Continuity and change: employers’ training practices and partnerships with training providers


Comparison between responses to RTO survey and to 2002 survey, for selected questions



Yüklə 3,82 Mb.
səhifə41/43
tarix04.01.2019
ölçüsü3,82 Mb.
#90278
1   ...   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43

Comparison between responses to RTO survey and to 2002 survey, for selected questions


The set of tables provided in this section were produced for the RTO survey responses that were readily comparable. There were some differences in the current survey from the 2002 survey. Respondents to the 2002 survey (n=102) were mainly TAFEs (n=96), whereas in the 2015 survey TAFEs (n=20) represented less than 20% of total respondents (n=107). The majority of respondents to the 2015 survey were private providers (n=87). The current survey analysis divides respondents into three categories: TAFEs (n=20); for-profit private RTOs (n=55) and non-profit private RTOs (n=32). In the 2002 survey only six respondents were from non-TAFE RTOs, but these were unable to be separated out for the comparative analysis. Thus, comparison undertaken was between the 2002 responses (n= 102) and the 2015 TAFE responses (n=20). However, another limitation in the comparison is that the 2002 survey included multiple responses from some TAFE Institutes, with respondents being people identified as managing large partnerships within RTOs rather than representatives providing a whole of organisation response as was the case in the 2015 survey.

The Callan and Ashworth 2002 survey data in the tables below was published in Callan, V., & Ashworth, P. (2004). Working Together: Industry and VET Provider Training Partnerships. Adelaide: NCVER. 4 The exact wording for 2015 questions, not the 2002 questions, has been used throughout this section. Comparison tables 8, 9, 10 and 11 have been sorted in descending order based on TAFE institute responses.

1. How would you classify your organisation? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q3: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.74)






2015

2002




N

%

N

%

TAFE

20

18.7

96

94.1

For Profit Private Provider

55

51.4

4

3.9

Non Profit Private Provider

32

29.9

Other







2

2.0

Total

107

100.0

102

100.0

2. What is your title? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q2: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.74)




2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Chief Executive Officer/Director/ Managing Director

3

15.0

34

61.8

11

34.4

48

44.9

7

6.9

Other Senior Manager

8

40.0

9

16.4

16

50.0

33

30.8

21

20.6

Head of School/Department

3

15.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

3

2.8

18

7.6

Program Co-ordinator

0

0.0

3

5.5

0

0.0

3

2.8

14*

13.7

Business Development Manager/ Partnership Management Coordinator

4

20.0

1

1.8

0

0.0

5

4.7

21

20.6

2002 category - Dean/Executive Dean

























3

2.9

Other

2

10.0

8

14.5

5

15.6

15

14.0

18

17.6

Total

20

100.0

55

100.0

32

100.0

107

100.0

102

100.0

3. How would you classify the location of your organisation? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q4: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.74)




2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Metropolitan-based

9

45.0

31

56.4

14

45.2

54

50.9

71

69.6

Regional

10

50.0

21

38.2

11

35.5

42

39.6

25

24.5

Other

1

5.0

3

5.5

6

19.4

10

9.4

6

5.9

Total

20

100.0

55

100.0

31

100.0

106

100.0

102

100.0

Note: Data collapsed to enable comparison between the two surveys.

4. What State/Territory is your organisation (head office) based in? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q5: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.75)






2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit Private

Non Profit Private

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

New South Wales

6

30.0

13

23.6

5

15.6

24

22.4

19

18.6

Victoria

6

30.0

13

23.6

8

25.0

27

25.2

25

24.5

Queensland

4

20.0

22

40.0

8

25.0

34

31.8

21

20.6

Western Australia

3

15.0

2

3.6

4

12.5

9

8.4

10

9.8

South Australia

1

5.0

3

5.5

3

9.4

7

6.5

11

10.8

Tasmania

0

0.0

1

1.8

2

6.3

3

2.8

9

8.8

Northern Territory

0

0.0

1

1.8

1

3.1

2

1.9

3

2.9

Australian Capital Territory

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

3.1

1

0.9

4

3.9

Total

20

100.0

55

100.0

32

100.0

107

100.0

102

100.0

5. What is your level of involvement in VET industry-provider partnerships? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q6: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.74)




2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit Private

Non Profit Private

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

I set up and continue to manage such partnerships

11

55.0

25

45.5

17

54.8

53

50.0

39

38.2

I set up these partnerships

1

5.0

9

16.4

3

9.7

13

12.3

14

13.7

I manage such partnerships

0

0.0

7

12.7

2

6.5

9

8.5

16

15.7

Those managing key partnerships report to me

7

35.0

4

7.3

6

19.4

17

16.0

24

23.5

Other

1

5.0

10

18.2

3

9.7

14

13.2

9

8.8

Total

20

100.0

55

100.0

31

100.0

106

100.0

102

100.0

6. In which of the following locations does your organisation have VET industry-provider partnerships? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q7: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.75)




2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

% of respon-dents

N

% of respon-dents

N

% of respon-dents

N

% of respon-dents

N

% of respon-dents

Your local region

19

95.0

39

70.9

27

84.4

85

79.4

86

84.3

Other parts of your State

16

80.0

25

45.5

12

37.5

53

49.5

63

61.8

In other Australian States

12

60.0

24

43.6

9

28.1

45

42.1

24

23.5

In overseas countries

4

20.0

2

3.6

1

3.1

7

6.6

25

24.5

Total

20




55




32




107




102




7. What percentage of your training partnerships with industry falls under each of the following categories? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q10: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.75)




2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

Mean

SD

N

Mean

SD

N

Mean

SD

N

Mean

SD




Mutual service partnerships where we pool resources with the industry partner to gain access to equipment or resources that aid training

18

11.9

9.6

45

16.8

25.6

29

14.5

20.8

92

15.1

21.7

31.0

Joint ventures where we pursue a training opportunity together by combining our capabilities and sharing the business risk

18

8.4

9.0

45

8.3

16.8

29

10.9

14.0

92

9.2

14.6

27.6

*We provide fee-for-service contracted services to client organisations

18

36.3

15.4

45

46.6

34.0

29

31.4

28.9

92

39.8

30.1

N/A

We cooperate with an industry partner to provide training that is wholly or largely government subsidised

18

37.5

18.3

45

21.8

30.2

29

35.8

29.9

91

29.2

28.8

30.9^

Other

18

5.8

9.9

45

6.4

23.0

29

8.6

23.6

92

7.0

21.1

15.2

Note: *Not included response in 2002 survey

^2002 category: Value chain partnership where we work together to change the training model to create enhanced training benefits for learners

8. What are the main drivers for your organisation’s involvement in industry/ employer partnerships? (RTO Survey 2015 – Q11: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.37)






2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N Agree

%
Agree


Mean

N Agree

% Agree

Mean

N Agree

% Agree

Mean

N Agree

% Agree

Mean

%
Agree


*To keep up-to-date with industry needs/requirements

18

100

5.17

39

86.7

4.93

25

86.2

4.97

82

89.1

5.0

N/A

*To maintain relevance/alignment with industry needs/requirements

18

100

5.44

41

91.1

5.16

25

86.2

5.00

84

91.3

5.2

N/A

To bring in additional revenue

18

100

5.22

35

77.7

4.53

19

65.5

3.90

72

78.3

4.5

88.2

To build extra capability within our staff

17

94.4

5.06

31

68.8

4.11

20

69.0

4.21

68

73.9

4.3

82.3

Industries/employers have requested that we assist them

17

94.4

4.94

35

77.7

4.47

24

82.8

4.66

76

82.6

4.6

45.9

To give staff stronger links with industry

16

88.9

5.00

34

75.5

4.40

22

75.9

4.31

72

78.3

4.5

82.3

To find future employers for our students

16

88.9

4.78

25

55.5

3.53

20

69.0

4.28

61

66.3

4.0

57.6

If we did not get involved in the partnering, another organisation would have taken the opportunity

15

83.3

4.83

20

45.4

3.34

15

51.7

3.62

50

54.9

3.7

67.1

To copy what other organisations are doing

2

11.1

2.17

7

15.9

2.02

3

10.7

1.96

12

13.3

2.0

34.1

Our motivations are not really clear

2

11.1

2.11

6

13.6

1.82

3

10.7

1.79

11

12.2

1.9

32.9

Note: *Not included responses in 2002 survey

9. Performance of the organisation in partnering with industry or with specific employers (perceived levels of satisfaction) (RTO Survey 2015 – Q17: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.54)






2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

% Sat

Mean

N

% Sat

Mean

N

% Sat

Mean

N

% Sat

Mean

%
Sat


Our ability to establish trust

18

100.0

4.67

42

93.3

5.33

23

95.8

5.17

83

95.4

5.2

87.6

Our willingness to customise training to meet industry needs

17

94.4

4.89

42

95.5

5.52

23

95.8

5.21

82

95.3

5.3

87.6

Our success in customising the training

17

94.4

4.44

42

95.5

5.36

23

95.8

4.96

82

95.3

5.1

86.3

The financial returns to us in the longer term

16

88.9

4.33

33

76.7

4.07

19

79.2

4.42

68

80.0

4.2

79.4

The commitment shown by our staff to make the partnerships a success

15

83.3

4.44

43

95.6

5.40

22

91.7

5.21

80

92.0

5.2

82.1

Our level of planning within the partnership

15

83.3

3.89

40

88.9

5.04

21

87.5

4.92

76

87.4

4.8

76.7

Our willingness to adopt a
long-term perspective in judging the success of the partnership

14

77.8

3.89

43

95.6

5.24

19

79.2

4.79

76

87.4

4.8

79.4

Our flexibility in providing different delivery modes for the training

14

77.8

4.28

37

84.1

4.91

19

82.6

4.91

70

82.4

4.8

75.3

The financial returns to us to date

13

72.2

4.00

29

65.9

3.93

18

75.0

4.17

60

69.8

4.0

67.1

The quality of our communication with the industry partner

13

72.2

4.00

42

93.3

5.13

23

95.8

4.96

78

89.7

4.9

89.0

Our willingness to make changes to the nature of the on-the-job training that we deliver

13

72.2

4.11

40

95.2

5.43

20

83.3

5.00

73

86.9

5.0

N/A

Our willingness to make changes to the nature of the off-the-job training

12

66.7

4.17

41

95.3

5.37

20

83.3

4.92

73

85.9

5.0

84.9

Our openness to experimentation

12

66.7

4.17

42

97.7

5.28

21

87.5

4.54

75

88.2

4.8

83.5

Our application of financial measures to determine the success of the partnering

12

66.7

4.00

35

79.5

4.43

20

83.3

4.54

67

77.9

4.4

64.3

Our application of non-financial measures to determine the success of the partnering

11

61.1

3.67

38

86.4

4.86

19

79.2

4.50

68

79.1

4.5

65.7

Our flexibility with staffing arrangements

8

44.4

3.22

44

97.8

5.33

20

83.3

4.75

72

82.8

4.7

75.3

The administrative arrangements we put in place to manage the day-to-day issues arising in such partnerships

6

33.3

3.17

39

86.7

5.00

20

83.3

4.71

65

74.7

4.5

72.6

10. Performance of the industry partners (levels of satisfaction by RTO). (RTO Survey 2015 – Q20: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.55)




2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N

% Sat

Mean

N

% Sat

Mean

N

% Sat

Mean

N

% Sat

Mean

%
Sat


Their ability to establish trust with us

17

94.4

5.38

43

97.7

5.38

23

95.8

5.08

83

96.5

5.2

73.2

Their willingness to customise the training

16

94.1

5.02

37

88.1

5.02

19

86.4

5.04

72

88.9

5.1

74.6

The financial returns to them to date

15

93.8

4.95

26

78.8

4.95

13

86.7

5.58

54

84.4

5.1

64.7

Their openness to experimentation with the training model

16

88.9

4.80

38

88.4

4.80

20

87.0

4.83

74

88.1

4.8

70.4

The commitment shown by their staff to make such partnerships a success

15

88.2

4.84

38

86.4

4.84

22

91.7

4.75

75

88.2

4.8

71.8

Their success in customising the training on the job

15

88.2

5.02

36

90.0

5.02

15

71.4

4.74

66

84.6

4.9

69.0

Their application of financial measures to determine the success of the partnering

15

88.2

4.67

24

70.6

4.67

17

89.5

5.00

56

80.0

4.7

59.1

The quality of their communication with us

14

87.5

4.84

38

86.4

4.84

23

95.8

4.96

75

89.3

4.9

66.2

Their application of non-financial measures to determine the success of the partnering

13

86.7

4.82

31

79.5

4.82

18

94.7

5.29

62

84.9

4.9

52.1

The financial returns to them in the longer term

15

88.2

5.05

25

80.6

5.05

12

85.7

5.78

52

83.9

5.2

74.6

Their willingness to adopt a
long-term perspective in judging the success of the partnership

15

88.2

4.93

34

87.2

4.93

19

95.0

5.21

68

89.5

5.0

69.0

The administrative arrangements they put place to manage the
day-to-day issues arising in such partnerships

14

82.4

4.67

27

73.0

4.67

19

82.6

4.71

60

77.9

4.7

57.7

Willingness to make changes to the nature of the on-the-job training that they deliver

13

81.3

5.07

32

88.9

5.07

18

85.7

5.08

63

86.3

5.0

63.3

Their flexibility in facilitating different delivery modes for the training

14

77.8

4.91

34

89.5

4.91

18

81.8

4.92

66

84.6

4.9

57.7

Their level of planning within the partnership

12

70.6

4.86

30

81.1

4.86

19

82.6

4.71

61

79.2

4.8

60.5

Their flexibility with staffing arrangements

12

70.6

4.73

33

80.5

4.73

19

82.6

4.58

64

79.0

4.6

56.3

11. Effectiveness of RTO staff who do partnering. (RTO Survey 2015 – Q25: Callan & Ashworth Survey 2002, p.53)




2015

2002




TAFE

For Profit

Non Profit

ALL RTOs

VET Providers




N Agree

%
Agree


Mean

N Agree

% Agree

Mean

N Agree

% Agree

Mean

N Agree

% Agree

Mean

%
Agree


Building personal relationships with the industry partner

18

100.0

5.06

43

95.6

5.33

23

100.0

5.17

84

97.7

84

95.7

Showing real interest in partners’ proposals and concerns

17

94.4

5.06

45

100.0

5.49

21

91.3

5.09

83

96.5

83

81.4

Employer liaison

17

94.4

4.56

44

97.8

5.13

20

87.0

4.83

81

94.2

81

80.0

Setting shared goals with the industry partner

16

88.9

4.39

42

93.3

4.91

20

87.0

4.78

78

90.7

78

85.7

Doing training needs analyses

16

88.9

4.56

43

97.7

5.05

19

82.6

4.61

78

91.8

78

80.0

Negotiation skills

15

83.3

4.33

38

84.4

4.80

21

91.3

4.61

74

86.0

74

71.4

Identifying and managing risk in the partnership

14

77.8

3.83

39

88.6

4.73

19

82.6

4.43

72

84.7

72

67.1

Winning the job

13

72.2

4.00

40

88.9

4.82

19

82.6

4.65

72

83.7

72

82.8

Providing information and regular feedback to the organisation about the performance of partnerships that they manage

13

72.2

3.94

40

90.9

4.95

19

82.6

4.61

72

84.7

72

75.7

Project management

12

66.7

3.78

35

79.5

4.48

18

78.3

4.39

65

76.5

65

70.0

Marketing what we can do

12

66.7

4.06

39

86.7

4.71

18

78.3

4.39

69

80.2

69

67.1

Legal and contractual arrangements

8

44.4

3.50

35

77.8

4.31

16

69.6

4.35

59

68.6

59

44.2



Yüklə 3,82 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin