International organisation for standardisation organisation internationale de normalisation
The Chair suggested that:
Jeongil Seo, ETRI, noted that Music 2.0 might require up to 16 objects rather than just 8 and require up to 4 residuals. It was also noted that it is important to specify levels whose complexity reflects the needs of the marketplace. Heiko Purnhagen, Dolby, showed an Excel spreadsheet that calculates complexity based on e.g. number of objects and residuals. A break-out will use this tool to refine the level definitions of the profiles and levels. The SAOC FCD text will be reviewed Thursday afternoon. It was the consensus of the Audio Subgroup that the proposed text be incorporated into incorporated into the FCD text. Based on this consensus, the complexity for the profile and levels (found in m16680) will also be incorporated into the FCD text. Oliver Hellmuth, FhG, presented
The contribution proposes two sets of tests, one oriented toward evaluating applications and the other toward evaluating technology. Each set is composed of a number of component tests, as shown below: Application-oriented tests: 1. Interactive Remix oriented test-cases A) Remix (Low Bitrate) B) Karaoke (High Bitrate) 2. Teleconferencing oriented test-case with 4-5 talkers and a varying degree of doubletalk A) Stereo loudspeaker presentation B) 3-front 2-rear (5.0) loudspeaker presentation Technology-oriented tests: 1) MCU Combiner Details TBD Details TBD It was the consensus of the Audio Subgroup to have as an output document a Draft SAOC Verification Test Plan. The Chair noted that the following schedule is anticipated:
Yüklə 2,78 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş: |