Continuity and change: employers’ training practices and partnerships with training providers


Comparison between responses to employer survey and to 2003 survey, for selected questions



Yüklə 3,82 Mb.
səhifə40/43
tarix04.01.2019
ölçüsü3,82 Mb.
#90278
1   ...   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43

Comparison between responses to employer survey and to 2003 survey, for selected questions


The 2003 data are taken from Smith, E., Pickersgill, R., Rushbrook, P., & Smith, A. (2005). Enterprises’ commitment to nationally recognised training for existing workers. Adelaide: NCVER. The 2003 survey divided its respondents into three categories: Enterprise RTOs (see footnote) (n=51); other enterprises that had used nationally-recognised training in the previous two years (which the report called ‘purchasers’) (n=34) and enterprises that had not used NRT in the past two years (which the report called ‘non-users’) (n=39). The 2003 data are presented in this section with and without enterprise RTOs3.

A. Industry sectors of respondents (Q1.5 in 2015 survey): coded to 2003 industry areas






Industry area

2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

1

Primary (includes mining)

8

5.0

4

5.6

9

7.4

2

Financial services

12

7.5

7

9.9

10

8.2

3

Other services (includes hospitality)

16

10.0

10

14.1

17

13.9

4

Communications & IT

8

5.0

5

7.0

8

6.6

5

Transport and distribution

4

2.5

5

7.0

10

8.2

6

Sales (wholesale and retail)

20

12.5

2

2.8

9

7.4

7

Manufacturing

14

8.8

24

33.8

33

27.0

8

Government/community/ public utilities

33

20.6

10

14.1

20

16.4

9

Construction and civil engineering

13

8.1

4

5.6

6

4.9

10

Health

13

8.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

11

Consultancy

5

3.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

12

Education

14

8.8

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A




Total

160

100.0

71

100.0

122

100.0

Notes: (i) 2003 survey included only codes 1-9
(ii) ‘Other’ responses have all been allocated.

B. Number of employees in the organisation (Q1.2 in 2015 survey)






2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

Up to 50

50

29.2

25

34.7

29

24.6

51-100

18

10.5

12

16.7

14

11.9

101-500

44

25.7

22

30.6

35

29.7

501+

59

34.5

13

18.1

40

33.9

Total

171

100.0

72

100.0

118

100.0

Note: Categories ‘501-1000’ and ‘More than 1000’ from 2003 study are collapsed into the ‘501+’ category.

C. Reported rate of change in skill needs of the organisation over the past five years (Q1.12 in 2015 survey)






2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

Fast

29

17.8

19

26.0

30

24.4

Steady

99

60.7

48

65.8

82

66.7

None

33

20.2

6

8.2

11

8.9

Declined

2

1.2

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total

163

100.0

73

100.0

123

100.0

D. Reported rate of change in the use of technology in the relevant industry over the past five years (Q1.10 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

Fast

38

23.2

24

32.9

38

30.6

Steady

102

62.2

45

61.6

75

60.5

None

23

14.0

4

5.5

11

8.9

Declined

1

0.6

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total

164

100.0

73

100.0

124

100.0

E. Whether respondents considered they did more or less training compared with similar organisations (Q2.1 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

More

55

33.7

27

38.6

60

50.0

Same

81

49.7

38

54.3

54

45.0

Less

27

16.6

5

7.1

6

5.0

Total

163

100.0

70

100.0

120

100.0

F. (For those using nationally recognised training), whether government funding was reported to be important in the decision to implement nationally recognised training. (Q4.11 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

Very important

28

36.8

14

43.8

29

35.8

Some importance

24

31.6

8

25.0

29

35.8

Not very important

10

13.2

6

18.8

12

14.8

Funding not available

11

14.5

4

12.5

11

13.6

Don’t know

3

3.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total

76

100.0

32

100.0

81

100.0

G. (For those using nationally recognised training), whether amount of all training had changed since the enterprise had been using nationally recognised training (Q4.14 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

Yes, a lot

7

9.2

5

14.7

27

31.8

Yes, somewhat

32

42.1

15

44.1

40

47.1

No change

32

42.1

13

38.2

16

18.8

Don’t know

2

2.6

1

2.9

2

2.4

Decreased

3

3.9

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total

76

100.0

34

100.0

85

100.0

H. Attribution of reason for the change in amount of training reported in previous question (Q4.15 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

Don’t know

21

28.4

3

13.1

4

5.9

Nationally recognised training

39

52.7

9

39.1

35

51.5

Other

14

18.9

11

47.8

29

42.6

Total

74

100.0

23

100.0

68

100.0

  1. Reported use of competency standards as the basis of other activities (besides nationally recognised training (Q4.6 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs

Yes for writing job descriptions

44

29.1

21

28.8

46

37.1

Yes for job evaluation/ classification

57

37.7

25

34.2

50

40.3

Yes for performance management

54

35.8

23

31.5

48

38.7

Yes for recruitment and selection

45

29.8

35

47.9

56

45.2

Do not use

52

34.4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

In non-accredited training*

15

9.9

32

43.8

72

58.1

Other

3

2.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total number of respondents

151




73




124




Notes: Respondents could give more than one answer.
We commented in 2003 that people may have misinterpreted the question, thinking of other competency frameworks besides Training Package competency standards. This could also apply in 2015.

J. Reported percentage of enterprise’s workforce in full-time permanent employment (Q1.4 in 2015 survey)






2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

0-10

8

4.8

3

4.3

7

5.7

11-20

6

3.6

4

5.6

7

5.7

21-30

6

3.6

4

5.6

8

6.6

31-40

6

3.6

3

4.3

4

3.3

41-50

17

10.3

4

5.6

7

5.7

51-60

16

9.7

2

2.8

8

6.6

61-70

19

11.5

1

1.4

3

2.5

71-80

27

16.4

13

18.3

19

15.6

81-90

18

10.9

15

21.1

23

18.8

91-100

42

25.5

22

31.0

36

29.5

Total

165

100.0

71

100.0

122

100.0

K. The extent to which nationally recognised training was customised to the specific needs of the organisation (Q13 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

2003 N (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (excluding enterprise RTOs)

2003 N (including enterprise RTOs)

2003 % (including enterprise RTOs)

Yes, greatly

23

30.3

10

30.3

35

43.2

Yes, somewhat

32

42.1

13

29.4

30

37.0

Not customised, or only customised in very minor ways

21

27.6

10

30.3

16

19.8

Total

76

100.0

33

100.0

81

100.0

L. Reported sources of knowledge about nationally accredited training (Q4.3 in 2015 survey)




2015 N

2015 %

Have no knowledge

33

21.6

TAFE or other Registered Training Organisation

80

52.3

Commonwealth Department of Education and Training

41

26.8

State Training Authority or Department

33

21.6

Employer/industry association

52

34.0

Trade unions

28

18.3

Australian Apprenticeship Centre

18

11.8

National Industry Skills Council

23

15.0

State Industry Training Advisory Body if still present in your State/ Territory

19

12.4

Group Training Organisation

32

20.9

Training.gov.au website, My Skills web site or Australian Apprenticeships web site

24

15.7

Skills@Work eNewsletter

7

4.9

Other

8

5.2

Note: The equivalent table from the 2003 survey is no longer available. However, the following text was included in the report:
‘The sources of knowledge about nationally recognised training varied. In the survey respondents were asked about their use of a range of sources of knowledge (thus they could make several choices). Enterprise RTOs were most likely to learn about nationally recognised training directly from ANTA (87% ticked this option) and STAs (78%) while Purchasers were more likely to learn from TAFE or other RTOs (82%) or employer associations (59%). Non-Users were only slightly less likely to learn from TAFE/RTOs (46%) than enterprise RTOs were (49%). Employer associations were reported as equally important sources of information for the three groups – around half in each case. New Apprenticeship Centres were reported more frequently among enterprise RTOs than among Purchasers, with the same pattern for national ITABs (65% for enterprise RTOs) but Group Training Organisations were not common sources of information, and were most used by Purchasers (24%).’


Yüklə 3,82 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin