Important! Click to the test to see answers! Test test test test test test test 10 test 11 test 12 test 13 test 14 test 15 test 16 test 17 test 18 test 19 test

=>ANSWER: F

1. Employees working in organisations with few rules are more likely to Keywords: few rules

In paragraph 10, the writer indicates that the environment “where the only rule was that there were no rules” … “encouraged a free interchange of ideas…” This means that employees working in organisations with few rules are more likely to share theirideas.

• 
  share=interchange
  

=>ANSWER: B

1. The physical surroundings in which a person works play a key role in determining their creativity.

Keywords: surroundings, determining creativity

In the first paragraph, “There are, nevertheless, people working in luxurious, state-of-the-art centres designed to stimulate innovation who find that their environment doesn‟t make them feel at all creative. And there are those who don‟t have a budget, or much space, but who innovate successfully.” This means that the physical surroundings where a person works does not influence their creativity.

=>ANSWER: NO

1. Most people have the potential to be creative Keywords: potential, creative

At the end of paragraph 2, “although some individuals may be more creative than others, almost every individual can be creative in the right circumstances.”

• 
  most people=almost every individual
  

• 
  have the potential=can
  

=> ANSWER: YES

1. Teams work best when their members are of equally matched intelligence.

Keywords: best, equally matched intelligence

Paragraph 7 deals with teamwork. Obviously, the writer does not mention the productiveness of teamwork when teammembers are equally intelligent. So, the statement is NOT GIVEN

=>ANSWER: NOT GIVEN

1. It is easier for smaller companies to be innovative Keywords: easier, smaller companies, innovative
In paragraph 5, the author just argues that “It‟s easy for a company to be pulled in conflicting directions as the marketing, product development, and finance departments each get different feedback from different sets of people” and “it‟s also easy for small „pockets of innovation‟ to disappear”. As a result, whether it is easier for smaller companies to be innovative or not is NOT GIVEN