Instructions for preparing proposal Part b for Integrated Projects in the ist priority
Yüklə 1,19 Mb.
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- ETHICAL ISSUES TABLE
- References
Section 4. Ethical IssuesConnectME, in one of its scenarios, plans to demonstrate a service for families, both parents and their young children, to interact with objects in the video stream (in our case, of RAI-sourced children's entertainment programs). The goal of this scenario is to reduce the role of the television as a passive “gogglebox” in the corner of the living room and transform the television watching experience into something which can be:
Hence, the consortium recognises and acknowledges an ethical issue here related to the project conduct with respect to trailing the family edutainment scenario with young children. It is essential to guarantee the safety and privacy of children and their parents or guardians who will take part in these trials. In order to achieve this, the partners’ running the user trials for this scenario will agree on a common Ethics Manual for all trials conduced in the project. Among others, the ethics manual will specify the conditions under which the trials shall take place (e.g. the children will be accompanied by their parent or guardian at all times, trials will be carried out at public and secure locations, children will only encounter during the trial suitable video and related Web content as shown to and agreed with the parents or guardians prior to the start of the trial). ConnectME will follow the guidelines (expressed in form of “opinions”) of the European group on ethics in science and new technologies to the European Commission [EGE_url]. All national legal and ethical requirements of the Member States where the research is performed will be fulfilled. In particular as ConnectME will be running research intending to involve children and young people as respondents, our consortium will look at long-standing experience by a well-established UK children charity such as Barnardos [BA_url] and their statement of ethical research practice that describes how: • Young people should be involved as early as possible in the design, planning and piloting of research whenever possible. • Safeguards to minimise any inconvenience, disruption, intrusion, embarrassment, coercion or distress should be written into the research protocol. • Attention should be paid to ensuring that participation in research is a positive and rewarding experience. Where appropriate consideration should be given to suitable compensation. • Feedback on research findings should be provided to children and young people as part of acknowledging their contribution and seeking their views on outputs and dissemination. The informed consent of children and young people to participation in research should be actively and explicitly sought. • Information about the proposed research and the optional nature of participation should be provided in both oral and written form and presented in accessible language. • Attention should be paid to minimising possible coercion from parents, teachers and other adults, and to minimising the influence of peer pressure. • Young people should be encouraged to question researchers about the aims and methods of the research. • Written, or explicit, recorded consent should be obtained from research participants whenever possible. • The consent of parents, or guardians should be routinely sought. ETHICAL ISSUES TABLE
References
1 Work package number: WP 1 – WP n. 2 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 3 Number of the participant leading the work in this work package. 4 The total number of person-months allocated to each work package. 5 Measured in months from the project start date (month 1). 6 Measured in months from the project start date (month 1). 7 Deliverable numbers in order of delivery dates. Please use the numbering convention 8 Please indicate the nature of the deliverable using one of the following codes: R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other 9 Please indicate the dissemination level using one of the following codes: PU = Public PP = Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services). RE = Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services). CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services). 10 Measured in months from the project start date (month 1). 11 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 12 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 13 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 14 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 15 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 16 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 17 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 18 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 19 Please indicate one activity per work package: RTD = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and coordination activities); DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium; OTHER = Other specific activities, if applicable in this call. 20 Measured in months from the project start date (month 1). 21 Show how both the participants and the Commission can check that the milestone has been attained. Refer to indicators if appropriate. 22 Europe to dominate IPTV growth, Light Reading, 5.3.2007 http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=118668 23 Klingler Walter: "Jugendliche und ihre Mediennutzung 1998 bis 2008" (Media usage of young people 1998 to 2008). In: Media Perspektiven 12/2008, pp. 625-634 24 IPTV'S Economic Realities, Light Reading, 21.11.2005 http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=84604&WT.svl=deptop_1 25 IPTV a potential goldmine, Light Reading, 28.11.2005 http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=84783 26 From the Wikipedia article (checked 18.3.09): “hypervideo combines video with a non linear information structure, allowing a user to make choices based on the content of the video and the user's interests”. Later in the article, it is stated: “one can imagine an interlinked web of hypervideo forming in much the same way as the hypertext based World Wide Web has formed. This hypervideo based 'Web of Televisions' or 'TeleWeb' would offer the same browsing and information mining power of the Web, but be more suited to the viewing experience” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervideo Proposal part B, page of Yüklə 1,19 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||