Conspire. Trevor Paglen unmarked 737 2005 conspire



Yüklə 1,68 Mb.
səhifə17/17
tarix14.01.2018
ölçüsü1,68 Mb.
#37730
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17
Now, I want to observe at this point that the strategy of the tragically incomplete


or fragmented object, the image of broken totality conceived as a mirror of the unrec-
onciled subjectivity - in short, the Adornian aesthetic - is not really contradictory with
the mainstream and indeed the norm of artistic production in the risk society. Because
we are no longer living in the Keynesian world of the 1950s, when the populations of the
most developed nations were being immobilised for mindless production and passive
consumption. At that time, one could denounce the grand modernist artwork as the
pacifying image of a narcissistic whole: the last, degraded ersatz of bourgeois harmony.
Today, the populations of the most developed nations, along with the elites of the least
developed ones, are being mobilised for the intensification of global imperial conquest
in the relatively short time that remains before ecological and social catastrophe. In this
situation, the aestheticised commodity produced by invention power fulfills the function
of an unsettling, stimulating force: like a shot of speed or better, another snort of cocaine
for the creative classes. The question is, how to go beyond their febrile repetitions?

The typical historicist mistake, when trying to assess the conditions of a vanguard art


and politics, is to take the bourgeoisie, and above all, classical bourgeois culture, as thesite of rupture. The dominant class in the world, politically and culturally, is no longer
the European bourgeoisie with its Enlightenment aesthetics, nurtured in the manicured
gardens of the old trading cities. Instead it is the Americanised imperial technocracy
of a nascent World Government, which results from the fulfillment of modernism and
industrial modernisation. Since the end of the Second World War and the final collapse
of Western European hegemony, the radically simplified techniques of scientific reduc-
tionism and abstract art, on which modern subjectivation is based, have made it possible
to extend the new American imperium at formerly inconceivable speeds. By spreading
their computerised toolkit around the globe, and in the process, doubling the number
of people in the capitalist labor force, the elites of World Government may not have ac-
complished a greater bout of deterritorialisation than the one wreaked upon the world
by the European colonial bourgeoisie. But they did it, not in four centuries but in less
than twenty years, essentially since 1989, with the consequence of tremendous social
and political upheaval - presently giving rise to a planetary civil war, whose misnomer is
(and «the war on terror»).

Now, if I evoke Ulrich Beck’s notion of the risk society, it is not only to refer to


the forms of risk management practiced by the new global elites. It is above all to refer
to Beck’s notion of the «second modernity,» wherein the success of the modernisation
project comes to alter the very environment in which it takes place, producing side-ef-
fects of essentially incalculable risk. I’m speaking of economic collapse, political conflict,
ecological disaster and the mass alienation produced by the globalisation of possessive
individualism. The specter of these risks is what provoked the ruptures of Seattle, Genoa,
Porto Alegre, Seoul, Buenos Aires, Cancún, Hong Kong and all the rest. Here is where
the possibility of something like new vanguards begins. The site of rupture is precisely
the site where the new technological toolkits are applied to the flesh of planet Earth. The
transformation that this rupture implies should now be radicalised both artistically and
politically, through deliberate experimentation, which is another name for the process
- and not just the instant - of becoming-other.

Art is no longer about the work, just as politics is no longer about the party. Both


these domains are entirely under control, they are zombie categories. We need instead
to look at situations, at complex assemblages, from which speaking subjects and groups
may emerge. Significant experimentation takes place at the sites where technoscientific
power is applied; this experimentation is carried out in order to develop new forms of
perception and expression, adequate to the transformation of the global society. The
sites of experimentation are double, contradictory, and in that sense they are perhaps
analogous to the contradiction between the commodity and the thing, developed by the
vanguard philosophers of the twentieth century. But the present configuration is entirely
different.

On the one hand, perception and expression are bound up with energy, technoscience


and code, that is, with the techniques whereby the globalising elites are reshaping the
planet. There is an urgency to awaken from the fascinated embrace of one’s own psychicinstability, and perceive the material and organisational processes whereby the techno-
elites are planet Earth, that is, subjecting it to total makeover. But this
perception can only be obtained through the scrim of technology, that is, through the con-
temporary universalising techniques of transportation, communication, visualisation,
and physical transformation of materials. No constructive aspiration can be developed
in ignorance of these techniques, because ignorance - and by that I mean the increasingly
profound unconsciousness of infrastructural development - makes it simply impos-
sible to resist the changes. But as everyone is surely aware, exposure to these techniques
bears the incalculable risk of self-transformation or indeed self-loss, profound alienation,
manifest in the trap of recodified, formatted expression.

This is why the assumption of technological risk at the very site of its application to


the flesh requires, on the other hand, a contradictory experience of time, which one might
call the time of the other. The time of the other cannot be reified into a determined histori-
cal identity. Such historicising identities now arise, throughout the world, as normative
constructs imposed in reaction to the process of deterritorialisation, or the disembedding
of entire populations from the matrix of their sustaining institutions. As the world comes
together through the power of deterritorialising abstraction, it risks falling apart into
normative identity blocs, strengthened by every possible technique of political manipula-
tion - but for that reason, inherently blind to the larger process, the double movement.
The expression of a new kind of agency, and indeed, the very capacity of perception that
allows it come into human being, also has to work through these identity-veils.

The time of the other can only be experienced, or better, experimented, between
people who in the process become foreign to themselves. The question of translation
thus moves to the center of the artistic and political event. The event of temporal trans-
lation replaces the vanguard artwork; its co-articulation replaces the vanguard party.
Such events have been prefigured in the dialogical mode of carnivalesque resistance; but
they have yet to be developed in deep affective and effective ways. Through and beyond
the scrim of technological perception, through and beyond the reactive identities, what
remains to be expressed is the constructive aspiration to build sustaining institutions,
able to contain and transform the destructive forces now at loose in the world. The desire
of another life.



Global Security Alliance
GSA Aerial Helicopter Protection at Liepaja navy port


Aksioma, Institute for Contemporary Art, Ljubljana


Bellwether Gallery, New York

Bureau des Art Plastiques, CulturesFrances / Französische Botschaft, Berlin


Collegium Hungaricum Berlin.

DIRAC - Dirección de Asuntos Culturales, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Gobierno de Chile


FORMICA

Historisch-Technisches Informationszentrum, Peenemünde


Künstlerhaus Bethanien
Ljubljana Municipality Cultural Department
Maison d'Ailleurs, Yverdon-Ies-Bains

Maska Institute for Publishing, Production and Education, Slovenia

Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Slovenia

Office for Contemporary Art Norway

Österreichisches Kulturforum Berlin

Pro Helvetia, Schweizer Kulturstiftung

Scumek Sabottka for MCT Agentur, Berlin

Sergio Motta Art and Technology Award, Sao Paulo

Schering Stiftung

Schwedische Botschaft

Zavod Projekt Atol

transmediale.08 ¡stein Projekt der Kulturprojekte Berlin GmbH,


transmediale wird gefördert durch die Kulturstiftung des Bundes.













Die spekulativen Mechanismen von Verschwörungstheorien haben globale Ereignisse
angetrieben, lange bevor das
ARPANET, der klandestine militärisch-akademische
Vorläufer des heutigen Internets, entstand. Ebenso wie unser Verlangen nach dem
Mysteriösen und Geheimnisvollen ist auch die Konspiration eine menschliche Kondition,
die alle Grenzen von Kulturen und Epochen überschreitet. Dieser erste transmediale
parcours umfasst eine Reihe von Textbeiträgen und Dokumenten, sowie eine Serie von
künstlerischen Arbeiten, die den zeitgenössischen konspirativen Wendungen im Bereich
von Kunst und digitaler Kultur nachspüren.


The speculative mechanisms of conspiracy theories have fueled global events long before
ARPANEXthe Internet's clandestin
e military-academic predecessor. Succumbing to our
yearnings for mystery, desire and unpredictability, conspiracy is a human condition
crossing all cultural and epochal boundaries. This first
transmediale parcours threads a
series of text contributions, found documents, and original art works together, tracing a
contemporary conspiratorial discourse through art and digital culture.


I So etwa im Hollywood-Spielfilm The Net mit Sandra Bjllockvon 1995 und in Lutz Dammbecks

Dokumentarfilm Das Netz von 2004.




I Dieses Zitat von Albert Jacquard stammt aus seinem Vorwort zu dem Buch eines anderen Rationalisten,
Alain Cuniot, Incroyable mais faux, Bordeaux, L'horizon chimérique, 1989, S. 21.

  1. Die Autoren, die neben ihren Kenntnissen der Physik offensichtlich auch in den Humanwissenschaften
    beschlagen sind, meinen, dass die Astrologie «ausschließlich als Studienobjekt der Psychologie, der
    Soziologie oder der Psychiatrie» in die Universität Vordringen sollte. Man zögert, sie zu fragen, wie

sie solche Studien definieren würden. Sie schieben die Verantwortung der Prüfungskommission zu und
raten den Studenten davon ab, diese Themen für ihre Dissertation zu wählen - «sofern sie nicht
Reue zeigten».

  1. Im Hinblick auf die Verschwörungstheorien über fliegende Untertassen muss zwischen mindestens zwei
    Kreisen unterschieden werden. Pierre-André Taguieff erwähnt Veröffentlichungen wie Le Livre Jaune oder
    Persönlichkeiten wie Milton William Cooper (den auch ich auch in meinem 1996 erschienenen Buch La
    Rumeur de Roswell porträtiert habe). Wir befinden uns hier ganz klar im Einflussbereich des Rechtsextre-
    mismus. Doch sind es meistens nicht politische Ideen, die einen Ufologen ausmachen, sondern sein
    Interesse für die Rätsel der Wissenschaft. Die Motive der meisten Ufologen liegen vor allem in einem
    bestimmten Bild von Wissenschaft begründet.




I

 This quotation from Albert Jacquard is taken from the preface he wrote to the book Incredible but Untrue


I
Incroyable mais faux), Bordeaux, L'horizon chimérique, 1989, p. 21, by fellow rationalist Alain Cuniot.

  1. The authors, who are obviously as competent in the humanities as they are in the physical sciences, believe
    that astrology and the like should only be allowed to enter the university as «subjects for study in socio-
    logy, psychology, or psychiatry.» One hesitates to enquire as to how they would define these studies.
    They lay the responsibility squarely at the door of the examination panel and advise students against
    choosing these studies for the subject of their thesis «unless, of course, as an act of repentance»

  2. It is necessary to distinguish between at least two distinct camps when discussing conspiracy theories
    surrounding UFOs. Pierre-André Taguieff refers to publications such as Le Livre Jaune, or figures such as
    Milton William Cooper (whose portrait I also traced in my book La Rumeur de Roswell, 1996). We are
    clearly moving within far right political circles here. The majority of ufologists, however, are not concerned
    with political ideas, but with the enigmas of science. Most ufologists are motivated above all by their
    particular view of science.




I
 We perceive the character of the city via the sky. Alison and Peter Smithson, Italienische Gedanken,
weitergedacht
[Italian Thoughts, continued], Basel, Boston, Berlin 2001, p. 71

  1. Hugh Stubbins, Kongresshalle, Berlin 1957.

  2. Franz Dischinger and Ulrich Finsterwalder, Zeiss Planetarium, Jena 1922.

  3. Robert Maillart, Concrete Hall for the Swiss National Exhibition, Zurich 1939.

  4. «... a shining beacon beaming towards the east.» Eleanor Dulles, 27 April 1955. Quoted from Steffen de
    Rudder, The Architect Hugh Stubbins, Fifties American Modernism in Berlin. Berlin, 2007, p. 122

  5. First architect for the Reich capital Berlin (= Albert Speer), Grossbelastungskorper [heavy load-bearing
    body]. Berlin, 1941.

  6. For more on the construction design of the Kongresshalle, see Steffen de Rudder, op cit. p. 40-62.

  7. Stiirzte Kongresshalle nach DiisenknaU ein? [Did the Kongresshalle collapse because of a sonic boom
    from a jet?], Berliner Morgenpost, 12 February 1984.




I
 Die Eingangsseite zum Blog von Alice Micheli unter:
http://www.jblog.com.br/chernobyl2.php?itemid=6024&catid=161



II

 Nachdem der Reaktor Nr. 4 in Tschernobyl am 26. April 1986 explodierte, wurde ein Umfeld von 30


Kilometern als für den Menschen verseuchtes und unbewohnbares Gebiet erklärt. Dieses radioaktiv ver-


I

 Cf. Jan Verwoert (2005], Da ist es. Siehst du es nicht? Do ist es doch. Über die Hellsichtigkeit der


Paranoia.
In: Korpys/Löffler (2005] Organisation 1990 - 2005 Frankfurt am Main, Revolver
Verlag, p.156-189.

  1. http://innovations-report.de/html/berichte/verfahrenstechnologie/bericht-68487.html

  2. Two fundamental problems of the technology: in order to remain camouflaged, the stealth bombers
    have to carry their weapons internally, which reduces the maximum weapon load. As soon as the
    stealth bomber opens the hatch to fire its weapons, it creates an increased radar echo and can more
    easily be traced.

  3. Stefan Römer (2001), Künstlerische Strategien des Fake. Kritik von Original und Fälschung. Köln.

  4. Cf. Sabine Maria Schmidt, (2006), Designing Truth - Streifzüge durch ein unwegsames Gebiet. In: Cat.
    Designing Truth. Stiftung Wilhelm Lehmbruck Museum, Duisburg, p. 8-15, and on the project by
    Knowbotic Research, p. 46-51.

  5. Cf. Knowbotic Research, Room for Manoeuvre, in this volume.

  6. http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page583.html

Yüklə 1,68 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin