|
Enabling Global Open Access through Collaboration Agenda Motivations for oa
|
tarix | 02.11.2017 | ölçüsü | 487 b. | | #27596 |
|
Enabling Global Open Access through Collaboration
Agenda Motivations for OA International Initiatives The Dual Road to OA - Institutional Repositories - Current Status
- Open Access Journals - Bioline International as a case study
Roles of Libraries in the Global OA Movement
Why Open Access? Open Access is intended to improve research access, thereby maximizing research impact Equalize the north-south flow of knowledge, thereby creating a truly global knowledge commons
Opportunities ?
Paradox of R&D and Scholarly Communications Emphasis on generation of research - lack of attention to its dissemination, even less attention on preservation and stewardship Publicly funded research results privately owned Eagerness to translate university research into marketable products Growing “enclosure” of the knowledge commons
Open Access ? Scholarly literature that are freely available online Primarily peer-reviewed journal publications Directed at publicly funded research Free from price barrier Free from permission barrier Free to copy and reuse Free to distribute
Other problems Data, information, knowledge highly fragmented High cost of research literature Divergence of information systems Lost of digital information Indigenous knowledge systems poorly represented - “lost” science
Added benefits of OA Increase citation impact and hence return on investment Raise institutional prestige New usage of research results Promote collaboration and broaden participation Enable new service and business models Enhance public subsidies
International Initiatives Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) Berlin Declaration on Open Access (2003) World Summit on the Information Society, Geneva (2003): Principles and Plan of Actions; Tunis Commitment, Tunisia (2005) OECD Ministerial Declaration on Access to Research Data (2004) IFLA Statement on Open Access (2004) Funding agencies moving towards open access policies - Wellcome Trust (UK)
- RCUK (UK)
- NIH (US)
- SSHRC (Canada)
- German Research Council
Salvador Declaration on Open Access: the developing world perspective (Sept. 2005)
Most recent developments European Commission - Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe (April, 2006)
Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) - Committee to draft OA policy on publicly funded health research in Canada (April 2006)
Recent OA Meetings Open Access for Developing Countries, 9th International Congress on Medical Librarianship, 20-23 September 2005, Salvador, Brazil - http://www.icml9.org/meetings/openaccess/public/documents/declaration.htm
International Conference on Strategies and Policies on Open Access to Scientific Information, Beijing, China (2005) Workshops on Open Access Repositories, MS Swamanathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India, 2003 OSI organized workshops in S. Africa (2003), Ukraine (2005), Lithuania (2005) Series of OAI meeting in Geneva and Berlin meetings
How to provide Open Access?
Recommends two complementary strategies to open access: Recommends two complementary strategies to open access: - 1. Publish in Open Access Journals
- 2. Publish in conventional journal and Self-Archive a copy of the published paper in one’s institutional archive
How many authors are self-archiving?
Top 10 countries with the most registered archives
Brazil SciELO IBICT (Brazilian Institute of Information on Science and Technology) Instituto Brasileiro de Informacao em Ciencia e Tecnologia
India IAS INSA IISc MedKnow Medler Centre
Part 2 Bioline International http://www.bioline.org.br
Core Partners
Funding Support University of Toronto Libraries Department of Social Sciences, U of T at Scarborough Open Society Institute. Information Access Program
What is Bioline International? Electronic aggregator of full text journals from developing countries OAI data provider Development project - using open source software and open standards Aims to influence scholarly communication practices and access to research literature Will open access improve the visibility and impact of journals from developing countries?
Journals from developing world
Why Bioline International? Publications from developing countries are poorly represented in the “big deal” Making the “lost science” visible Bridging the South-North knowledge gap Better understanding of global science
Increased visibility - Traditional directories and indexes ( e.g. EBSCO’s A-Z service, Ulrich’s Serials Directory)
- Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ), African Journal Online (AJOL), Virtual Health Library of Latin America and Caribbean (BRIME), ISI Web Content
- Accessibility from library catalogs through OpenURL
- Soon accessible through HINARI and AGORA
- OAI compliant search services (e.g. Oaister, Google, Scirus)
Circle of Accessibility
Downloads and visitors
Article submissions
International submissions
Projected Impact Factor
Economics of OA-P for India
Conclusions OA is increasing the visibility, accessibility and impact of some of the journals from developing countries Google is king? Need to develop value-added service with OA databases and Open Standards Alternative measure of research impact is emerging but OA is the foundation
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|