other side of the house at eleven o'clock, and was hardly up,
or but just rising at that time. So that it appeared not
possible to see into that part of the house at that time, by
the help of the moon. And considering withal the good
reputation of the man, and of the woman especially, and the
c 2
20 MEMORIALS ECCLESIASTICAL
BOOK ill disposition of the accusers, by this means the sagacious
• Archbishop made a clear discovery of the innocency of these
Anno 1552. two folks, and the malicious wickedness of their adversai'ies :
and so he set them both at liberty. And when a year or two
after he was himself in bands at Oxford, he sent a present
to the good woman, by one W. P. to whom the Archbishop
told this story, and who writ this account ; desiring her to
forffive him for his straitness used towards her. And the
Fox, 1st said person carried this present unto the woman, and de-
edit, p. ' ^
1477. livered the message accordingly.
Orders As the revising, perusing, explaining, and finishing the
new revised Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of the Sacra-
Coiuiuon nients, had been committed to the Archbishop, and certain
Prayer
Book. other learned divines ; so the work was completed, and was
Book*^''' printed off by Grafton, in the month of September, anno
355 1551. But it seems the book was not so correct as it should
be; for September 27, an order came to Grafton, the
printer, in any wise to stay from uttering any of the books
of the new service : and if he had distributed any of them
among his company, [of Stationers,] that then he give strait
commandment not to put any of them abroad, vintil certain
faults therein were corrected. And, probably, one reason of
this order might be, for inserting the article for declaring
the right meaning of kneeling at the communion. For which
there was an order in October.
The revi- These reviewers, before spoken of, were Cranmer, Rid-
ley, and certain other doctors ; whereof Dr. Cox was one :
who being met together at Windsor, diligently, as their
scope was, reformed the book according to the word of God.
They de- And thcy intended also to proceed to the restoring of a
restore dis- good discipline in the Church. But here great stop and op-
ciphne. position was made ; and loath men were to be brought under
ecclesiastical discipline. Of this. Cox wrote to Bullinger,
Cox to October 5, 1552. Therein he told him, " that they had
" already altered the rites of the public prayers and sacra-
" ments, and framed them according to the rules of God's
" word. But we hate, said he, those bitter institutions of
"' Christian discipline. We would be sons^ yea, heirs, but
Bullinger.
OF KING EDWARD VI. 21
" we abhor the rod. And he prayed Bullinger, that he CHAP.
" would by his letters stir up the great men and nobles, to.
take particular care about this discipline ; without which, Anno 1552.
" with great grief he spake it, the kingdom of God would be
" taken away from them." But something Cox met with in
Bullinger''s fifth Decad, in the place where he treated of the
Lord's supper, which he was not satisfied in, and which
looked contrary to an order they had made in the Com-
munion-Book, concerning communicating the sick: which
that learned man seemed not to allow of, for want of a con-
gregation, which four or five persons could not make.
Where Cox propounded this inconvenience, as arising from
his opinion ; " What if, when the Lord's supper was to be
" publicly administered, all should go out, or refuse, besides
" three, four, or five, that stayed to receive ; might not the
" sacrament be lawfully administered to them ? Why then
" should the sick be deprived of that liberty ?''"' Of this he D.
desired Bullinger's fuller solution.
But as for the aforementioned book, thus reformed. The new
called now the new service, it was ratified by the Parlia- l^^l'^^ '^*'
ment that sat in January following, in an act, entitled. An
Act for the Uniformity of Common Prayer, and Adminis-
tration of the Sacraments. Whereby all persons were en-
joined to resort to their parish churches on Sundays and
holydays, to hear those prayers, and to abide there quietly
and soberly, upon pain of the censures of the Church : and
no other forms to be used, nor any present at such forms,
upon pain of imprisonment.
There had, about the year 1550, been a conspiracy in the Bishop of
north : to which the Bishop of Durham had been privy ; but troub^gT :^
thought fit to conceal it. But one Ninian Menvil discovered
it; and withal informed against the said Bishop: where-
upon he was in danger of misprision of treason. This busi-
ness against the Bishop came before the Council in the month
of June, when it began to be considered f but the King
being then about taking his progress, it was resolved, June
19, to defer it till his Majesty's return. About September
the Bishop was sent up for by the Council, upon certain ac- 367
c3
22 MEMORIALS ECCLESIASTICAL
BOOK cusations. And accordingly, about, the beginning of Octo-
_______ ber, he was in London. And on the 4th and 5th days of
Anno 1552. the Said month, lodged at the late monastery of White
Monks on Tower-hill ; and soon after was committed thence
to the Tower ; and a special conunission appointed for his
trial. Which commission was directed to Sir Roger Cholme-
ly, lord chief justice of the King's Bench, Sir Richard Read,
John Gosnold, Richard Goodrick, Robert Chid ley,
Stamford, esquires, and Richard Liel, doctor of the law,
&c. or to seven, six, or five of them, " to call before them,
" at such time and place as they should think convenient,
" Cutbert, bishop of Durham, and examine him of all man-
" ner of conventicles, conspiracies, contempts, and conceal-
" ments, or other offences. And if he be found guilty, to
" deprive him of his bishopric ; and otherwise, to do in the
And depri- " premises according to their wisdoms," &c. In fine, he
vation. ^^g found guilty, and deprived, the 14th of October, of his
bishopric; or the 11th day, according to King Edward's
Journal.
The bi- And as Tunstal was thus deprived in October, so in No-
besiowed member following a grant was made to Robert Hornc, pro-
upon Horn, fessor of divinity, and dean of Durham, of the said bishopric,
"'"'"• "° 'with all the lordships, manors, lands, &c. to the same be-
longing, during his natural life. But in an Apology writ by
the said Horn, soon after his flying abroad under Queen
Mary, it is evident that he accepted not of it : and the rea-
son why he refused it was, because he cared not to take
Tunstal's bishopric over his head. Yet Tunstal, when re-
stored in the said Queen's reign, was his great and chief
enemy, as he complained in the said apology. The
bishopric was soon after dissolved, with an intent to foiuid
two in the room of it.
iMenviif re- But a Warrant was issued out to Sir John Williams to pay
to Menvile, [for his good service in making this discovery,]
Outlawed ^y ^^y °^ ^^^ Majesty's reward, the sum of 100/. but he
under paid for this afterwards. For in the first and second of
Q INIarv ...
(ok. In- King Philip and Queen Mary, under the name of Ninian
Ktit. par. iii. McnvUe nupcf de Scdwich in com. Dujichn, Armig. he was
OF KING EDWARD VI. 23
indicted in the King's Bench of high treason, [perhaps he CHAP,
was concerned in Wyat's business,] and upon process he was
outlawed, and so returned. He hved to the fourth year of Anno 1552.
Queen EHzabeth : in whose reign, long after, his daughter
and heir brought in a writ of error in the King's Bench
against her father's indictment; wherein two errors were
assigned. And the outlawry was reversed, anno regin.
Elizab. 27.
De Chambre, in his history of the bishops of Durham, ^'^^^^^^ ^^^
sheweth how Menvile, (whom he calls Rinian Menvile,) as the Deau
he accused Bishop Tunstal of conceahng a conspiracy in the ^[^^JJ^^
north in the year 1550, so in the year 1548 he had also ac- conspiracy
cused him, together with his chancellor, and the Dean : and '^'^^j^^g^^^^
I suspect it was of a crime of the like nature ; for it is pro- par. 1.
bable enough, that as in that year there was a dangerous
rebellion by Papists broken out in the west, so there might
be another hatching in the northern parts, to back them.
Upon this accusation, the said Bishop, and the two other
accused ^vith him, were summoned up to London ; where
the Dean, named Dr. Whitehead, formerly the prior there,
an ancient man, and not used to these harasses and troubles,
ended his days, and was buried in the church of the Mi-
nories, London.
Hay ward, that undertook to write the history of King 3 68
Edward's life, was ignorant of all this. For this is all he f^^J^'^
writ of Bishop Tunstal's troubles; "That he was sent to the
" Tower for concealment of I know not what treasons, writ-
" ten to him, I know not by whom, and not discovered
" until what I shall call the party, did reveal it." Because
he could pick nothing else of this matter out of King Ed-
ward's brief Journal, which was the main assistant of his
history, and he could not tell where to go, or would not take
the pains to give himself further information, he sets it
down after this sarcastical manner, below the gravity of an
historian ; and all, the better to conceal his own ignorance,
and to tax the government. Was this writ hke an historian,
whose office is to relate and give the reader plain and satis-
c 4
U MEMORIALS ECCLESIASTICAL
BOOK factory accounts of things? But this is a digression which
^^- the reader will pardon. And I proceed.
Anno 1552. While the Parliament was sitting this winter, a synod also
A synod, was held ; wherein was framed and concluded a book of
Artities of Articles of Religion, taken out of the word of God, purified
^''''^"""¦, and reformed from the errors of Popery and other sects.
" But it was m the month of May, anno 1556, (1 tran-
scribe out of the Warrant-Book,) " that these Articles,
" agreed upon by the bishops and other learned men, in
" the synod at London, in the year of our Lord 1552, for
" avoiding of controversy in opinions, and the establishment
" of a godly concord, in certain matters of religion, were
" published by the King's commandment."" And a book,
containing these Articles, was then signed by the King's own
hand.
A Gate- A Catechism for the instruction of children in the funda-
proveVby mentals of true religion passed the said synod ; but who was
the synod, ^-j^g author was not known in those days. Bishop Ridley
was charged to be the author and publisher thereof, by
Ward and Weston, in the disputation with him at Oxford ;
who falsely also told him, that Cranmer had said so but the
day before. Ridley declared he was not, and that Cranmer
would not say so. But he confessed that he saw the book,
perused it after it was made, and noted many things for it :
and so consented to the book. Weston then told Ridley,
that he made him at the synod to subscribe it, being then a
bishop, as he said, in his ruff: but Ridley replied, he com-
pelled no man to subscribe. Indeed he set his hand to it ;
and so, he said, did Cranmer ; and that then it was given to
others of the convocation to set their hands, but without
compulsion. Ward then would have framed an argument
out of this Catechism against Ridley, to prove, that though
Christ was ascended into heaven, yet he might be on earth ;
and so consequently in the sacrament : and then quoted a
passage out of it. Si v'mhilHcr ct in terris, &c.
Licence for AVliat 1 have to say more of this Catechism is, that it
printing it. ^^^^^^ ^.^j ^^^^^ ^^^^^ published in English as well as in Latin,
OF KING EDWARD VI. 25
that John Day printed it, and licensed to come abroad 1552. CHAP
For, according to the Warrant-Book, " in September, 1552
a hcence was granted to the same printer, to print it both A""" i^^s.
" in Latin and Enghsh, the King having caused it to be set
" forth :" but it was not printed before 1553. And the
reason it was so long between the licence and the publica^
tion, (half a year and more,) I conjecture was, because it
was thought fit to have the allowance first of the convoca-
tion, for the giving it the greater countenance and authority.
It was certainly writ by Alexander Noel, as I find by com- The author,
paring Noel's Catechism and this together. The coUocu-36d
tores are in both Catechisms the same, viz. magister and
auditor. And in many places the very same questions and
answers are given verbatim ; only Noel's Catechism, pub-,
hshed under Queen Elizabeth, is much larger. In May the
next year, viz. 1553, the Council sent their letters abroad
in behalf of this Catechism, enjoining it to be taught to
scholars, " as the ground and foundation of their learning," Enjoined to
as it is expressed in the Warrant-Book.
At the same time were many letters issued out, dated May Articles for
20, to the clergy, « That the King had sent unto them cer- ^^^'f'J^ity-^
" tain articles (which were fifty-four in number) for an uni-
" form order to be observed in every church within the realm :
" which articles are there said to be gathered with great
" study, and by the greatest learned men of the bishops,"
&c. These articles were enjoined for uniformity in rites, vide Cran-
as the last year were framed the articles for uniformity in ^JJ^jt^jg^"'
doctrine, being forty-two in number, though published notch. 27.
before June this year. And thus, by the care of the Arch-
bishop, the reformation of the Church seemed to be com-
pletely provided for. But what these articles were, I cannot
tell ; nor do I know any book or manuscript but this, where
there be any footsteps or mention of them.
Bernard Gilpin, famed in the north for his good zeal to Gilpin
religion, and his care of his flock, was sent for up to court ^[^tiurt!
to preach before the King. In obedience to which he came
up, and on the first Sunday after Epiphany he preached,
though the King, upon some occasion detained, was not
26 MEMORIALS ECCLESIASTICAL
BOOK present to hear him. It being a notable sermon, not spar-
ing vice, in whomsoever he met with it, and pointing to the
sermon.
Anno 1652. corruptions of these times, I shall briefly give some account
of it. He preached upon the gospel for the day, which
was Luke ii. beginning at ver. 49, taking only one clause
of it, Wist ye not that I must be about my Father's busi-
ness ? The method he chose for his discourse was, to shew
in order, how all estates of men, the clergy, the nobility,
and the commonalty, were vmder the bands of this obliga-
tion. They must be about their Father^s business. And he
must, he said, cry so unto all estates, as well of the eccle-
siastical ministry, as of the civil governance, together with
the vulgar people.
The con- ^ fjg began with the priests, who, he said, seemed to have
brought blindness into the whole body, making men to for-
get their heavenly Father''s business. Then he shewed the
avarice and ambition of the clergy in former days; and
how the Bishop of Rome abused Peter's keys to fill Judas''s
sachel ; how he dispensed with all prelates that brought
any money, from obeying Chrisfs commission given to Pe-
ter, Fecdy feed my lambs and my sheep ; and stretched it
so largely, that instead of feeding Chrisfs lambs and sheep,
he allowed them to feed hawks, hounds, and horses, I will
not say, said he, harlots ; and instead of fishers of men, he
made them to become fishers of benefices. He brought
preaching into such contempt, that it was accounted a great
absurdity for a cardinal to preach after he had once bestrid
his moyle. And then he declared, that if he had that gift,
strength, and calling, (though he were sure to smart for it,)
he had rather speak against the Pope's enormities in Rome,
than to speak of them there. Then he declaimed against
the intolerable abuses that came from Rome, and could not
be driven away, and sent to Rome again to their father:
3 70 he meant dispensations for pluralities and totquots, and for
non-residences : which had, he said, so many patrons, that
they could not be driven away, together with other abuses.
From tlie clergy he intended to turn his speech to the
King and the nobles; but they were not then present.
OF KING EDWARD VI. 27
Whereat he used these words ; " I am come this day to CHAP.
" preach to tlie King, and to those that be in authority un- ^^'
" der him. I am very sorry they should be absent, which Anno 1552.
" ought to give example, and encourage others to the hear-
" ing of God's word. And I am the more sorry, because
" other preachers before me complain of their absence. But
" you will say, they have weighty affairs in hand. Alas !
" hath God any greater business than this ? But in their
" absence I will speak to their seats, as if they were pre-
" sent." And so he proceeded to speak to the King, and
then to the nobles. Whereof, concerning such of them as
were patrons of livings, he said, that they saw that none
did their duty : and that they thought as good to put in
asses as men : and that as for the bishops, they were
never so liberal formerly in making of lewd priests, but
they were at that present as liberal in making lewd vicars.
He dared to say, that if such a monster as Dervil Gatherel,
the idol of Wales, burnt in Smithfield, could have been
well conveyed to come to set his hand to a bill to let the
patron take the greatest part of the profits, he might have
had a benefice. For worldly offices, they searched meet
and convenient men ; only Christian souls, so dearly bought,
were committed, without respect, to men not worthy to
keep sheep.
He advised the King to send forth surveyors to see how
benefices were bestowed and used, how Christ and his gos-
pel were robbed and dishonoured, to the great decay of the
realm and commonwealth. That he should find but a small
number of patrons, that bestowed rightly their livings,
seeking God's glory, and that his work and business might
be rightly applied. For that it was almost general to ob-
serve of evei'y one of them, his farming of them to himself or
his friends, and to appoint the rent at his own pleasure. But
worse than all this, a great number never farmed them at all,
but kept them as their own lands, and gave some three half-
penny-priest a curate's wages, 91. or 101. They began
first with parsonages, and seemed to have some conscience
towards vicarages. But now their hearts were so hardened,
S8 MEMORIALS ECCLESIASTICAL
BOOK all is fish that comes to the net. That there were vicarages
^^' about London, having a thousand people belonging to
Anno 1 552. them, so spoiled. Gentlemen kept in their hands livings
of 40Z. or 501. and gave one that never came there, 51. or 61.
Some changed the grounds of the benefice with their te-
nants ; to the intent, that if it were called for, the tenant
should lose it, and not they. He could name the place
where a living of an hundred mark by the year, [mentioned
in the margent, viz. Crostwait and Cheswic,] had been sold
for many years, he supposed an hundred, save one ; and so
continued still. That noblemen rewarded their servants
with livings appointed for the gospel. That he was not
able to rehearse, nor yet any man knew, all the abuses
which the simoniac, ambitious, and idol pastors had brought
into the land. By whose examples, ravenous wolves, paint-
ed Christians, hypocrites, had entered and defiled the sanc-
tuary, spoiled Christ and his gospel, to the destruction of
his flock.
3*7 1 Then he descended to shew what gross superstition and
blindness remained among the people, through lack of faith-
ful preachers. He passed over much infidelity, idolatry,
sorcery, charming, witchcrafts, conjuring, trusting in fi-
gures, &c. which lurked in corners, and began of late to
come abroad, only for lack of preaching ; they thought bap-
tism not effectual, because it wanted men's traditions. A
great number thought it a great offence to take the sacra-
ment into their hands, that had no conscience to receive it
with their blasphemous mouths. Many, because they
saw not in the church the shining pomp of painted cloths,
candlesticks, images, altars, lamps, tapers, they said, As good
go into a barn: nothing esteeming Christ, who spake to
them in his holy word ; neither the holy sacrament, reduced
to its first institution. That the Devil, by those cormo-
rants that devoured the livings appointed for the gospel,
had made a fortress and bulwark to keep learned pastors
from the flock ; that is, so to decay learning, that there
should be none learned to commit the flock unto. For by
reason livings appointed for the ministry, for the most
OF KING EDWARD \ I. 29
part, were either robbed of the best part, or clean taken CHAP,
away, almost none had any zeal or devotion to put their
children to schools, but to learn to write, to make them ap-'^""*' 1552.
prentices, or else lawyers : the two wells, Oxford and Cam-
bridge, almost dried up. The decay of students so great,
that there was scarce left of every thousand an hundred :
adding, that if they decayed so fast, in seven years more
there would be almost none at all. And then might the
Devil make a triumph. A thousand pulpits in England
were covered with dust. Some had not had four sermons
in fifteen or sixteen years, since friars left their limitations :
Dostları ilə paylaş: |