Report outline



Yüklə 166,56 Kb.
səhifə2/3
tarix29.07.2018
ölçüsü166,56 Kb.
#61925
1   2   3

Amatola


15

14

406

276

02

02

Central Cape

10

11

268

275

04

02

Drakensberg

08

09

145

200

04

04

East Griqualand

14

14

304

339

06

00

Egoli


03

03

71

80

04

02

Free State


05

05

71

71

02

03

Highveld


06

06

107

102

06

06

Lekoa


03

02

23

30

03

03

Limpopo


10

10

209

186

05

01

Mthatha


14

14

328

327

07

02

Thekwini


05

05

20

20

01

01

Thukela


07

07

65

71

03

02

Transkei


20

20

483

536

06

04

Tshwane








00

48

00

04

Western

Cape


11

13

243

275

08

06

Zambia




















Zimbabwe


36

36







02

00

TOTALS

167

169

2745

2836

64

42


  • As at the time of compiling the report.



    1. TRANSVERSAL CHALLENGES FROM PRESBYTERIES.

The general assessment of our Presbyteries is that they are performing fairly well, but can do better. We are excited by the fact that most of them are beginning to be more focused on their work. What however should worry us, is in areas where the Presbytery is showing a decline, especially in membership and branches. Questions need to be asked as to why do members leave the Guild, or why are they not renewing their membership. If they left where did they go. In situations where branches have declined, the key question is, where the former members of that branch are. These are the questions we should ask, because we cannot afford to be irrelevant to men in the UPCSA. We do have a reason to exist, and those reasons are still there.

Some of the transversal challenges found in our branches and Presbyteries are the following;

      1. Presbyterial EXCO’s do not visit and service branches as they should. This is against the spirit of conference where we agreed that we need to visit our branches regularly. There is absolutely no reason why the PEC cannot visit each of its branches at least twice a year.



      1. The issue of poor attendance of meetings needs to be attended to swiftly. Again it cannot be understood why Branch Executive Committees cannot pay personal visits to members who do not attend meetings. Without active participation of our members, there is no way in which we can build a strong Guild.

      2. The issue of unemployment has been reported in almost all our conferences as a challenge. It is critical that conference should express itself on the issue and find intervention mechanisms.

      3. One of the cross cutting issues is lack of relationship with the ACCM in most Presbyteries. While at the DEC’s level the relationship is excellent, it is lacking at Presbyterial level. Indeed there are Presbyteries where the ACCM is not established as yet, however the CAC has agreed that where the ACCM does not exist, we should assist to establish it.

      4. The issue of commitment from amongst our members is yet another source of concern in our branches. Members do not attend meetings regularly, while at the same time not taking up tasks allocated to them. It is worrying that this is a matter which cuts across a number of branches and Presbyteries. The Commission dealing with Campaigns and Organizing need to look at this issue and find ways and means to resolve it.

      5. One of the issues of concern which arise from Presbyteries is the relationship with some Ministers. Reports indicate that we still have Ministers who not only does not support the Guild, but there are those who actually make it difficult for the MCG to operate in their congregations. This matter has arisen in previous reports, but no concerted efforts were made to address it. Conference need to express itself on the issue and find creative ways of smothering the relations between our members, all our structures and our Ministers, irrespective of whether they are MCG members or not. It is our view that Ministers have a role to play in the life and works of the Guild at all levels of the denomination.

      6. A specific problem which arose in Zimbabwe which may necessitate a constitutional amendment is the demarcation and naming of our structures. While we speak of branches here in SA, they have regions and districts in Zimbabwe. There may be similar situations in Zambia. The Commission dealing with Constitutional amendments is required to look into this matter and accordingly recommend to Conference.



  1. WHERE TO FROM HERE

The MCG Vision 2017 document details the route travelled by the Guild since its formation. Clearly since inception, the MCG has travelled through the chartered waters seeking to fulfill the mandate bestowed upon it by its constitution. In this period, the MCG was pre-occupied by the need to build and ensure unity within the UPCSA. In this regard, we have engaged in honest discussions with the church leadership and our brothers who had left the MCG and were trying to form another association. The MCG saw it as a duty to fulfill the wishes of our forefathers who envisioned the need for a united Presbyterian Church of Christ. Despite the challenges accompanied by this initiative, the MCG remained committed to the unity of our denomination as espoused in the Basis of Union document. We remain committed to this unity as we were when the process started.

At this point, it is important to recognize the fact that we remain focused on this path because we have amongst our myth our veterans and intellectual capital who guided us through this journey. In this regard, they not only taught us about the origin of this initiative union, but they clearly educated us about the rationale for union. We indeed remain indebted to them for sharing their wisdom with us at all times when we required it.

These are the likes of Rev Mdlalose, who over the years, and for the rest of his life, he has dedicated his energy and efforts to the building of a united Church of Christ. Rev Mdlalose has, during his life committed his quality time to the church, especially the MCG, for which he was hurting at the inability of men to unite and worship God together. During the last General Assembly, Rev Mdlalose almost single handedly changed the course of discussions and rechanneled them to the proper context for all to acknowledge that the MCG cannot be equated to a group of men who want to form an association. This he did fearlessly and with fatherly love to ensure that the rationale for union as envisioned by our founding fathers remains on the right path. We are indeed indebted to Rev Mdlalose, upon whom we have relied for wisdom, and always available and ready to give guidance where necessary.

This son of the UPCSA can be described in many words; path finder, critical thinker, father, brother, parent, visionary, information bank, teacher, preacher, intellectual, evangelist and an MCG member for life. Never compromising on principle, he shepherded those of us who got tempted to veer of the path, to remain focused on our brief as the MCG. The MCG is lucky to have such depth of intellectual and committed Christians like Rev Mdlalose, to whom we shall remain indebted for a very long time in the work of our Guild.



It is the same Rev Mdlalose, who reminded us in Egoli in 1996, during the 06th Conference that ours, is an evangelism agenda. This conference, should be a brake with the past. It should be a conference which not only positions the MCG to roll out this evangelism agenda, but a conference which defines the MCG as an evangelist. It must define every MCG structure, member and program, the evangelist. Indeed we should be poised to reach out to every member of society where we live, where we work, in every social circle, in funerals, in weddings, in burial society meetings, in the schools, in the trains and buses, and in every corner of our society, and introduce Christ to them. After 13 years of readying ourselves, we cannot any longer preoccupy ourselves with activities which do not seek to alter the world to Christianity. We have arrived, and this conference should indeed signify a new beginning, where our space and platform will be amongst those who do not believe. This we must do in order to honor those who taught and showed us the ways of Christ and constantly reminded us of our responsibilities.

  1. ORBITUARIES

At this point, we remember those of our brothers who passed on since our last conference. For this period under review we have lost 45 members. These are the MCG soldiers who have fought the battle with us until they reached their destiny on earth. The breakdown of the numbers who passed on per Presbytery herein follows;

NAME OF PRESBYTERY

NUMBER PASSED ON


  1. AMATOLA

00

  1. CENTRAL CAPE

05

  1. DRAKENSBERG

00

  1. EAST GRIQUALAND

21

  1. EGOLI

00

  1. FREE STATE

00

  1. HIGHVELD

00

  1. LEKOA

00

  1. LIMPOPO

01

  1. MTHATHA

00

  1. THUKELA

06

  1. TRANSKEI

09

  1. TSHWANE

03

  1. THEKWINI

00

  1. WESTERN CAPE

00

  1. ZAMBIA

00

  1. ZIMBABWE

00

TOTAL

45

  • As at the time of compiling the report.

The names of these fallen brothers are herein attached in the addendum. Their memorial service will be held during the course of conference.

  1. CONCLUSION AND DELIVERANCES

We have arrived at yet another momentous year in the MCG. There is no doubt that we have been abundantly blessed for this period judging by the successes that we registered. Clearly our successful Denominational Council in Zimbabwe was not only historic, but mainly served to confirm the trans-national character of our denomination. It is our hope that the Council we envisage in Zambia in 2014 will be as successful.

Indeed there is a lot that can still be done. The fact that we still have many men within our church who are outside the MCG remains a challenge that we should confront in the coming year. This should include our ability to make the MCG reflect the demographics of our denomination. This conference, as we said, should be a break with the past, and the ushering of a new beginning into the future. That future should reflect an MCG that is relevant, responsive and duty bound to bring more men into the church. We should be an MCG on whom those with less faith should find solace, and be the real centre of evangelism within our denomination and the society where we live.



MAY THE GOOD LORD BLESS THIS CONFERENCE AND GIVE US THE WISDOM TO DETERMINE OUR FUTURE WITHIN HIM.

ON BEHALF OF THE DENOMINATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, WE DULY PRESENT THIS ANNUAL REPORT TO CONFERENCE FOR CONSIDERATION.

  1. RECOMMENDATIONS/DELIVERANCES



    1. That this report be received.

    2. That Conference note the successful Council held in Zimbabwe.

    3. That Conference note that progress is being made both at Denominational and Presbyterial levels with implementation of conference decisions.

    4. That conference notes that there is a need to give attention to Zambia and ensure their full participation in MCG programs.

    5. That the contents and the recommendations contained in the report be referred to the Groups for discussion.



  1. LIST OF DEPARTED BROTHERS



NAME

PRESBYTERY

BRANCH

  1. William T Moloi

East Griqualand

Springside

  1. Thabo Hene

East Griqualand

Springside

  1. Ernest Sphambo

East Griqualand

Springside

  1. Normack Mzilikazi

East Griqualand

Upper Mkhemane

  1. Kiviet Mbutsi

East Griqualand

Mbonda

  1. Wilson Dyantyi

East Giqualand

Mbonda

  1. S. Tenene

East Griqualand

Mpharane

  1. K. Mokatswana

East Griqualand

Mpharane

  1. S. Phuthing

East Griqualand

Mpharane

  1. P. Dladlamba

East Griqualand

T.T.Dekeda

  1. K. Sithunzela

East Griqualand

T.T.Dekeda

  1. Mtshutshi Matamela

East Griqualand

Yekelo Mbali

  1. T. Tswele

East Griqualand

Tsekong

  1. Simon Mtshawuli

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Phillip Sikisi

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Leanard Ngwebushe

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Elliot Msitshana

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Brother Zibele

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Wiseman Mangqokhwe

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Alfred Sokhanyile

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Berrington Msitshana

East Griqualand

Gillipse

  1. Soul Mishack Lekau Mamabolo

Limpopo

Blaauwberg

  1. Bro E Mcunu

Thukela

Douglas

  1. Bro G.O Ndlovu

Thukela

Msinga

  1. Bro P Hlatswayo

Thukela

Ernest Ntuli

  1. Bro P Dlamini

Thukela

Endumisweni

  1. Bro B.M.Ndlovu

Thukela

Ulundi

  1. Bro H Hlatswayo

Thukela

BW Zulu

  1. Boiboi T.N.

Tshwane

Phola

  1. Nqevu S.N.

Tshwane

Phola

  1. Ndabankulu G

Tshwane

Khayakhulu

  1. Bro AF Gaca

Transkei

Maclay

  1. Bro AV Xuba

Transkei

Kidston

  1. Bro Z Feti

Transkei

Main

  1. Bro GN Tsotsi

Transkei

Njikelana

  1. Bro N Mbanga

Transkei

Njikelana

  1. Bro R Mbasa

Transkei

Njikelana

  1. Bro NZ Manya

Transkei

Njikelana

  1. Bro IM Dubula

Transkei

Duff

  1. Bro MV Mthintsilana

Transkei

Duff

  1. Bro Phutumani

Central Cape

JY Hliso

  1. Bro Mapeyi

Central Cape

Plettenberg Bay

  1. Bro Mbilase

Central Cape

M Makwetu

  1. Bro Ramncwana

Central Cape

M Makwetu

  1. Bro Gcantsana

Central Cape

Uitenhage











  1. Yüklə 166,56 Kb.

    Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin