Risk Assessment & jsa



Yüklə 0,76 Mb.
səhifə2/4
tarix10.10.2022
ölçüsü0,76 Mb.
#118206
1   2   3   4
HSE-BMS-006 Risk Assessment & JSA

2. RISK MANAGEMENT

  • 2. RISK MANAGEMENT
  • Risk Management in its broadest sense represents the successful control of all threats of harm and loss to an organisation, group of people or an individual
  • 3. QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT
  • This type of assessment produces numerical values of the risk involved and evaluates the results against specified risk criteria.
  • 4. DANGER
  • Danger is a state or situation, which is a product of a hazard and it’s associated risk.
  • Definition

5. ACCIDENT

  • 5. ACCIDENT
  • An accident is commonly defined as an unplanned event, which result in Injury or Damage.
  • 6. INCIDENT
  • An incident is an event, which represents deviation from the intended sequence of designed steps. Commonly defined as an unplanned event, which does not result in Injury or Damage A “Near Miss” is by definition an Incident.
  • 7. RISK
  • A risk is the likelihood that harm may result being a function of both frequency and severity. The risk can range from the trivial (a paper cut) to catastrophic accident
  • Definition

8. SAFE OR SAFETY

  • 8. SAFE OR SAFETY
  • Often thought of as representing the level of security and freedom from harm.There is no such thing as complete safety, an appropriate definition might be “the maximum level of risk a person or organisation is prepared to accept”
  • 9. HAZARD
  • A hazard is something with the potential to cause harm. This can be substances or machines, methods of work and other aspects of work organisations
  • 10. Harm
  • Harm represents physical injury, death, ill health, property and equipment damage and any from of associated loss
  • Definition
  • Risk assessments for all field (site activities)
  • Hazard Operability Studies (HAZOPS)
  • Hazard Identification Studies (HAZIDS)
  • Job Safety Analysis (JSA)
  • Tool Box Talks
  • Risk management Tools
  • Identify
  • Analyse
  • PLAN
  • Track
  • Control
  • Communication and Documentation
  • GENERIC RISK ASSESSMENT
  • A generic or group assessment is a general assessment of the risk posed by a combination of discrete or separate risks of varying type & severity. The risk assessment process can be managed more efficiently by producing generic risk assessments that are applicable to as many people or places as possible
  • SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENT
  • Some specific hazards where a generic risk assessment has not been carried out, or where it is not considered suitable or sufficient, then a specific risk assesment should be made.
  • Risk Assessment Process
  • Safe Place Strategies
  • Eliminate the Hazard – the very best thing to do if possible
  • Reduce the Hazard
  • Isolate Hazard from people
  • Control the extent of exposure/contact with the hazard
  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) almost the last resort
  • Discipline
  • Hierarchy of Control
  • Safe Person Strategies
  • STAGES
  • Identify & analyse all tasks
  • Identify hazards that are, or may be involved
  • Identify those who may be exposed to the hazards
  • Analyse the risks of injury or loss from hazards
  • Evaluate if the risk is adequately controlled (consider existing control measures)
  • Monitor & review
  • Risk Management Process
  • METHODS OF HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
  • Accident Investigations
  • Safety Survey or Safety Tours
  • Communication (Tool Box Talks etc)
  • Job Safety Analysis (JSA)
  • Special Risk Assessment techniques such as:
    • Hazard Operability Studies (HAZOPs)
    • Quantified Risk Assessment (QRA)
    • Hazard Operability Studies (HAZIDs)
  • Stage Two – Identify Hazards
  • Workforce directly involved in activity
  • Other employees personnel
  • Visitors
  • Members of the public
  • Stage Three – Identify People at Risk
  • The purpose of the Risk Analysis stage is to obtain an idea of the size or the scale of the risk.
  • Put simply,
  • A Risk Assessment is finding out what could cause harm to people (Environment, Task or Equipment)
  • and deciding if we have done enough, or need to do more to protect them,
  • or better still to ensure we meet the Project H&S Policy that all risks are As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP)
  • Stage Four – Risk Assessment
  • QUALITATIVE TECHNIQUES
  • Where risk is expressed in terms of High, Medium or Low
  • QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
  • Attempt to express risk in numerical terms & will be based on calculation using data of failure rates of equipment, human error, etc
  • RISK EVALUATION
  • Risk evaluation is determined by the Likelihood of the incident event occurring multiplied by the Severity of the incident
  • LIKELIHOOD X SEVERITY = RISK
  • Stage Four – Risk Assessment
  • Risk Assessment Matrix
  • LIKELIHOOD POTENTIAL is determined as follows:
  • E - Happens several time per year in this project – could happen at any time
  • D - Happens several time per year in our Corporate – could happen sometimes
  • C - Incident has occurred in our Corporate – could happen, but very rarely
  • B - Heard of in construction industry – could happen, but probably never will
  • A - Never heard in construction industry – theoretical
  • Risk Evaluation - Likelihood

Harm to People

  • Risk Evaluation - Severity
  • Harm to People
  • 0 No injury or damage to health.
  • 1 Slight injury or health effects (including First Aid case and Medical Treatment case and Occupational illness) - Not affecting work performance or causing disability.
  • 2 Minor injury or health effects (Lost Time Injury ) -Affecting work performance, such as restriction to activities (Restricted work Case or Occupational Illness) or a need to take a few days to fully recover (Lost Workday Case). Minor health effects, which are reversible, e.g. skin irritation, food poisoning.

Harm to People

  • Risk Evaluation - Severity
  • Harm to People
  • 3 Major injury or health effects (including Permanent Partial Disability and Occupational Illness) -Affecting work performance in the longer term, such as a prolonged absence from work. Irreversible health damage without loss of life, e.g. noise induced hearing loss, chronic back injuries, sensitization, hand/arm vibration syndrome, repetitive strain injury.
  • 4 Permanent Total Disability or one to three fatalities - from an accident or occupational illness. Irreversible health damage with serious disability or death, e.g. corrosive burns, heat stroke, cancer (small exposed population)
  • 5 Multiple fatalities - from an accident or occupational illness (e.g. chemical asphyxiation or cancer (large exposed population)

Asset Damage and other Consequential Business Losses (USD)

  • Risk Evaluation - Severity
  • Asset Damage and other Consequential Business Losses (USD)
  • 0 Zero damage 
  • 1 Slight damage - No disruption to operation (costs less than 10,000)
  • 2 Minor damage- Brief disruption (cost less than 100,000)
  • 3 Local damage- Partial shutdown (can be restarted but costs up to 1,000,000)
  • 4 Major damage- Partial operation loss (2 weeks shutdown costs up to 10,000,000)
  • 5 Extensive damage- Substantial or total loss of operation (costs in excess of 10,000,000)

Environmental Effect

  • Risk Evaluation - Severity
  • Environmental Effect
  • 0 Zero effect - No environmental damage. No financial consequences.
  • 1 Slight effect - Slight environmental damage, within the fence and within systems. Negligible financial consequences.
  • 2 Minor effect - Sufficiently large contamination or discharge to damage to attack the environment, but no lasting effect. Single breach of statutory or prescribed limit, or single complaint.
  • 3 Localized effect - Limited discharges affecting the neighborhood and damaging the environment. Repeated breaches of statutory or prescribed limit, or many complains.

Environmental Effect

  • Risk Evaluation - Severity
  • Environmental Effect
  • 4 Major effect - Severe environmental damage. The company is required to take extensive measures to restore the damaged environment. Extended breaches of statutory or prescribed limits, or widespread nuisance.
  • 5 Massive effect - Persistent severe environmental damage or severe nuisance extending over a large area. Loss of commercial, or recreational use or nature conservancy resulting in major financial consequences for the Company. Ongoing breaches well above statutory or prescribed limits.

Impact on reputation

  • Risk Evaluation - Severity
  • Impact on reputation
  • 0 Zero effect - No public awareness.
  • 1 Slight impact - Public awareness may exist, but there is no public concern.
  • 2 Limited impact - some local public concern. Some local media and/or local political attention with potentially adverse aspects for company operations.
  • 3 Considerable impact - Regional public concern. Extensive adverse attention in local media. Slight national media and/or local/regional political attention. Adverse stance of local government and/or action groups.

Impact on Reputation

  • Risk Evaluation - Severity
  • Impact on Reputation
  • 4 National impact - National public concern. Extensive adverse attention in the national media. Effect on Regional/national policies with potentially restrictive measures and/or impact on grant of licenses. Mobilization of action groups.
  • 5 International impact - International public attention. Extensive adverse attention in international media. National/international policies with potentially severe impact on access to new areas, grants of licenses and/or tax legislation.
  • Risk Assessment - Sample
  • All
  • B2
  • B
  • 2
  • Foreman
  • Check scaffolds after adverse weather condition
  • C2
  • C
  • 2
  • Adverse weather
  • Scaffolders / All
  • B1
  • B
  • 1
  • Foreman
  • Barricade area during erection & Dismantling
  • E3
  • E
  • 3
  • Falls of Materials
  • Scaffolders
  • B2
  • B
  • 2
  • Foreman
  • Check ground condition. Use base plate & sole plate. Use proper materials
  • B4
  • B
  • 4
  • Collapse of Scaffold
  • Scaffolders
  • B3
  • B
  • 3
  • Foreman/ Scaffolders
  • Scaffolders working above 1.8m must be 100% tie off. Hand rails to be fitted
  • D3
  • D
  • 3
  • Scaffolders
  • B1
  • B
  • 1
  • Foreman
  • Sufficient personnel, “No Bombing”
  • C1
  • C
  • 1
  • Manual Handling
  • Scaffolder / Foreman
  • B1
  • B
  • 1
  • Foreman
  • Only trained and competent personnel to utilized for the task. All scaffolds to be certified prior to use
  • C3
  • C
  • 3
  • Competence Level
  • Scaffold Erection / Dismantling
  • R
  • LF
  • SF
  • R
  • LF
  • SF
  • Person affected (to be informed)
  • Risk After Control
  • By whom
  • Precautions
  • Risk Before Control
  • Hazards
  • Activities

Yüklə 0,76 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin