Mrigashira or the Orion c. 45OO-350O B.C. Rigveda Rohini or the Aldebaran 3100 B.C. (Transition) Mahabharata Krittika or the Pleiades c.2900-1900 B.C. Sutra and Brahmana As per tradition Asvalayana was born around 3000-2900 B.C.
following the five generations after the Mahabharat war during
the Krittika equinox. The Egyptian mathematics and Sulba point
2000 B.C. as a date much later than the Sutra period and thus,
there is the convergence between the two evidences. Satapatha
Brahmana also indicates Yajnavalkya’s birth about three
generations following the Mahabharat war very near to the
time of Asvalayana, thereby proving that the Brahmana and the
Sutra periods did overlap. This fact receives a confirmation from
the observation of the pole star mentioned in Satapatha
Brahmana and Asvalayana Grihyasutra. ”Dhruva star” the
”unmoving” (literally meaning ’certain’) is so important that it is
shown to a newly married couple to enjoin constancy. The
present a-Ursa Minoris (Polaris), a star of second magnitude
that indicates the north pole today did not do so in ancient
times. Since the orientation of the North Pole moves with the
precession of the equinoxes, during much of human history
there has not been a pole star. The fact that Asvalayana and
Satapatha Brahmana do mention the pole star, an observable
pole star, is a matter of great chronological significance. Our
evidence thus far indicates 3000-2500 B.C. as the period of the
earliest portion of the Sutra literature. This also brings the date
of the Mahabharat war to the traditional 3102 B.C. The Greek
chroniclers after Alexander’s invasion of India were aware of the
date of Krishna, the principal figure in Mahabharat. The
evidence, however, is confusing when it comes to SandrocottosChandragupta’s
identity. Pliny refers to Krishna as Hercacles, a D” T; u> -a ~o q:-os-’;2-acr<~>:T-o<:5.NJcra>c^c^<< K> * JsB.^ ”i’s-lggisf^0^*?** a rFSrOO*r--i£S S.’fD’ ogg._^°ga.rDa. o w a, °- n S £5-i-<£g-0&5-3.:r289:c/,=rg-a. ° S. h ^ n 5 -OQ?S2.i§i^^S--f^^I-Q:5. !^illtl^fi:4ffsriif| = i *f|lt|P5llPfSli!a|!|ii §=’S^»:§”S«g^|.>Q-«g.+<§>sg-2«n:
l5’?!^ Si^ll^irS^slgSsrfi?- Q-?S5l?>Wn°-S--”n|g.3o-^»ga.5o35: 8 2. s? § I; =r | g. & £ |; £- §- af §_c§. b § g- ^. 5 s ^ | g
»IS^l?l’I§:|g’pS^|s;’Si.s.|^3 ^
5 5- § a S o g ^ ^ J § g »-^. 0 ^ gcg K o- ^ ^ ? i o - S. <^_=rPn=i!ir?:1>O(P-H’_o_S1K^,«ft) & x” ys|Sof = I|s^H||roSa»||f^ °is|i: fiair33”g^Pnii| DO W w > =T ^ q§S,,1^a^<^<-KS>- • W=i3 h?p’N i^-l lliH?l5iiiii gli^r l&Pl^l^illiS^rli n ^^^3^ I’l^^SS-wo^^?!””? O ^”-curo-. ^•^Q-ffSj3Crs--A^^^.5 en on w §. 3 5 I §. 3 ”S-OgS^^^S^^g’^g^^ 2 o.22iQS ^^^SSr^oB-^K-Q-aiS^gK.f Q. cn L^_ X^-^-^O -tr^^i^^^^-OJ-’ c^ i^- ZL :z. ^ -* ^Q-#5>° WOW=-. g.^pa-W-g. WjggK & ?r^ a w ^ o I s-^ I ^ 5 § n ~ s- o § «- 5.5 5 g s I o > Proposed Chronology of
Ancient Indian and Contemporaneous Civilizations Date Geography: Climate Astronomical Era Technology Indian History Indian History Indian Literature Indian Authors; Mesopotamia Egypt: (Periods) Kings (Elsewhere) 9000 la; Age 8000 Ice Melts 7000 Mehgarh 6500 Horse 4500 Mrgasiras (Orion) Mandhatr fights f Druhvus 4000 Early Vedic RgVeda Atri 3800 Decline of Rg Vedic world
3700 Silver Battle of Ten Kings Sudas Purification of Visvamitra Copper Vasistha 3600 Late Vedic Yajur Veda Sdma Veda
Atharva Veda 3500 Sarasvati Rohmi (Aldebaran) perennial
3100 Sarasvati loses Kali Yuga Post-Vedic Mahabharata Vyasa, Krishna Yamuna Mahabharata Desert divides War east-west ’ Vedas canonized •g - ^ SP £ -S Q £ 3 £P liigii if i csi--5^J si N ^ T3
£ I ~§ c -v -^ s ^ ^ °Ji « .^ i -i ”? o ^ a ° ? £ I O 2 ^u J- |_-s ~ro (T3 £ S | =§ S 11 .E, 3 S i” C tu ro CL m nj
>- ea < ^ o. n: (i: (?
c b >~ I ilJ Q. ^ f9 ?a -5 a ^ a •£ 2
^ <» ^ 3 z c
C 0! -^ X 5 TJ 2 OJ rt D I -fe
o > _ S i O L^ c
O CT. C-- CHAPT« 17 ANCIENT INDIAN CIVILIZATION 273 The Puranas mention the passage of about 31 generations
between Rama of Ikshvaku dynasty and son of Dasharatha,
upto Brihadabala in Mahabharata records. Brihadabala was slain
by Abhimanyu, Arjun’s son, at Kurukshetra. Again computing
on the basis of 20 years per generation we come to a date of
between 3800 and 3700 B.C. for Rama. This date is further
confirmed by the fact that Vashistha a senior contemporary of
Rama was also present at the Battle of 10 Kings. To sum up in
David Frawley’s terms, the chronology of the Vedic age would
be as given below: Proto-Rigvedic Period Around 8000 BC and before 6000 B.C. Early Rigvedic Period 6000 to 4000 B.C.
Later Rigvedic Period 4000 to 2000 B.C.
Transitional 2000 to 1000 B.C. A chart showing a proposed chronology of ancient Indian
and contemporary civilizations is given in the chart opposite.
(Vedic Aryans and Origins of Civilization- A literary and scientific
perspective - By N.S. Raja Ram and David Frawley). Let us now deal with the scientific evidence. Domestication
of the horse was perfected in India well before it was done in
Central Asia and South Russian steppes around 4000 B.C. Along
with the recent findings of S.R. Rao, a marine archaeologist, at
the site of Dwarika the above date is further confirmed. There
is a mention of gold in Rigveda but not of silver, which should
have come after the Rigvedic period. The above facts are in
accordance with astronomical and geographical data particularly
the record of vernal equinox in Orion and the perennial Saraswatiboth
facts being mentioned in the Seventh mandala of the
Rigveda. The above together with the evidence of astronomy
and the Sulbas and Egyptian mathematics, all independent
determinations, indicate the same period of i.e. 4000 B.C. for
the ending of the Rigvedic age, The archaeological remains found
at Mehrgarh and other places in Gujarat and elsewhere alongwith
the submerged city of Dwarika discovered recently date the
earlier Indian civilization as far back as 7000 B.C. With more 274 INDIA AND ISRAEL CHAPTER 17 research in charting the river Saraswati and it’s dessication leadin
to the shift of ancient civilization from the centre of Saraswati
Drishadvati doab to the south west, more convincing evidence
will emerge on the Rigvedic society and our ancient settlements
The ecological disruptions in the Saraswati basin led to the move
of that civilization eastword to the Ganga valley and south
westward into Gujarat and Maharashtra. What further proof of
this movement is required than the fact that both Baudhayana
and Apsthamba belong to the south? While this dichotomy further
explains the Yajurvedic tradition into Vajasaneya and the Taittreya
schools, it also proves that the so-called Aryans and Dravidian
divide is so much historical humbug. Sethna from his laborious
works brings out the fact that cotton was a commodity of daily
use in the Harappan times. The Vedas and Brahmanas also
mention the making of cloth, and terms like weaving, war, and
weft. The discovery of Indian cotton in Peru during 2500 B.C.
and even earlier in Mexico accords with the common usage of
the cotton and its extensive trading abroad and across the seas
during the Vedic period. Further findings, tested with calibrated
C-14 methods, show that ’the Harappan culture should be
dated to the period 2700-2000 B.C. This along with the fact of
climatic change of 2200 B.C. recently discovered explain the
sudden ending of the Accadian empire and the shift of Saraswati
based civilization to the east and confirms the data brought out
thus far. We now come to the question of silver when did it
come to India? It was well known to the Harappans but not the
Rigveda. The use of silver in other parts of world goes back to
5000 B.C. This is not a certified fact. Silver as we know is not
mined in pure state but is separated from copper after a
purification process of the latter. The discovery of the silver
ornaments at the Pre-Harappan site of Kunal near Ambala points
to a date not later than 2000 B.C. With the application of
dendrochronology as practised by European archaeologists such
as Colin Renfrew that date could go back to 4000 B.C., several
centuries before the Vedic people had learnt to separate silver
from copper ore. In 1958, a famous casting known as ”Vashistha’s
head” was discovered by Hary Hicks, an American collector. rr”TpTtR 17 ANCIENT INDIAN CIVILIZATION 275 Subsequent metallurgical tests have shown a high silver content
which points to the art of casting of an ancient era. Laboratory
tests in California and Zurich on this artifect showed carbon
deposits, which according to Radio Carbon dating leads to a
date between 3800 and 3700 B.C. This conclusively proves that
the Vedic age should have ended well before this time. This is
also corroborated by Mrigashira vernal equinox, which dates
closer to 4000 B.C. With the evidence adduced thus far the
brief chronology of events can be inferred. Close to the end of
the last Ice Age before 8000 B.C., the river Saraswati, the greatest
in India started flowing from the mountains to the sea around
7000 B.C. during the Rigvedic age. It remained a mighty river joined by two other great rivers,
the Satluj and the Yamuna, which followed the course of the
dry river Drishadavati. This was the situation around 4000 B.C.,
when North India was watered by the three major river systems
of the Indus, Saraswati and the Ganga. There was no Thar
Desert separating the regions as it is today. Astronomically this
was the Mrigashira era. Sometime around 3100 B.C., when the
great Mahabharata took place the Yamuna changed its course to
empty itself into the Canga resulting in the diversion of the
waters from Saraswati, which gradually dried up. The expanding
desert began to separate the western people and their SindhuSauvira
culture from the Kuru heartland around the Ganga. The
desiccation of Saraswati along with recurring floods resulted in
the shift of the heart of the Vedic religious praxis eastward to the
Kuru-Panchala territory adding to the alienation between the
east and the west. These were the times of the rise of the
Sumerian civilization and the Sutra period, when the western
people were derisively called ’Melcchas’ by the orthodox of the
Vedic heartland. Subsequently, a center of Vedic tradition grew
up in the Gujarat - Maharashtra region anchored on Taittiriya
thought led by Baudhayana. While the Vajasaneya school of
Yajyavalkya settled in the east, the Yajurvedic tradition as brought
out earlier was split into its northern and southern components
following the Mahabharata war. The desert continued to encroach
on the river Indus and the Harappan civilization, a branch of 276 INDIA AND ISRAEL CHAPTE *17 the main Vedic heartland around Canga, and along with th
drying up of river Saraswati caused the extinction of the indu
valley civilization. As these lines are being written, a land-mark discovery jn
the Gulf of Cambay by a team of oceanographers followed by
the combined efforts of National Institute of Ocean Technology
the Birbal Sahani Institute of Palaeobotany and the National
Geophysical Research Institute, has conclusively proved the
existence of a civilization in that area much before the Harappan
and contemporary civilizations in Egypt, Sumeria and Babylon
Artifects such as construction material, wood with holes and
studs, pot shreds, beads and fossil bones, after the process of
carbon dating, point to a date around 7500 B.C., almost the
same as’the proto-Vedic civilization that came into existence
after the melting of the Ice Cap around 8000 B.C., as discussed
earlier. Professor S.N. Rajguru, former Joint Director and Head
of Department of Archaeology at Deccan College, said, ”These
collections represent an exciting breakthrough in offshore
archaeology. The findings indicate that the entire landscape
between Bhavnagar and Hazira were probably connected around
7000 B.C. The acoustic images of the area present channel like features,
indicating the presence of a river in the region. ”Geometrical
structures and the antiquities have been discovered in an area
only within 200 miles adjoining the channel indicating human
activity on the banks of the river that was present at that time”. These findings also conclusively prove the existence of river
Saraswati in the early Vedic period and its subsequent desiccation.
The above effort by the National Institute of Ocean Technology
(NIOT), which led to an accidental discovery of this sub-merged
township was further supplemented by the following factoid
published in many Indian news magazines. The town lay at a depth of 40 meters below the sea, 30
kms off the Gujarat coast and the dredging efforts spread to an
area of nine kms, situated on the mouth of a river with signs of
a masonry dam. Geometric forms like those at Harappa in rp CHAPTER 17 ANCIENT INDIAN CIVILIZATION \ 277 various forms and sizes were found. An Olympic size sunken
area with steps going down as for a swimming pool and resembling
the great bath of Mohenjodaro was discovered, through
photographs and sonar soundings. Rectangular platform of
200x45 meters, almost the same size as the Acropolis in Greece,
was also found as earlier in Harappa. A large granary structure
made out of mud 185 meters long could also be seen. As part
of this township rectangular basement resembling remains of
homesteads and tiles of a drainage system and mud roads too
were found. About 2000 artifects including polished stones, tools,
ornaments, figurines, broken pottery, some precious stones, ivory
and remains of human vertebra, jawbone and human tooth
were also found. But the clinching evidence of antiquity was
provided by a fossilized log of chopped wood that dated back
to 7500 B.C. The only other settlement of this antiquity was
found earlier at Mehargarh in Baluchistan, which was basically
an agricultural settlement in the Bolan river valley. We shall sum up by stating that the entire linguistic, literary,