(d) It is not true that the identity of Voters could not be verified.
(e) There are no serious flaws in the Voters Register and no Voters were denied a chance to scrutinise the Registers with a view to correcting flaws if any.
(f) It is not true that the Petitioner’s Polling Agents were denied the opportunity to safeguard the interests of the Petitioner at the time of polling, counting and tallying of votes and there is no evidence that illegal voters voted and legitimate voters voted more than once as alleged
(g) The 2nd Respondent did not hinder the Petitioner from freely canvassing for support but on the contrary the Petitioner traversed the whole country during the campaign period.
