Of 29 ethiopia social accountability program (esap2) midterm review (mtr) final report


responsibilities to plan, budget, implement and monitor public basic service delivery”



Yüklə 0,58 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə22/28
tarix28.06.2022
ölçüsü0,58 Mb.
#117295
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   28
Final PBS-ESAP2 Midterm Review Report sent to GoE July17

responsibilities to plan, budget, implement and monitor public basic service delivery” than where it 
is currently placed. 
(C) Indicators where there will be measurement issues and concerns 
2.7. At least half of the joint action plans developed under ESAP2 are gender 
sensitive and address needs and concerns of women at project end. 
3.4 The number of women organizations and networks (e.g. iddirs) in the project 
woredas that demand an improvement of basic public services has increased by 
50% at project end. 
(D) Consider replacing Specific Objective 5 on SAIPs with an Objective more directly 
concerning Sustainability efforts (including activities towards SA-FTA linkage)
As ESAP2 continues, issues of sustainability and institutionalization will become increasingly important.
This was a subject addressed at the MTR with all key stakeholders (Government/COPCU, donors, 
SAIPs/CSOs). It is becoming clear that the SA-FTA linkage will be an important element in linking 
better the ‘demand-side’ activities that is the focus of ESAP2 with the ‘supply-side’ reform efforts such as
FTA, which are driven also by MoFED.
Currently, Objective 4 within the Logframe (“Citizens and citizen groups are aware of their 
responsibilities to plan, budget, implement and monitor public basic service delivery”) captures the 
progress ESAP2 is making in preparing citizens to better participate and engage with FTA. There may be 
a possibility following the discussions at the MTR, the creation of the new Technical Group within 
MoFED and the further discussion on the FTA-SA Linkage Report prepared with the Government for 
ESAP2 to distil some key activities specifically fostering such a linkage to be monitored within the 
Logframe. For instance, the participation of PFM/FTA teams in ESAP2 trainings and capacity building 
as well as their presence in interface meetings that focus on participatory budgeting or PETS is being seen 
as important indicators to ensure coordination going ahead. The Project Logframe may try to 
accommodate this better. 
The ESAP2 Logframe is already long in the numbers of it indicators it currently comprises. In order to 
keep the Logframe succinct, there is also the suggestion that present Objective 5 (“Increased capacity of 
SAIPs to empower citizens and citizen groups on using SA tools, approaches and mechanisms”) be 
reconsidered. Much of the indicators and activities within this objective are captured elsewhere in the 
Logframe since trained and effective SAIPs are the key interim outputs for Objectives 2, 3 and 4 or, stated 
differently, SAIPs are the mobilizers for the awareness of public basic service providers becoming 
responsive, awareness of citizens to demand better services and for citizens to be aware of their 
responsibilities to participate in the plans, budget and implementation of basic services. Output 5.3 
currently has a set of indicators that may be reconsidered, since the basis for their measurement is left 
unclear (e.g. all SAIPs have pertinent action plans) and may be assumed as an essential part of the 
implementation process which will not change at the MTR or at the End-line.


Page 24 of 29 

Yüklə 0,58 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   ...   28




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin