Periphyton Christine L. Weilhoefer

Environmental Monitoring

and Assessment
Angeler, D.G.; Garcia, G. 2005. Using emergence from soil propagule banks as indicators of ecological integrity in wetlands: advantages and limitations. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 24: 740-752.

Arvanitidis, C.; Atzigeorgiou, G.; Koutsoubas, D.; Dounas, C.; Eleftheriou, A.; Koulouri, P. 2005. Mediterranean lagoons revisited: Weakness and efficiency of the rapid biodiversity assessment techniques in a severely fluctuating environment. Biodivers Conserv. 14(10): 2347-2359.

Arvanitidis, C; Chatzigeorgiou, G.; Koutsoubas, D.; et al. 2005. Estimating lagoonal biodiversity in Greece: Comparison of rapid assessment techniques. Helgol. Mar. Res. 59(3): 177-186.

Bady, P.; Dolédec, S.; Fesl, C.; Gayraud, S.; Bacchi, M.; Schöll, F. 2005. Use of invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of European large rivers: the effects of sampling effort on genus richness and functional diversity. Freshwater Biol. 50(1): 159-173.

Battarbee, R.W.; Anderson, N.J.; Jeppesen, E.; Leavitt, P.R. 2005. Combining palaeolimnological and lomnological approaches in assessing lake ecosystem response to nutrient reduction. Freshwater Biol. 50(10):1772-1780.

Beamonte, E.; Bermúdez, J.D. Alejandro, C.; Amesto, V.; 2005. Global stochastic index for water quality: the case for the river Turia in Spain. J. Agri. Biol. Env. Stat. 10(4): 424-439.

Beaugrand, G. 2005. Monitoring pelagic ecosystems using plankton indicators. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62(3): 333-338.

Becker, B.L.; Lusch, D.P.; Qi, J. 2005. Identifying optimal spectral bands from in situ measurements of great lakes coastal wetlands using second-derivative analysis. Remote Sensing of Environ. 97(2): 238-248.

Bello-Pineda, J.; Liceaga-Correa, M.A.; Hernandez-Nachez, H.; Ponce-Hernandez, R. 2005. Using aerial video to train the supervised classification of landsat tm imagery for coral reef habitats mapping. Environ. Monit. Assess. 105(1-3): 145-164.

Bennion, H.; Hilton, J.; Hughes, M.; et al. 2005. The use of a GIS-based inventory to provide a national assessment of standing waters at risk from eutrophication in Great Britain. The Science of the Total Environ. 344(1-3): 259-273.

Berg, N.H.; Gallegos, A.; Dell, T.; et al. 2005. A screening procedure for identifying acid-sensitive lakes from catchment characteristics. Environ. Monit. Assess. 105(1-3): 285-307.

Bleuel, C.; Wesenberg, D.; Sutter, K.; et al. 2005. The use of the aquatic moss Fontinalis antipyretica L. ex hedw. as a bioindicator for heavy metals. The Science of the Total Environ. 345(1-3): 13-21.

Borderelle, A.L.; Verneaux, V.; Gerdeaux, D. 2005. Biological quality assessment of three French Alpine lakes (Lake Annecy, lake Crop, Lake Grand Demenon) using the lake biotic index (LBI). Archiv. für Hydrobiol. 162(4): 497-509.

Borja, A.; Muxika, I. 2005. Guidelines for the use of AMBI (AZTI marine biotic index) in the assessment of the benthic ecological quality. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50(7):787-789.

Bramblett, R.G. 2005. Development and evaluation of a fish assemblage index of biotic integrity for northwestern Great Plains streams. Trans. Amer. Fisher. Soc. 134(3): 624-640.

Caeiro, S.; Costa, M.H.; Goovaerts, P.; Martins, F. 2005. Benthic biotope index for classifying habitats in the Sado estuary: Portugal. Mar. Environ. Res. 60(5):570-593.

Cao, Y.; Hawkins, C.P. 2005. Simulating biological impairment to evaluate the accuracy of ecological indicators. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 954-965.

Cao, Y.; Hawkins, C.P.; Storey, A.W. 2005. A method for measuring the comparability of different sampling methods used in biological surveys: implications for data integration and synthesis. Freshwater Biol. 50(6): 1105-1116.

Carr, G.M.; Chambers, P.A.; Morin, A. 2005. Periphyton, water quality, and land use at multiple spatial scales in Alberta rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62(6): 1309-1319.

Dale, P.E.R.; Knight, J.; Ritchie, S.A.; Kay, B.H. 2005. A practical tool to identify water bodies with potential for mosquito habitat under mangrove canopy: Large-scale airborne scanning in the thermal band 8m. Wetlands Ecol Managem. 13(4):389-394.

Danielsen, F.; Burgess, N.D.; Balmford, A. 2005. Monitoring matters: Examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 14(11):2507-2542.

Davy-Bowker, J.; Murphy, J.F.; Rutt, G.P.; Steel, J.E.C.; Furse, M.T. 2005. The development and testing of a macroinvertebrate biotic index for detecting the impact of acidity on streams. Archiv. für Hydrobiol. 163(3): 383-403.

De Bisthoven, L.J.; Gerhardt, A.; Soares, A.M.V.M. 2005. Chironomidae larvae as bioindicators of an acid mine drainage in Portugal. Hydrobiologia. 532(1):181-191.

Dorigo, U.; Volatier, L.; Humbert, J. 2005. Molecular approaches to the assessment of biodiversity in aquatic microbial communities. Water Res. 39(11):2207-2218.

Edsall, T.; Bur, M.; Gorman, O.; Schaeffer, J. 2005. Burrowing mayflies as indicators of ecosystem health: Status of populations in western Lake Erie, Saginaw Bay and Green Bay. Aquat. Ecosystem Health & Managem. 8(2):107-116.

Ewers, R.M.; Didham, R.K. Wratten, S.D.; Tylianakis, J.M. 2005. Remotely sensed landscape heterogeneity as a rapid tool for assessing local biodiversity value in a highly modified New Zealand landscape. Biodivers Conserv. 14(6):1469-1485.

Ferreira, M.T.; Rodri­guez-Gonzalez, P.M.; Aguiar, F.C.; Albuquerque, A. 2005. Assessing biotic integrity in Iberian rivers: Development of a multimetric plant index. Ecol. Indicators 5(2):137-149.

Ferraol, M.; Dohet, A.; Cauchie, H.; Hoffmann, L. A. 2005. top-down approach for the development of a stream typology based on abiotic variables. Hydrobiologia 551(1):193-208.

Fleishman, E.; Thomson, J.R.; Nally, R.M.; Murphy, D.D.; Fay, J.P. 2005. Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. Cons. Biol. 19(4):1125-1137.

Flotemersch, J.E.; Blocksom, K.A. 2005. Electrofishing in boatable rivers: Does sampling design affect bioassessment metrics? Environ. Monit. Assess. 102(1-3):263-283.

Foote, A.L.; Homung, C.L.R. 2005. Odonates and biological indicators of grazing effects on Canadian prairie wetlands. Ecol. Entom. 30(3): 273-283.

Gabriels, W.; Goethals, P.L.M.; Pauw, N.D. 2005. Implications of taxonomic modifications and alien species on biological water quality assessment as exemplified by the Belgian biotic index method. Hydrobiologia. 542(1):137-150.

Gandouin, E.; Franquet, E. van Viet-lanoe, B. 2005. Chironomidae (Diptera) in river floodplains: their status and potential use for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction purposes. Archiv. für Hydrobiol. 162(4): 511-534.

Giangrande, A.; Licciano, M.; Musco, L. 2005. Polychaetes as environmental indicators revisited. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50(11):1153-1162.

Gosselain, V.; Coste, M.; Campeau, S.; et al. 2005. A large-scale stream benthic diatom database. Hydrobiologia 542(1):151-163.

Griffith, M.B.; Hill, B.H.; McCormick, F.H.; Kaufmann, P.R.; Herlihy, A.T.; Selle, A.R. 2005. Comparative application of indices of biotic integrity based on periphyton macroinvertebrates, and fish to southern rocky mountain streams. Ecol. Indicators 5(2):117-136.

Gruau, G.; Legeas, M.; Riou, C.; Gallacier, E.; Martineau, F.; Hanin, O. 2005. The oxygen isotope composition of dissolved anthropogenic phosphates: A new tool for eutrophication research? Water Res. 39(1):232-238.

Hall, G.J.; Clow, K.E.; Kenny, J.E. 2005. Estuarial fingerprinting through multidimensional fluorescence and multivariate analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(19): 7560-7567.

Hanson, M.; Lagadic, L. 2005. Chitobiase activity as an indicator of aquatic ecosystem health. Aquat. Ecosystem Health & Managem. 8(4):441-450.

Hardman-Mountford, N.J.; Allen, J.I.; Frost, M.T.; et al. 2005. Diagnostic monitoring of a changing environment: An alternative UK perspective. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50(12):1463-1471.

Hedley, J.D.; Harborne, A.R.; Mumby, P.J. 2005 2005. Technical note: simple and robust removal of sun glint for mapping shallow water benthos. Int. J. Remote. Sens. 26(10): 2107-2112.

Heino, J.; Paavola, R.; Virtanen, R.; Muotka, T. 2005. Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: Do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns? Biodivers Conserv. 14(2): 415-428.

Hiddink, J.G.; Kaiser, M.J. 2005. Implications of Liebig’s law of the minimum for the use of ecological indicators based on abundance. Ecography 28(2): 264-221.

Hodkinson, I.D.; Jackson, J.K.; 2005. Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental moitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. Environ. Managem. 35(5): 649-666.

Hortal, J.; Lobo, J.M. 2005. An ED-based protocol for optimal sampling of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv. 14(12):2913-2947.

Jardine, T.D.; Al, T.A.; MacQuarrie, K.T.B.; et al. 2005. Water striders (family Gerridae): Mercury sentinels in small freshwater ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 134(1):165-171.

Jiang, J.; Shen, Y. 2005. Use of the aquatic protozoa to formulate a community biotic index for an urban water system. The Science of the Total Environ. 346(1-3):99-111.

Johnson, M. J.; Giller, P.S.; O’Halloran, J.; O’Gorman, K.; Gallagher, M.B. 2005. A novel approach to assess the impact of landuse activity on chemical and biological parameters in river catchments. Freshwater Biol. 50(7): 1273-1290.

Kim, A.G.; Cardone, C.R. 2005. Scatterscore: A reconnaissance method to evaluate changes in water quality. Environ. Monit. Assess. 111(1-3):277-295

Lavoie, I.; Somers, K.M.; Paterson, A.M; Dillon, P.J. 2005. Assessing scales of variability in benthic diatom community structure. J. Appl. Phycol. 17(6):509-513.

Li, X.; Wang, S.H.; Haman, M.; Improved lake/reservoir water quality Modeling using an environmental model and GIS. GIScience and Remote Sensing. 42(4): 320-332.

Linke, S.; Norris, R.H.; Faith, D.P.; Stockwell, D. 2005. ANNA: A new prediction method for bioassessment programs. Freshwater Biol. 50(1): 147-158.

Liou, Y.; Lo, S. 2005. A fuzzy index model for trophic status evaluation of reservoir waters. Water Res. 39(7):1415-1423.

Livingston, P.A.; Aydin, K.; Boldt, J.; Ianelli, J.; Jurado-Molina, J. 2005. A framework for ecosystem impacts assessment using an indicator approach. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62(3):592-597.

Luan, B.T.; Debenay, J. 2005. Foraminifera, environmental bioindicators in the highly impacted environments of the Mekong Delta. Hydrobiologia 548(1):75-83.

Maassen, S.; Uhlmann, D.; Raske, I. 2005. Sediment and pore water composition as a basis for the trophic evaluation of standing waters. Hydrobiologia 543(1):55-70.

Marcogliese, D.J. 2005. Parasites of the superorganism: Are they indicators of ecosystem health? Intern. J. for Parasitol. 35(7):705-716.

Martin, R.; Beck, C.W.; Baker, S. 2005. Comparison of two bioassessment protocols in five Georgia streams. Fresh. Ecol. 20(4):

Maxwell, D.; Jennings, S. 2005. Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish. Appl. Ecol. 42: 25-37.

Mouillot, D.; Gaillard, S.; Aliaume, C.; et al. 2005. Ability of taxonomic diversity indices to discriminate coastal lagoon environments based on macrophyte communities. Ecol. Indicators 5(1):1-17.

Mulholland, P.J.; Houser, J.N.; Maloney, K.O. 2005. Stream diurnal dissolved oxygen profiles as indicators of in-stream metabolism and disturbance effects: Fort Benning as a case study. Ecol. Indicators 5(3):243-252.

Muxika, I.; Borja, A.; Bonne, W. 2005. The suitability of the marine biotic index (AMBI) to new impact sources along European coasts. Ecol. Indicators 5(1):19-31.

Nijboer R.C.; Verdonscott, P.F.M.; Van Der Werf. D.C. 2005. The use of indicator taxa as representative of communities in bioassessment. Freshwater Biol. 50(8): 1427-1440.

Ode, P.R.; Rehn, S.E.; May, J.T. 2005. A quantitative tool for assessing the integrity of southern coastal California streams. Environ. Managem. 35(4): 493-504.

Pagliosa, P.R. 2005. Another diet of worms: the applicability of polychaete feeding guilds as a useful conceptual framework and biological variable. Mar. Ecol. 26(3-4): 246-255.

Pozdnyakov, D.; Shuchman, R.; Korosov, A.; Hatt, C. 2005. Operational algorithm for the retrieval of water quality in the Great Lakes. Remote Sensing of Environ. 97(3):352-370.

Raunio, J.; Moutka, T. 2005. The use of chironomid pupal exuviae in river biomonitoring: the importance of sampling strategy. Archiv. für Hydrobiol. 164(4): 529-545.

Reghunath, R. Murthy, T.R.S.; Raghavan, B.R. 2005. Time series analysis to monitor and assess water resources: A moving average approach. Environ. Monit. Assess. 109(1-3):65-72.

Rimet, F.; Cauchie, H.; Hoffmann, L.; Ector, L. 2005. Response of diatom indices to simulated water quality improvements in a river. J. Appl. Phycol. 17(2):119-128.

Rogers, S.I.; Greenaway, B. 2005. A UK perspective on the development of marine ecosystem indicators. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50(1):9-19.

Shields Jr., F.D.; Rigby, J.R. 2005. River habitat quality from river velocities measured using acoustic Doppler current profiler. Environ. Managem. 35(4): 565-575.

Silveira, M.P.; Baptista, D.F.; Buss, D.F.; Nessimian, J.L.; Egler, M. 2005. Application of biological measures for Stream integrity assessment in south-east Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 101(1-3):117-128.

Statzner, B.; Bady, P.; Dolédec, S.; Schöll, F. 2005. Invertebrates traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of trait patterns in least impacted river reaches. Freshwater Biol. 50(12): 2136-2161.

Wang, X.; Homer, M.; Dyer, S.D.; White-Hull, C.; Du, C. 2005. A river water quality model integrated with a web-based geographic information system. J. Environ. Managem. 75(3): 219-228.

Wang, Y.K.; Stevenson, R.J.; Metzmeir, L. 2005. Development and evaluation of a diatom-based index of biotic integrity for the interior plateau ecoregion, USA. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 24: 990-998.

Wiersma, Y.F. 2005. Environmental benchmarks vs. ecological benchmarks for assessment and monitoring in Canada: Is there a difference? Environ. Monit. Assess. 2005; 100(1-3):1-9.

Wilhelm, J.G.O.; Allan, J.D.; Wessell, K.J.; Merritt, R.W.; Cumins, K.W. 2005. Habitat assessment of non-wadeable rivers in Michigan. Environ. Managem. 35(4):592-609.

Xu, F.; Zhao, Z.; Zhan, W.; Zhao, S.; Dawson, R.W.; Tao, S. 2005. An ecosystem health index methodology (EHIM) for lake ecosystem health assessment. Ecol. Model. 188(2-4):327-339.

Yurista, P.; Kelly, J.R.; Miller, S. 2005. Evaluation of optically acquired zooplankton size-spectrum data as a potential tool for Assessment of condition in the Great Lakes. Environ. Managem. 35(1): 34-44.
Environmental Management,

Habitat Restoration, and

Conservation Techniques
Abellán, P.; Sánchez-Fernández, D.; Velasco, J.; Millán, A. 2005. Conservation of freshwater biodiversity: A comparison of different area selection methods. Biodivers Conserv. 14(14):3457-3474.

Abellán, P.; Sánchez-Fernández, D.; Velasco, J.; Millán, A. 2005. Assessing conservation priorities for insects: status of water beetles in southeast Spain. Biol. Cons. 121(1): 79-90.

Achleitner, S.; DE Toffol, S.; Engelhard, C.; Rauch, W. 2005. The European water framework directive: water quality classification and implications of engineering planning. Environ. Managem. 35(4): 517-525.

Acreman, M. 2005. Linking science and decision making: features and experience from environmental river flow setting. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(2): 99-109.

Alcaraj, C.; Villa-Gispart, A.; Garcia-Berthou, E. 2005. Profiling invasive fish species: the importance of phylogeny and human use. Diver. & Distr. 11(4): 289-298.

Anbumozhi, V.; Radhakrishnan, J.; Yamaji, E. 2005. Impact of riparian buffer zones on water quality and associated management considerations. Ecol. Engin. 24(5):517-523.

Araüjo, M.B.; Thuiller, W.; Williams, P.H.; Reginster, I. 2005. Downscalling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implication for conservation planning (Research Review). Glob. Ecol. & Biogeog. 14(1): 17-30.

Bauna, J.J.; François, D.; Troch, P. 2005. Risk Assessmentand Water management. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(2): 141-151.

Bonn, A.; Gaston, K.J. 2005. Capturing biodiversity: Selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodivers Conserv. 14(5):1083-1100.

Brown, M.T.; Vivas, M.B. 2005. Landscape intensity development index. Environ. Monit. Assess. 101(1-3): 289-309.

Burel, F.; Baudry, J. 2003. Landscape Ecology Concepts, Methods and Applications. Science publishers, Inc. Enfield, USA. 362 pp.

Cacela, D.; Lipton, J,; Beltman, D.; Hensen, J.; Wolotira, R. 2005. Associating ecosystem service losses with indicators of toxicity in habitat equivalency analysis. Environ. Managem. 35(3): 343-351.

Cipollini, K.A.; Maruyama, A.L.; Zimmeman, C.L. 2005. Planning for Restoration: A decison analysis approach to prioritization. Restor. Ecol. 13(3): 460-471.

Comin, F.A.; Menendez, M.; Pedrocchi, C.; Moreno, S.; Sorando, R.; Cabezas, A.; Garcia, M.; Rosas, V.; Moreno, D.; Gonzalez, U.; Gallardo, B.; Herrera, J.A.; Clancarelli, C. 2005. Wetland restoration: scientific-technical, economic and social perspectives. Ecol. Restor. 23(3): 182-186.

Correll, D.L. 2005. Principles of planning and establishment of buffer zones. Ecol. Engin. 24(5):433-439.

Crisman, T.L.; Mitraki, C.; Zalidis, G. 2005. Integrating vertical and horizontal approaches for management of shallow lakes and wetlands. Ecol. Engin. 24(4):379-389.

Cury, P.M.; Shannon, L.J.; Roux, J.; et al. 2005. Trophodynamic indicators for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. ICES J. of Mar. Sci. 62(3):430-442.

Diaz-Francis, E.; Soberon, J. 2005. Statistical estimation and model selection of species-accumulation functions. Cons. Biol. 19(2): 569-573.

Darwall, W.R.T.; Vié, J.C. 2005. Identifying important sites for conservation of freshwater biodiversity: extending the species-based approach. Fish. Managem. Ecol. 12(5): 287-294.

Dodkins, I.; Rippey, B.; Harrington, T.J.; et al. 2005. Developing an optimal river typology for biological elements within the water framework directive. Water Res. 39(15):3479-3486.

Drechsler, Martin. 2005. Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection. Biol. Cons. 122(2): 253-262.

Erös, T.; Grossman, G.D. 2005. Fish biodiversity in two Hungarian streams: a landscape-based approach. Archiv. für Hydrobiol. 165(1): 53-71.

Faith, D.P. 2005. Global biodiversity assessment: Integrating global and local values and human dimensions. Global Environ. Change 15(1):5-8.

FitzHugh, T.W. 2005. GIS tools for freshwater biodiversity conservation planning. Trans. GIS 9(2): 247-264.

Franklin, A. 2005. Linking science and policy for biodiversity. Hydrobiologia 542(1):15-17.

Fuharty, D.; 2005. Evolving ecosystem approaches to management of fisheries in the USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 300: 248-253.

Garcia, S.M.; Cochrane, K.L.; Ecosystem approach to fisheries: A review of implementation guidelines. ICES J. of Mar. Sci. 62(3):311-318.

Gerber, L.R.; Beger, M.; McCarthy, M.A.; Possingham, H.P. 2005. A theory of optimal monitoring of marine reserves. Ecol. Letters 8(8): 829-837

Giller, P.S. 2005. River restoration: seeking ecological standards. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 201-207.

Gladstone, W; Alexander, T. 2005. A test of the higher-taxon approach in the identification of candidate sites for marine reserves. Biodivers. Conserv. 14(13):3151-3168.

Gregory, S.; Boyer, K.; Gurnell, A. (Eds). 2003. The Ecology and Management of Woods in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD. 431 pp.

Guralnick, R.; Cleve, J.V. 2005. Strength and weaknesses of museum and national survey data sets for predicting regional species richness: comparative and combined approaches. Diver. & Distr. 11(4): 349-360.

Harmann, G.; Horn, A.; Fohrer, N. 2005. The evaluation of land-use options in mesoscale catchments. Ecol. Model. 187(1):3-14.

Higgins, J.V; Bryer, M.T.; Khoury, M.L.; Fitzhugh, T.W. 2005. A freshwater classification approach for biodiversity conservation planning. Cons. Biol. 19(2): 432-445.

Holmes, M.G.R.; Young, A.R.; Goodwin, T.H.; Grew, R. 2005. A catchment-based water resource decision support tool for the United Kingdom. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(2):197-202.

Host, G.E.; Schuldt, J.; Ciborowski, J.J.H.; Johnson, L.B.; Hollenhorst, T.; Richards, C. 2005. Use of remotely sensed data for a priori identification of reference areas for Great Lakes coastal ecosystems. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26(23): 5325-5342.

Janssen, R.; Goosen, H.; Verhoeven, M.L. Verhoeven, J.T.A.; Omtzigt, A.Q.A.; Maltby, E. 2005. Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(2): 215-229.

Jansson, R.; Backx, H.; Boulton, A.J.; Dixon, M.; Dudgeon, D.; Hughes, F.M.R.; Nakamura, K.; Stanley, E.H.; Tockner, K. 2005. Stating mechanisms and refining criteria for ecologically successful river restoration: A comment. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 218-222.

Jennings, S. 2005. Indicators to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 6(3): 212-232.

Kail, J.; Hering, D. 2005. Using large wood to restore streams in central Europe: Potential use and likely effects. Landscape Ecol. 20(6):755-772.

Kearns, F.R.; Kelly, N.M.; Carter, J.L.; Resh, V.H. 2005. A method for the use of landscape metrics in freshwater research and management. Landscape Ecol. 20(1):113-125.

Kremen, C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services; what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol. Letters. 8(5): 468-479.

Le V. dit Durell, S.E.A; McGrorty, S.; West, A.D.; Clarke, R.T.; Goss-Custard, J.D.; Stillman, R.A. 2005. A strategy for baseline monitoring of estuary special protection areas. Biol. Cons. 121(2): 289-301.

Lepori, F.; Palm, D.; Malmqvist, B. 2005. Effects of stream restoration on ecosystem functioning: detritus retentiveness and decomposition. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 223-227.

Leslie, H.M. 2005. A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Cons. Biol. 19(6): 1701-1713.

Letcher, R.A.; Giupponi, C. 2005. Policies and tools for sustainable water management in the European Union. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(2): 93-98.

Maes, D.; Bauwens, D.; De Bruyn, L.; et al. 2005. Species richness coincidence: Conservation strategies based on predictive modelling. Biodivers Conserv. 14(6):1345-1364.

Mander, Ü; Hayakawa, Y.; Kuusemets, V. 2005. Purification processes, ecological functions, planning and design of riparian buffer zones in agricultural watersheds. Ecol. Engin. 24(5):421-432.

Mathooko, J.M. 2005. Application of traditional ecological knowledge in the management and sustainability of fisheries in East Africa: A long-neglected strategy? Hydrobiologia 537(1-3):1-6.

McKinstry, M.C.; Anderson, S.H. 2005. Salvaged-wetland soil as a technique to improve aquatic vegetation at created wetlands in Wyoming, USA. Wetlands Ecol. Managem. 13(5):499-508.

Meester, L.D.; Declerck, S. 2005. The study of biodiversity in freshwater habitats: Societal relevance and suggestions for priorities in science policy. Hydrobiologia 542(1):1-9.

Mitchell, S.C.; 2005. How useful is the concept of habitat? – A critique. Oikos 110(3): 634-637.

Mougiakakou, S.G.; Tsouchlaraki, A.L.; Cassios, C.; Nikita, K.S. Matsopoulos; G.K.; Uzunoglu, N.K. 2005. SCAPEVIEWER: Preliminary results of a landscape perception classification system based on neural network technology. Ecol. Engin. 24(1-2):5-15

Mysiak, J.; Giupponi, C.; Rosato, P. 2005. Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(2):203-214.

Nunneri, C; Hofmann, J. 2005. A participatory approach for integrated river Basin management in the Elbe catchment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci. 62(3):521-537.

Palmer, M.A.; Bernhardt, E.S.; Allan, J.D.; et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 208-217.

Petty, J.T.; Thome, D. 2005. An ecologically based approach to identifying restoration priorities in an acid-impacted watershed. Restor. Ecol. 13(2): 348-387.

Porej, D.; Hetherington, T.E. 2005. Designing wetlands for amphibians: The importance of predatory fish and shallow littoral zones in structuring of amphibian communities. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 13(4):445-455.

Power, M.E.; Brozovic, N.; Bode, C.; Zilberman, D. 2005. Spatially explicit tools for understanding and sustaining inland water ecosystem. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3(1): 47-55.

Reckhow, K.H.; Arhonditsis, G.B.; Kenny, M.A.; Hauser, L.; Tribo, J.; Wu, C. Elcock, K.J.; Steinberg, L.J., Stow, C.A.; McBride, S.J. 2005. A predictive approach to nutrient criteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(9): 2913-2919.

Reuss, N.; Conley, D.J.; Bianchi, T.S. 2005. Preservation conditions and the use of sediment pigments as a tool for recent ecological reconstruction in four northern European estuaries. Mar. Chem. 95(3-4):283-302.

Richter, R.; Stromberg, J.C. 2005. Soil seed banks of two montane riparian areas: Implications for restoration. Biodivers Conserv. 14(4):993-1016.

Rosenberg, A.A.; Mcleod, K.L. 2005. Implementing ecosystem-based approaches to management for the conservation of ecosystem services. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 300: 270-274.

Rouen, K.; George, G. (eds.) 2005. New Tools for the Monitoring, Modelling & Management of Fresh Waters, A Special Issue, Volume 23, The Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No. 63 Bryozoans, Ambleside, UK. 170 pp.

Ruiz-Jaen, M.; Aide, T.M. 2005. Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor. Ecol. 13(3): 569-577.

Sherma, K.; Sissenwine, M.; Christensen, V.; Duda, A.; Hempel, G.; Ibe, C.; Levin, S.; Lluch-Belda, D.; Matishov, G.; Mcglade, J. O’Toole, M.; Seitzinger, S.; Serra, R.; Skojoldal, H.R.; Tang, Q; Thulin, J.; Vandeweerd, V., Zwanenburg K. 2005. A global movement toward an ecosystem approach to management of marine resources. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 300: 275-279.

Shields, F.D.; Knight, S.S.; Cooper, C.M. 2005. Stream ecosystem restoration: is watershed-scale treatment effective without instream habitat rehabilitation? Ecol. Restor. 23(2): 103-109.

Sondergaard, M.; Jeppesen, E.; Jensen, J.P.; Amsinck, S.L. 2005. Water framework directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 616-629.

Stem, C.; Margoluis, R.; Salafsky, N.; Brown, M. 2005. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: a review of trend and approaches. Cons. Biol. 19(2): 295-309.

Stephen, N. 2005. A combined hydrologic simulation and landscape design model to prioritize sites for wetlands restoration. Environ. Model. Assess. 10(3): 251-263.

Suh, A.N.; Samways, M.J. 2005. Significance of temporal changes when designing a reservoir for conservation of dragonfly diversity. Biodivers Conserv. 14(1):165-178.

Tippett, J. 2005. The value of combining a system view of sustainability with a participatory protocol of ecologically informed design in river basins. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(2): 119-139.

Uchida, T, Tazaki, F. 2005. New methods and allelopathic considerations of riparian buffer zones using Phragmites australis (cav.) trin. Ecol. Engin. 24(5):559-569.

Walsh, C.J.; Fletcher, T.D., Ladson, A.R. 2005. Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 24: 690-705.

Wardrop, D.H.; Bishop, J.A.; Easterling, M.; et al. 2005. Use of landscape and land use parameters for classification and characterization of watersheds in the mid-Atlantic across five physiographic provinces. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 12(2):209-223.

Watanabe, M.; Adams, R.M.; Wu, J.J.; Bolte, J.P.; Cox, M.M.; Johnson, S.L.; Liss, W.J. Boggess, W.G.; Ebersole, J.L. 2005. Toward efficient riparian restoration: integrating economic, physical, and biological models. J. Environ. Managem. 75(2): 93-104.

Wilson, Kerrie A.; Westphal, Michael I.; Possingham, Hugh P.; Elith, J. 2005 Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data. Biol. Cons. 122(1): 99-112.

Wissmar, R.C.; Bisson, P.A.; Duke, M.(ed.) 2005. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. Fish and Fisheries 6: 160-164.

Whittaker, R. J.; Araújo, M.B.; Jepson, P.; Ladle, R.J.; Watson, J.E.M.; Willis, K.J. 2005. Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diver. & Distr. 11(1): 3-24.

Wolters, M.; Garbutt, A.; Baker, J.P. 2005. Salt-marsh restoration evaluating the successes of de-embankments in north-west Europe. Biol. Cons. 123(2): 249-268.

Yang, X. 2005. Remote sensing and GIS applications for estuarine ecosystem analysis: an overview. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26(23): 5347-5356.

Zacharias, M.A.; Gregr, E.J. 2005. Sensitivity and vulnerability in marine environments: an approach to identifying vulnerable marine areas. Cons. Biol. 19(1): 86-97.

Zedler, J.B. 2005. Restoring wetland plant diversity: A comparison of existing and adaptive approaches. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 13(1):5-14.

Zhao, S.; Li, Z.; Li, W. 2005. A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application. Ecol. Model. 185(1):65-75.