Aspect
|
Indicators
|
Specific Targets/Goals
|
Physical
|
|
Household
|
Community
|
Barangay
|
City
|
|
a.) A certain number (unspecified for the moment) of families with security of tenure of various kinds : Titles, MOA and other forms of security that go beyond the familiar CMP.
|
a) Sewerage
b) Legal Electricity
c) Safe Water (at least level 2 – communal)
d) Toilets and sanitation facilities
e)roads and access pathways
Note: it was asked why this is placed under the Physical aspect when it should be under the Social aspect since these are basic services. It was explained that they are Physical in the sense that they must be included in the City Shelter Plan.
|
Should have data relevant to addressing the community needs
Should have a Brgy Dev’t Plan
Should have approved budget adopted to address the needs in terms of security of tenure and basic services
Should implement the BDP
With regards to roads and pathways, the barangay should aggressively enforce the Road Right of Way city ordinances (case of Pasacola
|
The city should have Road Right of Way regulations in the plans and implement them
|
b.) There are already identified relocation sites for the identified number of families residing within the 3-meter easement of major rivers in QC.
The relocation site must conform to the minimum standard of relocation under the UP-All Agenda.
|
|
a) Affected barangays will adopt int heir BDP the C.O. 1774 (on the 3-meter easement)
b) BDPs should include data on the number of families affected and plans that include proposed resettlement plans/sites
(note: the barangay merely proposes not implement because such matters will really have to go up the city level)
|
The city should have a City Shelter Plan with appropriate budget for relocation)
|
c) Identify the number of families and communities affected by local and national projects
Priorities:
1.Communities where PHILSSA-QC is currently engaged
2.UP-All Communities
Note: Depending on the NGO takers (“champions”), the activity may go beyond mere monitoring)
|
|
|
|
Social
|
|
-
Improvement in Access to and Quality of services (using the MBN/survey as baseline) especially on education of children
|
Access to quality barangay day care center in partnership with the Social Services Department (SSD) of the LGU particularly in communities where the PHILSSA-QC NGOs are present. As a start it must be noted that Miriam College trained the day care workers of QC and they have volunteer teachers who are willing to train day care workers in communities.
|
|
At the community level, we must institute day care for babies
Our communities/NGOs must be able to integrate children-friendly programs in their community designs/plans/programs and services
|
|
|
-
Improvement in Access to and Quality of services (using the MBN/survey as baseline) especially on health
|
|
Community mechanism and programs on reproductive health.
Indicators for good reproductive health would be:
-
child mortality
-
mortality of women in child-bearing and birth-giving
|
BHW are trained on alternative and preventive health care, nutrition and reproductive health
(Champions for this are Arugaan and Healthdev)
|
|
|
Reduce incidence of couples with unmet need for family planning services
|
BHW are trained on responsible parenting
(Champions for this are Arugaan and Healthdev)
|
|
-
Improved juvenile and adult education
|
|
a) Incorporate development of skills/trade training for out-of-school youth (OSY) because sometimes these are better than the academic diplomas.
Examples would be skills training given by TESDA related to Housing Construction Skills.
Such construction skills can be used not only for employment but also for their sweat equity.
b) access to adult education of Miriam College (HS and vocational which are TESDA accredited)
For instance, such programs are ongoing in Batasan Hills and this can be replicated in the other barangays by having them integrated in the BDP.
|
|
|
Political
|
-
Functional representative mechanisms/institutions (LHBs, LSBs) as well as
|
|
|
|
Functional LHBs/LSBs
Sectoral reps to sit in the City Sanggunian
|
representation of not just the urban poor groups but the subsectors as well (e.g. women, children etc.)
|
|
Community leaders are members of the LSBs of the city (Local School Boards, Local Housing Boards etc.)
|
Community leaders are members of the BDCs. The BDCs seem to be a more effective venue for engagement compared to the CDC since the CDC seems to have merely recommendatory powers as of now. At the BDC level however, one can truly make concrete contributions and the political struggle there is easier than at the CDC.
|
Since there are four PHILSSA members in the CDC, it can be a potentially effective mechanism to push the PHILSSA development agenda. However, it remains to be seen if the CDC is really an effective venue since it could just be a mere “stamp pad.” So the goal for 2008-2010 is too see if the CDC is indeed a viable venue. If it is then in 2011, the group can work on ensuring that a substantial number of PHILSSA NGOs and POs become part of the CDC
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation and strengthening of UP-ALL-QC with respective Barangay Alliances in priority barangays so that UP-All can become a significant player in the LHBs.
|
Economic
|
|
|
|
|
|
through enterprise development and employment
|
Households in our communities should have access to credit/livelihood and skills training (see discussion on Juvenile and adult education under the Social aspect.)
|
|
The BDPs will include a clear strategy and mechanism for possible partnership with business establishments.
It can therefore make a “skills inventory” and function as a placement office.
|
|
Environmental
|
-
Systematic Management of Solid Waste Basically genuine implementation of RA 9003
|
Basically genuine implementation of RA 9003 in all levels
|
(Liquid waste and Air pollution)
|
For PHILSSA-QC and POs to study and eventually adopt a water treatment design that can be integrated in community planning.
The champion for this would be HEALTHDEV since they have already tried implementing a communal treatment of waste from the septic tanks of 100 households in Antipolo.
Some important factors to be considered are:
-
is it feasible in the urban setting?
-
how much will it cost?
-
who will shoulder the cost?
|
|
|
For the households to be able to practice safe/environment friendly liquid waste management
i.e. septic tanks or similar safe alternatives that are all-concrete and ideally two-chambered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To advocate among tricycle drivers in the communities for preventive maintenance of tricycles and for the barangay to include this in the BDP.
|
|