Proposed Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for Cattle


A2.4 Standard 5.6 – Exercise of tethered cattle



Yüklə 2,86 Mb.
səhifə19/42
tarix08.01.2019
ölçüsü2,86 Mb.
#92692
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   42

A2.4 Standard 5.6 – Exercise of tethered cattle

According to proposed Standard 5.6, a person in charge must ensure cattle are accustomed to tethering before they are tethered for long periods. A person in charge must ensure tethered cattle are able to exercise daily. Tethering of cattle is a minority practice associated with peri-urban cattle ownership.


The main resource cost of this standard would be the time required to ensure that exercise is undertaken for cattle. Hourly charge out rates for each state and territory are established in Appendix 1 (see column (h) in Table A1.1). Moreover, for the purpose of estimation, the amount of time required per day to exercise permanently tethered cattle would be 10 minutes per animal, even if the exercise is off-leash as some oversight would be required to prevent damage to house paddocks.
Based on advice from AWC the estimated number of cattle permanently tethered by state or territory is summarised in Table A2.4.


Public consultation question 16: Do you know the number or percentage of cattle tethered and requiring exercise under proposed standard S5.6 or any information to improve the estimation of costs?

As shown in Table A2.4, the 10-year cost of exercising permanently tethered cattle under proposed Standard 5.6 is estimated to be approximately $4.76m or $3.13m in 2012-13 present value dollars.


Table A2.4 – 10-year incremental cost of exercising permanently tethered cattle under Standard 5.6 –2012-13 dollars


Jurisdiction

No. of cattle permanently tethered

(t)

Hourly charge out rates

(h)179

Annual cost of exercise

(u) = (t)*(h)*0.167hrs*365 days

10-year cost

(v) = (u)*10

NSW

100

$51

$308,463

$3,084,632

VIC

10

$57

$34,933

$349,328

QLD

10

$49

$30,092

$300,924

SA

10

$49

$29,644

$296,437

WA

10

$55

$33,454

$334,535

TAS

10

$65

$39,585

$395,855

NT

-

$33

$0

$0

ACT

-

$46

$0

$0

Australia

150

 

$476,171

$4,761,711

Present value 7% discount rate

 

 

$3,125,633

3% discount rate

 

 

$3,943,530

10% discount rate

 

 

$2,659,878

A2.5 Standard 5.7 – Electro-immobilisation requirements

Electro-immobilisation180 is the use of pulsed, low-frequency electrical current to restrain an animal. It is an important supplement to cattle restraint for treatments and procedures, most frequently used where, using conventional restraint methods, cattle are highly likely to injure themselves or stock people (Petherick 2005). Electro-immobilisation does not provide pain relief but is useful for assisting cattle treatments and procedures in skilled hands.


According to Standard 5.6, a person must only use electro-immobilisation on cattle if:


  1. the device is approved for use in the jurisdiction181;

  2. the cattle are over six months old;

  3. the operator is trained or it is done under direct supervision of a veterinarian182 or a trained person; and

  4. alternative restraining methods are inadequate to hold cattle sufficiently for the procedure being performed.

The implication of this is that there will be additional training costs in all states and jurisdictions less costs of direct veterinary supervision in New South Wales and Tasmania where the cheaper option of training and accreditation would now be available183. Although Victoria is likely to retain its ban on electro-immobilisation this costing is for the proposed national standards that are intended to replace all other standards. (The proposed national standards represent minimum standards of welfare that do not preclude jurisdictions from retaining existing higher requirements). The standard determines the basis for acceptable use of electro-immobilisation. The risk to industry if this method is banned would be increased costs due to the need to apply different methods of restraint (better veterinary crushes, roping, veterinary sedation and anaesthesia), injuries to stock persons and the need to apply alternative more expensive treatments.


According to AHA, the cost of training and accreditation is likely to be minor as it is envisaged that this would be provided by the retailer as a support service accompanied by a ‘soft’ accreditation approach and estimated to take one hour. This is mainly envisaged as a defensive standard with minimal cost impact. Moreover, according to Dairy Australia this would only be relevant to beef cattle.
It is noted that a total of 45,534184 individuals (i.e. farmhands) are employed in the production of beef cattle. Of this number, it is estimated that 2,212 farmhands are employed in accredited and unaccredited feedlots (see Part A2.18 for discussion and estimate). Therefore the total number of farmhands relevant for this estimation is 45,534 minus 2,212 or 43,322 farmhands. Pro rata estimates of the number of farmhands employed by state and territory are based on the number of beef cattle in each jurisdiction, as outlined in Table A2.5.
Table A2.5 – Total cattle herd by state and territory 2010-11


Jurisdiction

Dairy cattle herd*

(w)

Beef cattle herd **

(x)

Total cattle herd

(y)=(w)+(x)

NSW

200,000

5,383,931

5,583,931

VIC

1,020,000

2,365,850

3,385,850

QLD

90,000

12,449,625

12,539,625

SA

90,000

1,109,640

1,199,640

WA

55,000

1,954,382

2,009,382

TAS

145,000

466,583

611,583

NT

-

2,197,359

2,197,359

ACT

-

8,807

8,807

AUSTRALIA

1,600,000

25,936,177

27,536,177

*Source: Dairy Australia, Australian Dairy Industry in Focus 2011

**Source: ABS (2011) – Agricultural Commodities by State & Territory - Cat. No. 7121.0 2010-11
Based on the total beef cattle herd in column (x) in Table A2.5 the following pro rata estimates of the number of farmhands by state and territory is provided in Table A2.6.
Table A2.6 – Estimated number of beef cattle farmhands by state and territory 2010-11


Jurisdiction

No. Farmhands beef cattle

(z) = 43,322/ 25,936,177 *(x)185

NSW

8,993

VIC

3,952

QLD

20,795

SA

1,853

WA

3,264

TAS

779

NT

3,670

ACT

15

AUSTRALIA

43,322

It is assumed that 1% of farmhands would need to be trained under proposed Standard 5.7 at a time cost of around one hour per farmhand (including training and testing), DVD costs at $1 per disc and reading materials at $0.50 per reading material - per farmhand. It is also assumed that the turnover in the number of beef cattle farmhands will be constant and stable over 10 years, as well as, and those needing training (i.e. 1% or in other words 455 per annum).


The total 10-year incremental training/disc production cost and publication cost is estimated to be approximately $0.22m or $0.15m in 2012-13 present value dollars, as shown in Table A2.7.
Table A2.7 – 10-year incremental training cost of beef cattle farmhands by state and territory under Standard 5.7 –2012-13 dollars


Jurisdiction

No. Farmhands requiring training

(a1)=(z)*1%

Hourly cost

(h)186

Training cost

(b1)=(a1)*(h)

Disc production cost

(c1)=(a1)*$1

Material publication cost

(d1)=(a1)*

$0.50

Annual cost (e1)=(b1)+

(c1)+(d1)

10-year cost

(e1)’= (e1)*10

NSW

90

$51

$4,560

$90

$45

$4,695

$46,949

VIC

40

$57

$2,269

$40

$20

$2,329

$23,285

QLD

208

$49

$10,287

$208

$104

$10,599

$105,986

SA

19

$49

$903

$19

$9

$931

$9,310

WA

33

$55

$1,795

$33

$16

$1,844

$18,442

TAS

8

$65

$507

$8

$4

$519

$5,188

NT

37

$33

$1,221

$37

$18

$1,276

$12,762

ACT

0

$46

$7

$0

$0

$7

$70

Australia

433

 

 

 

 

$22,199

$221,993

Present value 7% discount rate

 

 

 

 




$145,718

3% discount rate

 

 

 

 




$183,849

10% discount rate

 

 

 

 




$124,004

Moreover, there would be an annual cost savings of $220187 per hour of veterinary costs (routine issues for multiple animals188 including travel costs) for around 1.5%189 of beef cattle in New South Wales and Tasmania, as veterinary supervision would no longer be required where training is undertaken. The 10-year cost savings would be equal to $0.39m or $0.26m in 2012-13 present value dollars, as shown in Table A2.8.


Table A2.8 – 10-year incremental cost savings of no longer exclusively requiring veterinary supervision in NSW and TAS for electro-immobilisation under Standard 5.7 –2012-13 dollars


Jurisdiction

No. cattle affected

(f1)= (x)*1.5%

Annual veterinary cost savings

(g1)=(f1)*$220hr/180

10-year cost savings

(h1)=10*(g1)

NSW

80,759

$35,893

$358,929

TAS

6,999

$3,111

$31,106

Australia

87,758

$39,003

$390,034

Present value 7% discount rate

 

$256,022

3% discount rate

 

$323,017

10% discount rate

 

$217,872

The net 10-year incremental cost savings of proposed Standard 5.7 would therefore be approximately equal to $0.17m or $0.11m190 in 2012-13 present value dollars. This reflects purely the impact of the proposed standard on all the jurisdictions and does not reflect the choice of particular states or territories, such as NSW or TAS to retain existing higher standards.




Public consultation question 17: Do you know the number or percentage of cattle subject to electro-immobilisation, the number of farmhands requiring training under proposed standard S5.7 or any information to improve the estimation of training costs?




Yüklə 2,86 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   42




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin