High Quality Evidence Impact Tool


High Quality Evidence of Impact Flowchart



Yüklə 306,84 Kb.
səhifə3/7
tarix07.01.2022
ölçüsü306,84 Kb.
#77709
1   2   3   4   5   6   7
High Quality Evidence of Impact Flowchart

At a minimum, strong evidence of impact is:

Next, strong evidence of impact is:


Right facing arrow
When possible, it should:

Outcomes-based

  • Evidence focuses on the results of the programmatic feature.

Aligned with Criterion

  • Practices and evidence of impact should be directly linked to the criterion being evaluated. It must address all aspects of the criterion.

If your evidence is outcomes-based and aligned with criterion, move to the next components.

Specific, and wherever possible, quantifiable

  • Evidence of impact should be specific about the result for each programmatic feature. It should be descriptive of the outcome and, when possible, numeric in measure.

Measured by multiple sources

  • It is important to triangulate evidence from multiple sources, whenever possible. SOs should consult the Review Evaluation Tools in order to see the multiple sources of evidence ESE uses to evaluate a single criterion.

Interpreted

  • All evidence shared (whether it is state level data or SO-specific data) should be explained in a way that articulates the key takeaway(s).

Capture multiple points in time

  • This could include pre- and post- data; formative and summative data; and/or longitudinal data from multiple points throughout a year or over multiple years.

Overall, strong evidence of impact is:

Connected to plans and inputs

  • All evidence shared should be woven together in a cogent narrative that explains the connection between evidence of impact and inputs and clearly articulates any subsequent plans.


Appendix A: Examples

Yüklə 306,84 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin