Regulation and enforcement of economic freedoms and social rights: a thorny distribution of sovereignty
Yüklə 246,91 Kb.
|
CML. Rev, p. 1499 at 1508.
NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case C-36/02, Omega Spielhallen- und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn (Ome ga), ECLI:EU:C:2004:614; C-208/09, Sayn-Wittgenstein, ECLI:EU:C:2010:806. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case C-244/06, Dynamic Medien, ECLI:EU:C:2008:85, para. 42. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT K. LENAERTS and J.A. GUTIÉRREZ-FONS, 'The constitutional allocation of powers and general principles of EU law' (2010) 47 CML. Rev., pp. 1629–1669. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT T. TRIDIMAS, General principles of EU law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006, pp. 341. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Sayn-Wittgenstein, supra at 67, para. 92. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT A. VON BOGDANDY and S. SCHILL, ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’ (2011) 48 CML Rev., pp. 1417, 1425. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Schmidberger, supra at 66, para 89. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case 96/67, Albany International v Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Textielindustrie, [1999] ECR I-05751. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Albany, supra at 74, para. 59. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Albany, supra at 74, para. 60. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT See also WEATHERILL, supra at 44, p. 17. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Viking, supra at 3, para. 81. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Laval, supra at 3, para. 98; Viking supra at 3, para. 33. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Laval, supra at 3, para. 84. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Viking, supra at 3, paras. 86-87. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT D. ASHIAGBOR, ‘Unravelling the Embedded Liberal Bargain: Labour and Social Welfare Law in the Context of EU Market Integration’ (2013) 19:3 European Law Journal, pp. 315-316. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Directive 96/71/EC of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, [1996] OJ L 018 , 21.01.1997. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Consideration no. 22 of the preamble to Directive 96/71 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT A. BÜCKER & W. WARNECK (eds.), Reconciling Fundamental Social Rights and Economic Freedoms after Viking, Laval and Rüffert, 2011; A. VAN HOEK and M. HOUWERZIJL, ‘Loonconcurrentie als motor van de interne markt? Deel II’ (2008) no. 12 Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Europees Recht, pp. 337-346. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case C-426/11, Mark Alemo-Herron and others v Parkwood Leisure Ldt. (Alemo Herron), ECLI:EU: C:2013:52. See also S. WEATHERILL, ‘Use and Abuse of the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights: on the improper veneration of freedom of contract’ (2014) 10 European Review of Contract Law, p. 157; J. PRASSL, ‘Freedom of Contract as a General Principle of EU Law? Transfers of Undertakings and the Protection of Employer Rights in EU Labour Law’ (2013) 42 Industrial Law Journal, p. 434. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Art. 8 of Directive 77/187/EEC of 14 February 1977 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States rela ting to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT DE VRIES, supra at 53, p. 332. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT This developed over time, see: P. CRAIG, ‘The Evolution of the Single Market’ in C. BARNARD and J. SCOTT (Eds.), The Law of the Single European Market – Unpacking the Premises, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2002, p. 32. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT D. AUGENSTEIN, ‘Engaging the Fundamentals: On the Autonomous Substance of EU Fundamental Rights Law’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal, p. 1919. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT S. DOUGLAS-SCOTT, ‘The European Union and Human Rights after the Treaty of Lisbon’, (2011) 11 Human Rights Law Review, p. 681. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT ‘Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work’. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT S. PEERS, e.a. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2014, pp. 425-431. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT See: The Future Status of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, Session 2002-03, 6th Report, HL Paper 48; cf. PEERS, supra at 94, p. 438. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case 4/73, Nold, ECLI:EU:C:1974:51. In this case the fundamental status of the right was derived from inter alia the German Basic Law. Still, the freedom to conduct a business is recognised by only a few national constitutions, most notably in States with a history of fascist or dictatorial regime, cf. PEERS, supra at 94. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case C-70/10, Scarlet Extended SA v Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM) (Scarlet Extended), ECLI:EU:C:2011:771. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT S. WEATHERILL, ‘Protecting the Internal Market From the Charter’ in S. DE VRIES, U. BERNITZ and S. WEATHERILL (eds.), Five Years Old and Growing - The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a binding instrument, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2015, forthcoming. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT P. CRAIG and G. DE BÚRCA, EU Law. Text, cases, and materials, 5th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011, p. 398. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Opinion of AG CRUZ VILLALÓN in Case C-176/12, AMS, ECLI:EU:C:2013:491, para. 49. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT K. LENAERTS, ‘Exploring the limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) European Constitutional Law Review, p. 399. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT R. BARENTS, ‘Een grondwet voor Europa (VI): de grondrechten’ (2005) no. 2 Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, p. 44. See TRIDIMAS, supra at 70, pp. 358-359. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case C-176/12, AMS, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT AMS, supra at 103, para. 45. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Opinion of AG CRUZ VILLALÓN in Case C-176/12, AMS, ECLI:EU:C:2013:491, paras. 50-80. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Opinion AMS, supra at 105, para. 49. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Opinion AMS, supra at 105, para. 55. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT See also J.M. SERVAIS, International labour law, Kluwer International, The Hague 2014, p. 104. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT This was recognized by the ECtHR in that it acknowledged that the rights to collective bargaining and collective action, though regulated in the European Social Charter, are an essential part of the civil right to associa tion and, there fore, are protected by Article 11 ECHR (ECtHR 12 November 2008, Appl. No. 34503/97, Demir and Baykara v Turkey; ECtHR, 21 April 2009, Appl. No. 68959/01, Enerji Yapi-Yol Sen v Turkey). NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Opinion AMS, supra at 105, paras. 38-41. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Opinion AMS, supra at 105, para. 31. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT AMS, supra at 103, para. 41. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT AMS, supra at 103, para. 47. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Case C-555/07, Kücükdeveci, ECLI:EU:C:2010:21. NOTEREF _Ref420512544 \h \* MERGEFORMAT BARNARD, supra at 2, pp. 50-51; Opinion of AG Trstenjak in Case C-271/08, European Commission v. Germany, ECLI:EU:C:2010:183. NOTEREF _Ref420512738 \h \* MERGEFORMAT Opinion 2/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454. Yüklə 246,91 Kb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|