Prodoc pims5686 SouthAfrica National abs project



Yüklə 2,96 Mb.
səhifə32/32
tarix05.09.2018
ölçüsü2,96 Mb.
#77505
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32

ANNEX X-8. Bibliography


#

Year

Author

Title

1

2008

Department of Environmental Affairs Republic of South Africa (DEA) and Department of Tourism Republic of South Africa (DT)

A National Framework for Sustainable Development in South Africa

2

2007

Johnson Q., Syce J., Nell H., Rudeen K., Folk W. R.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Lessertia frutescens in healthy adults

3

2004

Ojewole, J. A.

Analgesic antiinflammatory and hypoglycemic effects of Sutherlandia frutescens R. BR. (variety Incana E. MEY.) Fabaceae shoot aqueous extract, In: Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology no. 26

4

2015




Bioprospecting, Access and Benefit Sharing (BABS) Amendment Regulations, In: National Environmental Management Laws Amendment Act 25 of 2014 (NEMLA).

5

2013

Street R.A. and Prinsloo G.

Commercially important medicinal plants of South Africa: A review, In: Journal of Chemistry, 2013. (Access: Article ID 205048 http://dx.dot.org/10.1155/2013/205048, 21 May 2017)

6

2003

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)

FAO Document Repository - Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Case Study No. 7, (http://www.fao.org/docrep/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0758-A1.HTM, retrieved on 10 May 2017.)

7

2003

Schippmann et al.

Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues, In: FAO Document Repository - Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Case Study No. (http://www.fao.org/docrep/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0758-A1.HTM, retrieved on 10 May 2017.)

8

2013

Department of Science and Technology (DST) of South Africa Republic

Initiative for the “Bio-Economy Strategy

9

?

McGregor 2016

?

10

?

McGregor 2017

?

11




Government of South Africa Republic

Medium-Term Strategic Framework (MTSF, 2009-14), Access date: 1 Feb 2017, http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/MTSF_2014-2019.pdf

12

2014

Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) of South Africa Republic - Govender, 2007

Traditional Knowledge Associated with Rooibos and honey bush Species in South Africa

13

2015

Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) of South Africa Republic

National Biodiversity Economy Strategy (NBES) for the Department of Environmental Affairs, Republic of South Africa, In: Government Gazette, 9 October 2015.

14

2012

National Planning Commission

National Development Plan 2030 Our Future-make it work.

15

Apr-14

the ABS Capacity Development Initiative the Government of South Africa

National Study on ABS Implementation in South Africa.

16

2006

Wesgrow.

Natural Products Sector Brief. Wesgrow, Western Cape

18

2011

Harvey, A. L.; Young, L. C.; Viljoen, A. M.; Gericke, N. P.

Pharmacological Actions of the South African Medicinal and Functional Food Plant Sceletium tortuosum and its Principal Alkaloids, In: Journal of Ethnopharmacology no. 137

19

2017




Plant Distribution Sheet by Prime Africa - A sheet prepared for the needs of this PRODOC

20

2005

Kelly et al.

Recent trends in use of herbal and other natural products, In: Archives in Internal Medicine no. 165

21

Geneva, April 24 to 28, 2006




Republic of South Africa: Indigenous Knowledge Systems Policy - Document submitted by South Africa to Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources,
Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

22

2016

Rooibos Council

Rooibos Industry Fact Sheet 2016, access date: 2 May 2017, http://sarooibos.co.za/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/20160930-SARC-Fact-Sheet-final.pdf

22







Royal Society's list of countries by research and development spending on Wikipedia, access on 2 July 2017, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending

23

2012

Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) of South Africa Republic

South Africa’s Bioprospecting, Access and Benefit-Sharing Regulatory Framework

24

2012

Department of Environmental Affairs Republic of South Africa

South Africa’s Bioprospecting,
Access and Benefit-Sharing
Regulatory Framework


25

2004

Government of Republic of South Africa

South Africa’s Indigenous Knowledge Policy (IKS)

26

2015

Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) of South Africa Republic

The scope and extent of the utilization of indigenous biological resources by bioprospecting industries in South Africa

27

2013

Van Niekerk J., Wynberg R.

The trade in Pelargonium sidoides: Rural livelihood relief or bounty for the ‘bio-buccaneers’?

Presentation for HSRC PRETORIA 25 Feb 2013



28

2014

Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) of South Africa Republic

Traditional Knowledge Associated with Rooibos and Honey bush Species in South Africa

29

1996

Homma, Alfredo K. O

Utilization of Forest Products for Amazonian Development: Potential and Limitations, In: Lieberei, R., Reisdorff, C & Machado, A. D., Interdisciplinary Research on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Amazonian Rain Forest and its Information Requirements. Report on the Workshop held in Brasilia, Brazil, November 1995. Hamburg, Germany

30

2008

Beckett K., Lombard C., Millennium Challenge Corporation.

Value Chain Specialist Component (CRIAA SA‐DC / PhytoTrade Africa) of the Indigenous Natural Products: Producer and Processor Organisations Sub‐Activity

31

Copyright 2017

n/a

Webpage of International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Access date: 22 May 2017, http://www.iwgia.org/regions/africa/south-africa

32

2008

Brendler R., Van Wyk P.

Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA No. 34487 Vol. 553 Pretoria, 29 July, containing National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (10/2004): Draft Biodiversity Management Plan for Pelargonium Sidoides 2011




1 From the website of International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) on South Africa, retrieved on 27 Apr 2017.

2 DEA (2014): Traditional Knowledge Associated with Rooibos and Honeybush Species in South Africa. Report to the Department of Environmental Affairs, Republic of South Africa.

3 Wikipedia, citing the Royal Society: List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending, accessed on 19 June 2017.

4 In 2013, South Africa’s Department of Science and Technology (DST) published its initiative for the “Bio-Economy Strategy” and with a strong focus on biotechnological activities and processes that translate into economic outputs, particularly those with industrial application. In turn, DEA’s Bioeconomy Strategy (NBES) focuses on value chains linked to wildlife and bioprospecting, and where both ABS and conservation are key concerns upon which the NBES builds.

5 The last bullet outlining NEMBA’s definition of bioprospecting refers to ‘biotrade’ – and more specifically to the trade in non-food bioprospecting products. Else, in other countries and contexts, the mainstream definition of biotrade is normally broader, as biotrade may additionally also target (i) the use of species for food and agriculture; and (ii) be concerned not only with ‘genetic resources’ and their commercial application, but also with ‘biological resources’ more broadly. For this project, we are adopting the definitions included in the NBES Glossary, but noting that this is not a mainstream definition.

6 DEA (2015): The scope and extent of the utilization of indigenous biological resources by bioprospecting industries in South Africa. Department of Environmental Affairs, Government of the Republic of South Africa. (ISBN 978-0-621-42766-0).

7 For example, growth in sales of nutritional products in the United States of America (USA) alone increased from US$ 15 billion in 1999 to US$ 23 in 2002 – showing a 53% increase in only 3 years. (see e.g. Kelly et al. (2005): Recent trends in use of herbal and other natural products. Achieves in Internal Medicine 165: 281-296.)

8 DEA’s Bio-products retail database, quoted in the 2015 Scoping Study.

9 Mader et al. (undated) cited in DEA (2015): The scope and extent of the utilization of indigenous biological resources by bioprospecting industries in South Africa. Department of Environmental Affairs, Government of the Republic of South Africa. (ISBN 978-0-621-42766-0).

10 DST (2013): The Bioecomic Strategy. The Bio-economy Strategy is an initiative of the Department of Science and Technology, South Africa.

11 Cited in the 2015 Scoping Study on Bioprospecting. DEA (2015). See also this link for flagship agreements facilitated by the Department of Environmental Affairs: https://www.environment.gov.za/babs/bioprospectingpermits

12 As defined by DEA in the NBES.

13 Agreement # PCT/IB2007/050649.

14 The term ‘plant extrativism’ is a synonymous to wild-harvesting of plants, but used mostly in association with such activities in the Brazilian Amazon.

15 UNDAF Results Area 4 PLANET makes the direct links to SDGs 1, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, & 15 and this project is strategically positioned to contribute to the aforementioned SDGs.

16 See also Figure a for a representation of the project’s Long Term Solution and

Error: Reference source not found, in the Results and Partnership section (Section IV), showing alignment of the Barriers with the Project’s components



17 The ABS Capacity Development Initiative / Government of South Africa (2014): National Study on ABS Implementation in South Africa.

18 This is discussed further below and the summary argument is picked up again in sections ‘Threats, Root Causes and Barriers’ and in ‘Long-Term Solution’ further down.

19 See e.g. Homma, Alfredo K. O. 1996. “Utilization of Forest Products for Amazonian Development: Potential and Limitations". In: Lieberei, R., Reisdorff, C & Machado, A. D. Interdisciplinary Research on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Amazonian Rain Forest and its Information Requirements. Report on the Workshop held in Brasilia, Brazil, November 20-22, 1995. Hamburg, Germany. See also: Schippmann et al. (2003). Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues. FAO Document Repository - Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Case Study No. 7 (http://www.fao.org/docrep/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0758-A1.HTM, retrieved on 10 May 2017.)

20 See guidance here: https://info.undp.org/global/popp/frm/pages/financial-management-and-execution-modalities.aspx


21 Excluding project team staff time and UNDP staff time and travel expenses.

22 The costs of UNDP Country Office and UNDP-GEF Unit’s participation and time are charged to the GEF Agency Fee.

23 Definition of terms:

Suppliers: individuals or groups representing the interests of the parties concerned which provide funding and/or technical expertise to the project.

Beneficiary Representative: individuals or groups of individuals representing the interests of those who will ultimately benefit from the project. The primary function within the Board is to ensure the realization of project results from the perspective of project beneficiaries.


24 Possibly SECO.

25 See http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/operations/transparency/information_disclosurepolicy/

26 See https://www.thegef.org/gef/policies_guidelines

27 Prohibited grounds of discrimination include race, ethnicity, gender, age, language, disability, sexual orientation, religion, political or other opinion, national or social or geographical origin, property, birth or other status including as an indigenous person or as a member of a minority. References to “women and men” or similar is understood to include women and men, boys and girls, and other groups discriminated against based on their gender identities, such as transgender people and transsexuals.

28 In regards to CO2, ‘significant emissions’ corresponds generally to more than 25,000 tons per year (from both direct and indirect sources). [The Guidance Note on Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation provides additional information on GHG emissions.]

29 Forced evictions include acts and/or omissions involving the coerced or involuntary displacement of individuals, groups, or communities from homes and/or lands and common property resources that were occupied or depended upon, thus eliminating the ability of an individual, group, or community to reside or work in a particular dwelling, residence, or location without the provision of, and access to, appropriate forms of legal or other protections.

30 At present, the state nominally holds communal land in trust but the land rights still rest with households and communities. The function of the traditional leader in relation to land is to allocate it to households and act as an arbiter in land disputes.

31 Estimates of National Expenditure 2016, Vote 27, National Treasury, Republic of South Africa, 24 February 2016.

32 Homma, Alfredo K. O. 1996. Utilization of Forest Products for Amazonian Development: Potential and Limitations". In: Lieberei, R., Reisdorff, C & Machado, A. D. Interdisciplinary Research on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Amazonian Rain Forest and its Information Requirements. Report on the Workshop held in Brasilia, Brazil, November 20-22, 1995. Hamburg, Germany

33 See e.g.: Schippmann et al. (2003). Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues. FAO Document Repository - Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Case Study No. 7 (http://www.fao.org/docrep/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0758-A1.HTM, retrieved on 10 May 2017.)


Yüklə 2,96 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin