Edf answers to List of Issues on the eu report


Article 25, Health (question 29, List of Issues)



Yüklə 237,52 Kb.
səhifə8/10
tarix02.08.2018
ölçüsü237,52 Kb.
#66305
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

Article 25, Health (question 29, List of Issues).


Please explain how the European Union can prevent disability-based discrimination in health care service provision and ensure the training of the health care professionals on human rights of persons with disabilities, in the view of its’ shared competences with the EU Member States in the field of health care.

Persons with disabilities are not protected against discrimination in health care. The EU anti-discrimination legislation only protects against discrimination in the workplace. The inaccessibility of health care facilities and the lack of accessible information about health care services and entitlements also result in discrimination and exclusion of persons with disabilities by health care providers96.

The lack of adequate training and flexibility for health care professionals97 and misconceptions about the health care needs of persons with disabilities are also major barriers98. Free and informed consent is often denied to persons with psychosocial disabilities, intellectual disabilities and persons under guardianship in their access to mental health services in the EU99.

The EU has failed to incorporate the rights of persons with disabilities in an appropriate way in its relevant health instruments100. The 2011 European legislation on cross-border health101 does not guarantee patients with disabilities access to affordable health care in the EU Member States other than their own. It has left the implementation of the most important provisions to the discretion of the Member States.

The EU is currently witnessing an enormous migration and migrants are living in precarious situations in Europe where their access to essential health and social care, including medical devices, is restricted based on their insurance and residence status102.

For more information on the gaps existing in EU health policies, and in particular its 2014-2020 EU Health Programme, please see the alternative reports of Autism Europe, Mental Health Europe and IF.


  1. Article 27, Employment (Questions 31 and 32, List of Issues).


Please provide precise data on amount of money invested in wage subsidies for workers with disabilities employed at the open labour market, in work place adaptations at the open labour market and in the hiring of work place assistants for workers with disabilities employed at the open labour market.

Please indicate what concrete steps the European Union has taken to ensure that persons with disabilities are prioritised in all EU policy-making and implementation on employment, such as the Europe 2020 strategy and the EU funding instruments, and that the effect is measured in a comparative way across the EU Member States?

The EU has shared competence in the field of employment103. Positive legislation has been adopted to promote the right of persons with disabilities to employment, such as the General Block Exemption Regulation, and to combat discrimination in the workplace under the Employment Equal Treatment Directive.

As mentioned in paragraph 111 of its reply to the List of Issues, the EU has the overall economic objective to increase the employment rate by 2020 but does not have specific indicators to measure employment amongst persons with disabilities. In comparison to other excluded groups, the EU has adopted specific strategies and funding instruments104 to promote youth employment. We welcome these initiatives, as well as the ones that the EU took on elderly people and Roma minorities105. Persons with disabilities are not included as specific target in the EU policies in the same way. The EU should include specific indicators when pursuing the target of increasing the EU employment rate.

Monitoring on how EU funding improved employment of persons with disabilities in the long term is difficult, mainly due to lack of specific indicators. The EU should promote the use of EU funds for the employment in the open labour market of persons with disabilities, to provide reasonable accommodation at workplaces and to invest in wage subsidies for workers with disabilities. Awareness should be raised about all EU financial and legislative existing instruments.

In the Country Specific Recommendations 2015106, the overall approach to employment remains closely linked to boosting competitiveness, getting people off welfare benefits, and keeping wages low. No mention is made of job creation or quality work. Despite significant growth in in-work poverty rates, in-work poverty is only mentioned in two Member States (Bulgaria and Slovenia). Positive activity with personalised approaches has been effectively replaced by a more punitive approach to the poor; ‘reducing disincentives to work’ through negative activity where often vulnerable people, including persons with disabilities, are forced into jobs at any price through tightened eligibility, conditionality and threats of sanctions on benefits107.

  1. Article 28, adequate standard of living and social protection (questions 33, List of Issues).

Please provide data on the effects of the international financial crisis and the austerity measures taken on the daily life of persons with disabilities in EU Member States.


Social policies remain principally the responsibility of Member States. A high level of employment, adequate social protection and the fight against social exclusion should be taken into account in the development and implementation of EU policies according to the EU treaties and the Fundamental Rights Charter108. The right to an adequate standard of living and social protection is one of the eight areas for action of the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020.

The EU’s management of the Greek crisis reveals that economic factors precede over social concerns and human rights. The EU has the obligation to adopt a new approach combining economic competitiveness with social justice, in particular for the purpose of advancing the implementation of the rights of persons with disabilities enshrined in the CRPD.

Austerity measures supported by the EU directly and indirectly109 have a significant impact on the standard of living and the wellbeing of persons with disabilities. Persons with disabilities are sometimes forced to move back into institutions. Psychiatric hospitals are closed with no alternatives provided in the community110. A wide range of mechanisms has been used by EU Member States to reduce the real value of cash benefits to persons with disabilities111. This dramatically damaged their possibility of accessing basic goods and services, as well as the possibility of covering disability-related costs.

EU economic strategy and EU funding instruments aim to reduce the poverty rate. However, in 2013 more than 24% of the EU’s population was at risk of poverty and social exclusion. Already in 2012, 36% of persons with disability aged 16-64 are at risk of household poverty or social exclusion compared to 21.4% of people without disabilities112.

Persons with disabilities believe that it is necessary for the EU to create a social protection floor, to ensure that austerity policy does not cross that threshold, and to develop recommendations for equitable social security systems, with a specific scheme for persons with disabilities.



  1. Yüklə 237,52 Kb.

    Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin