Ilo evaluation
Yüklə 2,52 Mb.
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- Introduction 1.1 Country Context and Contextual Developments
- 1.2 Key partners in SCORE implementation At present, the key partners in SCORE are: VCCI-HCMC
- HAWA (Handicraft and Woodwork Industry Association of HCMC) and BIFA(Bin Duong Industry Furniture Association
- 1.3 National Tripartite Advisory Committee
- 1.4 Activities, outputs and outcomes since start of SCORE Phase II
- Job creation
- Changes in employment status
- SME Walk Through Checklist Score
1.1 Country Context and Contextual Developments The most important country contextual developments are presented below:
1.2 Key partners in SCORE implementation At present, the key partners in SCORE are: VCCI-HCMC: The Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Ho Chi Minh City) is the most important historic partner in the SCORE project. In the first phase of SCORE VCCI was also the implementing partner of SCORE and there was no separate ILO SCORE team. This has changed in phase II, when the SCORE team was formed as an ILO implementing structure. VCCI still remains an important (though less actively and intensively involved in implementation) partner for general oversight and for promotion and marketing of SCORE and for the identification of possible trainers for SCORE. ILO is now starting up a process of transferring SCORE back into the hands of VCCI. Although there is clear interest of VCCI in SCORE, the sustainability perspectives of SCORE are not yet good enough to ensure a quick process of transfer of SCORE to VCCI. The ILO SCORE team is currently facilitating the process of institutionalizing SCORE into VCCI HCMC. HAWA (Handicraft and Woodwork Industry Association of HCMC) and BIFA(Bin Duong Industry Furniture Association: These are the furniture sector associations in the region of HCMC with whom ILO SCORE is cooperating in promoting and marketing SCORE, to organize trainings and also to provide candidates for the team of SCORE trainers. The cooperation with these two associations is very good and intensive. The SCORE project in Vietnam is mostly managed and coordinated by the ILO SCORE team together with national implementing partners (the furniture associations). The SCORE team has provided training to these VCCI and associations on how to manage, market and organize SCORE to members of business associations. There are not yet any institutional training providing institutions with whom SCORE works together in Vietnam. 1.3 National Tripartite Advisory Committee The members of the National Technical Advisory Committee in Vietnam are VCCI, Vietnam General Confederation of Labour (VGCL), Ministry of Labour, Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA and DOLISA). In the practical implementation of the project MOLISA/DOLISA and VGCL are not very actively involved, although both participate occasionally in training events and they observe SCORE activities in the sector associations and companies. 1.4 Activities, outputs and outcomes since start of SCORE Phase II The realization of activities against planning is presented in the Workplan smartsheets of SCORE. The Smartsheet results of Vietnam were analyzed for implementation rates and are presented in the table below:
Legend: Green=completed; yellow=in progress; red=delayed; white=not yet started or not planned The realization of activities against planning is on track, but the table also shows that all outputs are still in the implementation stage and only a limited amount of activities under outputs is completed. This image can be explained by the fact that implementation at the start of phase II was delayed, but is catching up considerably in the passed year. The realization of outputs is presented on smart-sheets. Until June 2015, the following outputs were realized:
(Between brackets is the percentage of Females) The table above shows that implementation of the project is generally on track in Vietnam with the exception of the cost-recovery rates that are significantly below planned targets. Outcomes reported on the M&E online platform until 20 December 2015 are presented below:
The data on the indicators in the table above are somewhat confusing and difficult to interpret. Some of this confusion can be related to errors and imprecisions in the data collection. While some changes are negative, others are positive and this is (except for wages) contrary to the logic of SCORE. The reported savings per company (recalculated in USD) also seems to contain an error, because it indicates savings with virtually no value. At the highest level, outcomes were reported on job-creation effects. The results (until 20 December 2015) are presented in the table below:
The net job creation effect in Vietnam is surprisingly high, considering the relatively small number of participating companies and considering effects in other countries. But here one should realize that the furniture industry is very labour intensive and it is also doing quite well. Although there might be some bias towards the positive side, it is likely that SCORE in Vietnam might have contributed to a significant increase of employment in the furniture sector, including a process of transferring casual contracts into fixed labour contracts. These developments were also confirmed by the stakeholders interviewed in Vietnam. During the evaluation visit the evaluators have visited two SME’s to confirm achievement of outcomes in enterprise walkthroughs. The changes observed at SME level are presented in the table below. The average scores are given on a three-point scale (1=low, 2=sufficient, 3=good)
Yüklə 2,52 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|