and fenvironmental risk; while this writer sought to dispel the mydh that... .. ., * ■■■■. ...
deforestation adoiig Tibetan- : riVafsisfcjMiMly.related to.". I '" increased siltation and JQooeiing in downstream basins, :■■■■■
Spiansor&l Dy tjie French poyjerBment and organised by two relatively new- NGO^: EcoTifeet-France-afid-Ehvirdn-raent SansFroptiere, the Paris conference was able to analyse envHO^jmenLaLaiid deveiopnient trends; but provided tittle in the v way of a future agenda or practical soMons. That task was, iri part, undertaken by the secopdl coaference^ "Ecology, Development Trendssand Ttansnafidna'l Impacts on the -Higft Plateau", held in StockhoIniJn November. - Organised by EcoTibet-' ♦' Swedenatilthe$w.edishTijb^ * Committee, tfiis meeting fielded-papers^, a^nong bthejrs, on flie environmental hatory and i biodiversity of the Hnnalaya, development trends in Tibet, remote sensing versus the field*- * woirk approach to data collection, and sustainable day4ong conference was roun* * deH Off by a panel disctissioii on the viability-of independent» projects foj' s'ustainibje, development,in Tibet
: It was cleaf thai the iqaestion of Tibetan development involved two-radically differing perceptions pf jhe road to ..be. taken, -llie; conference discussed the "grand plari" and the \.J*tihtering*? app^daehes to deyeiopme.ht, Th^ Chinese mega-project approach falls in ■ th fir^l (jategojfy^ Whereas the seeds of Tibet was seen to lie in small, participatory projects, such as for watershed management, education ">■■
assertion and demands for reservations and affirmative actions increase in the Himalayan
region with the authorities being pressured to act, there wiltbemyriadi ^compteMiesMuntangle, Most difficult will be the problem of identifying those eligible for preferential status. Ladakh is a case inpoint. ■ M January 1991, the Indian Government decided to WhB'ScHeduie^Aibe status to most residents of ladakh. The debate that has risen subsequently over identity Jdenti^mifoyuMgrMk Mints is instructive
to all'concerned over ir$er-eth%icand^communalharmony in :jhe Bimalaya, The issue of'scheduled'tribe status for Ladakh was te^|f||^|3|||.fc^»j3fo|/1!i SfHfiti SfMmijk Frotifeei What follows is an adapted portion of her piece in tfye'n&g^neZ. '".'. .-.■..-. ■■ -..-.■. -.■.-.. ^ .■■■■ - ■■■■ ■>■■ ■ ■■■■■ ■■■■ -" //: ■■■ "
Tribe status has conferred on nearly all
; inhabitants of Ladakh {that is, I
: both %£$ and KargU districts), except on groups stieh as iftghito Sunni Muslins (bora of;
.;.-, marriages between L^dafcrus arid Sunni Muslims from outside Lacfekh, basic ally Kashmiris^ Syeds and Ktoans. Syeds haw
: beers denied ST status prestirriably : t|ey are'ethnically'outside : L^daktu and in the case'of JChans/the consideration was their high economio stattis (though ST status I13S japt been denied to wealthy, Buddhist families); The denial of tribal status to Arghun Sunnis is, however, a thorny issue locally andis aresult of conti'adictions iri Government policy.
Ladakh M»slim Association jPfesideat Akbar Ladakhi does not agree "With the recoinraendations made by: ,e^)erte on Ladakhi history to the
Scheduled Tribes. Their definition of Arghans as half1: breeds (saying tliey had an...... ... ,. .
identity oftheir own different
■ frdrri theroth^r ^ tribes' of.-.■..■. .■■■■
Ladakibj is contradictory to the : idea of a■■■' ffibe* in me first place,
he says: Jfthe" fix^etts.had■:■■
adopted thecriterion of naming:/l:: : the^inhabitants of afegion:as k 'Whole as eligible fo| tribal status, it would not have cheated bitterr^ejsSi He adds: "Byivirtut of its geographical isolatio^i Snd backwardness, the entirev region of Ladakh is eligible for:
st status.^ :;i - "
m does- appear to tnariy that the denial of ;ST statii^ to Arghmi Musiiihsisnotjust, as other ■;■;■ 'h&lf^breeds' such as Dpgra Arghuris (of in^ed Lad,akrii:..and<, Dogra parentage) andNepati ■: :: Arghuns^oJ.' mixed Ladakhi'arid
given1 tribal status;; This is par%..: djie to the conflating of various
criteria for deciding Oh STstanis/
this status accordmg to
;'' for"" 7 .
irijitance, E^tipa-(people of Baltistan) and Purigja people of
declared tribal on: thebasis of " some racial criteria; for instance, 'Bbtos* (^ teriri Indicating people of Mongoloid or'Tibelan : stock; locally liavfeg assbciaii^n with Buddhists and, therefore,'., riot acceptable to Arghuri Sursius);
^andTa Buddhist mother or-grandmother, everf if :hehas converted tp ]BiidcIh|soi,,: ;iie is denied ST status by virtae vf his baterrafd^sceiati v;I '". ."
If ST stattts is given to alj inhabitants of Ladakh, it would go a k>ng way in creating an atmtisphere of goodwill, .This opinion was eudoi-sed by a responsible section of the older generation, in Leh. It was.felt ihat first; given Ladakh's batkwardriess vis-a-vis:therest of India, some reservation policy for the whole area was necessary; second, given its vulnerable geo-pplitical ppsitipn, alienating sections of the population, howsoever ■advantageous in .the Machiavellian internal politics of the nation-state, would be c dunte'tprodu c ti ve.
The success of the new mi"tia,tivesiiiLehwilldepend ^s
■BRIEFS
Corffergijee in
|f on a combination of . ....
economic and culEiral factors:
the influence of regions, sudfi as
Tibet, Central Asia and Kashmir
in its political and social history-
(in rhftlters of trade, pilgrimage !
and transhjimahce), which1
rnjkes Ladakh amulticentred
^one; the existence of various
cultural groups — Shias,
: Sunnis, Buddhists (of various ■
order)jChristjians:aridso en —■■,■■
speaking different dialects with
shifting allegiances and
cleavages; political interest at.
the local level and above,(
which often crisscross; and finally, the customary modes.oj Sife based on a political economy of which the Indian nation state is yet to .have full control. All these factors make Ladakh a; centre of various centripetal and centrifugal forces, throwing up questions about ihe success of She proposed decentralisMpri experiment, *•
W ill the Himalayan • Research Builittn rise from the ashes? Refleeting perhaps the iegs^rpng of interest s in Himalayan-studies in North Arnericah uhwersfties, over recent^ years thtf journal 'has1 ost some ofiLs lustre^ Shuiited from, dn^ American university to another iri search of patronage, the » joyrrlal became less and less tegular. ' After
tenure at Cornell Universitywider editors Kathryn March and David Holmberg, the journal moved to Columbia University (editors: l^ieodore Riccardi, Bruce." "Owerts, Bill Fisber): hi 1991, -editorship was Jtakep over by Ter BDb'ngson and Linda Htis of the
Shiihng,Mt&jhpitedm the Roasts of peaee" I ' tnthestrife-hm
js to'host an ■■■ ■■■ ■,, .' .":" intepnationalxonfirpvce,
Tou are invited to consider ^mankind's defpest concerns^ r^ptelions and challenges, |nd ". to share exp#Hences of charge and hope in difficult situations," states the invitation letter that has been sent to feuding Serbs, .;Croat| ahdMtislirrisinBosnia,. .=■ ;teBlacksandVWrrite>uiSoutii- -Ttfnca, Israelis,^Pftlestin?an^ " , Lebanese Ss WelT as peopk:::: .. 1 frornManipur. Invitatiohs have ■ also been sent to Asva-Paciftt? :
tlrii v ersi iy 6 f: Washing ton kt
University1 did not eome «p:-promised si^p^ri, and anly one ^ issue has bcen:brought ovit so ihst issue is not
■ as ihe bulk of its. ..:
■:■■ A-decision was |akeh bverthe fall, at a,. meeting Of, the Nepal Stud bsAss ociawon 1
,are devoted toprinting toe entire I^MNepah' \ ; .
wrest the publication fro the University ojf Washington^aad:' it avei to the
University of jl^xas in Austin. ■■■■■ Barbara Brower, a geographer ; whO;has worked amorig'ths : Sherpas, was appointed; the new editor; ■■ - :- - - -: -.. ■ . .
populations a
Jnpeace'V;- ■■■■ ■■■ .-- ■. ... .„ I "' ■:■■ ■■..■ Sfeiljtopg i$ said to have. been.v. ■ selected ses the. venue "sincb;:it---; "■■■ ... offers e'asy acces^btlity. to the... .. flashing -Nagas.-anid^KuJasin' BeigPjpyripg Manipur, as weil as the different tribes arid- :
wiio are up inarmsagaJntst thetf
., called Moral Rearmament,, and supported byJliS Ramalftishna Mission and various Cllfistian .orgaqrii$a(ions, the tliems of the conference is: "Learnjing to Jiye tog|tr^r—vfrontieF ■.■, v; ... 6f hope". Since foreign : ■ ■djil^gates will'need restricted
■:.■ sea pepnits to enter the Northeast, theu;#pplicatbiis"
c onference c 9 ofd that or
\.Ttid survival or demise.-ol . die HI^B In"We ^drnijig year will {ilso indicate &e siaiie..p£ Z 2. . Himalayiii'studies in North Aniericai bk the past, fevu-opeari schdlm were among,ihe main svippottCTs of HRft.:Now,-they. ,■. have their piynpMicatioti,"the :
:. Research, and aiithtMT and reader
loyalties arefTaetur^. .Pgrtiaps a
partnftrshjp between the::
Europeans 4np Nojtb AjBdricaiis |bpublish one, regular* professional ]oiuTiaI: will be to everyone's good.; New^.subsciriptipn details: Mima tayan«Re$earcfi Bulletin, 'Geography Department, !u^iiyersity;of Austin,^ ; ■■■■■