1. cross-check the ED_AD_EG
[Resolution]:
-> corrected the ED_AD_EG FU (some comments were added to the document, include it as it is) [done]
2. cross-check the ED_BP
[Resolution]:
-> we need to update the BP to be more generic – it is compliant with the TFAN implementation
-> The proposed generic FU (m28199) is not compliant with the SVA
-> The proposed FU (m28219) is not generic and only covers a specific method used in SVA
-> check if a subcase of this FU is still compliant with TFAN (even if it is do not include it as the ED_BP because it includes some coded specific parts).
-> cross-check the design (during this week)
3. Check IQ 1D (for mode = 1 – you need all 3 values to compute) – doesn't make sense in 1D
[Resolution]:
-> Removed mode 1 in 1D
-> shifted modes (find solution for ehaviordence table – implement using LUT – in some decoders mode = X has a different meaning)
4. Inverse Prediction (Md)
-> Should dimD remain as parameter ?
[Resolution]:
-> dimD remains as parameter
-> Check the newly added case 6 (predMode = 6) – it includes case 4 (ehavior differential prediction), is it the same ?
[Resolution]:
-> case 6 is the same as case 4: remove case 6
-> Check the newly added case 7 (predMode = 7) – it includes case 4 (ehavior differential prediction), is it the same + some additional processing ?
-> Check with Sinwook for the IP (mode 6 is mode 4 with some post-processing ?, is it generic or specific to SVA ?)
-> naming problem case 4 and case 6
-> check case 6 and define it as what it is (description + math )
-> check if it is generic enough
-> Investigate removing case 7 and design a SVA specific FU that applies post-processing to case 6 to implement case 7
[Resolution]:
-> still ongoing:
-> Design 1 or 2 new Fus that implement the reordering and id necessary the post-processing in conjoint with IP to implement case 6 (design during this week)
-> corss-check of the new design (during this week)
-> implementation and corrections during editoral period ?
5. Add section in CD: Context Modeling
-> for the known decoders (MPEG/Part) provide the Fus
[Resolution]:
-> Fus are designed, to be included
-> provide 2 examples implemented using generic Fus (LUTs+Mngt)
[Resolution]:
-> Christian to provide the TFAN context modeling implementation using LUTs
-> Seungto provide the SVA context modeling implementation using LUTs
6. Granular IB
-> check for EG and BP (mine) – also check LUTs – TFAN specific, change the name
[Resolution]:
-> will be done during this week
-> IB Connectivity
-> change name to Granular_InverseBinarization_XXX_SVA
-> check DEMUX selection – there seems to be a mistake (+investigate using the extractSegmentData FU)
[Resolution]:
-> another granular IB_nType was proposed in the BoG but not checked
-> if there is time, design the correct Granular IB Connectivity FU and discuss it during this meeting
-> include it in TuC
-> IB Coordinates
-> Check description part (connectivity)
-> check BP & EG
-> naming problem (SVA)
[Resolution]:
-> update description and naming [ Cui Li ]
-> update BP & EG [ Seung ]
-> if there is time, discuss it during this meeting
-> include it in TuC
7. ExtractMask SC3DMC
[Resolution]:
-> re-check and include in CD
8. Study the difference between Mgnt_ExtractSegment and Mgnt_ExtractBytes
-> does it have the same ehavior as ExtractSegment ?
[Resolution]:
-> still ongoing, answer [ Seung ]
9. ExtractFaceDirection
-> naming problem
[Resolution]:
-> rename to ExtractFaceDirection_sVA, SVA specific [ Seung ]
10. PostP (Post Processing)
[Resolution]:
-> not ok, should include only simple math operations
-> check if it is fully detachable in all the cases (SVA)
11. Provider
-> change the name
[Resolution]:
-> changed, include it in the CD
12. check ED Fus ( codeBytes and codeBuffer port names, be consistent)
[Resolution]:
-> to be done during the editorial period
13. HEVC:
[Resolutions]:
-> contribution discussed (low delay decoder mXXXX)
-> Start WD with the initial set of Fus that are already defined
-> Continue the work on the latest HM10.0
14. RVC based Energy Efficient Decoder
[Resolution]:
-> informal contribution to report the the RMC group (also presented in Green MPEG)
RGC+RVC:
-> CALL Mickael about package naming in CD (during the editorial period)
-> move the network definitions as part of annex (schematic, fnd)
-> Mickael: if the interface, input tokens and output tokens are the same => compliant
-> FSMs as informative (weight on RS)
-> put all the Fus in the generic section, specific to specific section, context modeling as a new section
-> parameters as table in annex
| 
