The Trade-
A Personal Experience
In the course of conducting the interviews for this book, I came to realize that one of my primary motives for
the entire project was a quest for self-discovery. Although I have been a net profitable trader over the years
(substantially multiplying a small initial stake on two separate occasions), I had a definite sense of failure about my
trading. Given the extent of my knowledge and experience about markets and trading, as well as the fact that on
numerous occasions I had correctly anticipated major price moves, I felt that my winnings were small potatoes
compared to what I should have made.
In one of my trips for this book, on one evening, I was interviewed at length about my trading by Dr. Van
Tharp, and the very next evening, I had a probing conversation about my trading with the very perceptive Ed
Seykota. This back-to-back experience caused me to focus intensely on the flaws that had prevented me from
reaching what I perceived to be my true potential as a trader.
As a result of this self-examination, I came to realize that one of my great errors had been failing to exploit
major price moves that I had correctly anticipated. Invariably, my initial position would be far too small, given the
potential I perceived in such trades. This mistake was then compounded by a highly premature liquidation of the
position. Typically, I would take profits on the first leg of the price move, with the intention of reentering the position
on a correction. The problem was that subsequent corrections usually fell short of my reentry points and, refusing to
chase the market, I ended up watching the rest of the price move unfold while I was on the sidelines. I vowed to
myself that the next time such a situation would arise, I would make a concentrated effort to come closer to realizing
the true potential of the trade.
I did not have to wait very long. Two weeks later, while on a plane to Chicago to conduct some further
interviews, I was thinking about my review of the price charts the previous evening. I recalled that I had come away
with the distinct impression that precious metal prices were ready to move higher, even though the foreign currency
markets appeared vulnerable to further price erosion. Suddenly, the trade I should have made became crystal clear.
Given my combination of expectations, a trade of long precious metals and short foreign currencies would be
particularly attractive. (Since these markets normally move in the same direction, the combined position implied less
risk than an outright long position in precious metals.) I made a mental note to generate some charts on this trade at
my first opportunity.
The next morning, I found a quote machine capable of generating price charts and sat down to evaluate
various price relationships. First, I looked at the interrelationships between silver, gold, and platinum and decided
that silver was my preferred buy among the metals. Then I reviewed the interrelationships between the various
foreign currencies and decided that the Swiss franc appeared to be the weakest currency. Having made these two
determinations, I then reviewed charts of the silver/Swiss franc ratio for various time spectrums, ranging from ten
years to one month.
This analysis led me to the conclusion that we were at the brink of a possible multiyear advance of silver
relative to the Swiss franc. Although I had intended not to trade because my traveling prevented me from paying
attention to the markets, the potential of the trade seemed so dynamic that I had to put on at least a base position.
To be done properly, a ratio trade requires approximately equal dollar positions in each market. I quickly calculated
that at the prevailing price levels, it would require approximately three long silver contracts to balance one short
Swiss franc contract.
I looked at a short-term chart of the silver/Swiss franc price ratio. To my dismay, the price ratio had already
moved sharply in the direction of my intended trade since my realization about it the previous morning. Even on that
morning's opening, the trade could have been implemented at much more favorable price levels. As I was trying to
decide what to do, the silver/Swiss franc ratio continued to move higher and higher. I decided that I had to act to
prevent the possibility of missing this trade altogether. I immediately called in an order establishing the minimum
position of long three silver contracts and short one Swiss franc contract. No sooner had I placed the order than the
price ratio seemed to reach its peak and began retreating. The ratio pulled back further during the next two days. As
it turned out, I had managed to implement the trade at the exact worst possible moment in time since the inception
of my idea. However, the silver/Swiss franc price ratio quickly recovered, and a few days later I was well ahead.
At this point, I thought about my recent realization regarding my continued failure to adequately profit from
major price moves. I decided to maintain my position and, moreover, selected a reaction point for doubling up the
position. The correction came about a week later and I followed my game plan. My timing proved good, as the trade
once again rebounded in my favor—this time with double the initial position. Given my account size (approximately
$70,000 at the time), the long six silver/short two Swiss franc position was about twice as large as the one I normally
would have held. My efforts to correct my aforementioned trading flaw seemed to be paying off, as the trade raced in
my favor during the following two weeks. Within a month of putting on the trade, my account was up over 30
percent.
I now faced a dilemma: On the one hand, my new-found realization suggested that I hang on to the trade for
the long run. On the other hand, one of my other rales is that if you are ever lucky enough to realize a very large
profit on a trade very quickly, take it, because you will usually get an opportunity to reenter the trade at considerably
more favorable levels. The second rale came to mind when the silver/Swiss franc price ratio began falling.
A cursory examination of the price charts suggested it might be prudent to take at least partial profits. I
should have done more analysis to reach a decision. However, the combination of having undertaken a new job, while
at the same time writing this book, left me with very little time and energy to focus on other areas—trading included.
Instead of doing the necessary work, I made a snap judgment to stay with the trade.
The trade now moved swiftly against me, and within a week, I had given back a significant portion of my
earlier gains.
Although a week earlier, I had rationalized that my substantial profits would give me enough of a comfort
cushion in the event of a reaction, now that such a reaction had occurred, I found that I had seriously misjudged my
comfort level. Suddenly, I was concerned that I might give back all my profits, and possibly even ride the trade into a
158
loss. I could not decide whether to blow out of the trade or stay with it as initially planned.
That night I had a dream. I was talking to a friend of mine, who is a developer of software for the analysis of
futures and options markets, but not a trader. In my dream, he had begun trading. We were talking about trading
and my current dilemma regarding the silver/Swiss franc position.
My friend commented on my predicament, "Everybody gets what they want out of the markets." I replied,
"You sound just like Ed Seykota." This sounded a bit odd to me, since as far as I knew, he did not even know
Seykota. To my surprise, he answered, "I have been talking to Ed Seykota for a while and I have been winning in my
trading ever since."
He had a sheet in front of him, with one of the columns indicating his month-to-month ending equity. I
glanced at the sheet and was astounded to see that the last figure exceeded $18 million. I exclaimed, "Bert, you have
made $18 million in the market! I hope you plan to take a few million out for safekeeping." "No, I need all the money
for trading," he replied. "But that is crazy," I said. "Take $3 or $4 million out, and that way you will be sure then that
no matter what happens, you will come out way ahead." "I know what I am doing, and as long as I do my homework
on the markets every day, I am not concerned," he replied.
His answer had implied, quite correctly, that I did not diligently do my homework on the markets every day.
His point, although unstated, was quite clear: If I did my work on the markets every day, I wouldn't have any trouble
understanding why he did not need to pull out several million dollars in profits from his account to feel confident that
he would not lose back all his profits in trading.
"You say you don't have enough time each day to do your work on the markets. You are too busy with your
new job and writing your book. Here, letme show you something." He started citing assumptions regarding the sales
of my book, royalties per copy sold, and the total hours I had spent writing the book. He then scribbled various
calculations on a yellow pad. He arrived at a final figure of $18.50 per hour. "Here," he said, "this is what you are
making on your book." The tone of his voice implied that I was crazy to jeopardize tens of thousands of dollars in my
trading for such a paltry sum. (Actually, the $18.50 estimate is probably wildly overinflated, but remember this was a
dream.)
It was no coincidence that this dream occurred the night after editing the section of the Marty Schwartz
interview dealing with his diligence in doing his daily homework on the markets. I realized that there are no shortcuts.
If you want to be a good trader, you have to do your work on the markets every day. If there is not enough time, you
have to make time. The costs for straying from this daily discipline, in terms of lost profit opportunities as well as
losses, can be very substantial. The message my subconscious seemed to be crying out was: If you are going to be
serious about trading, you have to reestablish your time priorities.
159
160
|