Chapter 1 37
Introduction 37
Scope of the review 37
INFORMATION PAPER 38
CONSULTATION PROCESS 38
STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT 39
Draft Cremations and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 40
Terminology 40
Dead body / human remains 40
The terms of reference for this review use the term ‘dead body’, as do many of the cases in this area. In contrast, the Cremations Act 2003 (Qld) uses the term ‘human remains’, which it defines in the following terms: 40
Ashes 41
Personal representative 41
Potential administrator 43
Matters outside the Terms of Reference 43
Currency 44
Chapter 2 45
Lawful Methods for the Disposal of Human Remains 45
Introduction 45
Methods of disposal 45
Burial 45
Cremation 46
Aquamation 48
In recent times, aquamation has emerged as an additional method for the disposal of a dead body. Aquamation uses a process called alkaline hydrolysis to dissolve the body. At the end of the process, the remaining bones are crushed and can be provided to a deceased person’s family. In this respect, aquamation has a similar outcome to cremation. Advocates of aquamation suggest that it is a more environmentally friendly process than conventional cremation. 48
Other methods of disposal 50
other legislation regulating aspects of the disposal of human remains 50
Section 236(b) of the Criminal Code (Qld) makes it an offence for a person, without lawful justification or excuse, to improperly or indecently interfere with, or offer any indignity to, a dead human body or human remains. Section 236 provides: 50
The law in other jurisdictions 50
New South Wales 51
In New South Wales, the Public Health (Disposal of Bodies) Regulation 2002 (NSW) has recently been amended to recognise ‘alkaline hydrolysis’ (commonly referred to as aquamation) as a lawful method for the disposal of a dead body. 51
Victoria 51
The Cemeteries and Crematoria Act 2003 (Vic) enables the Secretary of the Department of Health (the equivalent of a chief executive or director-general in Queensland) to give his or her approval for a cemetery trust to use a method other than interment (burial) or cremation to dispose of ‘bodily remains’, whether generally, for a class of disposals or for a specific disposal. Such an approval may be made subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary thinks fit. 51
Information Paper 52
Consultation 52
The Commission’s view 54
Mechanism for approving new methods of disposal 54
Scope of legislative provisions 55
Ministerial approval 55
Maximum penalty 56
Application of other legislation 56
Specific regulation in the future 57
recommendations 57
Chapter 3 60
Places for the Disposal of Human Remains and Ashes 60
Introduction 60
Burial in a cemetery or in a place other than a cemetery 60
The common law 61
The tort of trespass protects the interest of a person in maintaining ‘the right to exclusive possession of [his or] her place of residence, free from uninvited physical intrusion by strangers’. If a person wishes to bury human remains on land that is not owned by that person, it is necessary (in addition to any governmental approvals or consents that may be required) to obtain the consent of the owner of the land. In the absence of that consent, burying the human remains on the land will constitute a trespass to land. 61
Entick v Carrington has been applied in Australia: see Halliday v Nevill (1984) 155 CLR 1, 10 (Brennan J); Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635, 639 (Mason CJ, Brennan and Toohey JJ). 61
Commonwealth government regulation 61
State government regulation 62
Local government regulation 66
The law in other jurisdictions 74
Burial at sea 76
Commonwealth regulation 76
State government regulation 81
Local government regulation 84
Places for cremation 84
The common law 84
Commonwealth government regulation 84
State government regulation 84
Local government regulation 85
The law in other jurisdictions 87
Places for the disposal of ashes 88
The common law 88
As explained below, the scattering of ashes does not generally require any governmental approvals or permits. However, this does not mean that a person may bury or scatter ashes in a way that would constitute a trespass to property or create a nuisance at common law. For example, although a deceased person may have had a wish to have his or her ashes scattered at a particular venue, such as Lang Park, the scattering of ashes at that venue without the consent of the relevant landowner would be a trespass to property. 88
Commonwealth government regulation 88
State government regulation 89
Local government regulation 89
The law in other jurisdictions 91
Information Paper 92
Consultation 92
The Commission’s view 94
Burial of human remains in a place other than a cemetery 94
Burial at sea 95
Cremation of human remains at a place other than a crematorium 96
Disposal of ashes 97
Maximum penalties 98
Short title of Act 99
Recommendations 99
Chapter 4 102
An Overview of the Current Law:
The Right to Decide the Method and Place of Disposal 102
Introduction 102
When a person dies, the first priority is to arrange for the disposal of the person’s body. In this chapter, the Commission outlines who has legal rights and duties to decide the method and place of disposal of the human remains of a deceased person. 102
Where there is an executor 103
Where there is an administrator 105
Where there is no executor and no administrator has been appointed 109
As it takes some time to obtain a grant of letters of administration, it will usually be impractical, in cases where there is no will, to delay the disposal of the body of a deceased person until after an administrator has been appointed. Further, in some cases, there may be no intention to obtain a grant of administration. 109
Persons with an equal entitlement to possession of a dead body for disposal 113
The effect of directions given by the deceased 115
Although a deceased person may have given directions about the disposal of his or her body, an executor or administrator is not obliged at common law to act in accordance with those instructions. However, as explained later in this chapter, section 7(3) of the Cremations Act 2003 (Qld) overrides the common law in relation to the effect of signed instructions left by the deceased for his or her body to be cremated. 115
The payment of funeral expenses 115
Statutory modifications under The Cremations Act 2003 (Qld) 116
Signed instructions of the deceased person 116
Section 7 of the Cremations Act 2003 (Qld) deals with the circumstance in which a deceased person’s personal representative is arranging for the disposal of the deceased’s human remains and knows that the deceased has left signed instructions to be cremated. That section provides: 116
The effect of a third party’s objection to cremation 117
The approved form for an application for permission to cremate 120
Burials Assistance Act 1965 (Qld) 121
Chapter 5 122
Recognition of Funerary Instructions Left by a Deceased Person 122
The law in Queensland 122
The law in other jurisdictions 124
Australia 124
Canada 127
United States of America 128
Recognition of funerary instructions left by a deceased person 129
Issue for consideration 129
Information Paper 132
Consultation 132
The Commission’s view 133
Limits on what may constitute funerary instructions 136
Issue for consideration 136
Information Paper 137
Consultation 138
The Commission’s view 139
Persons who should be required to carry out a deceased person’s funerary instructions 140
It is not uncommon for a person who is not the personal representative of a deceased person to arrange for the disposal of the deceased’s body. For example, although the spouse of a deceased person might be the deceased’s executor (and therefore have the legal entitlement to dispose of the deceased’s body), an adult child of the deceased might make the necessary arrangements with a funeral director because the surviving parent is too distressed or frail to make the arrangements personally. 140
Information Paper 141
Consultation 141
The Commission’s view 142
Formal requirements for funerary instructions 143
Issue for consideration 143
Consultation 145
The Commission’s view 146
Prohibition on issuing permission to cremate or allowing cremation 148
Introduction 148
The Commission’s view 149
Consequential amendments 151
Burials Assistance Act 1965 (Qld) 151
Transplantation and Anatomy Regulation 2004 (Qld) 152
Recommendations 152
Chapter 6 158
The Right to Control the Disposal of Human Remains 158
Introduction 158
the Common law approach 159
Legislative developments in Canada 162
Issues for reform of The Common Law Approach 164
Guiding principles 164
The primacy of the executor 165
Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander kinship structures 166
Many of the cases regarding who should have the duty and right of disposal have involved disputes between the surviving spouse or de facto partner of an Aboriginal deceased and members of the deceased’s Aboriginal family. Often these conflicts have involved the wishes of the deceased’s family to bury the deceased in his or her traditional homeland in keeping with customary law and those of the deceased’s spouse to have the deceased buried elsewhere. In some cases, there have been competing cultural beliefs and practices about who has the right of disposal in relation to the deceased or where the disposal of the deceased’s remains should take place. 166
Disputes between persons with an equal entitlement 168
The exercise of the court’s discretion to determine disputes 169
The common law authorities have expressed different views about the extent to which the court, when determining who should have the duty and right of disposal, should give consideration to cultural and spiritual beliefs and practices where such factors are present. 169
A new Legislative Scheme 173
Information Paper 173
Consultation 174
The Commission’s view 180
The Position of a Person Who is, or may be, criminally responsible for the death of a deceased person 190
Introduction 190
The common law 190
Comparison with succession law 194
Legislation in other jurisdictions 195
Information Paper 195
Consultation 195
The Commission’s view 197
The jurisdiction of the court 202
The Supreme Court 203
The Coroners Court 205
Mediation 207
Information Paper 207
Consultation 208
The Commission’s view 208
The effect of a Third party’s objection to cremation 210
Cremations Act 2003 (Qld) 210
The law in other jurisdictions 211
The Commission’s view 211
A statutory duty to consult 213
Information paper 213
Consultation 214
The Commission’s view 216
Recommendations 216
Chapter 7 222
The Right to Control the Disposal of Ashes 222
Introduction 222
The Commission’s terms of reference require it to review the law regarding the rights and duties associated with the disposal of a dead body. The terms of reference refer, among other things, to: 222
disposal of the ashes of a deceased person 223
The Right to Control the disposal of ashes 223
The common law 224
There has been little judicial consideration of the rights relating to the possession and disposal of ashes. The few cases that have arisen for determination have turned uniquely on their own facts. 224
Cremations Bill 2002 (Qld) 228
Clause 11 of the Cremations Bill 2002 (Qld), as it was originally introduced into Parliament, imposed ‘obligations on the person in charge of a crematorium in respect of the return of ashes’. Clause 11 was initially expressed in the following terms: 228
Cremations Act 2003 (Qld) 230
Section 11 of the Cremations Act 2003 (Qld) provides: 230
The legislation in other jurisdictions 233
Issues for consideration 239
Information Paper 240
Consultation 241
The Commission’s view 243
The crematorium operator’s Dealings with the ashes in the absence of instructions 247
Giving the ashes to another person 247
Disposing of the ashes other than by burial 249
Information Paper 250
Consultation 250
The Commission’s view 251
Protection from liability for person in charge of crematorium 255
The Commission’s view 255
Exercising the discretion to make decisions about the disposal of ashes 255
Effect of the deceased’s wishes 256
Consideration of the claims of others 258
Information Paper 259
The Commission’s view 259
The Commission’s general approach to decision-making about the disposal of the deceased’s body and ashes embodies, among others, two important objectives: to recognise and respect the choices made by a person about the disposal of his or her remains or ashes; and otherwise to preserve the decision-making discretion of the person with decision-making authority. To this end, the Commission has recommended: 259
Recommendations 262
Chapter 8 269
Miscellaneous Issues 269
Application of recommended provisions to particular human remains 269
Introduction 269
Human remains that have been buried for one year or more 270
Body parts taken during a medical procedure or autopsy 271
Aboriginal human remains and Torres Strait Islander human remains 273
The Commission’s view 275
Transitional provision 275
Introduction 275
The Commission’s view 276
In the Commission’s view, the legislation that implements the draft Cremations and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 (the ‘Cremations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2011’) should include a provision to the effect that: 276
Community awareness 276
The Commission’s view 276
Recommendations 277
Appendix A 279
Terms of Reference 279
Appendix B 281
Local Government Regulation of Burial and Scattering of Ashes in Queensland 281
Appendix C 291
Draft Cremations and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 291
The provisions of this Act relating to cremations shall not apply to the cremation of any human body which has already been buried for a period of not less than one year:
(b) the retention of the prescribed tissue is necessary for the investigation of the death, despite any concerns raised with the coroner about the retention of the prescribed tissue.