Salutation to holy Ga eśa
Yüklə 3,53 Mb.
|
| ā āndhradeśaparyanta_
419 A, B, C: kau_ītakī...; L: kau_ītaki 420 Cara_avyūhabhā_ya (Chaukhambha edn., p. 33): śā_khāyanī; Ayachit edn. (p. 47): sā_khyāyanī 421 A, B: ...sa_game; C: ...sa_gamai. C miscopies from A, where a descending lower part of ह from the line above can at first glance make one read sa_gamai. Cara_avyūhabhā_ya (Chaukhambha edn., p. 33): āndhrādidak_i_āgneyī godā sāgara āvadhi 422 A, C: hyopastambī 423 Cara_avyūhabhā_ya (Chaukhambha edn., p. 34): yajurvedas tu taittirya āpastambī prati__hitā; Ayachit edn. (p. 47): yajurvedas taittirīya āpastambī prati__hitā 424 This reading from L agrees with the Cara_avyūhabhā_ya. However, all our mss read: sahyādi-parvatārambhān nair_tyā_ tu sāgarāt 425 Cara_avyūhabhā_ya (Chaukhambha edn., p. 34): c parśurāmasya sannidhau; also Ayachit edn. p. 48. The reading paraśurāmasya violates the meter, and the reading parśurāmasya probably represents the actual pronunciation. 426 Printed edn. reads: vyāptavāyavyadeśe tu. Both editions of the Cara_avyūhabhā_ya (Chaukhambha edn. p. 34, Ayachit edn., p. 48) read: vyāptā vāyavyadeśāt tu Cara_avyūhabhā_ya (Chaukhambha edn. p. 34, Ayachit edn., p. 48) reads: ...kali_gaśca kānīno 427 L adds this verse. It is missing in our mss, though it is found in the Cara_avyūhabhā_ya and seems to be presupposed by the subsequent verse, as well as by the subsequent discussion in our text. 428 A, C: sarvadeve_u; B: sarvavede_u; L: sarvadeśe_u 429 A, C: ...saneyī... 430 Lele reads: kā__a... The ms reads kā_vasa_j–ateti. Cf. Cara_avyūhabhā_ya: kā_vasa–j–akā (Chaukhambha edn., p. 34), kā_vasa_j–akā (Ayachit edn. p. 48). 431 A, B, C: bahudhāyana... 432 A, B, C: ...rā_āya_īya...; L: rā_āyanīya... 433 A, C: sapa__ito...; B: sa_pī_ito...; L: sa_pi__ito... 434 B: ...dinī iti padena 435 A, C: kā_vapi 436 A, B, C: anyad_ju; L: anyadyaju_. Lele leaves the phrase anyadyaju_ untranslated. 437 A, B, C: kau_ītakī...; L: kau_ītaki... 438 A, C: kau_ītaki...; B: kau_ītakī; L: kau_ītaki... 439 A, B, C: tadāgneyādi...; L: tathāgneyādi... 440 A, B, C: ...nika_asthasamudra...; L: ...nika_asamudra... 441 A, C: hira_yakeśī...; B, L: hira_yakeśi... 442 A, B, C: ...vāyavī_ diśa_; L: ...vāyavyadiśa_ 443 A, B, C: maitrāya_ī...; L: maitrāya_īya... 444 This sentence relates to verse 9 of the Mahār_ava passage quoted earlier. This makes it more likely that the verse was present in the original text, though it is missing in A, B, and C. 445 A, C: pravartateti 446 A, B, C: tadanyasyārthāmapi; B corrects to tadanyasyālpatvam api arthāt siddham; L: tadanyasyārthādalpatvamapi 447 A, B, C: śākhānāmapi; L: śākhānāmapīti 448 A, B, C: svasvaśākhā...; L: svaśākhā... 449 L: yathāśāstre; A, B, C: yathāśāstra_ 450 A, C: śīk_a_īya eva 451 A, C: ...vāsastata_ścā__ālādi... A, B, C: ...kalpādau; L: ...kalyā_ādau. Lele’s Marathi translation assumes kalpādau. 452 A, B, C: sarvayaju_sāmādi...; L: sarva_gyaju_sāmādi... 453 A, B, C: pratipadya etad ...; L: pratipadyata etad... 454 L: itīti 455 The italicized text is missing in L. 456 A, C: pra_avagatānām ॐkārokāramakāra_ā_ 457 A, C: p_vyakāra_ 458 The original passage in the N_si_hapūrvatāpanīyopani_ad, 2, N_si_hottaratāpanīyopani_ad 3, actually goes further and speaks of the 4th half-mātrā and identifies it with the Atharvaveda. Our pandit, while ostensibly citing from an âtharva_a source, leaves out the reference to the Atharvaveda, and highlights only the three Vedas. 459 A, C: sarvā_i sarvā_i par_ā_ 460 A, C: sa_t__eti 461 A, B, C: ...sad_śā_ / āvayavā_ 462 L: pra_avādevakārasyaiva; A, B, C: pra_avāderakārasyaiva 463 A, B, C: _co ak_are parame vyoman ० samāsata iti 464 A, C: careti / 465 A, C: ...myomiccityetad... 466 A, C: adhini_adu_ / adhika... 467 B: ...sānatvamuktam 468 The N_si_hottaratāpanīyopani_ad, kha__as 3-4, contain a related discussion, though I have not found a passage with identical wording. 469 A, C: k__ī 470 A, B, C: d_śyamānā_; L: parid_śyamānā_ 471 A: samyagavati te 472 Jābālopani_ad in the volume Upani_adā_ Samuccaha_ (p. 290) reads: ...dattātreya... 473 A, C: ॐityekāk_ara_ brahma ० gatim. 474 A, C: bhūtasyā 475 Cited in Śa_kara’s Bhā_ya on Brahmasūtra 1.1.3. 476 Cited in Śa_kara’s Bhā_ya on Brahmasūtra 1.1.4. 477 A, C: kar_akadvayena 478 A, B, C: ...śākhayā; L: śākhāyā 479 A, B, C: ...sapta...; L: ...samasta 480 A, B, C: ...śirasaśca; L: śirasa_. This passage seems to refers to the recitation of the Gāyatrī mantra preceded by the recitation of the seven Vyāh_tis and followed by the cited segment: ॐ bhū_ ॐ bhuva_ ॐ sva_ ॐ maha_ ॐ jana_ ॐ tapa_ ॐ satyam / ॐ tat savitur vare_ya_ bhargo devasya dhīmahi / dhiyo yo na_ pracodayāt // ॐ āpo jyotī raso ‘m_ta_ brahma bhūr bhuva_ svar ॐ // This mode of recitation is part of the performance of the ritual of Sandhyā. 481 A, C: ...svadhākāha_ta... 482 A, B, C: ...sakala...; L: ...śakalā... 483 B: _ksāmavyatiriktānā_ 484 A, C: prāśastaittirīya... 485 A, C: ...vedapek_atvāt 486 B: maitrāya_īnā_ 487 L: somādarvāg... Here the term arvāk is equivalent of prāk, cf. the section titled prāk-soma in the Mānava-śrauta-sūtra. Beginning with the Soma sacrifice, the Taittirīyas do need mantras from other sources, but upto this sacrifice, they have a complete set of mantras in the TS. I would like to thank Dr. T.N. Dharmadhikari for his help in interpreting this passage. 488 L: sāmātharvavedinām 489 C: ...mantrabhāvāt 490 A, C: ...rāmnāta_ tathāpi 491 A, C: sāvināciketādicitayopi // 492 A, B, C: smārtāvapi 493 A, C: nā; B: no 494 L: dvitīya_ pādo... 495 L: arthātada_gatarpa_amityuktameveti 496 A, B, C: ...karmā_ā_; L: karma_ām 497 A, C: nityatvamuktimityata 498 A, B, C: phalāśruter; L: phalaśruter 499 A, C: ...vīpsāyā ca; B: vīpsāyāś ca; L: vīpsayā ca 500 A, C: bhede ca; B, L: bhedena 501 A, B, C: śauce pala_; L: śauce yatna_. 502 B: ...vākyānyānhikāni 503 A, C, L: pāk_ikāni; B: pāk_ikā_i 504 No repetition in B. 505 A, C: pāk_itva_ 506 The term yāvajjīvaśruti refers to the passage yāvajjīva_ darśapūr_amāsābhyā_ yajeta. This passage is cited by Śabara on Mīmā_sāsūtra 2.4.1 as coming from the Bahv_ca-Brāhma_a, and is not traced to any extent text. D.V. Garge (1952, p. 125) says that Kumārila’s remarks on this passage (namely, bahv_cabrāhma_e ’dhvaryubrāhma_e vā śrūyate iti nātīvābhinive__avyam) indicate that he had no access to this Brāhma_a text. Ganga Nath Jha’s translation of the passage in Kumārila’s Tantra-vārttika (p. 890) reads: ÒThough the sentences in question are found both in the Bahv_ca-Brāhma_a and the Adhvaryu-Brāhma_a, yet the name of only one of these is mentioned in the Bhā_ya; but it does not matter in which particular Brāhma_a the sentence is found.Ó The original passage in Kumārila seems to say that the passage may be found in a _gvedic Brāhma_a or in a Yajurvedic Brāhma_a, but that should not be of any great concern. What matters to Kumārila is just the fact that this is a Vedic citation. Its specific source is of little concern to him. This kind of yāvajjīvaśruti for Darśapūr_amāsa is indeed assumed by the âpastambaśrautasūtra (3.14.8 and 3.14.10): svargakāmo darśapūr_amāsau, ... tābhyā_ yāvajjīva_ yajeta. 507 A, B, C: ārtavā_yapi; L: ārtavānyapi 508 A, C: pa_hitāt; B: pa_hitatvāt 509 A, C: ...pauru_am; B, L: pūru_am A, B, C: baudhāyanā...; L: bodhāyanā... 510 A, C: kāni d_śyante / 511 A, C: yajata iti 512 A, C: ...keśī...; B, L: ...keśi... 513 A, C: ...nyathāyanāni; B: ..._i yathāyanāni; original ...nyapyāyanāni probably misread as ...nyathāyanāni 514 A, B, C: ...kapila...; L: ...kapilā... 515 A, C: kadācitkāni / 516 A, C: naimittikāni cidvihitāni 517 The italicized text is missing in L, but is found in all our mss. 518 A, C: nityanaimittikama_trātya_tamāvaśyakā_; B: ...ma_trā atyantamāvaśyakā_; L: nitya-naimittikavannātyantamāvaśyakā_ 519 A: karmā_ā_ 520 A, B, C: vipratipannā_; L: pratipannā_ 521 B: maitrāvaru_īyāś ca 522 A, C: vicāparai_ 523 A, B, C, L: sarvam anu__hīya_ta. I have given a contextually corrected reading. 524 A, C: adye 525 L: ...prasa_gatvabhiyā; A, B, C: ...prasa_gabhiyā 526 L: ...vandanamantrā; A, B, C: ...va_danādima_trā 528 A, BC: pārāśaramādhave; L: pārāśaramādhavīye 529 A, B, C: tatrāpyaśaktakara_e; L: ...aśakta_ kara_e 530 A, B, C: śaucācamanasa_dhyādika_; L: śaucācamanasnānasa_dhyādika_ 531 C: sm_tāyukta_ 532 A, C: anasthāpatte_ 533 C: karma_ā 534 A, C: vyavaschā.. 535 A, C: vaitāgnikāni_u; B: vaitānikāni ca; L: vaitānikāgni_u 536 A, B, C: vaitāni; B corrects to vaitānikāni; L: vaitānikā 537 A, B, C: mādhavācāryā_; L: mādhavācārya_ 538 A, B, C: bharadvājas tu; L: bhāradvājas tu 539 A, C: smārtānmukhyamāha 540 L: homavaitānika_ 541 A, B, C: yatsyāt; L: yasmāt 542 B: aśakta_ 543 A, C: ye dvijo vrātyatathā; B: ti__heta yo dvijo vrātyas tathā; L: ti__heta ced dvijo vrātyas tathā 544 A, B, C: tathā; L: yathā 545 A, C: ...yogatā_ 546 A, C, L: karma smārtetihāsika_; B: smārta_ karmaitihāsikam. I have given what would be the grammatically correct combination of smārta+aitihāsikam. 547 A, C: pradhānavaidika_ 548 A, B, C: ...ni__hā_; L: ...ni__ha_ 549 A, C: ...homaśca 550 B: iti na virodha_ 551 A, C: ta_āgādi...; B: ta_ākādi...; L: ta_āgādi... 552 The actual wording of Śa_kara’s commentary on the Chāndogya-Upani_ad (5.10.3): i__am agnihotrādi vaidika_ karma, pūrta_ vāpīkūpata_āgārāmādikara_am / datta_ bahirvedi yathāśaktyarhebhyo dravyasa_vibhāgo dattam / 553 B: ...māvāsan; C: ...māyasan; L: ...māvasan 554 Parallel passages in: TA 2.8.1: na mā_sam aśnīyān na striyam upeyān noparyāsīta jugupsetān_tāt, and TA 5.8.13: sa_vatsara_ na mā_sam aśnīyāt / na rāmām upeyāt /. 555 A, C: ...udaka_ nā / cāmedityādi / 556 C: satyamaryādā_; A, B: satya_ maryāda_; L: sapta maryādā_ 557 A, C, L: asyārtho niruktakāro yāska āha; B: asyārtho niruktakārairyāskācāryairvyākhyāta_ 558 A, B, C: satyaiva maryādā / 559 A, B, C: ...gaccha_nahasvān 560 A, B, C: du_k_tasya karma_a_; L: du_k_takarma_a_ 561 A, B, C: ...mārabhya apādye__i... 562 For the name Ekāgnikā__a for the Āpastambamantrapā_ha, see Winternitz’s introduction (p. x) to his edition of The Mantrapā_ha of the Āpastambins, 1897. |