[R]ules of jus cogens, or peremptory norms of general international law…have been defined in Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969…as norms ‘accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character’…
[R]ules of jus cogens, or peremptory norms of general international law…have been defined in Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969…as norms ‘accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character’…
In a sense, both types of customs are socially enforced, and a violation is cause for general shock and scorn rather than immediate punishment by a government authority.
Customary Law: State Practice and Opinio Juris
Unfortunately, it is hard to prove that a custom exists. Two elements must be proven – State practice and opinio juris.
“Practice” indicates the State’s overt behavior where as opinio juris means the State’s belief that the practice is required as a matter of international law. State practice refers to general and consistent practice by states, while opinio juris means that the practice is followed out of a belief of legal obligation.