Foreign philology faculty the department of english language and literature

Conclusion
In conclusion, which method works the best to teaching and giving information about the category of posteriority is up to the individual teacher, but one thing is certain: it is the English teacher's job to make sure this information is cleverly presented. Therefore grammar is one of those issues that do not have an easy solution. It is tricky and it is tough, kind of like all important things in life. It is not for the faint of heart or the creatively shallow. Grammar instruction is most naturally integrated during the revising, editing, and proofreading phases of the writing process. The category of posteriority is an important aspect of English grammar that enables speakers and writers to express events or actions that occurred after a particular point in time. By understanding its definition, grammatical features, differences from related categories, usage in various contexts, and challenges in using it effectively, one can communicate more accurately and effectively in English. General ormalizel MEANING is a dynamic process, i. e. developing in time, or a state General processual meaning is embedded in the semantics of all the verbs, including those that denote states, forms of existence, types of attitude, evaluations, etc. rather than actions. General ormalizel MEANING is a dynamic process, i. e. developing in time, or a state General processual meaning is embedded in the semantics of all the verbs, including those that denote states, forms of existence, types of attitude, evaluations, etc. , rather than actions greatly enlarges the simple stem set of verbs, since it is one of the most productive ways of forming verb lexemes in modern English: a cloud — to cloud, a house — to house; a man — to man; a park — to park. Structurally the verb stems may be 4. Expanded Typical suffixes expanding the stem of the verb: -ate (cultivate), -en (broaden), -ifу (clarify), ise(-ize) (ormalize). Verb-deriving prefixes: be- (belittle, beshut) and en-/em- (engulf, embed), re- (remake), under(undergo), over- overestimate, sub, submerge, mis-(misunderstand), un- undo. Structurally the verb stems may be 5. Composite compound of conversion type blackmail n. — to blackmail v. of the reduction type proof-reader n. — to proof-read. Grammatical Categories of Verbs B. Ilyish identifies 6 grammatical categories in present-day English verb: tense, aspect, mood, voice, person and number. L. Barkhudarov, D. Steling distinguish 4: voice, order, aspect, and mood, adding, that the finite forms have special means expressing person, number and tense. B. Khaimovich and B. Rogovskaya 7: voice, order, aspect, mood, posteriority, person, number.
Category of Posteriority is distinguished by B. S. Khaimovich and B. I.
-21-
Rogovskaya. This category is the system of two member opposition: shall come –
should come; will come – would come; their meaning is: absolute and relative posteriority. When posteriority is expressed in relation to the moment of speech it is called absolute. If posteriority is with regard to some other moment then it is relative. If we accept this category, according to the definition of the grammatical category it is expressed by auxiliary verbs shall and will for absolute posteriority and should and would for relative. In Modem English there are also special forms for expressing relative priority — perfect forms. Perfect forms express both the time actions preceding a certain moment and the way the action is shown to proceed the connection of the action with the indicated moment in its results or consequences. So the meaning of the perfect forms is constituted by two semantic components:, temporal priority and aspeetive result, current relevance. That is why perfect forms have been treated as tense-forms or aspect-forms. Haymovich and Ragovskaya treat the forms of future as the forms of the category of posteriority. And some linguists treat the forms of the future in the past as the form of the category of taxis, which establishes the order of events within a certain period of time presented in a sentence\utterance. Bloch distinguishes absolutive time characteristics and non-absolutive relative time characteristics of actions. Absolutive time includes the past and the present time which are given in language as the past tense and the present tense. The non-absolute time includes the future of the past and the future of the present, which are expressed accordingly by the forms of the future tense. So, he distinguishes two categories, opposed to each other – the category of the primary time, which is the absolutive expression of time; and the category of prospective time, which is purely relative and that is why it expresses the non-absolutive time.
The category of the primary time which is the absolutive expression of time, is expressed by the two tense forms those of the past and present tenses. But the future actions can be expressed not only grammatically but also by the forms of absolutive
-22-
tenses. All of them build up a certain system which can be presented in the form of a functional semantic feature.