books

  • written course material such as syllabi or outlines/handouts

  • products of educational merit (videos, CD-ROM’s, computer based instruction, websites, exams)

  • curriculum/courses designed/coordinated

  • committee involvement/service activity

  • educational courses attended (ACEP, SAEM, etc.)

  • awards and honors

  • evaluations (recommendation letters, lecture evaluation form, thank you letters)

Whenever possible, you should include proof of quality of teaching/scholarly activity including awards and evaluations or letters by faculty, peers, and medical students.

Part II: Appendices – Supporting documents for the Portfolio should be kept in a binder or folder documenting the activity, material produced and evaluation of the activity and material.
There are a few items you should include in your portfolio (some are in addition to the ones mentioned above):


  • all printed and labeled ultrasound images

  • one-page write up of your morning report

  • lecture/journal club/presentation printouts, CD’s and/or handouts

  • patient encounter follow up form (one per month)

  • focus group questions and answers you prepared

  • topic review questions and answers you prepared


PLEASE NOTE: The portfolio should be given to the residency coordinator and must be updated after every educational activity. It should be available and will be reviewed during the 6-months evaluation by the Residency Directors.
If you have any questions or need help, please contact Dr. Doty.

PORTFOLIO – SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES WORKSHEET

    1. Teaching Awards and Honors



    1. Educational Committees



    1. Curricula Developed



    1. Lectures



    1. Workshops



    1. Seminars



    1. Panels



    1. Mentoring/Advisees



    1. Grants



    1. Research



    1. Publications



    1. Educational Materials Produced



    1. Educational Courses Attended

14. National Activities


CME
Each resident is encouraged to attend a national EM conference. Unfortunately, the department has only limited funds. The policy set forth is that each junior resident may receive an SAEM and EMRA membership and an EM textbook on joining the residency. The program will also contribute $500 for attendance of a national conference or course within one of the senior years. An additional $600 is offered by CIR if he/she attends a conference in the fourth year. Not going to a conference does not entitle the resident to $600 cash in the senior years. In other words, if you don’t go- you lose it.
Any additional conference attendance reimbursement, particularly for poster, abstract, and/or lecture presentation, and/or representation of the department has to be cleared before hand with the Chairman or the Residency Directors.
OTHER CIR BENEFITS INCLUDE: PEP (Professional Educational Plan): $600 per year per resident.  Used balance rolls over each year, accumulative, up to PGY 8 as long as you are on HHC payroll. 

 

Educational Conferences: An additional $600 to use in your next to last or last year of residency, and again as Chief Resident, and each year of your fellowship - as long as you are on HHC payroll.



TRAVEL PLANS & REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES

 
The following outlines the procedure to follow regarding travel/conference reimbursements.

 

 


  1. Complete travel approval form (located in rack outside of residency office) and return to Martha Patella for approval by Residency Director, Chairman and/or Dean.     
      a. Attach documentation legitimizing conference. i.e. front page of the brochure or blank registration form.  

          b. This is for any type of travel that you anticipate getting reimbursed for.

When in doubt, ask Ms. Patella prior to the event..
               

  1. Once you receive the approval notice (usually in less than 2 weeks), see Ms. Patella to make airline/rail reservations. through the SUNY travel agent. There will be no out of pocket for airlines or rail travel. It will be paid directly through SUNY. (Please note that you will not be reimbursed should you book and pay for your air/rail travel on your own.)

3. After you receive the approval notice, you can register and pay for conferences and hotel reservations. After the conference bring your original receipts to Ms. Patella and complete a travel voucher form. SUNY will reimburse directly to your home. They will also reimburse for cab fare, breakfast and dinner (no lunch) only with original receipts. If you intend to rent a car, a letter justifying the expense will be required.



DUE PROCESS AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES


A. Departmental Resident Due Process and Grievance Policy
Residents who do not meet departmental academic or professional requirements as set forth in this handbook, and accordingly are judged by the Residency Directors to have failed to maintain satisfactory performance resulting in disciplinary action and/or dismissal or termination of contract prior to completion date, may challenge this decision by appealing to the Departmental Resident Grievance Committee.

This committee is chaired by the chairperson of the department and includes the resident’s faculty advisor, a member of the departmental steering committee, one of the Chief residents, and a resident representative.


A request for review of any disciplinary action by this committee has to be done in writing to the Chairperson of the department. The committee then convenes and will review the case in a timely fashion. Results of this review will be forwarded to the Residency Director and the institutional GME committee for further action.

If the unfavorable issue is upheld or not resolved by this committee, the institutional GME Committee may be contacted for review of the action.


In the case of a violation of departmental academic and/or professional standards and/or serious patient care issues by a resident, the program director will issue a written warning. This warning will also outline expected corrections, suggestions how to achieve them, and in which time frame. The resident will be given a copy of the warning, the signed original will stay in the resident’s file, and another copy will be forwarded to the GME office. In the unlikely event of a repeated negative action, the resident will be placed on probation. If a performance review after the specified time or a third negative action occurs, and if the resident has been given proper due process, the resident will be dismissed from the program.

However, certain serious patient care issues as judged by the departmental leadership, may lead to immediate dismissal.


B. Institutional Due Process
The resident agrees that the continuation of his residency depends upon the satisfactory performance of assigned duties, and that failure to maintain a satisfactory performance, in the judgment of his Program Director, may result in termination of this Agreement and dismissal of the Resident from the Residency Program prior to the completion date. In the event of resident grievance, academic discipline or dismissal from the Residency Program, the Resident shall be entitled to due process in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the Graduate Medical Education Committee (GMEC) and the HSCB standard.
Due Process in all SUNY-HSCB programs will be based on department specific educational requirements and expectations for resident performance. Departmental guidelines and procedures for resident review and evaluation must be explicit and in written form, consistent with RRC requirements, and must meet the HSCB standard set below:
A. The GMEC must be notified by the Department Chair or Program Director of any action leading to the suspension, probation or dismissal of a resident. In all instances documentation of evaluations and attempted intervention must be in place prior to any action.
B. Residents who challenge an evaluation of their academic performance in a required educational activity, or who challenge an unfavorable academic standing or status assigned to them because of inadequate evaluations of their performance may request a review of the evaluation or of the academic status, or both.
Each residency program has established procedures for considering such requests. Residents who wish to request a review of an academic grievance should submit such a request in writing to the program Director. If the issue is not resolved through completion of the program’s grievance procedure, residents may then address a petition to the GMEC for a review of their case and of the program’s decisions on it. The GMEC may appoint and refer such petitions to an Ad Hoc Resident Grievance Sub-committee. In reviewing a resident’s petition of redress of an academic grievance, the Ad Hoc Resident Grievance Sub-committee may utilize a variety of procedures. The procedures adopted are those which the committee believes will provide the parties involved with an opportunity to present their sides of the issues to the committee and for the committee to gather information and evidence as it deems necessary to make its decision. Action taken on resident grievances by an Ad Hoc Resident Grievance Sub-committee is reported to the GMEC. Action accepted by the GMEC is final and is not subject to further formal review within the University.
C. Departmental due process procedures must be consistent with SUNY HSCB Resident Evaluation Policies and Procedures.
D. SUNY-HSCB Due Process and Grievance Policies and Procedures are independent (and complementary) to those set forth by HHC-Collective Bargaining Agreement, the Brooklyn VA and other affiliated hospital procedures.

FACULTY ADVISORS

Each resident will be assigned a faculty advisor. The role of the advisor is to facilitate the resident’s progress through the residency. The resident is encouraged to utilize his or her faculty advisor with all aspects of resident life. Faculty advisors should be a source of feedback and inspiration for the residents. The faculty advisor may be particularly helpful in assisting the resident to achieve set academic goals. It is required that the faculty member and the advisee meet at least every three months to review the resident’s progress. The faculty advisor is also required to review the monthly patient follow-ups. Residents may ask their advisors to be present during their bi-annual evaluation with the residency director and during any remediation discussions with the residency directors.


It is the resident’s responsibility to approach his/her advisor. If there are problems scheduling a meeting with your advisor or you would like to change your advisor for any reason, please let the Residency Directors know.
However, the role of the advisor shall not be limited to mandatory meetings but shall be proactive and visible in the resident’s academic development.

This can be accomplished in a variety of ways and should consist of, but not be limited to, some of the following:




  • Literature review

  • Reading assignments

  • Meetings with oral board type scenarios

  • Case review

  • Review of advisee’s follow-up sheets

  • Round table discussions

  • Question & answer settings

  • Review of multiple choice questions

  • Review of ethical and administrative issues

  • Review of resident’s procedural skills and help in achieving excellence

  • Review of the resident’s ethical and professional growth and guidance towards excellence

  • Mentoring during times of personal duress or stress

  • Resolution of conflicts with the department or other staff


NOTE: A Resident Evaluation Form (located outside Ms. Lane’s office) may be used as a guideline for resident-advisor meetings to address certain issues and to document regular meetings. This form must be given to the residency coordinator to be placed in the resident’s file.

Please inform the Residency Directors (specifically, Dr. Quinn) if there are any problems with meeting with your advisor or if you wish to be assigned to a different advisor for any reason.



SICK CALL POLICY

The Department of Emergency Medicine has set up a sick call beeper system to cover the ED when residents are ill or unable to work scheduled shifts. During the PGY-2 and PGY-3 years residents will be assigned two separate two-week blocks of sick call.



Historically, these rotations have been during non-ICU and non-ED rotations, such as ENT, Ultrasound, and Research/Airway. While on sick call, the resident will generally cover any sick EM resident scheduled for the UHB & KCH adult or pediatrics EDs.
Typically, PGY-2 residents cover junior residents and PGY-3 residents cover senior residents. However, at the discretion of the EM Chief or residency directors, any sick call resident may be activated for any sick resident irrespective of year or parent department.
The sick call resident will carry the sick call beeper for the entire time on sick call and is expected to be available and free from the influence of any mind altering substance at all times during their call period, including weekends and nights. The resident must also stay within beeper range of the hospital. If you need to leave the NYC area then arrange coverage from a peer. The resident who is receiving the pager at the time of turn over is responsible for obtaining the pager. Not having been given the pager is not an excuse to miss a call. Any resident who is unavailable during their sick call will be held accountable for the missed clinical time.
The sick call beepers are usually used when another EM resident calls in sick, the ED is busy, and extra help is required to ensure adequate patient care. Do not abuse the Sick Call System. It is not to be used for recreational or personal needs.
The only people who are authorized to activate the sick call resident are the Chief-on-call or one of the Residency Directors. If the sick call resident is called in by another person, the called resident is to immediately refer the matter to the Chief Resident on call or one of the residency directors.
The following is the procedure for an ill resident to activate the sick call system:
PLEASE NOTE:

NOT ADHERING TO THESE PROCEDURES HAS CAUSED MAJOR PROBLEMS IN THE PAST. THEREFORE, STRICT ADHERENCE IS MANDATORY AND WILL BE ENFORCED.
Sick Call Procedure: KCH ED


  1. This procedure has to be followed for all rotations, not only KCH-ED




  1. Check to see if there is anyone who can switch with you. Contact that person. You must call the Chief-on-call either way. If you can find coverage for yourself, call the chief-on-call and tell the chief who will be covering your shift. If not, you need to call the chief-on-call and tell them that you will require sick call coverage.




  1. You must call Dr. Christopher Doty (cell no.: 1-917-597-0466, pager no.:

1-917-760-2005) and the chief on call (1-917-761-1405.) If you cannot reach Dr. Doty, leave a message on his cell phone voicemail. NOT CALLING IS UNACCEPTABLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE UNLESS YOU ARE INTUBATED.


  1. You must leave a message with the Residency Coordinator (718-245-3318)




  1. A Residency Director and/or the Chief-on-call will decide IF the sick call resident will be called after evaluating who is calling in sick and the state of the clinical area that is about to be short-staffed. We only use sick-call when absolutely necessary.




  1. If sick call coverage is required, then YOU must call the sick call person to cover for you; the chief on call may volunteer to do it for you, but it is ultimately YOUR responsibility.




  1. **Only the Chief-on-call or one of the Residency Directors can activate the sick call coverage system.**



Sick Call Procedure: Off-service and Affiliate EDs

Same as above, in addition:



  • You must notify the clinical site director for ED rotations and the Chief residents for off-service rotations.

  • Residents will adhere to established sick call policies at these sites.

  • Any difficulties with sick call policies should be referred to the Residency Directors.

  • You must call Dr. Christopher Doty.

  • You must leave a message with the Residency Coordinator (718-245-3318)



Sick Call Procedure Conference Days


  • You must make 70% of conference days. There is no negotiation on this point. If you are sick, don’t come in. If you miss more than 30% of all conference days for ANY reason, then you can not graduate the program until this is rectified.

ED CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE POLICY
In an effort to give the residents more autonomy, we are instituting a new attendance policy for conference. It is a national benchmark that every EM resident must be present for 70% of the Wednesday conferences that we sponsor. (35% for EM/IM residents) With that thought in mind, we would like to leave it up to you, the residents, to make sure that you are making this RRC requirement. Therefore, the directors will not be worried about your reasons for missing conference. It is your responsibility to be there. The attendance statistics will be posted on the conference room door on or around the first of every month. You must be there for the full 5 hours to get credit for the day if you are not scheduled to work that day or the night before. If you leave early or come late outside of the current handbook policy on Wednesday conference attendance, you will not get credit for that conference day.
Realize that this 70% of conferences includes everything. (Sick day, I worked overnight, my car got towed, my Granny was in town, I was on vacation, my dog ate my metrocard..EVERYTHING.)
If you come more than 5 minutes late, it will be recorded. If you are late 3 times, it will count as one full missed day of conference. It is your responsibility to keep track of your conference attendance and know how close you are to that 70% level. This number can be reviewed with a residency director at your 6 month evaluation meeting or you can make an appointment with a director to discuss this at any time.
If by some terrible chance of luck, graduating residents are below your required 70% (35%), they will have to attend conference during their elective or during July to make the minimum requirement in order to graduate the program. The 70% ( or 35% for EM/IMs) RRC conference attendance requirement is not negotiable and you can not graduate from ANY EM residency with out fulfilling it.
WORK ATTIRE POLICY
We all realize that the hospital is not the cleanest place in the world. Therefore, wearing fancy clothes can become taxing on the wallet when dry cleaning bills and replacements for destroyed garments start to stack up. However, as dirty as the ED may be, we still need to look professional.  While we do not want to enforce a strict dress code, we would like to set a standard.
When working clinically at Kings County, scrubs are acceptable although we encourage professional casual dress when working in the non-procedure oriented areas such as Pod A. Jeans are never acceptable and neither is any shirt that does not cover the entire abdomen. When working in UHB, men should try to wear khaki pants or slacks and a button down shirt while women can wear a similar ensemble or something equally as professional. Additionally, we should also think about what we wear to our academic Wednesday conferences. This is especially true when an outside speaker is going to be present. When giving a lecture, looking the part is very important.  If you are giving a lecture, you should have professional attire or business casual.  This means:

 

1.  No scrubs when giving a lecture.  If you are working at 12 noon or worked the overnight, you can change into your scrubs before or after your lecture



2.  No jeans, t-shirts or sweatshirts when giving a lecture

3.  The lecturer should wear business casual which means an ironed shirt, pants, blouse, dress etc.


If you have questions, you can check out the link below for some additional examples.

 

http://www.career.vt.edu/Jobsearc/BusCasual.htm

 

You put a great deal of effort into your presentations.  Look the part and complete the package.  If you have any questions, please feel free to contact your faculty advisor or any one of the residency directors with additional questions.



 

"The difference between greatness and mediocrity is in the detail."



Yüklə 1,16 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin