Specific objective 3:
|
Improvement of public finances and public procurement management
|
Measure 3.5:
|
Improvement of the public procurement system
|
Activity implem. status
|
Institution responsible for implementation
|
Result
|
Indicators
|
Activity
|
Deadline for implement.
|
Progress made, achievements made through activity
|
IF ACTIVITY HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME LIMIT OR HAS BEEN INITIATED
|
Indicator
|
Baseline and target value
|
Achieved value in 2015
|
Achieved value in 2016
|
Reasons for deviation from the plan and measures taken to address issues
|
FUTURE STEPS
Key steps necessary to implement the activity, with recommendations (milestones)
|
Expected time of completion of the activity
|
|
PPO
Partners:
Republic Commission for Protection of Rights in Public Procurement Procedures
AJSRP (act. 7)
Republic Fund for Health Insurance (act. 7)
SAI
|
3.5.1. Operationally and methodologically improved public procurement system
|
Number of visits to the portal in relation to the initial value
|
BV (2014): 2,028,919
TV (2016, 2017): 5%-10%
|
2,343,503 (15%)
|
2,576,545 (9.94%)
|
3 . Improvement of the training level of officials and decision-makers in public procurement procedures
|
4th quarter of 2016
|
Improvement of the training level contributes to more efficient and effective functioning of the entire system of public procurement
|
|
|
|
|
4. Adoption of the assessed value determination methodology and Methodological Guidelines for Implementation of the “Life cycle product cost” Concept
|
4th quarter of 2016
|
Facilitated process of market analysis and the choice of the subject of procurement, as well as a better evaluation of the value of the procurement subject. The affirmation of the principle of cost-effectiveness taking into account the costs and benefits of the exploitation of the subject of procurement.
|
|
|
|
|
5. Analysis of technical solutions and options implemented or developed in EU Member States in the area of e-procurement (e-tender, e-auction, e-dynamic procurement system, e-catalogues, etc.)30
|
4th quarter of 2016
|
The analysis defines the rudiments and possibilities for further development of electronic procurement in Serbia by taking into account the solutions which are implemented in EU Member States
|
|
|
|
|
Number of certified public procurement officers in relation to the initial value
|
BV (2014): 140
TV (2016): 20%
TV (2017): 10%
|
1098 (784%)
(Given that certification in accordance with new legislation was launched in October 2014 the target value set for 2015 is high, which is also indicated in the passport of indicators. A slight growth trend is expected in the following years.).
|
1,478 (25%)
|
6. Adoption of the public procurement justification and appropriateness assessment methodology
|
4th quarter of 2016
|
The process of identifying needs related to the subject and the quantity of public procurement depending on the subject of public procurement improved.
|
|
|
|
|
7. Improvement of centralized public procurement system
|
4th quarter of 2016
|
Guidelines for Framework Agreements as a tool contribute to the efficiency of public procurement.
In August 2016, AJSRP established the Public Procurement Information System (ISCJN), for the needs of centralized public procurements, with the relevant instruction for use. The contracting authorities entered into the ISCJN the data on public procurements for the Plan (the total estimated value, estimated values per year, economic classification and the time of initiation of the procedure) and indicative quantities. The technical specifications for each cost category were prepared by AJSRP.
In 2016, Execution of Framework Agreements, AJSRP maintains a record in ISCJN in which the individual contracting authorities enter the required information on concluded contracts, thereby reducing the contracting authorities’ costs of delivery of individual agreements in writing for the purpose of monitoring. In 2014 and 2015, AJSRP copied the complete documentation required for execution of contracts from finalized procedures and delivered them to all individual contracting authorities (103 contracting authorities from the List of Contracting Authorities). Savings were made possible in 2016 because the AJSRP allowed individual contracting authorities to take over complete documentation required for conclusion of individual contracts by publishing it on the website of AJSRP (signed framework agreement, tender and other documentation necessary for contract conclusion / decision to initiate the procedure, the commission formation decision ...).
In the implemented centralized public procurement procedures, in 2014 AJSRP concluded 25 framework agreements, in 2015 it concluded 104, and in 2016 it concluded 120 framework agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
8. Improvement of software for planning the procurement and quarterly reporting
|
4th quarter of 2016
|
Public procurement planning and quarterly reporting processes have been made faster and easier
|
|
|
|
|
9. Training for the police and prosecutors in the field of public procurement
|
(4th quarter of 2016 – cont.)
|
Training for the police and prosecutors contributes to the increase in the quality of processing, in conjunction with the penal provisions of the law
|
|
|
|
Specific objective 4:
|
Indicator (impact level)
|
Increase of legal certainty and improvement of the business environment and the quality of public services provision
|
Extent to which citizen-oriented policy for service delivery is in place and applied (PAP 5)
BV (2014): 4
TV (2017): 5
Extent to which the legal framework for good administration is in place and applied (PAP 5)
BV (2014): 2
TV (2017): 3
Extent to which policy development process makes the best use of analytical tools (PAP 2)
BV (2014): 3
TV (2017): 4
|
Specific objective 4:
|
Increase of legal certainty and improvement of the business environment and the quality of public services provision
|
Measure 4.1:
|
Improvement of the legislative process as a part of a wider system of Government public policy management 31
|
Activity implementation status
|
Institution responsible for implementation
|
Result
|
Indicators
|
Activity
|
Time limit for implementation
|
Progress made, achievements made through activity
|
IF ACTIVITY HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME LIMIT OR HAS BEEN INITIATED
|
Indicator
|
Baseline and target value
|
Achieved value in 2015
|
Achieved value in 2016
|
|
|
|
Reasons for deviation from the plan and measures taken to address issues
|
FUTURE STEPS
Key steps necessary to implement the activity, with recommendations (milestones)
|
Expected time of completion of the activity
|
|
RSPP
Partners:
MPALSG (act. 1)
National Legislation Secretariat
GGS
MF
HRMS (act. 5)
CSO
|
4.1.1. Improved and transparent process of development and implementation of regulations in a manner that ensures inter-sector coordination, participation of interested public, and assessment of potential effects, implementation monitoring, evaluation and reporting on the regulation implementation
|
Share of draft laws harmonized with the adopted methodology for regulation impact analysis in the total number of draft laws submitted for opinion to RSPP for which it is necessary to perform the effects analysis, on annual level
|
BV (2014): 53%
TV (2016): 60%
TV (2017): 65%
|
66.9%
|
89.6%
|
1. Prescribing the manner of education, function and responsibility of working groups for drafting regulations (amendments to the Regulation on the Principles of Internal Organization and Job Classification )
|
2nd quarter of 2015
|
|
Amendments to the Regulation on the Principles of Internal Organization and Job Classification have not been adopted yet.
|
Formulating amendments to the Regulation on the Principles of Internal Organization and Job Classification and their adoption
|
2nd quarter of 2017
|
|
3. Methodological improvement of the system of regulatory impact analysis and analysis of the impact of public policy documents
|
1st quarter of 2016
|
In the course of II and III quarter of 2016, consultations on the improvement of the text of the proposal of the Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents were conducted in line with the suggestions and comments of the European Commission, SIGMA, institutions of the Government Centre and other stakeholders, considering the fact that the package of regulations on the planning system was available on the website of RSPP for comments/ amendments by the public and stakeholders. The said Regulation will stipulate in more detail the process of public policy management through planning, coordination, development, adoption, implementation, monitoring of implementation, analysis, evaluation and assessment of the effects of measures contained in public policy documents and regulations, which are proposed and/or adopted by the participants in the planning system, in accordance with their responsibilities as authorized nominators, (including the scope, process and quality control of public policy and regulatory impact analysis conducted in the course of drafting of policy documents and regulations, as well as the content and analysis of the effects of the mandatory elements that should be included in the public policy documents and be aligned with the regulations implementing the public policy. The public debate on the package of regulations, including the said Regulation, began in December 2016 and ended on 20 January 2017. The text of the Proposal of the said Regulation is in the process of harmonization with the received comments and results of the public debate.
|
Planned dynamics of adoption of the Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents was somewhat slowed down by the snap parliamentary elections in 2016, as well as by the technical mandate of the Government.
|
Upon the completion of the public debate, on 20 January 2017, the RSPP will, in accordance with the results/ proposals/ suggestions of the stakeholders further amend the text of the Draft Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents. A prerequisite for the implementation of the activity is the defining of the Draft Law on the Planning System of the Republic of Serbia, and its adoption by the National Assembly.
|
Pursuant to the Government Work Plan for 2017, the Government is to adopt the Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents in II quarter of 2017.
|
|
The share of the number of proposals of strategic documents harmonized with the adopted methodology for analysis of the impact of documents and public policies in the total number of proposals of strategic documents submitted for the opinion to RSPP, on annual level
|
BV (2014): 0%32
TV (2016): 25%
TV (2017): 30%
|
-
|
0%
|
4. Methodological introduction of system of analysis of regulatory and public policy impact on the budget
|
2nd quarter of 2016
|
The adoption of the Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents will significantly improve the overall planning system, as well as the more rational use of budgetary funds. The public debate on the package of regulations, including the said Regulation, began in December 2016 and ended on 20 January 2017.
|
Planned dynamics of adoption of the Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents was somewhat slowed down by the snap parliamentary elections in 2016, as well as by the technical mandate of the Government.
|
Upon the completion of the public debate, on 20 January 2017, the RSPP will, in accordance with the results/ proposals/ suggestions of the stakeholders further amend the text of the Draft Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents. A prerequisite for the implementation of the activity is the defining of the Draft Law on the Planning System of the Republic of Serbia, and its adoption by the National Assembly.
|
Under the Government Work Plan for 2017, the Government is to adopt the Regulation on the Public Policy Management Methodology, Analysis of the Effects of Public Policies and Regulations and the Content of Individual Public Policy Documents in II quarter of 2017.
|
|
5. Preparation of the training program and implementation of civil servants training on the analysis of regulatory, public policy, and the legislative process impact
|
2nd quarter of 2015 - preparation
(4th quarter of 2017 - implementation)
|
In order to strengthen the capacities SAB for performing a research-analytical tasks, in the course of 2016, RSPP in cooperation with HRMS conducted five training sessions of civil servants and managers on regulatory impact assessment, legislative process management, the role of managers in strategic and financial planning in the state administration - in April and September, as well as the training session on the management of the system of public policy. In total, 71 civil servants and managers were trained within SAB.
|
Activity is treated as partially implemented because the package of regulations on the planning system of the Republic of Serbia has not been adopted yet, and RSPP is to start the training of civil servants in accordance with the provisions of that Law, in cooperation with HRMS.
|
Following the adoption of the package of regulations on the planning system of the Republic of Serbia, the current training program will be further promoted in order to fully reflect the solutions provided by the adopted regulations, and to adequately prepare civil servants to implemented and enforce the adopted decisions and regulations in practice.
|
In I and II quarter of 2017
|
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
