15
at the law in a positivist way without understanding the surrounding political
context.
Chapter 2, where Pakistan’s constitutional history is assessed by reference to the
key factors, has divided the constitutional history into four periods, each of which
involves legal systems already established by (political)
authority, that is,
constitutional law, in Hart's positivist sense.
34
These implemented legal systems are
then subject to an interpretivist interpretation so as to answer the research
questions.
The researcher is aware that challenging the existing political system can be of an
interdisciplinary nature. Since the thesis employs two research techniques, the
researcher admits that not only jurisprudential and philosophical approaches are
central to the challenge but there may be some alignment of sociological and
anthropological approaches too. Those two approaches are not explored in detail
except where they are already incorporated in the chosen methods, for example,
comparative law involves an anthropology element and
legal realism involves an
element of sociology.
35
The researcher like authors in interdisciplinary approaches
(such as Vick
36
and Balkin
37
) use both philosophical and sociological standards to
cover multiple disciplines.
The researcher is aware of the possibility of inappropriate shifts in focus if he tries
to involve himself in to too many disciplines. In Chapter 3, the researcher explores
the relevant concepts (as indicated above) from philosophy and integrates them with
the hypothesis of constitutional suitability and the concept of a Democratic Federal
Political System as a result of his investigation into his initial hypothesis.
38
To draw
a boundary and maintain focus, he very briefly resorts to legal instrumentalism i.e.
'the view that the law should be used as a tool to achieve social purposes and to
balance competing societal interests'.
39
As indicated in Chapter 1 and explored in
much more detail in Chapter 4, state necessity is an important feature in Pakistan's
34
HLA Hart, 'Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals' (1958) 71(4) Harvard Law Review
593.
35
Reza Banakar,
Merging Law and Sociology: Beyond the Dichotomies of Socio-Legal Research (Galda
and Wilch 2003).
36
Douglas Vick, 'Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law' (2004) 31 Journal of Law and Society
163.
37
J. B. Balkin, 'Interdisciplinarity as Colonization' (1996) 53(3) Washington and Lee Law Review
949.
38
ibid.
39
Thomas Richard Harry,
The Gathering of the Clan: An Independent Political Option for
America (iUniverse 2009) 45.
16
constitutional history and especially its judicial interpretation. Gardner discusses
instrumentalism by reference to its extension to necessity.
40
He believes that 'it may
seem unacceptable even to contemplate the replacement of the norms of a
democracy by the acceptance of refractory conduct as being justified'.
41
The
refractory conduct
as indicated by Gardner, in the context of this thesis, is the
conduct of the judges in applying the doctrine of state necessity in Pakistan. The
researcher, therefore, does
not fully agree with Gardner, as the constitutional
history of Pakistan as critically evaluated in Chapter 3 has proved that democracy
can be compromised to safeguard the unity and integrity of the state.
The researcher for the first part of his thesis applies the list of steps set out by
Hutchinson and Duncan to solve a specific legal problem using the doctrinal
method.
42
The researcher has adapted those steps into
a four-step approach to
conduct the research in this document. The first two steps are related to positivism
and the remaining two steps to interpretivism. These steps are:
1. Reading and evaluating background material
2. Collecting relevant facts
3. Analysing the issues
4. Drawing a tentative conclusion
In the context of this project, the background material entailed a broad stream of
material and there was always a potential risk of focus shifting. To stay focused the
researcher's rationale for selection was confined to the material directly related to
the research questions. The other important issue was the authenticity and
reliability of the background material.
The scope of the background material to be considered was, therefore, limited to
primary sources such as case law, and theoretical and analytic
sources such as
jurisprudence, philosophy and political science. The areas that came within the
40
Simon Gardner, 'Instrumentalism and Necessity' (1986) 6(3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 431
431.
41
ibid.
42
Terry Hutchinson and Nigel Duncan, 'Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal
Research' (2012) 17(1) Deakin Law Review 106.
17
scope of the investigation were necessity, premature
dissolution of legislatures,
democratic federalism and the key factors chosen for analysis as discussed above.
In the doctrinal method, sources of the law are located and then the law is
interpreted and analysed.
43
Locating the source of law is an attempt to determine
an objective reality by the researcher.
44
The researcher is locating the objective
reality of what the law is rather than what it should be.
The next step is to separate the relevant facts from the background material. In the
context of this thesis, the facts are premature dissolutions in the name of necessity
and self-interest.
The third step is analysis. This is carried out throughout chapters 4 and 5 leading
to the fourth step i.e., the conclusion given in Chapter 6.
Dostları ilə paylaş: