Of itu-t sg16 wp3 and iso/iec jtc1/SC29/WG11



Yüklə 1,66 Mb.
səhifə218/249
tarix05.01.2022
ölçüsü1,66 Mb.
#63707
1   ...   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   ...   249

7.2BoGs


In addition to the BoGs listed below, it was originally planned to conduct some RExt dicussions as a BoG with activity to be reported as JCTVC-M0462. However, this discussion was held directly as JCT-VC rather than in a BoG, and the corresponding notes were instead included directly into this report. Thus, JCTVC-M0462 was not submitted.

JCTVC-M0436 Report of Non-3V high-level syntax BoG [M. M. Hannuksela (BoG coordinator)]

Initial BoG report provided.

[Add notes as necessary from BoG report.]


  • The BoG agreed that the use cases [copy from BoG report]. Agreed.

  • M0044 is for further study.

  • M0219 / M0309 / M0274:

    • M0219 crops the reference layer. No action.

    • M0309 sends offsets (in VPS) to specify the relative spatial alignment of the base & enhancement layers (without cropping the base layer). Regarding "region of interest scalability" – should the EL rectangle include regions without a corresponding base layer position? The prior SVC can do a (somewhat restricted) form of this. The entire BL region can be a subset of the EL region or the entire EL region can be a subset of the BL picture region. Decision: Adopt with that restricted form of "ROI" flexibility, but in SPS syntax rather than VPS (exact location left to editor discretion).

    • M0274 proposes to allow inter-layer referencing of the region of the reference layer outside of the conformance cropping window. (The current draft specifies the reference to be bounded by the cropping rectangle.) Decision: Adopted (option A in M0274). Software will be provided for both HEVC and AVC base layer operation by the proponents.

  • M0180 was basically a subset of M0274.

Should scaling factors other than 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 be supported? We currently have this capability in the syntax, but do not have the upsampling filter coefficients for intermediate positions in the draft or SHM.

It would be feasible, but it is not clear whether we need such a profile at this time.

If we don't have the flexibility in a profile, we don't need the coefficients.

It was remarked that we don't need it in the working draft, as it is not clear that we need such a profile.

We currently do not have phase offsets for luma or chroma in the WD or SHM.

Defer to later consideration when it becomes clear whether we need such a profile. Revisit.See section 6.4.7.



Yüklə 1,66 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   ...   249




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©muhaz.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

gir | qeydiyyatdan keç
    Ana səhifə


yükləyin