Study manual


Cassidy v. Ministry of Health (1951)2 KB 343, at p. 365



Yüklə 0,55 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə106/144
tarix07.05.2023
ölçüsü0,55 Mb.
#126531
1   ...   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   ...   144
OLW 204 Law of Tort-Part I,AGGREY WAKILI

Cassidy v. Ministry of Health (1951)2 KB 343, at p. 365. 
 
3.Employers' Liability 
The duties which the employer owes at Common Law towards persons s/he 
employs. These duties are now considerably supplemented by the vast number 
of duties which are imposed on employers for the protection of 
workmen/women particularly in the industrial field. 
 
An employer is liable if an accident is due to his/her own act or default - this is 
the employer's personal liability. Secondly an employer is also responsible for 
the acts of their employees in the course of their employment - this is vicarious 
liability. This distinction has become of less importance where the doctrine of 
common employment has been abolished. This doctrine seems to apply in East 
Africa even today. 
 
I.Employer's Personal Liability 
 
The employer's duty is three fold: 
 
(i) provision of a competent staff of men and women 
(ii) provision of adequate material


136 
 
(iii) provision of proper system and effective supervision. 
 
Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co. v. English (1938)AC 57, at p. 78 
Per Lord A.C. Wright; 
 
Speed v. Thomas Lwift (1943) KB 557; 
 
Winter v. Cardiff R.D.C. (1950)1 All ER 819, 822-23; 
Harris v. Brights Asphalt Contractors (1953) QB 617, 626; 
 
(i)Competent staff of men/women 
Hudson v. Ridge Manufacturing Co. (1957)2 QB 348 
 
0'Reilly v. National Rail & Transway Appliances (1966)1 All ER 499 
 
* Black v. Fife Coal Co. (1912) AC 149 

Yüklə 0,55 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   ...   144




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2025
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin