Executive summary

Annex 1.1: Additional Results on Growth and Poverty

Figure A.1.1.1: Annual Growth Rates of GDP-National Accounts and Income–EH Survey, 1997-2003
Source: Nationals Accounts, Contraloria General de la República de Panama. Own estimates based on Encuesta de Hogares (EH), 1996-2003 data.

Figure A.1.1.2: Difference Between Growth Rate Per Capita GDP and Per Capita Income From Household Surveys

Source: Gasparini, Gutierrez and Tornarrolli (2005). Note : The period of reference for the growth rate p/c GDP and income survey is: Argentina;1992-2004, Bolivia; 1993-2002, Brazil; 1990-2003, Chile; 1990-2003, Colombia; 1992-2004, Costa Rica;1992-2003, Dominican Republic; 2000-2004, Ecuador; 1994-198, El Salvador; 1991-2003; Honduras; 1997-2003, Jamaica; 1990-2002, Mexico; 1992-2002, Nicaragua; 1993-2001, Paraguay; 1997-2002, Peru; 1997-2002, Uruguay; 1989-2003, Venezuela;1989-2003.

Figure A.1.1.3: Correlation by Sector of Activity Between
(i) Annual Growth rates of GDP-National Accounts and labor income-survey	(ii) Decomposition of the change of GDP-National Accounts and labor income-survey
Source: Nationals Accounts, Contraloria General de la República de Panama. Own estimate based on ENV 1997 and 2003 data.

Table A.1.1.1: Annual Growth Rates of Survey – Agriculture Income, 1997-2003
Source: Own estimates on ENV 1997 and 2003 data.

Figure A.1.1.4: Distribution of Per Capita Consumption by Area - Kernels Function 1997, 2003
National	Urban
Rural	Indigenous
Source: Own estimate based on ENV 1997 and 2003 data. Note: The vertical line in the graphs indicates the value of the extreme poverty line in 2003.

Table A.1.1.2: Who are the extreme poor in 1997? Decomposing the Extreme Poverty, Poverty Gap, and Severity by Area

Source: Own estimate based on ENV 1997 and 2003 data. Note: Extreme poor refers to the population who has its per capita consumption below the extreme poverty line value.

Figure A.1.1.5: Extreme Poverty Impact of Different Growth Scenarios – Exercise 1
(i) Simulating changes in extreme poverty using three different growth scenarios with an associated increase in inequality of 1 percent between 2003 and 2015
Source: Own estimate based on ENV 1997 and 2003 data.

Table A.1.1.3: Poverty Impact of Different Growth Scenarios – Exercise 2

Source: Own estimate based on ENV 1997 and 2003 data.