Study manual


analyse closely the four ingredients constituting the definition of Tortious



Yüklə 0,55 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə21/144
tarix07.05.2023
ölçüsü0,55 Mb.
#126531
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   144
OLW 204 Law of Tort-Part I,AGGREY WAKILI

analyse closely the four ingredients constituting the definition of Tortious 
Liability as furnished by Professor Winfield. 
 
Fleming has suggested that the word TORT derives from Latin 
tortus
, meaning 
twisted or crooked, and early found its way into English Language as a general 
synonym for “wrong”. Later, the word disappeared from common usage, but 
retained its hold on the law and ultimately acquired its current technical 
meaning. 
 
Fleming has on his part furnished his own definition of Law of Tort as: 
(a) In general terms, a civil wrong, other than a breach of contract, 
(b) which the law will redress by an award of damages. 
 
You will observe that both sets of definitions will not help you in identifying such 


32 
individual tortious liabilities as Trespass, Negligence, Defamation and even 
Nuisance. The definitions are important only in so far as they help you 
distinguish Tortious Liability from such other forms of liability like Contractual 
Liability, Criminal Liability and Breach of Trust. 
 
Analysis of Winfield’s Definition of Tortious Liability
 
We have observed that Winfield defined Tortious Liability as arising from: 
(a) 
breach of a duty primarily fixed by the law
(b) 
this duty is towards persons generally; and 
(c) 
its breach is redressible by an action for unliquidated damages. 
 
Let us take some time to look closely at the definition furnished by Professor 
Winfield: 
 
(a) 
Breach of a duty primarily fixed by the law 

Yüklə 0,55 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   144




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2025
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin