1INTRODUCTION
This is the final report from the Centre for Health Services Development on the evaluation of the EBPAC program. CHSD was engaged in September 2012 to evaluate the program which ran between June 2012 and December 2014.
Under the EBPAC program, eight projects were funded that aimed to encourage the uptake of evidence-based practice in the aged care sector. In addition three projects were funded under the ACSHIHAG initiative. EBPAC represented an extension of the former EBPRAC Program under which 13 projects were funded in two rounds (rounds 1 and 2) between December 2007 and December 2010. The key difference with the EBPAC initiative is that it included a number of projects that worked with older people living in the community. In addition, three projects were funded under the ACSIHAG initiative. For convenience, this report refers to the 11 projects as EBPAC projects.
1.2Links between the current program and earlier rounds
The previous evaluation of rounds 1 and 2 concluded with a series of 15 recommendations covering the establishment of a central agency to support the ongoing implementation of evidence-based practice in residential aged care; linking the use of evidence with the system of accreditation; developing clinical leaders to support the implementation of evidence-based practice; maximising the impact of what had been learnt from rounds 1 and 2; and the funding of future projects. Many of the recommendations have not been acted upon directly (e.g. the establishment of a central agency) but some components of Round 3 are consistent with the recommendations:
Two projects (CL1, CL2) developed models for training clinical leaders, consistent with a recommendation regarding clinical leadership. As was noted in the evaluation report for rounds 1 and 2 (p 80), ‘without a focused effort on developing clinical leadership there will continue to be limits to the extent to which evidence-based practice is initiated, implemented and sustained, within individual facilities and across the sector’.
Two projects (RC1 and RC2) delivered nation-wide workshops to disseminate current evidence in the areas of palliative care and skin care, consistent with recommendations to maximise the impact of what had been learnt in rounds 1 and 2.
A web page to disseminate selected resources from each round of the program is currently being developed, consistent with a recommendation about disseminating existing evidence and another recommendation about establishing a central web-based repository which can serve as a ‘one stop shop’ for resources to support implementation of evidence-based practice.
1.3EBPAC and ASCIHAG Objectives
The decision to conduct a single national evaluation of the Round 3 EBPAC and recent ACSIHAG projects reflected the clear synergies that existed between the objectives of the two initiatives. The overall objective of both initiatives was to achieve practice and evidence-based improvements for people receiving aged care services, staff providing those services, the aged care system and the broader community. The types of improvements that were expected include:
Improvements for recipients of aged care services EBPAC:
Improve clinical and personal care for recipients of Australian Government subsidised aged care services
ACSIHAG:
Support activities that promote healthy and active ageing
Support activities that provide information and support to assist carers maintain their caring role
Support to services providing aged care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and people living in remote areas
Support people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds
Improvements for staff EBPAC:
Provide opportunities for aged care and health workforce to enhance their knowledge and skills to support the uptake of evidence-based, person centred, aged care practice
Support staff to access and translate the best available evidence into everyday practice
ACSIHAG:
Support activities that build the capacity of aged care services to deliver high quality care
System improvements EBPAC:
Showcase innovative Australian evidence-based, person centred, aged care practice, including through encouraging partnerships between aged care providers, education and research organisations
Widely disseminate and promote established, evidence-based, person centred aged care practice, including through encouraging partnerships between aged care providers, education and research organisations
Develop, maintain and promulgate resources that support evidence-based, person centred, aged care practice and inform ongoing development of, and assessment against, relevant standards
Contribute to development of the aged care evidence base through evaluation of projects that translate into everyday practice
ACSIHAG:
Respond to existing and emerging challenges, including dementia care
1.4 Individual project aims and objectives
From this point forward, EBPAC and ACSIHAG projects are referred to as EBPAC projects.
Across the EBPAC initiative, there were three broad groups of projects: clinical leadership; evidence translation in community care; and evidence translation in residential aged care. For convenience we have referred to the two clinical leadership projects as CL1 and CL2, the six evidence translation in community care projects as CC1 to CC6 and the three evidence translation in residential aged care projects as RC1 to RC3.
It is clear that there are both common elements and differences across the three groups of projects, such as target audiences, planned outcomes or impacts, whether they build on existing models/information, and proposed change mechanisms being used. For example, four projects (CL1, RC1-3) were focusing their efforts on residential aged care, with the remaining projects focusing primarily on community aged care services. Within these groups, however, there were a mix of target audiences and outcomes expected. Five projects appeared to be focusing their interventions on management and/or clinical leaders (CL1, CL2, CC6, RC1 and RC3), five targeting care staff (CC2, CC3, CC4, CC5, RC1 and RC2) and one seeking to influence consumers as well as clinicians to improve clinical practices (CC1). Three of the four projects targeting leaders were seeking to facilitate organisational or structural impacts and outcomes (CL2, CC6, RC3), with the remaining project (CL1) seeking to achieve clinical and/or care practice impacts and outcomes, along with the remaining eight projects.
It also appears that six projects were building on work already underway or completed, including two trialling the transfer of processes developed for the residential aged care sector to the community sector (CC2 and CC5), one translating clinical guidelines into practice (CC1) and another building on an existing project, the seed funding for which was provided by another agency (CC6).
The eight projects funded under the EBPAC initiative each featured a lead organisation that worked with consortium members to implement evidence translation projects focussed on specific clinical and/or care practice areas. The three projects funded under the ACSIHAG initiative comprised two projects that were national roll-outs of the previous Encouraging Best Practice in Residential Aged Care Program and one which aimed to develop a national approach to organisational culture change.
The structure of the eleven projects to be evaluated is shown in Table .
Table Projects funded under the EBPAC and ACSIHAG initiatives
#
|
Funding initiative
|
Project
|
Lead organisation
|
Implementation sites
|
CL1
|
EBPAC
|
Bridging the leadership skill Gap
|
Dept of Ed and Training (QLD) and Metropolitan South Institute of TAFE (MSIT) (QLD)
|
Twenty five RACFs in SA, NSW and Qld
|
CL2
|
EBPAC
|
Clinical Mentoring: from evidence-base to outcomes for older people
|
Resthaven Incorporated (SA)
|
Eleven aged care services in Qld, NT and SA
|
CC1
|
EBPAC
|
Better practice for older people living with or at risk of chronic wounds in the community (wound management)
|
Royal District Nursing Service
|
Five Community Aged Care Services in Vic and WA
|
CC2
|
EBPAC
|
The Lifestyle Engagement and Activity Program (LEAP) for Life Project (social engagement and physical activity)
|
University of NSW
|
Six community aged care services in Sydney, Central Coast, Bathurst and the Illawarra
|
CC3
|
EBPAC
|
Home-based Preferred Music Listening Program (emotional well-being)
|
Chinese Community Social Services Centre Inc. (Vic)
|
Five Community Aged Care Services in Vic
|
CC4
|
EBPAC
|
Choices in CDC Aged Care
|
Uniting Care Community Options (Vic)
|
Aged Care Providers assisting up to 200 clients in VIC, NSW and ACT
|
CC5
|
EBPAC
|
Building Better oral health Communities
|
South Australian Dental Services
|
Five aged care providers in SA and NSW (including Indigenous communities)
|
CC6
|
EBPAC
|
Person-centred Dementia Support in the Community
|
Alzheimer’s Australia (Vic)
|
Five aged care providers in each state and territory
|
RC1
|
ACSIHAG
|
National rollout of The Palliative Approach Toolkit for residential aged care facilities
|
Qld Health
|
National roll out
|
RC2
|
ACSIHAG
|
Improving Wound Management for Residents in Residential Aged Care Facilities project
|
Queensland University of Technology
|
National roll out
|
RC3
|
ACSIHAG
|
The Sustainable Culture change in Residential Aged Care Project
|
University of Western Australia/ Curtin University/ RSL Care
|
Four residential aged care facilities in WA and f our residential aged care facilities in Qld
|
There are similarities and differences in the change strategies being utilised across the projects.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |