Reconciliation of the quantity of emission allowances by sectors
The above “bottom-up” projections by sectors, sub-sectors and total is compared to the macroeconomic projection derived in p.2., and presented in Table 20. At this stage, both the differences in the two projections – bottom-up and top-down, and the difference between the forecast for 2004 (top-down) and the reported data for installations for the same year - should be overcome. In case of difference in data for 2004, a correction of the “top-down” projection is undertaken.
When the differences in the projections for the period 2005-2012 are insignificant, the decision for a compromise projection could be taken at the level of the Inter-ministerial working group and between ministries.
When the differences are considerable and lead to a risk of non-implementation of the commitments under the Kyoto Protocol, a complete and detailed revision of “bottom-up” forecasts and projections of sectors is undertaken. The revision covers an assessment of the estimated production volumes and of the compliance of those volumes with the state policy taken into account in the macroeconomic “top-down” forecast. The branch organizations are also involved in discussions on the revision.
As a result of the activities mentioned above, it is expected that a consensus will be reached regarding projected CO2 emissions by sectors and sub-sectors for the period 2007–2012. Determined projections of emission volumes are presented in a table, which repeats the structure of Table 6 in section 3.1. Compromise volumes of emissions (allowances) are expressed by, where “j” means the specific year, and “g” – a specific sector.
Table 17. Comparison between the macroeconomic projection and the bottom-up projection for registered installations
№
|
Year
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
1
|
Overall allowances for registered installations – macroeconomic projection
|
49 470 560
|
50 161 260
|
52 583 634
|
58 304 621
|
60 343 473
|
59 864 886
|
|
Overall allowances for registered installations – bottom up projection
|
50 180 444
|
54 022 797
|
55 709 952
|
61 243 618
|
64 315 800
|
63 635 910
|
2.1
|
Energy activities, including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.1
|
Electric power – macroeconomic projection
|
22 326 044
|
21 907 164
|
23 125 522
|
26 268 762
|
28 840 447
|
27 355 107
|
|
Electric power – bottom-up projection
|
19 957 347
|
23 314 214
|
24 444 958
|
28 182 136
|
31 137 556
|
31 454 792
|
2.1.2
|
Combined production – macroeconomic projection
|
8 061 028
|
8 161 776
|
8 240 503
|
8 411 681
|
6 994 499
|
7 097 189
|
|
Combined production – bottom-up projection
|
8 980 512
|
9 118 680
|
9 306 839
|
9 466 113
|
9 501 113
|
8 452 229
|
2.1.3
|
Heating power – public sector – macroeconomic projection
|
828 190
|
871 531
|
914 871
|
958 212
|
1 001 552
|
1 044 893
|
|
Heating power – public sector – bottom-up projection
|
660 188
|
671 668
|
686 867
|
695 115
|
706 538
|
717 656
|
2.1.4
|
Heating for industrial purposes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production of chemical products and rubber – macroeconomic projection
|
324 655
|
340 368
|
355 702
|
370 719
|
385 469
|
399 989
|
|
Production of chemical products and rubber – bottom-up projection
|
365 140
|
397 017
|
397 017
|
397 017
|
397 017
|
397 017
|
|
Production of foods and beverages – macroeconomic projection
|
39 739
|
41 792
|
43 872
|
45 801
|
47 903
|
49 909
|
|
Production of foods and beverages – bottom-up projection
|
73 531
|
77 529
|
80 617
|
88 161
|
91 385
|
92 433
|
|
Production of woods and wood products (except furniture) – macroeconomic projection
|
92 309
|
99 905
|
107 500
|
115 095
|
122 691
|
130 286
|
|
Production of woods and wood products (except furniture) – bottom-up projection
|
84 830
|
85 803
|
86 777
|
87 750
|
88 724
|
89 697
|
|
Production of textile and textile products (except for apparel) – macroeconomic projection
|
23 867
|
25 483
|
27 098
|
28 714
|
30 330
|
31 945
|
|
Production of textile and textile products (except for apparel) – bottom-up projection
|
27 824
|
28 837
|
29 850
|
30 863
|
31 876
|
32 889
|
|
Production and casting of non-ferrous metals – macroeconomic projection
|
129 870
|
132 863
|
135 629
|
138 204
|
140 617
|
142 888
|
|
Production and casting of non-ferrous metals – bottom-up projection
|
187 925
|
174 098
|
178 985
|
184 139
|
187 363
|
190 902
|
|
Production of machines, equipment and household appliances – macroeconomic projection
|
28 835
|
29 836
|
30 773
|
31 657
|
32 493
|
33 289
|
№
|
Year
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
|
Production of machines, equipment and household appliances – bottom-up projection
|
47 007
|
94 377
|
96 613
|
98 128
|
99 529
|
100 958
|
|
Health protection and social activities – macroeconomic projection
|
3 765
|
3 962
|
4 159
|
4 356
|
4 553
|
4 750
|
|
Health protection and social activities – bottom-up projection
|
3 684
|
4 094
|
4 094
|
4 094
|
4 094
|
4 094
|
|
Agriculture and hunting and related to them services – macroeconomic projection
|
7 185
|
7 561
|
7 937
|
8 313
|
8 689
|
9 065
|
|
Agriculture and hunting and related to them services – bottom-up projection
|
9 791
|
10 312
|
10 599
|
10 599
|
10 599
|
10 599
|
|
Distribution of natural gas – macroeconomic projection
|
182 488
|
182 488
|
182 488
|
182 488
|
182 488
|
182 488
|
|
Distribution of natural gas – bottom-up projection
|
181 094
|
181 094
|
181 094
|
181 094
|
181 094
|
181 094
|
3.
|
Refineries – macroeconomic projection
|
6 752 931
|
7 158 107
|
7 587 593
|
8 042 849
|
8 525 420
|
9 036 945
|
|
Refineries – bottom-up projection
|
7 410 007
|
7 418 019
|
7 426 031
|
7 434 043
|
7 442 055
|
7 442 055
|
4.
|
Cement– macroeconomic projection
|
4 236 386
|
4 559 839
|
4 980 585
|
6 721 709
|
6 919 724
|
7 117 740
|
|
Cement – bottom-up projection
|
4 395 057
|
4 520 494
|
4 743 225
|
6 286 333
|
6 286 333
|
6 286 333
|
5.
|
Lime – macroeconomic projection
|
562 869
|
593 746
|
615 529
|
637 312
|
659 094
|
680 877
|
|
Lime – bottom-up projection
|
554 321
|
594 884
|
602 879
|
619 977
|
620 365
|
621 012
|
6.
|
Cellulose and paper – macroeconomic projection
|
375 463
|
412 976
|
480 258
|
509 054
|
537 076
|
562 773
|
|
Cellulose and paper – bottom-up projection
|
305 711
|
320 015
|
363 226
|
368 699
|
373 772
|
376 119
|
7.
|
Glass – macroeconomic projection
|
354 053
|
357 450
|
361 257
|
364 733
|
367 930
|
369 065
|
|
Glass – bottom-up projection
|
440 180
|
439 369
|
439 369
|
439 369
|
439 369
|
440 225
|
8.
|
Ceramics – macroeconomic projection
|
154 328
|
157 212
|
160 342
|
162 805
|
165 106
|
167 268
|
|
Ceramics – bottom-up projection
|
236 221
|
240 901
|
258 695
|
265 887
|
269 799
|
275 603
|
9.
|
Ferrous metallurgy – macroeconomic projection
|
4 986 555
|
5 117 201
|
5 222 016
|
5 302 157
|
5 377 393
|
5 448 420
|
|
Ferrous metallurgy – bottom-up projection
|
6 260 075
|
6 331 393
|
6 372 218
|
6 404 099
|
6 447 219
|
6 470 203
|
* Note: The two projections for the electric power sector differ considerably because the projection for the installations assumes that the installations will not improve their indicators in the period 2003-2012. The macroeconomic forecast assumes that as a result of the rehabilitation of power capacities, installations’ indicators will improve and specific emissions for the production of kWh electric power will be reduces by some 10 %.
For 2007, the difference between the aggregated projected emissions by installations and by macroeconomic forecast exceeds 10%, therefore it is necessary to apply a compromise projection for the emissions in 2007.
Table 18. Compromise projection for CO2 emissions by sectors for 2007, t (allowances)
№
|
Sector/Year
|
2007
|
|
Energy activities, including
|
|
1.
|
Electric energy
|
22 326 044
|
2.
|
Combined production
|
8 061 028
|
3.
|
Heating power, public sector
|
744 189
|
4.
|
Heating power for industrial purposes
|
933 379
|
5.
|
Refineries
|
6 752 931
|
6.
|
Cement
|
4 395 057
|
7.
|
Lime
|
554 321
|
8.
|
Cellulose and paper
|
305 711
|
9.
|
Glass
|
397 116
|
10.
|
Ceramics
|
195 275
|
11.
|
Ferrous metallurgy
|
4 986 555
|
|
Total
|
49 651 606
|
2.2 If the potential, including the technological potential, of activities to reduce emissions was taken into account at this level, please state so here and give details in Section 4.3 below.
|
The technological potential is not taken into account at this level.
2.3 If Community legislative and policy instruments have been considered in determining separate quantities per activity, please list the instruments considered in Section 5.3 and state which ones have been taken into account and how.
|
The effects on emissions of carbon dioxide (both in terms of reduction and increase) resulting from the implementation of Directives 2003/96/ЕС, 2002/91/ЕС, 2001/77/ЕС, 96/61/ЕС, 2003/17/ЕС, 2001/80/ЕС, 1999/13/ЕС, have been taken into considerationduring the development of the National Allocation Plan. See also section 5.3.
2.4 If the existence of competition from countries or entities outside the Union has been taken into account, please explain how.
|
Bulgaria’s NAP does not include special measures to assess the competition from countries outside the European Union. The Plan will be co-ordinated with the Commission for Protection of Competition before it is submitted for approval to the Council of Ministers.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |