Marginalized Knowledge: An Agenda for Indigenous Knowledge Development and Integration with Other Forms of Knowledge


Table 2 Comments on the use and availability of ICTs in the community



Yüklə 2,6 Mb.
səhifə107/245
tarix04.01.2022
ölçüsü2,6 Mb.
#60042
1   ...   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   ...   245
Table 2 Comments on the use and availability of ICTs in the community. N=200 (South Africa)


Comments

Frequency

Percent

Unavailable, difficult to use

ICTs are costly & unaffordable

ICTs are handy

Establish ICT centres near rural women

Easily available and accessible

ICTs are affordable

Lack of power

Great improvement in ICTS

Poor TV& Radio networks

There's no trust in ICTs

57

25



20

20

19



18

13

10



10

8

28.5

12.5


10.0

10.0


9.5

9.0


6.5

5.0


5.0

4.0


Total

200

100


Table 3

Comments on use and availability of ICTs in the Community. (Kenya) N=200





Kenya

Comments

Frequency

Percent

Would like affordable ICTs

63

31.5

ICTs should be made available

48

24

ICTs should be made accessible

28

14

There is improved information access with the use of ICTs

14

7

Use of ICTs depends on ones lifestyle

11

5.5

ICTs are very handy

2

1










There is need for ICT centres in rural areas

15

7.5

TV/ Radio networks are poor

2

1

Lack of power hinders use of ICTs

15

7.5

Total

200

100

In table 3, results from Kenya indicate that a large number of the respondents (63; 31.5%) believed that ICTs were unaffordable, followed by 48 (24%) stating them as unavailable, and 28 (14%) as inaccessible. Therefore on average, the survey portrayed that 139 (69.5%) respondents felt that ICTs were either too far, too costly or entirely unavailable. Only 16 (8%) respondents acknowledged the usefulness and availability of ICTs, citing that they were “handy” (2; 1%) or "improved access to information” (14; 7%).

The table indicates that a significant number (82; 41.0%) of the respondents in rural KZN (SA) felt that ICTs were not only unavailable and inaccessible to them, but also difficult to use. Similarly, an average of 139 (69.5%) respondents in rural RVP (Kenya) felt that ICTs were too far, too costly or entirely unavailable. Evidently, there was a larger percentage of rural respondents (70%) in RVP (Kenya) who felt that ICTs were inaccessible.

3.3 How ICTs have enhanced the rural women’s quality of life

A number of arguments have been raised as to whether or not ICTs contribute towards the improvement of a society's quality of life. With this in mind, a structured question making use of the likert scale was designed. Respondents were expected to answer the question based on areas in which ICTs have served them best. In this question, the scale of 4 denoted a high and favourable response ("always"), followed by 3 ("often"), 2 ("sometimes”), 1 ("never") and a "not applicable" scale. By calculating the average for each area listed, the study was able to arrive at conclusive remarks.



Table 4 How ICTs have enhanced the women's quality of life in South Africa (n=200) and Kenya (n=200).



Yüklə 2,6 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   ...   245




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin